Spoilers for Wednesday 2nd April 2025 (Series 91, Heat 63)

Discuss anything that happened in recent games. This is the place to post any words you got that beat Dictionary Corner, or numbers games that evaded Rachel.

Moderator: James Robinson

Post Reply
Philip A
Kiloposter
Posts: 1592
Joined: Thu Jan 07, 2021 2:56 pm

Spoilers for Wednesday 2nd April 2025 (Series 91, Heat 63)

Post by Philip A »

Title contender if George octos. Overcame round 1 nerves to win with a century. That conundrum was horrible in my opinion.
Series 78 Runner-up
User avatar
Graeme Cole
Series 65 Champion
Posts: 2150
Joined: Tue Jul 06, 2010 9:59 pm

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 2nd April 2025 (Series 91, Heat 63)

Post by Graeme Cole »

Philip A wrote: Wed Apr 02, 2025 7:33 pm Title contender if George octos. Overcame round 1 nerves to win with a century. That conundrum was horrible in my opinion.
What's horrible about it? There may be a couple of plausible-but-wrong anagrams, but it's a normal, everyday -ING word. Perfectly fair, I think.

If it was one of those crapshoot conundrums where you could spot both alternatives but it's still a coin-flip, like BACKCROSS/CROSSBACK, or HEADPOWER/POWERHEAD, then sure, those are bad conundrums. It would be even worse if there was a plausible-but-wrong answer which looks more like a word than the correct answer, such as WHACKABLE/WHALEBACK. Those can get in the bin. But in today's conundrum, even if you see RECOSTING or SECTORING first, you'll be unsure about them. If you spot ESCORTING, it's obvious that's a real word and must be the answer.
Philip A
Kiloposter
Posts: 1592
Joined: Thu Jan 07, 2021 2:56 pm

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 2nd April 2025 (Series 91, Heat 63)

Post by Philip A »

Graeme Cole wrote: Wed Apr 02, 2025 8:31 pm
Philip A wrote: Wed Apr 02, 2025 7:33 pm Title contender if George octos. Overcame round 1 nerves to win with a century. That conundrum was horrible in my opinion.
What's horrible about it? There may be a couple of plausible-but-wrong anagrams, but it's a normal, everyday -ING word. Perfectly fair, I think.

If it was one of those crapshoot conundrums where you could spot both alternatives but it's still a coin-flip, like BACKCROSS/CROSSBACK, or HEADPOWER/POWERHEAD, then sure, those are bad conundrums. It would be even worse if there was a plausible-but-wrong answer which looks more like a word than the correct answer, such as WHACKABLE/WHALEBACK. Those can get in the bin. But in today's conundrum, even if you see RECOSTING or SECTORING first, you'll be unsure about them. If you spot ESCORTING, it's obvious that's a real word and must be the answer.
There’s also corseting, which isn’t in despite CORSETED being in.

Yes, a common word, but there’s many plausible guesses which are words in other dictionaries: sectoring and corseting might not be used as much as escorting, but they are all words. It is equally as unsuitable as those examples in my opinion.

And another point: ODP is not what viewers recognise as a dictionary, as it’s neither visible nor mentioned.

FWIW, I’d have set the scramble as SECTORGIN to mitigate at least one of the traps.

I personally wouldn’t even set traps like that in a heat game: that I would save for knockout matches.

A bit hard and unfortunate on George I think, especially as he notched up a very good 13-round score on his impressive debut.
Series 78 Runner-up
Gavin Chipper
Post-apocalypse
Posts: 14319
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:37 pm

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 2nd April 2025 (Series 91, Heat 63)

Post by Gavin Chipper »

Philip A wrote: Wed Apr 02, 2025 7:33 pm Title contender if George octos. Overcame round 1 nerves to win with a century. That conundrum was horrible in my opinion.
I beat him by quite a bit which is my barometer. I'd need to see a big improvement to say title contender. Rounds were quite flat. Not sure DC beat me in a round unless I'm forgetting something.

I think when you're a good player (like you) it's maybe harder to distinguish between players further down the pecking order.
Philip A
Kiloposter
Posts: 1592
Joined: Thu Jan 07, 2021 2:56 pm

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 2nd April 2025 (Series 91, Heat 63)

Post by Philip A »

In all seriousness, he maxed 10 rounds and none of his answers in rda 1-14 were disallowed – plus transferable skills from the aforementioned maths competitions he’s entered.

Do not underestimate the non-Apterites!
Series 78 Runner-up
Gavin Chipper
Post-apocalypse
Posts: 14319
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:37 pm

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 2nd April 2025 (Series 91, Heat 63)

Post by Gavin Chipper »

Not everyone who has maths credentials is good at numbers remember! Time will tell but he missed the first one and the others were relatively straightforward.
Post Reply