Spoilers For Thursday October 15th 2009
Moderator: James Robinson
- James Robinson
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 10580
- Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2009 5:38 pm
- Location: Mirfield, West Yorkshire
Spoilers For Thursday October 15th 2009
Can Steve become an octochamp today
Can he leap over Jeffrey in the standings
Can he get that very elusive 3-figure score today
We'll know soon enough
Can he leap over Jeffrey in the standings
Can he get that very elusive 3-figure score today
We'll know soon enough
-
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1123
- Joined: Sat Mar 01, 2008 3:15 pm
- Location: Harlow
Re: Spoilers For Thursday October 15th 2009
Is this a first ? When Steve declared BARON for 5, the subtitler beat him with BARREN for 6
- Sue Sanders
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1334
- Joined: Mon May 25, 2009 10:29 pm
- Location: Whitstable Kent
Re: Spoilers For Thursday October 15th 2009
MEDLIED for beater in meddle/tiddle round
Also, although there was a 9 (GLAMORISE) - that round also had GLORIES and MILAGES for contestant beaters
Also, although there was a 9 (GLAMORISE) - that round also had GLORIES and MILAGES for contestant beaters
Last edited by Sue Sanders on Thu Oct 15, 2009 2:51 pm, edited 1 time in total.
'This one goes up to eleven'
Fool's top.
Fool's top.
-
- Devotee
- Posts: 799
- Joined: Thu Jun 04, 2009 5:12 pm
- Location: Kildare, Rep. of Ireland
Re: Spoilers For Thursday October 15th 2009
INHAUL as a dc equaller rd. 9
-
- Devotee
- Posts: 799
- Joined: Thu Jun 04, 2009 5:12 pm
- Location: Kildare, Rep. of Ireland
Re: Spoilers For Thursday October 15th 2009
RD 10:In time
10/5 =2 7x4=28 25-2=23 23x28=644 644-3=641
P.S. I forget, did Rachel solve this after the break?
10/5 =2 7x4=28 25-2=23 23x28=644 644-3=641
P.S. I forget, did Rachel solve this after the break?
Last edited by Liam Tiernan on Sat Oct 17, 2009 12:25 am, edited 1 time in total.
- Phil Reynolds
- Postmaster General
- Posts: 3329
- Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2008 3:43 pm
- Location: Leamington Spa, UK
Re: Spoilers For Thursday October 15th 2009
And MIRAGES and LOAMIER.Sue Sanders wrote:although there was a 9 (GLAMORISE) - that round also had GLORIES and MILAGES for contestant beaters
The standard of gameplay isn't the highest, but I'm really enjoying the banter on today's show. Penny is a really entertaining DC guest; I've never been much aware of her on TV before as I don't watch in the mornings, but her sense of humour and rapport with Jeff are excellent.
-
- Devotee
- Posts: 799
- Joined: Thu Jun 04, 2009 5:12 pm
- Location: Kildare, Rep. of Ireland
Re: Spoilers For Thursday October 15th 2009
And MORALISESue Sanders wrote:MEDLIED for beater in meddle/tiddle round
Also, although there was a 9 (GLAMORISE) - that round also had GLORIES and MILAGES for contestant beaters
- Richard Priest
- Devotee
- Posts: 678
- Joined: Sun Apr 13, 2008 4:30 pm
- Location: Newcastle-under-Lyme
Re: Spoilers For Thursday October 15th 2009
FORGIVEN as a DC beater, round 13
- Craig Beevers
- Series 57 Champion
- Posts: 653
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:37 am
- Contact:
Re: Spoilers For Thursday October 15th 2009
Did they serve free drinks to the audience or something?
Most of the stuff they're laughing at even Dudley wouldn't bother with normally. It's a bit surreal.
Most of the stuff they're laughing at even Dudley wouldn't bother with normally. It's a bit surreal.
- Kirk Bevins
- God
- Posts: 4923
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:18 pm
- Location: York, UK
Re: Spoilers For Thursday October 15th 2009
Well done Steve on becoming an octochamp and was nice to give Chris Davies a plug but I'm sure Innis and Andrew are a bit pissed off you ignored their abilities.
I can't help but notice today's challenger's ambition: to become a Countdown octochamp. With 3 4 letter words during the course of the programme (record?) his ambition surely was a tough one.
I can't help but notice today's challenger's ambition: to become a Countdown octochamp. With 3 4 letter words during the course of the programme (record?) his ambition surely was a tough one.
-
- Devotee
- Posts: 557
- Joined: Wed Jan 30, 2008 3:53 pm
- Location: South Yorkshire
Re: Spoilers For Thursday October 15th 2009
Yea, I too thought it sounded forced.Craig Beevers wrote:Did they serve free drinks to the audience or something?
Most of the stuff they're laughing at even Dudley wouldn't bother with normally. It's a bit surreal.
There has been a recent tendency towards pretend-laughter, which tends to result in the viewer laughing
(or even smiling) less.
Re: Spoilers For Thursday October 15th 2009
Ralph Gillions wrote:Yea, I too thought it sounded forced.Craig Beevers wrote:Did they serve free drinks to the audience or something?
Most of the stuff they're laughing at even Dudley wouldn't bother with normally. It's a bit surreal.
There has been a recent tendency towards pretend-laughter, which tends to result in the viewer laughing
(or even smiling) less.
Not sure what pretend-laughter is. Either they laugh or they don't. If they don't you won't hear anything, if they do then you will. If you're suggesting it's 'canned' laughter then it's not. Am sure James Robinson can testify to this, he was there wasn't he?
Edit - i know he wasn't, i was being silly.
-
- Devotee
- Posts: 557
- Joined: Wed Jan 30, 2008 3:53 pm
- Location: South Yorkshire
Re: Spoilers For Thursday October 15th 2009
No, I'm not suggesting that.D Eadie wrote: If you're suggesting it's 'canned' laughter then it's not.
-
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 6410
- Joined: Wed May 20, 2009 3:37 pm
Re: Spoilers For Thursday October 15th 2009
I got the impression that some of the reasons for the laughter today may have not made the editD Eadie wrote:Ralph Gillions wrote:Yea, I too thought it sounded forced.Craig Beevers wrote:Did they serve free drinks to the audience or something?
Most of the stuff they're laughing at even Dudley wouldn't bother with normally. It's a bit surreal.
There has been a recent tendency towards pretend-laughter, which tends to result in the viewer laughing
(or even smiling) less.
Not sure what pretend-laughter is. Either they laugh or they don't. If they don't you won't hear anything, if they do then you will. If you're suggesting it's 'canned' laughter then it's not. Am sure James Robinson can testify to this, he was there wasn't he?
Edit - i know he wasn't, i was being silly.
GR MSL GNDT MSS NGVWL SRND NNLYC NNCT
Re: Spoilers For Thursday October 15th 2009
Oh, well i'll have to have a listen out for it. Never noticed anything different this end.
Wonder if it's Dudley holding them at gun-point?
Wonder if it's Dudley holding them at gun-point?
- Kirk Bevins
- God
- Posts: 4923
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:18 pm
- Location: York, UK
Re: Spoilers For Thursday October 15th 2009
Hmmm - when I asked he said he was just pleased to see me.D Eadie wrote: Wonder if it's Dudley holding them at gun-point?
- Kai Laddiman
- Fanatic
- Posts: 2314
- Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2008 3:37 pm
- Location: My bedroom
Re: Spoilers For Thursday October 15th 2009
PROPANES?
16/10/2007 - Episode 4460
Dinos Sfyris 76 - 78 Dorian Lidell
Proof that even idiots can get well and truly mainwheeled.
Dinos Sfyris 76 - 78 Dorian Lidell
Proof that even idiots can get well and truly mainwheeled.
- Derek Hazell
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1535
- Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2008 10:52 am
- Location: Swindon
- Contact:
Re: Spoilers For Thursday October 15th 2009
On some shows the audience are prompted as to where they should laugh. It is fair that people who have never been to see Countdown recorded would assume that that show is the same.D Eadie wrote:Not sure what pretend-laughter is. Either they laugh or they don't. If they don't you won't hear anything, if they do then you will.
There was a suspicious sound cut out at around 31 minutes just after Penny Smith spoke of how much she enjoys a grilled snapper.Marc Meakin wrote:I got the impression that some of the reasons for the laughter today may have not made the edit
Kirk Bevins wrote:Hmmm - when I asked he said he was just pleased to see me.D Eadie wrote:Wonder if it's Dudley holding them at gun-point?
Living life in a gyratory circus kind of way.