Page 1 of 1

Spoilers for Tuesday, 29th April

Posted: Tue Apr 29, 2008 1:28 pm
by Joseph Bolas
Youse know what to do :)

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday, 29th April

Posted: Tue Apr 29, 2008 2:33 pm
by Joseph Bolas
OPERANDS as an equaller.

EDIT 1st Numbers alternative: ((100 + 25) x 3) + (50 - 10)

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday, 29th April

Posted: Tue Apr 29, 2008 2:40 pm
by Dinos Sfyris
I don't see why he wasnt allowed the points, when he thought he'd lost it, then rembered a couple of seconds later to add the 50.

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday, 29th April

Posted: Tue Apr 29, 2008 2:47 pm
by Joseph Bolas
I know LEISURE is a mass noun, but would Susie have allowed LEISURES?

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday, 29th April

Posted: Tue Apr 29, 2008 2:57 pm
by Dinos Sfyris
Countmax says no. Its not like you can have more than one leisure, or different leisures, just leisure activities.
Although BLUESIER and SUBERISE were there in that round.

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday, 29th April

Posted: Tue Apr 29, 2008 3:14 pm
by Joseph Bolas
dinos_the_chemist wrote:Countmax says no. Its not like you can have more than one leisure, or different leisures, just leisure activities.
I suppose, but Susie might've allowed it for some reason :lol:.

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday, 29th April

Posted: Tue Apr 29, 2008 3:15 pm
by Richard Brittain
dinos_the_chemist wrote:I don't see why he wasnt allowed the points, when he thought he'd lost it, then rembered a couple of seconds later to add the 50.
I'm guessing that they cut parts of the dialogue out. i.e. it was much longer than a couple of seconds.

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday, 29th April

Posted: Tue Apr 29, 2008 3:25 pm
by Dinos Sfyris
Oh yeah. Forgot about that. Still I wanted him to win cause he was a likeable/likable personality. EMINENCE was a great spot but then he threw it away with PARISONED when there were about 10 good 8s.

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday, 29th April

Posted: Tue Apr 29, 2008 3:30 pm
by Joseph Bolas
dinos_the_chemist wrote:Oh yeah. Forgot about that. Still I wanted him to win cause he was a likeable/likable personality. EMINENCE was a great spot but then he threw it away with PARISONED when there were about 10 good 8s.
EMINENCE was a cracking spot. I think he took the risk with PARISONED, because it was only the 2nd round in and there was still alot of rounds left, so he would've had plenty of chances to take back the lead.

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday, 29th April

Posted: Tue Apr 29, 2008 11:36 pm
by Gavin Chipper
dinos_the_chemist wrote:I don't see why he wasnt allowed the points, when he thought he'd lost it, then rembered a couple of seconds later to add the 50.
Didn't Carol basically tell him he should add the 50?

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday, 29th April

Posted: Wed Apr 30, 2008 3:08 am
by Joseph Bolas
Gevin-Gavin wrote:
dinos_the_chemist wrote:I don't see why he wasnt allowed the points, when he thought he'd lost it, then rembered a couple of seconds later to add the 50.
Didn't Carol basically tell him he should add the 50?
I don't think she did, but sometimes she does normally finish off the sums for contestants, which is annoying.

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday, 29th April

Posted: Wed Apr 30, 2008 7:28 am
by Jon Corby
Gevin-Gavin wrote:Didn't Carol basically tell him he should add the 50?
Yeah. It was peculiar that she didn't then realise the 10 was still there for subtraction as well.