Rileys Reckoner
-
- Newbie
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Mon Aug 10, 2009 3:29 pm
Rileys Reckoner
Hi Everyone,
If anyone has any objection to this post then please remove it (I am fairly new to forums and very new to this one).
I am a software engineer and whilst watching countdown I worked out that it is possible to use every combination of numbers in the numbers game to work out if a solution is possible.
Having checked the web I found a couple of solutions, both of which missed solveable (new word?) number combinations and not wierd combos either, regular ones from the show.
I have now written a piece of software that uses every combination of numbers to ascertain a solution and it does it in less than 28 seconds (even on a slooooooooooow PC).
I will never charge for this software but would love to offer it free to anyone who wants a copy. It has been downloaded by around 2000 people during the last 3 months (from CNET) and all bugs have now been eradicated. I am not looking for anything out of this as it was undertaken on a purely research basis and is not finished to the usual standards expected by my company.
The URL is http://www.contactconsultants.co.uk/pro ... ckoner.exe (my company is Contact Consultants who offer any support or help completely free of charge).
Many thanks to all
David Wadsworth
If anyone has any objection to this post then please remove it (I am fairly new to forums and very new to this one).
I am a software engineer and whilst watching countdown I worked out that it is possible to use every combination of numbers in the numbers game to work out if a solution is possible.
Having checked the web I found a couple of solutions, both of which missed solveable (new word?) number combinations and not wierd combos either, regular ones from the show.
I have now written a piece of software that uses every combination of numbers to ascertain a solution and it does it in less than 28 seconds (even on a slooooooooooow PC).
I will never charge for this software but would love to offer it free to anyone who wants a copy. It has been downloaded by around 2000 people during the last 3 months (from CNET) and all bugs have now been eradicated. I am not looking for anything out of this as it was undertaken on a purely research basis and is not finished to the usual standards expected by my company.
The URL is http://www.contactconsultants.co.uk/pro ... ckoner.exe (my company is Contact Consultants who offer any support or help completely free of charge).
Many thanks to all
David Wadsworth
- Charlie Reams
- Site Admin
- Posts: 9494
- Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm
- Location: Cambridge
- Contact:
Re: Rileys Reckoner
I haven't tried your program yet (no Linux support ) but I'd be surprised if it were as good as this one, which doesn't require a separate download and is quite a lot faster than 28 seconds. But it's a cool project to mess around with so well done on that front. Oh and yours has the best name.
-
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 295
- Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2008 12:41 am
- Location: Stamford, Connecticut
Re: Rileys Reckoner
Stewart Gordon's cdsolve is my numbers solver of choice; despite the less glamorous name it's lightweight and very speedy. AFAIK it finds all possible solutions. The source code is available on his site too, if you don't mind D.
The word SOLVABLE is valid on Countdown, by the way.
The word SOLVABLE is valid on Countdown, by the way.
-
- Newbie
- Posts: 13
- Joined: Wed Mar 11, 2009 12:50 am
Re: Rileys Reckoner
Thanks but I don't want .net on my machine.
I have always used Countup which seems to work fine for all combinations.
I have always used Countup which seems to work fine for all combinations.
- Jason Larsen
- Postmaster General
- Posts: 3902
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 3:18 pm
- Location: Seattle, Washington
Re: Rileys Reckoner
I had a feeling Charlie wouldn't object to that post because it is your program.
If it would have been somebody else's, then he would have thought otherwise.
If it would have been somebody else's, then he would have thought otherwise.
-
- Newbie
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Mon Aug 10, 2009 3:29 pm
Re: Rileys Reckoner
Thanks to all for your kind comments.
Yah I didnt think mine would be the fastest or even the best but it is a fun project to kick around and the solution is neat!
The average solve time is two seconds but it continues through all solutions looking for the shortest (in steps).
My next project is a attempt to find the solution to 'Deal Or No Deal' ...
Wait ... I have it ... x = Random(1, NumberOfContestants) in any language.
I had intended to write RR for non-windows OS's but 88-90% of PC's use Windows and 100% of people with attitude use Linux.
(Sorry I saw this on another forum and couldn't wait to use it)
Roll on the 24th eh?
David Wadsworth
Yah I didnt think mine would be the fastest or even the best but it is a fun project to kick around and the solution is neat!
The average solve time is two seconds but it continues through all solutions looking for the shortest (in steps).
My next project is a attempt to find the solution to 'Deal Or No Deal' ...
Wait ... I have it ... x = Random(1, NumberOfContestants) in any language.
I had intended to write RR for non-windows OS's but 88-90% of PC's use Windows and 100% of people with attitude use Linux.
(Sorry I saw this on another forum and couldn't wait to use it)
Roll on the 24th eh?
David Wadsworth
- Charlie Reams
- Site Admin
- Posts: 9494
- Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm
- Location: Cambridge
- Contact:
Re: Rileys Reckoner
Why not make it find the shortest one first?David Wadsworth wrote: The average solve time is two seconds but it continues through all solutions looking for the shortest (in steps).
- Jason Larsen
- Postmaster General
- Posts: 3902
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 3:18 pm
- Location: Seattle, Washington
Re: Rileys Reckoner
Will it have Rachel Riley's smily face included?
- Thomas Wood
- Rookie
- Posts: 51
- Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2009 9:58 pm
- Contact:
Re: Rileys Reckoner
DOND solution, lmao. I tried to download the programme but there's no support for Apple Mac's either, I'm sure it's great anyway! Must have taken you a considerably amount of time to compile.David Wadsworth wrote:Thanks to all for your kind comments.
Yah I didnt think mine would be the fastest or even the best but it is a fun project to kick around and the solution is neat!
The average solve time is two seconds but it continues through all solutions looking for the shortest (in steps).
My next project is a attempt to find the solution to 'Deal Or No Deal' ...
Wait ... I have it ... x = Random(1, NumberOfContestants) in any language.
I had intended to write RR for non-windows OS's but 88-90% of PC's use Windows and 100% of people with attitude use Linux.
(Sorry I saw this on another forum and couldn't wait to use it)
Roll on the 24th eh?
David Wadsworth
Thomas Wood
http://www.youtube.com/countdowngoofs
http://www.youtube.com/countdowngoofs
- Jason Larsen
- Postmaster General
- Posts: 3902
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 3:18 pm
- Location: Seattle, Washington
Re: Rileys Reckoner
How so, Thomas?
- Thomas Wood
- Rookie
- Posts: 51
- Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2009 9:58 pm
- Contact:
Re: Rileys Reckoner
I'm just guessing, to compose a programme that can solve any number's game must be programmed with every single outcome. Such as every possible number selection and every target number.Jason Larsen wrote:How so, Thomas?
Thomas Wood
http://www.youtube.com/countdowngoofs
http://www.youtube.com/countdowngoofs
- Charlie Reams
- Site Admin
- Posts: 9494
- Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm
- Location: Cambridge
- Contact:
Re: Rileys Reckoner
Yeah but think how long Microsoft Word must've taken, what with them having to program in every document that would ever be written. No wonder it's so expensive.Thomas Wood wrote:I'm just guessing, to compose a programme that can solve any number's game must be programmed with every single outcome. Such as every possible number selection and every target number.Jason Larsen wrote:How so, Thomas?
-
- Newbie
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Mon Aug 10, 2009 3:29 pm
Re: Rileys Reckoner
Its the only way to be sure .....
The big trick is to get WinDoze to do the task quick enough.
The big trick is to get WinDoze to do the task quick enough.
- Phil Reynolds
- Postmaster General
- Posts: 3329
- Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2008 3:43 pm
- Location: Leamington Spa, UK
Re: Rileys Reckoner
Ah, but they cheated and missed some out. This is why Word keeps trying to "correct" what you type in.Charlie Reams wrote:Yeah but think how long Microsoft Word must've taken, what with them having to program in every document that would ever be written.Thomas Wood wrote:I'm just guessing, to compose a programme that can solve any number's game must be programmed with every single outcome. Such as every possible number selection and every target number.
- Charlie Reams
- Site Admin
- Posts: 9494
- Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm
- Location: Cambridge
- Contact:
Re: Rileys Reckoner
Nuke it from orbit?David Wadsworth wrote:Its the only way to be sure .....
- Jason Larsen
- Postmaster General
- Posts: 3902
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 3:18 pm
- Location: Seattle, Washington
Re: Rileys Reckoner
Thomas, why would it matter what kind of computer you have?
- Rosemary Roberts
- Devotee
- Posts: 555
- Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2008 5:36 pm
Re: Rileys Reckoner
Um... Do you by any chance work for Microsoft?David Wadsworth wrote:all bugs have now been eradicated
- Thomas Wood
- Rookie
- Posts: 51
- Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2009 9:58 pm
- Contact:
Re: Rileys Reckoner
Apple Mac is a completely different (& better) OS to Windows. Mac's don't run .exe install files, they run .dmg so I can't install it sadly.Jason Larsen wrote:Thomas, why would it matter what kind of computer you have?
Thomas Wood
http://www.youtube.com/countdowngoofs
http://www.youtube.com/countdowngoofs
- Jason Larsen
- Postmaster General
- Posts: 3902
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 3:18 pm
- Location: Seattle, Washington
Re: Rileys Reckoner
I'm the only person from Seattle here, Rosemary.
- Matt Morrison
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 7822
- Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2008 2:27 pm
- Location: London
- Contact:
Re: Rileys Reckoner
Thomas Wood wrote:Apple Mac is a [...] better OS to Windows.
and then Thomas Wood wrote:Mac's don't run .exe install files, they run .dmg so I can't install it sadly.
- Michael Wallace
- Racoonteur
- Posts: 5458
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:01 am
- Location: London
Re: Rileys Reckoner
This highlights what I never understand about Mac vs. Windows arguments. I don't get why people pay for Macs when they can get Linux for free, and both come with the same main disadvantages associated with Not Being Windows.Matt Morrison wrote:Thomas Wood wrote:Apple Mac is a [...] better OS to Windows.and then Thomas Wood wrote:Mac's don't run .exe install files, they run .dmg so I can't install it sadly.
(and just so I'm clear, I'm not saying Windows is better, just that if you're going to use a good OS but have to put up with not being able to run .exes, why pay for it if you don't have to?)
- Charlie Reams
- Site Admin
- Posts: 9494
- Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm
- Location: Cambridge
- Contact:
Re: Rileys Reckoner
It's SHINY!!!!!!! And if that isn't worth £500, I don't know what is.Michael Wallace wrote: This highlights what I never understand about Mac vs. Windows arguments. I don't get why people pay for Macs when they can get Linux for free, and both come with the same main disadvantages associated with Not Being Windows.
(and just so I'm clear, I'm not saying Windows is better, just that if you're going to use a good OS but have to put up with not being able to run .exes, why pay for it if you don't have to?)