Spoilers for Friday 18th September 2009

Discuss anything that happened in recent games. This is the place to post any words you got that beat Dictionary Corner, or numbers games that evaded Rachel.

Moderator: James Robinson

User avatar
John Bosley
Enthusiast
Posts: 380
Joined: Fri Oct 17, 2008 3:52 pm
Location: Huddersfield

Re: Spoilers for Friday 18th September 2009

Post by John Bosley »

Thanks, Jim. Silly me. Sorry to mislead.
User avatar
Kirk Bevins
God
Posts: 4923
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:18 pm
Location: York, UK

Re: Spoilers for Friday 18th September 2009

Post by Kirk Bevins »

Kai Laddiman wrote:
I got 134. 12 maxes - I missed BAHADURS (SUDARIA), PROFILER (didn't risk it) and MEADOWS/DISAVOW/MIAOWED (MOVIES).
This sounds like a bit of a piss take. I only posted what I did since I was asked to.
User avatar
Kai Laddiman
Fanatic
Posts: 2314
Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2008 3:37 pm
Location: My bedroom

Re: Spoilers for Friday 18th September 2009

Post by Kai Laddiman »

Kirk Bevins wrote:
Kai Laddiman wrote:
I got 134. 12 maxes - I missed BAHADURS (SUDARIA), PROFILER (didn't risk it) and MEADOWS/DISAVOW/MIAOWED (MOVIES).
This sounds like a bit of a piss take. I only posted what I did since I was asked to.
Only messin' with ya Kirky ;)
16/10/2007 - Episode 4460
Dinos Sfyris 76 - 78 Dorian Lidell
Proof that even idiots can get well and truly mainwheeled.
User avatar
Sue Sanders
Kiloposter
Posts: 1334
Joined: Mon May 25, 2009 10:29 pm
Location: Whitstable Kent

Re: Spoilers for Friday 18th September 2009

Post by Sue Sanders »

Charlie Reams wrote:
Sue Sanders wrote:The Q and the U are coming out together alot lately ...can that have been 'helped' in some way??? I prefer it, I must say.
Yes, a naked Q tends to be rather disappointing, especially because y'average contestant is unlikely to spot any of the tiny handful of Q-no-U words, although it occasionally adds to the cuteness as in round 8 here. Damian has said before that he had considered making QU a combined tile (as in Boggle) but that adds some odd complications with word lengths (i.e. you could get a 10). I guess it wouldn't be that hard to bias the C and V piles so that Q and U were at about the right depths to coincide, but I would guess it's probably a coincidence, because the pseudo-shuffling process is not that pseudo.
That's interesting. I wonder if you could argue that Q/U on the same tile is a unit that counts as one letter so it's inclusion can still result as nothing more than a 9 letter word (though of coursethen, the Q could NOT be used in a Q-no-U word) I seem to recall from my dim and distant school days that in Spanish, the double L that gives the eyo sound in Mallorca was classed as one letter with its own section in the dictionary.
'This one goes up to eleven'
Fool's top.
User avatar
Charlie Reams
Site Admin
Posts: 9494
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm
Location: Cambridge
Contact:

Re: Spoilers for Friday 18th September 2009

Post by Charlie Reams »

Sue Sanders wrote: That's interesting. I wonder if you could argue that Q/U on the same tile is a unit that counts as one letter so it's inclusion can still result as nothing more than a 9 letter word (though of coursethen, the Q could NOT be used in a Q-no-U word) I seem to recall from my dim and distant school days that in Spanish, the double L that gives the eyo sound in Mallorca was classed as one letter with its own section in the dictionary.
I think you end up with weirdness either way; I'd certainly be puzzled as a new viewer if I saw QUIVER declared as a 5, even if Q and U were on the same tile. The LL in Spanish, like IJ in Dutch, is universally considered as a single character which just happens to look like two other characters, so that audience wouldn't find it so puzzling.
User avatar
Sue Sanders
Kiloposter
Posts: 1334
Joined: Mon May 25, 2009 10:29 pm
Location: Whitstable Kent

Re: Spoilers for Friday 18th September 2009

Post by Sue Sanders »

Charlie Reams wrote:
Sue Sanders wrote: That's interesting. I wonder if you could argue that Q/U on the same tile is a unit that counts as one letter so it's inclusion can still result as nothing more than a 9 letter word (though of coursethen, the Q could NOT be used in a Q-no-U word) I seem to recall from my dim and distant school days that in Spanish, the double L that gives the eyo sound in Mallorca was classed as one letter with its own section in the dictionary.
I think you end up with weirdness either way; I'd certainly be puzzled as a new viewer if I saw QUIVER declared as a 5, even if Q and U were on the same tile. The LL in Spanish, like IJ in Dutch, is universally considered as a single character which just happens to look like two other characters, so that audience wouldn't find it so puzzling.
Yeah, you're right actually - its a non starter. Ho hum.
'This one goes up to eleven'
Fool's top.
User avatar
Phil Reynolds
Postmaster General
Posts: 3329
Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2008 3:43 pm
Location: Leamington Spa, UK

Re: Spoilers for Friday 18th September 2009

Post by Phil Reynolds »

Charlie Reams wrote:
Sue Sanders wrote:I seem to recall from my dim and distant school days that in Spanish, the double L that gives the eyo sound in Mallorca was classed as one letter with its own section in the dictionary.
The LL in Spanish, like IJ in Dutch, is universally considered as a single character which just happens to look like two other characters
Or, closer to home, the characters LL, DD, CH etc. in Welsh.
User avatar
Ray Folwell
Acolyte
Posts: 153
Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2008 5:46 pm

Re: Spoilers for Friday 18th September 2009

Post by Ray Folwell »

Phil Reynolds wrote: Or, closer to home, the characters LL, DD, CH etc. in Welsh.
Do they have Welsh Countdown on S4C ?
User avatar
Matt Morrison
Post-apocalypse
Posts: 7822
Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2008 2:27 pm
Location: London
Contact:

Re: Spoilers for Friday 18th September 2009

Post by Matt Morrison »

Enjoyed Jo Brand a lot more than last time round. A lot more than most other DCers of late in fact. Made up words were slightly less annoying (and as MW said, it's a game in itself trying to work out what it's going to be from the description), and her pre-advert chats were actually pretty funny, and got me chuckling in a couple of spots. Thumbs up.
User avatar
Derek Hazell
Kiloposter
Posts: 1535
Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2008 10:52 am
Location: Swindon
Contact:

Re: Spoilers for Friday 18th September 2009

Post by Derek Hazell »

Matt Morrison wrote:Enjoyed Jo Brand a lot more than last time round. A lot more than most other DCers of late in fact. Made up words were slightly less annoying (and as MW said, it's a game in itself trying to work out what it's going to be from the description), and her pre-advert chats were actually pretty funny, and got me chuckling in a couple of spots. Thumbs up.
IAWTP. I enjoyed her a lot more than usual too. Perversely I think her very noticeable don't-care-attitude this time actually made me care more.
Living life in a gyratory circus kind of way.
Post Reply