Spoilers For Wednesday March 10th 2010

[James Robinson]

Today's spoilers will be just like yesterday's; rubbish, unimaginative, lacking content and overall, sub-standard.

A bit like me then

But, anyway, I'll hopefully have a good recap lined up for you lucky readers later.

And hopefully, Kevin will continue to fly the flag for c4c/Apterous.

[Marc Meakin]

Why no BEARDIER for round 2?

[Marc Meakin]

CAMPSITE round 3.

[Ben Wilson]

1st numbers alt (all my own work- and in time too): (75-9+50/25)*(10+3).

Rachel's way was probably better though.

[Chris Davies]

UNLASHED

[David O'Donnell]

SOIGNEURS, missed PRODIGALS though.

[Charlie Reams]

Today's spoilers will be just like yesterday's; rubbish, unimaginative, lacking content and overall, sub-standard.

A bit like me then

You're not that bad mate.

[JackHurst]

There was a nice bloke in the last series who looked like todays challenger. Were they related (I missed the start of the episode if they mentioned anything)

[Kevin Davis]

There was a nice bloke in the last series who looked like todays challenger. Were they related (I missed the start of the episode if they mentioned anything)

No, but his son Joe was on the show back in Series 58.

[Alec Rivers]

Simpler 2nd numbers:

(75 x 2 + 1) x 2 = 302