Tuesday 10th May 1988 (Series 15, Prelim 22)

Any recaps from older series should be posted here. This forum is unlikely to contain spoilers, but recaps may contain "forward references" if they are written much later, so approach with caution.

Moderator: James Robinson

Post Reply
User avatar
James Robinson
Post-apocalypse
Posts: 10683
Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2009 5:38 pm
Location: Mirfield, West Yorkshire

Tuesday 10th May 1988 (Series 15, Prelim 22)

Post by James Robinson »

Countdown recap for Tuesday 10 May 1988.

C1: Champion Dave Clapham (1 win, 35 points.)
C2: Challenger Rose Meyer.
DC: Della Thompson and Derek Nimmo.
CV: Carol Vorderman.
OT: Other words or solutions.

R01: E A F D I B E R O
R02: N O G N A P I J A
R03: C I A F I N T L O
R04: 75, 3, 5, 3, 10, 5. Target: 629.
R05: S A W G O E N I S
R06: T O U Z G E I S R
R07: G U T T E P S G I
R08: 25, 6, 7, 4, 2, 2. Target: 818.
R09: Q U I E T M O D S (conundrum)


And now a brief interlude before our main feature:

SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER
SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER
SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER
SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER
SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER
SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER
SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER
SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER
SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER
SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER
SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER
SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER
SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER
SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER
SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER
SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER
SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER
SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER
SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER
SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER

Enjoy the show.

Round 1: E A F D I B E R O

C1: BRIEFED (7)
C2: BRIEFED (7)
DC: BEADIER (7) FORBADE (7)
OT: BEARDIE (7) DEBRIEF (7)
Score: 7–7 (max 7)

Round 2: N O G N A P I J A

C1: JAPING (6)
C2: JAPING (6)
DC: ANGINA (6)
OT: GOANNA (6) INANGA (6) JOANNA (6)
Score: 13–13 (max 13)

Round 3: C I A F I N T L O

C1: FACTION (7)
C2: TALON/FAINT/FLINT (5)
DC: FICTIONAL (18)
Score: 20–13 (max 31)

Round 4: 75, 3, 5, 3, 10, 5. Target: 629.

C1: 630. ((5 + 3) x 75) + (10 x 3) (7)
C2: 630. ((5 + 3) x 75) + (10 x 3) (7)
CV: 629. ((75 + 3) x (3 + 5)) + 5 (10)
Score: 27–20 (max 41)

Round 5: S A W G O E N I S

C1: SWINGES (7)
C2: sewings - actually OK..... :oops:
DC: AGONISES (8)
Score: 34–20 (max 49)

Round 6: T O U Z G E I S R

C1: GUSTIER (7)
C2: GORIEST (7)
OT: GOITRES (7) GOUTIER (7) GUTSIER (7) GUTZERS (7) OUTSIZE (7) ROUGETS (7)
Score: 41–27 (max 56)

Round 7: G U T T E P S G I

C1: SPITE (5)
C2: PUGGIEST (8)
DC: PUTTIES (7)
OT: GUTTIES (7)
Score: 41–35 (max 64)

Round 8: 25, 6, 7, 4, 2, 2. Target: 818.

C1: 814. (4 x 25 x (6 + 2)) + (7 x 2) (7)
C2: 813.
CV: 818. ((25 + 2 + 2) x 4 x 7) + 6 (10)
Score: 48–35 (max 74)

Round 9: Q U I E T M O D S

C2 buzzes on 28 seconds to say MISQUOTED which is correct.
Score: 48–45 (max 84)

So, if SEWINGS was given, then Rosie would've won 52-48 :!: :oops:

Statistics Corner

Dave:
Total score - 48
Raw score - 53
Total % of max - 57
Raw % of max - 63
Total average score per round - 5.3
Raw average score per round - 5.9
Number of maxes - 3

Rose:
Total score - 45
Raw score - 57
Total % of max - 54
Raw % of max - 68
Total average score per round - 5.0
Raw average score per round - 6.3
Number of maxes - 5

Further summaries are at:
http://www.apterous.org/cdb/series.php?series=15
User avatar
Mike Brown
Legend
Posts: 1413
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 7:16 pm
Location: King's Lynn
Contact:

Re: Tuesday 10th May 1988 (Series 15, Prelim 22)

Post by Mike Brown »

James Robinson wrote:So, if SEWINGS was given, then Rosie would've won 52-48 :!: :oops:
Having looked at this again, the decision to disallow was probably a fair one. SEWING is indeed given as a noun in COD7 (on which fact I probably based by comment at the time), but it is only mentioned in the sense of the act of sewing, so to be fair it's hard to see how it can be pluralised. This is a good example of the sort of thing that it was naively thought would be solved by the introduction of mass noun definitions in the NODE. :)
Post Reply