OK - I've no hope of solving this, as 99% of the time I have to rely on Google for anything to do with pop music.Junaid Mubeen wrote:The fomer. ...marc meakin wrote:Are they lyrics to a song or words from a poem?
So what's the answer?
Moderator: Michael Wallace
OK - I've no hope of solving this, as 99% of the time I have to rely on Google for anything to do with pop music.Junaid Mubeen wrote:The fomer. ...marc meakin wrote:Are they lyrics to a song or words from a poem?
Just Philed it in using the same method as Fill.Phil Reynolds wrote:OK, got it, but only by guessing from the clues already given what some of the other words might be and then Googling - I'd never heard (or heard of) the answer.
The answer is here.kevin manthorpe wrote:Aaaargh! Still not got it, and bored trying.
Please, it's been a month now, could someone PM me the answer please?!
Absolutely tiny, from what I've heard. Anyway, it was rap (with the silent "c") - not a song.sarah white wrote:How huge was that song!
A cover version that was neither necessary nor appreciated, apart from the good old substitution of "constipation" for "reputation".David Roe wrote:Absolutely tiny, from what I've heard. Anyway, it was rap (with the silent "c") - not a song.sarah white wrote:How huge was that song!
Well, it spent several weeks at number one, and the (c)rap was only a small part of it, Lindy Layton sang the main vocals.David Roe wrote:Absolutely tiny, from what I've heard. Anyway, it was rap (with the silent "c") - not a song.sarah white wrote:How huge was that song!
Since when was being number 1 for several weeks a mark of quality? Was it as good as "Shadd-ap-a-your-face?"Jon Corby wrote:Well, it spent several weeks at number one, and the (c)rap was only a small part of it, Lindy Layton sang the main vocals.
I have the excuse that I'd never heard the song before. I remember "Dub Be Good to Me", but not this remix thing.Jon Corby wrote:it's still not remotely as shit as the people who hadn't caught on by page 2 despite it being practically spelt out for them.
Jon Corby wrote:thxbai
Jon Corby wrote:It would be pretty twattish of me not to tell you the answer.
I would have to be some kind of colossal bell-end not to.
Why do you say they were supposed to be clues? They were never described as such. I believe they were intended more as self-fulfilling prophecies.Peter Mabey wrote:As those were supposed to be clues, what was their relevance?Jon Corby wrote:It would be pretty twattish of me not to tell you the answer.
I would have to be some kind of colossal bell-end not to.
That was a rebuttal to it being "tiny", not the crap part. If you re-read you'll notice I actually agreed with that bit.David Roe wrote:Since when was being number 1 for several weeks a mark of quality? Was it as good as "Shadd-ap-a-your-face?"Jon Corby wrote:Well, it spent several weeks at number one, and the (c)rap was only a small part of it, Lindy Layton sang the main vocals.
I think the answer must be "no" by now . . .Alice Moore on the 19th June wrote:Here's another. What are the next 5 letters in this sequence?
F,U,K,A,W,W,R,A,Y,R,D,U,K,A,W,W,L,T,E,E,T,K,E,Y,R,Y,E,W,N,U,K,A,R,Y,O,E,E,W,T,U,T,D,O,E,E,W,N,U,K,A,R
Clue: It's going on a similar principle to the last one (which is why it uses single letters: too easy otherwise). God knows whether anyone'll get it though.