The 'A' in GATE is the diphthong 'ei'. I had to write a riveting paper on the subject as part of my English degree. My tutor was an OED lexicographer who described himself as "too ugly for dictionary corner"!Gavin Chipper wrote:Really? I must speak a totally different kind of English to you. The A in GATE (in my language) is not a single "pure" sound like the A in CAT.Charlie Reams wrote:Unless you speak a totally different kind of English to me, the A in GATE is not a diphthong. But that native speakers even need this debate suggests that the ODE needs to be clearer.Gavin Chipper wrote:The A in GATE is a diphthong and GATE is certainly one syllable, but there is certainly something extra in FRAIL. I would call that something extra a syllable. I suppose it comes down to your definitions, but if syllable means what I think it does, FRAIL has two of those.
What 'allowable words' rules would you like to have?
-
- Rookie
- Posts: 91
- Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2008 8:10 pm
Re: What 'allowable words' rules would you like to have?
-
- Acolyte
- Posts: 105
- Joined: Thu Oct 16, 2008 7:04 pm
Re: What 'allowable words' rules would you like to have?
Mike, thank your for your very informative post.
(I realise what distinguished company I'm in, but I will wade in regardless... !)
It's good that the trend is now towards allowing more "sensible pluralisations" of mass nouns. As it is so subjective, my point was, really, wouldn't it be better to allow them all? Even taking Charlie's examples - could an archaeologist not talk about two eras of 'mankind' with different characteristics as being 'mankinds'? What if "human life" is found on another planet in another solar system (as some astrophysicists think likely to exist)? 'Gunfire' is a bit more difficult, I admit - but could two episodes of gunfire during a battle not be referred to as 'gunfires'? Of course in these cases the plurals would stand for "kinds of - " or "episodes of - " - but we love to abbreviate. I do not see that there is anything intrinsically "wrong" in the pluralisation of mass nouns - it just depends on the context (and, I agree, the contexts above are a bit far-fetched!).
(I realise what distinguished company I'm in, but I will wade in regardless... !)
It's good that the trend is now towards allowing more "sensible pluralisations" of mass nouns. As it is so subjective, my point was, really, wouldn't it be better to allow them all? Even taking Charlie's examples - could an archaeologist not talk about two eras of 'mankind' with different characteristics as being 'mankinds'? What if "human life" is found on another planet in another solar system (as some astrophysicists think likely to exist)? 'Gunfire' is a bit more difficult, I admit - but could two episodes of gunfire during a battle not be referred to as 'gunfires'? Of course in these cases the plurals would stand for "kinds of - " or "episodes of - " - but we love to abbreviate. I do not see that there is anything intrinsically "wrong" in the pluralisation of mass nouns - it just depends on the context (and, I agree, the contexts above are a bit far-fetched!).
- Charlie Reams
- Site Admin
- Posts: 9494
- Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm
- Location: Cambridge
- Contact:
Re: What 'allowable words' rules would you like to have?
Hum. I guess I don't understand what a diphthong is then. Can you elaborate?Lucy Gowers wrote:The 'A' in GATE is the diphthong 'ei'. I had to write a riveting paper on the subject as part of my English degree. My tutor was an OED lexicographer who described himself as "too ugly for dictionary corner"!
- Mike Brown
- Legend
- Posts: 1413
- Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 7:16 pm
- Location: King's Lynn
- Contact:
Re: What 'allowable words' rules would you like to have?
Feel free to wade in, John! I think to sum up what I personally think: we have to bear in mind that Countdown is first and foremost a TV programme, and it would probably generate complaints from viewers if it started to allow such seemingly nonsensical words as MANKINDS on a regular basis - a bit like the case for disallowing American spellings. (Actually, they get my goat anyway - every time I see colour without the 'u', my blood pressure rises!)John Douglas wrote:Mike, thank your for your very informative post.
(I realise what distinguished company I'm in, but I will wade in regardless... !)
It's good that the trend is now towards allowing more "sensible pluralisations" of mass nouns.
... lots of interesting stuff about the plurals of MANKIND and GUNFIRE ...
- Ian Volante
- Postmaster General
- Posts: 3971
- Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2008 8:15 pm
- Location: Edinburgh
- Contact:
Re: What 'allowable words' rules would you like to have?
Floopy.
Edit: Oh, I missed the word "rules" in the thread title.
As for diphthongs, as I understand it, being a Yorkshireman with a funny accent, I don't use a diphthong for words such as "gate". Is that correct Lucy?
Edit: Oh, I missed the word "rules" in the thread title.
As for diphthongs, as I understand it, being a Yorkshireman with a funny accent, I don't use a diphthong for words such as "gate". Is that correct Lucy?
meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles
-
- Rookie
- Posts: 91
- Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2008 8:10 pm
Re: What 'allowable words' rules would you like to have?
Sure.Charlie Reams wrote:Hum. I guess I don't understand what a diphthong is then. Can you elaborate?Lucy Gowers wrote:The 'A' in GATE is the diphthong 'ei'. I had to write a riveting paper on the subject as part of my English degree. My tutor was an OED lexicographer who described himself as "too ugly for dictionary corner"!
It’s all about gliding tongues. We articulate vowels by shaping the tongue in the mouth. A diphthong consists of the tongue gliding from one vowel position to a second vowel position in a single syllable so as to produce one continuous sound.
There’s six diphthongs in English: the sound found in eye, tired and hide; the sound in how, out and bowed; the sound in gate and hay; the sound in boat and no; the sound in boy and the sound in fury and pure.
-
- Acolyte
- Posts: 105
- Joined: Thu Oct 16, 2008 7:04 pm
Re: What 'allowable words' rules would you like to have?
Mike, I take your point.
Thanks!
Thanks!
-
- Rookie
- Posts: 91
- Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2008 8:10 pm
Re: What 'allowable words' rules would you like to have?
Absolutely right, Ian. I'm originally from Durham and we Mackems don't hold with diphthongal pronunciations for words like gate either. But I've lived in the South for over 20 years so I speak with a dull, characterless RP accent now.Ian Volante wrote:
As for diphthongs, as I understand it, being a Yorkshireman with a funny accent, I don't use a diphthong for words such as "gate". Is that correct Lucy?
- Charlie Reams
- Site Admin
- Posts: 9494
- Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm
- Location: Cambridge
- Contact:
Re: What 'allowable words' rules would you like to have?
That's pretty much what I thought, but I tried saying GATE earlier and couldn't feel my tongue moving. But I just spent a few happy minutes saying GATE with my finger in my mouth, and now I think I agree with you.Lucy Gowers wrote:Sure.Charlie Reams wrote:Hum. I guess I don't understand what a diphthong is then. Can you elaborate?Lucy Gowers wrote:The 'A' in GATE is the diphthong 'ei'. I had to write a riveting paper on the subject as part of my English degree. My tutor was an OED lexicographer who described himself as "too ugly for dictionary corner"!
It’s all about gliding tongues. We articulate vowels by shaping the tongue in the mouth. A diphthong consists of the tongue gliding from one vowel position to a second vowel position in a single syllable so as to produce one continuous sound
Re: What 'allowable words' rules would you like to have?
Yeah, "finger". Right.Charlie Reams wrote:That's pretty much what I thought, but I tried saying GATE earlier and couldn't feel my tongue moving. But I just spent a few happy minutes saying GATE with my finger in my mouth, and now I think I agree with you.
-
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 13346
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:37 pm
Re: What 'allowable words' rules would you like to have?
Really? When I say it, PURE = P - Y - some lengthened vowel sound that is unchanging.Lucy Gowers wrote:and the sound in fury and pure.
- Ian Volante
- Postmaster General
- Posts: 3971
- Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2008 8:15 pm
- Location: Edinburgh
- Contact:
Re: What 'allowable words' rules would you like to have?
A Mackem from Durham? Haway, now I'm confused...Lucy Gowers wrote:Absolutely right, Ian. I'm originally from Durham and we Mackems don't hold with diphthongal pronunciations for words like gate either. But I've lived in the South for over 20 years so I speak with a dull, characterless RP accent now.Ian Volante wrote:
As for diphthongs, as I understand it, being a Yorkshireman with a funny accent, I don't use a diphthong for words such as "gate". Is that correct Lucy?
meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles