Ask Mike Brown

All discussion relevant to Countdown that is not too spoilerific. New members: come here first to introduce yourself. We don't bite, or at least rarely.
Post Reply
User avatar
Charlie Reams
Site Admin
Posts: 9494
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm
Location: Cambridge
Contact:

Ask Mike Brown

Post by Charlie Reams »

Dear Mike,

Why did CoC X, in addition to sounding like a Richard Desmond production, only have five games?

Thanks,
Charlie in Cambridge
User avatar
Mike Brown
Legend
Posts: 1413
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 7:16 pm
Location: King's Lynn
Contact:

Re: Ask Mike Brown

Post by Mike Brown »

Dear Charlie

Thank you for your interesting and thought-provoking question.

I have always assumed it was simply that the powers that be wanted to fit in the Championship of Champions neatly between Christmas and New Year (and so that the finals could be on Christmas Day and Millennium Eve (sic) respectively). Whatever the reason, it seemed a bit of a shame to only include six contestants, especially coming off the back of one of the most octochamp-rich series of all-time (and I think, from memory, the one during which the term was coined).

And you made me google Richard Desmond!

Yours conundrumly

Dr Mike
User avatar
Charlie Reams
Site Admin
Posts: 9494
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm
Location: Cambridge
Contact:

Re: Ask Mike Brown

Post by Charlie Reams »

Dear Mike,

Thanks for your excellent answer. Maybe in compensation all the contestants from the preceeding four series should be invited back for specials. Just a thought!

Yours,
Charlie
David Williams
Kiloposter
Posts: 1269
Joined: Wed Jan 30, 2008 9:57 pm

Re: Ask Mike Brown

Post by David Williams »

I'm pretty sure that I've seen a reason given, but I can't remember what it was! If so, the explanation can only have come from Damian.

Possibly they thought the 16 player three week affair went on too long. I'm also pretty sure Damian did say at one time that there weren't going to be any more. I know I was surprised when I got the invitation to the following one.

Ask Damian Eadie?
Gavin Chipper
Post-apocalypse
Posts: 13329
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:37 pm

Re: Ask Mike Brown

Post by Gavin Chipper »

I'm fairly sure Damian himself said that Channel 4 asked them to do it like that to get the CofC final on New Year's Eve. Also Damian has certainly talked about scrapping CofCs before, but after the last one I thin he conceded it was too good to drop. But don't hold your breath for another Supreme championship.
User avatar
D Eadie
Devotee
Posts: 829
Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2009 10:24 am
Location: Mars Hotel

Re: Ask Mike Brown

Post by D Eadie »

Random question if ever i saw one. I think from memory, C4 gave us late notification to make shows for the last week of the year, so we had to shoe-horn 5 progs in somehow. I remember it was thrown together in no time, so it definitely wasn't planned. The C of C debate, well let's see. Maybe its time to have a game between the two series winners at the end of the year instead, as somebody mentioned in a different thread somewhere.
Marc Meakin
Post-apocalypse
Posts: 6361
Joined: Wed May 20, 2009 3:37 pm

Re: Ask Mike Brown

Post by Marc Meakin »

D Eadie wrote:Random question if ever i saw one. I think from memory, C4 gave us late notification to make shows for the last week of the year, so we had to shoe-horn 5 progs in somehow. I remember it was thrown together in no time, so it definitely wasn't planned. The C of C debate, well let's see. Maybe its time to have a game between the two series winners at the end of the year instead, as somebody mentioned in a different thread somewhere.
Can't you do both?
GR MSL GNDT MSS NGVWL SRND NNLYC NNCT
User avatar
Kirk Bevins
God
Posts: 4923
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:18 pm
Location: York, UK

Re: Ask Mike Brown

Post by Kirk Bevins »

Marc Meakin wrote: Can't you do both?
Yeah, COC is vengeful for some. Take Junaid and Charlie. Junaid won the series and if there was no COC, Charlie wouldn't have been able to get his sweet revenge. As Damian once said, anybody can beat anybody on any given day which is what makes the COC exciting (a losing quarter finalist won the last one!).
User avatar
D Eadie
Devotee
Posts: 829
Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2009 10:24 am
Location: Mars Hotel

Re: Ask Mike Brown

Post by D Eadie »

Marc Meakin wrote:Can't you do both?
The last C of C was pretty special, in that several of the players (Kai, Charlie, Corby, James H, Steve Baines and others), were very congenial, smiling, giving, open and warm. Next time it could be top-heavy with guys who aren't quite so outgoing, which makes it less enjoyable. It's nobodies fault, it's just circumstance.
Marc Meakin
Post-apocalypse
Posts: 6361
Joined: Wed May 20, 2009 3:37 pm

Re: Ask Mike Brown

Post by Marc Meakin »

Has Apterous killed off CofC?
GR MSL GNDT MSS NGVWL SRND NNLYC NNCT
User avatar
Charlie Reams
Site Admin
Posts: 9494
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm
Location: Cambridge
Contact:

Re: Ask Mike Brown

Post by Charlie Reams »

D Eadie wrote:It's nobodies fault
Bit harsh to call them nobodies :lol:
Jimmy Gough
Devotee
Posts: 876
Joined: Thu May 22, 2008 4:08 pm
Location: Eastbourne

Re: Ask Mike Brown

Post by Jimmy Gough »

D Eadie wrote:
Marc Meakin wrote:Can't you do both?
The last C of C was pretty special, in that several of the players (Kai, Charlie, Corby, James H, Steve Baines and others), were very congenial, smiling, giving, open and warm. Next time it could be top-heavy with guys who aren't quite so outgoing, which makes it less enjoyable. It's nobodies fault, it's just circumstance.
I guess that would include me. I don't disagree at all, but for me one of the cool things about Countdown is how it gives people who really really enjoy the game a chance to shine on TV who would otherwise probably not be given the opportunity. I totally see what you're saying (like I would find me on TV pretty boring), and yeah those guys are all really great, but I felt the urge to reply cos (for whatever reason) this just made me feel a bit ":("
Gavin Chipper
Post-apocalypse
Posts: 13329
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:37 pm

Re: Ask Mike Brown

Post by Gavin Chipper »

D Eadie wrote:
Marc Meakin wrote:Can't you do both?
The last C of C was pretty special, in that several of the players (Kai, Charlie, Corby, James H, Steve Baines and others), were very congenial, smiling, giving, open and warm. Next time it could be top-heavy with guys who aren't quite so outgoing, which makes it less enjoyable. It's nobodies fault, it's just circumstance.
Is this less enjoyable for you or for the viewers?
User avatar
D Eadie
Devotee
Posts: 829
Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2009 10:24 am
Location: Mars Hotel

Re: Ask Mike Brown

Post by D Eadie »

Nobody specifically Jimmy, just on the whole. I fully understand how difficult it is for young lads to try and be telegenic, i'm not being critical at all, just open about how it might look if we had a 16-player C of C.
Gavin Chipper wrote:
D Eadie wrote:
Marc Meakin wrote:Can't you do both?
The last C of C was pretty special, in that several of the players (Kai, Charlie, Corby, James H, Steve Baines and others), were very congenial, smiling, giving, open and warm. Next time it could be top-heavy with guys who aren't quite so outgoing, which makes it less enjoyable. It's nobodies fault, it's just circumstance.
Is this less enjoyable for you or for the viewers?
My enjoyment isn't relevant and i've no idea about the viewers, they've never been surveyed. Perception maybe, call it what you like, but i'm not wrong.
User avatar
Jon Corby
Moral Hero
Posts: 8021
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 8:36 am

Re: Ask Mike Brown

Post by Jon Corby »

D Eadie wrote:The last C of C was pretty special, in that several of the players (Kai, Charlie, Corby, James H, Steve Baines and others), were very congenial, smiling, giving, open and warm. Next time it could be top-heavy with guys who aren't quite so outgoing, which makes it less enjoyable. It's nobodies fault, it's just circumstance.
It's fairly obvious that you should just fuck all those other guys off and have us lot back again then :)
Ralph Gillions
Devotee
Posts: 557
Joined: Wed Jan 30, 2008 3:53 pm
Location: South Yorkshire

Re: Ask Mike Brown

Post by Ralph Gillions »

I suppose individual viewers are drawn to different aspects of a contestants 'television personality'.
If it is any consolation to you, Jimmy, I much enjoyed watching you on television (not as much as Jeffrey Burgin
of course :) .)
If someone is very chatty, obviously outgoing, or a poser I could be turned off.
I am enjoying watching Craig's run at the moment.
Different things appeal.
You were not boring Jimmy.
User avatar
D Eadie
Devotee
Posts: 829
Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2009 10:24 am
Location: Mars Hotel

Re: Ask Mike Brown

Post by D Eadie »

Ralph Gillions wrote:I suppose individual viewers are drawn to different aspects of a contestants 'television personality'.
Exactly, hence the better it is to have a mixed-bag of person, so to speak, which is harder to get in a C of C.
Jimmy wasn't boring at all, his conundrum exploits are stuff of legend. ;)
User avatar
Lesley Hines
Kiloposter
Posts: 1250
Joined: Tue Mar 24, 2009 9:29 pm
Location: Worcester

Re: Ask Mike Brown

Post by Lesley Hines »

D Eadie wrote:top-heavy with guys who aren't quite so outgoing
Spike 'em with ecstacy ;)








*This is obviously a joke and an extremely bad idea; drugs aren't legal and why would you waste them on some bleeder who was happy to be miserable anyway? No conclusions should be drawn from the reading of this post, and no responsibility will be taken for anybody, anywhere having a good time.
Lowering the averages since 2009
Post Reply