Defending you property

Discuss anything interesting but not remotely Countdown-related here.

Moderator: Jon O'Neill

David Williams
Kiloposter
Posts: 1269
Joined: Wed Jan 30, 2008 9:57 pm

Re: Defending you property

Post by David Williams »

Rosemary Roberts wrote:If my hazard is as low as that I guess I can lash out with impunity in future. Thanks guys.
May I suggest that if you are ever unfortunate enough to find yourself vulnerable, defenceless and outnumbered by assailants intent on doing you down, you engage them in spirited debate. They'll run a mile.
Gavin Chipper
Post-apocalypse
Posts: 13333
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:37 pm

Re: Defending you property

Post by Gavin Chipper »

David Roe wrote:The Daily Telegraph did a survey of Chief Police Officers a couple of years back, and about a third of them said that keeping a baseball bat by the side of the bed just in case of attack, would constitute premeditation if it was used and therefore be unreasonable force.
That sounds like bollocks. It's not a premeditated attack any more than learning some martial art in case someone attacks you. You could easily argue that you only intended to do the minimum necessary with the baseball bat, which startsfrom simply holding it if that's enough for the burglar to piss off.
User avatar
Rosemary Roberts
Devotee
Posts: 555
Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2008 5:36 pm

Re: Defending you property

Post by Rosemary Roberts »

David Roe wrote:The Daily Telegraph did a survey of Chief Police Officers a couple of years back, and about a third of them said that keeping a baseball bat by the side of the bed just in case of attack, would constitute premeditation if it was used and therefore be unreasonable force. I sincerely hope they are plain wrong and that is not the law. But it does suggest the law needs clarifying if even the police don't know it.
That probably means I shouldn't rig up tripwires on all my window ledges either.

It just occurred to me to wonder whether Munir Hussain could not have argued that at the time of the beating he was so far beyond fear and anger that he did not understand that what he was doing was wrong.
User avatar
Charlie Reams
Site Admin
Posts: 9494
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm
Location: Cambridge
Contact:

Re: Defending you property

Post by Charlie Reams »

No doubt the Daily Mail will give equal coverage to the follow-up story.
David Roe
Enthusiast
Posts: 390
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 12:58 pm

Re: Defending you property

Post by David Roe »

There's at least a couple of bits in Judge Judge's summing-up that don't ring true.

""The burglary was over and the burglars had gone, no one was in any further danger from them," said Judge."

50 previous convictions, but there was no future danger? The General Belgrano wasn't actually facing the British fleet when it was torpedoed, it doesn't mean it wasn't a danger.

"Reducing Tokeer's sentence, but not suspending it, he said: "He himself was not the victim of any crime. He will not have to live with the consequences of the crime.""

He turned up on the scene to rescue his sister-in-law from an armed gang. Just because it was his brother that was tied up, not him, doesn't mean he wasn't a victim of the crime. If I am murdered, my brother is also a victim.
User avatar
Ian Fitzpatrick
Devotee
Posts: 620
Joined: Sat Jan 31, 2009 12:23 pm
Location: Wimborne, Dorset

Re: Defending you property

Post by Ian Fitzpatrick »

Charlie Reams wrote:No doubt the Daily Mail will give equal coverage to the follow-up story.
They have indeed Charlie, Front page and headline news, together with a picture of Tiger Woods attending a Sex Addiction clinic - I imagine he is well qualified to give classes there!
I thought I was good at Countdown until I joined this forum
Post Reply