Spoilers for Monday 21st September 2009
Moderator: James Robinson
Spoilers for Monday 21st September 2009
Apparently a tipsy Ian gets into bed with Tanya during the "husband swap" competition, while Jane advises Peter to use protection if he's gonna plough Lauren, much to Max's chagrin. Elsewhere, will Lucas confess if the police continue to suspect Denise?
-
- Acolyte
- Posts: 248
- Joined: Sun May 10, 2009 9:20 am
Re: Spoilers for Monday 21st September 2009
A guy in my brother's football team used to go out with Lauren.
Re: Spoilers for Monday 21st September 2009
Did Max see him off?Jeffrey Burgin wrote:A guy in my brother's football team used to go out with Lauren.
-
- Acolyte
- Posts: 248
- Joined: Sun May 10, 2009 9:20 am
Re: Spoilers for Monday 21st September 2009
Nah, I think he used Viagra in the end.Jon Corby wrote:Did Max see him off?
Re: Spoilers for Monday 21st September 2009
*post removed after checking Madeline Duggan's age in Wikipedia*Jeffrey Burgin wrote:Nah, I think he used Viagra in the end.Jon Corby wrote:Did Max see him off?
- Chris Davies
- Series 61 Champion
- Posts: 404
- Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2008 5:50 pm
Re: Spoilers for Monday 21st September 2009
BHUNAS, round 2.
ALCAHEST, round 6.
ALCAHEST, round 6.
Last edited by Chris Davies on Mon Sep 21, 2009 2:46 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Series 80 Champion
- Posts: 2707
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:07 am
- Location: Sheffield
Re: Spoilers for Monday 21st September 2009
Also OUBAAS Missed the double OBTRUDES/DOUBTERS though
-
- Newbie
- Posts: 13
- Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2008 7:19 pm
Re: Spoilers for Monday 21st September 2009
Round 6 - chelates for 8
H James
H James
-
- Series 80 Champion
- Posts: 2707
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:07 am
- Location: Sheffield
Re: Spoilers for Monday 21st September 2009
FRUSTRATED by the conundrum
-
- Rookie
- Posts: 88
- Joined: Wed Dec 10, 2008 5:22 pm
Re: Spoilers for Monday 21st September 2009
Did anybody else notice the error in Rd 11? The selection was TKJEOASGF and when Rachel put GASKET on the board, the other 3 letters were JOE!
- Kirk Bevins
- God
- Posts: 4923
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:18 pm
- Location: York, UK
Re: Spoilers for Monday 21st September 2009
Woohoo - Colin Murray namechecked me and even remembered my surname! Get in.
- Kieran Child
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 355
- Joined: Fri Mar 20, 2009 8:48 pm
Re: Spoilers for Monday 21st September 2009
^ I thought this too. Dunno why I noticed it.
Re: Spoilers for Monday 21st September 2009
Pleased to say I got ASTEROIDS on Friday and TOLERATED today in just a few seconds- hope I do as well when I go on it!
- Derek Hazell
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1535
- Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2008 10:52 am
- Location: Swindon
- Contact:
Re: Spoilers for Monday 21st September 2009
Not only that, but Jeff also named his favourite sportsman as being the same one as yours!Kirk Bevins wrote:Woohoo - Colin Murray namechecked me and even remembered my surname! Get in.
Another one of those funny coincidences today, when Jeff started the show talking about soaps, after Jon had started this thread in the same way.
Also, lots of mentions of birthdays, so could this be the final negative proof in the debate about Susie's birthday? Or is it just Damian's twisted sense of humour?
Living life in a gyratory circus kind of way.
- James Robinson
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 10580
- Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2009 5:38 pm
- Location: Mirfield, West Yorkshire
Re: Spoilers for Monday 21st September 2009
I had one of my best days watching the show today (from my own house, not the studios unfortunately) up until missing TOLERATED and the conundrum.
I do have a few good equallers though:
Round 2 - BONUS
Round 3 - DAMPEST
Round 7 - WAVIEST (which was good until it was beaten by Susie's VESICANT)
Round 8 - REELING
Round 12 - TOADLET (which Susie always seems to miss, if anyone hasn't noticed) (not bad, but it wasn't TOLERATED)
Like Dinos, I also thought the conundrum was FRUSTRATED!
Simple alternative to 2nd numbers game:
100 + 5 + 1 = 106
106 x 7 = 742
742 - 2 = 740
Also double checked Naomi's observation. How that happened seems beyond me as everyone who has been knows that all the letters for each round are kept in a little stack marked with whichever round they're on, so very puzzling that.
P.S. It would be very interesting if it was Susie's birthday (Wikipedia says it's her 42nd today (although it does say "dubious" as well)), but they forgot considering that she was allowed to mention her mum's birthday on my first show, although it was also mentioning the Queen's birthday too. Although, it's at least my sister's 19th today.
P.P.S. Also note that there are 21 small numbers on the trolley (as foreseen in the "Number Frequencies" topic in General). So, expect a shrunken 5 pretty soon, since it didn't appear today. But don't worry it'll only be for this week and next week.
I do have a few good equallers though:
Round 2 - BONUS
Round 3 - DAMPEST
Round 7 - WAVIEST (which was good until it was beaten by Susie's VESICANT)
Round 8 - REELING
Round 12 - TOADLET (which Susie always seems to miss, if anyone hasn't noticed) (not bad, but it wasn't TOLERATED)
Like Dinos, I also thought the conundrum was FRUSTRATED!
Simple alternative to 2nd numbers game:
100 + 5 + 1 = 106
106 x 7 = 742
742 - 2 = 740
Also double checked Naomi's observation. How that happened seems beyond me as everyone who has been knows that all the letters for each round are kept in a little stack marked with whichever round they're on, so very puzzling that.
P.S. It would be very interesting if it was Susie's birthday (Wikipedia says it's her 42nd today (although it does say "dubious" as well)), but they forgot considering that she was allowed to mention her mum's birthday on my first show, although it was also mentioning the Queen's birthday too. Although, it's at least my sister's 19th today.
P.P.S. Also note that there are 21 small numbers on the trolley (as foreseen in the "Number Frequencies" topic in General). So, expect a shrunken 5 pretty soon, since it didn't appear today. But don't worry it'll only be for this week and next week.
- Charlie Reams
- Site Admin
- Posts: 9494
- Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm
- Location: Cambridge
- Contact:
Re: Spoilers for Monday 21st September 2009
Susie's "official" age and birthday are bollocks.James Robinson wrote: P.S. It would be very interesting if it was Susie's birthday (Wikipedia says it's her 42nd today (although it does say "dubious" as well)), but they forgot considering that she was allowed to mention her mum's birthday on my first show, although it was also mentioning the Queen's birthday too.
- James Robinson
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 10580
- Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2009 5:38 pm
- Location: Mirfield, West Yorkshire
Re: Spoilers for Monday 21st September 2009
Do you happen to know what they are by chance, Charlie? I did also mention that it was from Wikipedia, so it was bound to be slightly wrong.Charlie Reams wrote:Susie's "official" age and birthday are bollocks.
- Charlie Reams
- Site Admin
- Posts: 9494
- Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm
- Location: Cambridge
- Contact:
Re: Spoilers for Monday 21st September 2009
Maybe you can ask her yourself next time you're at the studio, I'm sure she'll be pleased to hear from you.James Robinson wrote:Do you happen to know what they are by chance, Charlie? I did also mention that it was from Wikipedia, so it was bound to be slightly wrong.Charlie Reams wrote:Susie's "official" age and birthday are bollocks.
Re: Spoilers for Monday 21st September 2009
Fuck me, no mention of Rach today?
JESUS CHRIST
JESUS CHRIST
- Matt Morrison
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 7822
- Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2008 2:27 pm
- Location: London
- Contact:
Re: Spoilers for Monday 21st September 2009
I was pretty confused by the horrible fake tan until I discovered there'd been the Summer filming break in between today's and Friday's episodes.Jon Corby wrote:Fuck me, no mention of Rach today?
Wonder where all the sun was, I saw fuck all of it. Must be this new Countdown pay packet providing some excellent holiday action abroad.
- Chris Philpot
- Acolyte
- Posts: 214
- Joined: Sat Jan 26, 2008 12:34 pm
- Location: West Sussex
- Contact:
Re: Spoilers for Monday 21st September 2009
There was an interesting bit of camerawork during the ONERIYEGL round as Jeff came into view - presumably to the bemusement of the camera operator who seemed to be readying himself to pan away at the time! Was this a vision mixing blip that wasn't picked up in the edit, or was there nothing to tidy it up with?
- James Robinson
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 10580
- Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2009 5:38 pm
- Location: Mirfield, West Yorkshire
Re: Spoilers for Monday 21st September 2009
She told the audience that she'd been to Borneo during the break, so that's probably the answer. She also told us how there first 2 days were interrupted by her boyfriend getting heat stroke and sunburn.Matt Morrison wrote:I was pretty confused by the horrible fake tan until I discovered there'd been the Summer filming break in between today's and Friday's episodes.Jon Corby wrote:Fuck me, no mention of Rach today?
Wonder where all the sun was, I saw fuck all of it. Must be this new Countdown pay packet providing some excellent holiday action abroad.
- Kai Laddiman
- Fanatic
- Posts: 2314
- Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2008 3:37 pm
- Location: My bedroom
Re: Spoilers for Monday 21st September 2009
Yeh I noticed this.Chris Philpot wrote:There was an interesting bit of camerawork during the ONERIYEGL round as Jeff came into view - presumably to the bemusement of the camera operator who seemed to be readying himself to pan away at the time! Was this a vision mixing blip that wasn't picked up in the edit, or was there nothing to tidy it up with?
Recap probs up tomorrow.
16/10/2007 - Episode 4460
Dinos Sfyris 76 - 78 Dorian Lidell
Proof that even idiots can get well and truly mainwheeled.
Dinos Sfyris 76 - 78 Dorian Lidell
Proof that even idiots can get well and truly mainwheeled.
- Kai Laddiman
- Fanatic
- Posts: 2314
- Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2008 3:37 pm
- Location: My bedroom
Re: Spoilers for Monday 21st September 2009
Woah, raw score Jeffrey 98 - 110 Russell. Awesome.
16/10/2007 - Episode 4460
Dinos Sfyris 76 - 78 Dorian Lidell
Proof that even idiots can get well and truly mainwheeled.
Dinos Sfyris 76 - 78 Dorian Lidell
Proof that even idiots can get well and truly mainwheeled.
-
- Acolyte
- Posts: 248
- Joined: Sun May 10, 2009 9:20 am
Re: Spoilers for Monday 21st September 2009
If Russell hadn't made such a poor start he could have cantered home had things played out similarly. That said, he didn't, and thankfully I live to fight another day.Kai Laddiman wrote:Woah, raw score Jeffrey 98 - 110 Russell. Awesome.
Furious with missing WAVIEST and, having seen LEOTARD after 7, when trying to find a word with the ATE/ATED suffix I copied down the other letters wrong, missing an E and thus TOLERATED. My annoyance was only slightly checked by the fact DC missed it as well. I was also leaning towards FRUSTRATED for the conundrum, although a record of 0/4 is quite shocking! Hopefully will eradicate my form of playing well for a few rounds before switching off for some as I have done thus far.
I laughed when I realised everyone was a whole lot more tanned and had different haircuts to Friday- but that said, I think my jaw dropped quicker than Harrods' lift when Rachel came out. I think that is probably the best she has looked on any show, that dress was indecently tight.
- James Robinson
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 10580
- Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2009 5:38 pm
- Location: Mirfield, West Yorkshire
Re: Spoilers for Monday 21st September 2009
Yeah, you're telling me Jeffrey, I hope a lot of her new wardrobe contains similarly tighter dresses. It just reminds me a bit of how she looked on my second show, with the obvious exceptions of the tan and the hairstyle of course.Jeffrey Burgin wrote:I laughed when I realised everyone was a whole lot more tanned and had different haircuts to Friday- but that said, I think my jaw dropped quicker than Harrods' lift when Rachel came out. I think that is probably the best she has looked on any show, that dress was indecently tight.
- Darren Carter
- What a lot of bling
- Posts: 344
- Joined: Tue Mar 10, 2009 1:58 pm
- Location: Shrewsbury
Re: Spoilers for Monday 21st September 2009
I had that as well, I guess it is allowed as a mass noun seeing as it's food.Chris Davies wrote:BHUNAS, round 2.