Spoilers For 8 out of 10 Does Countdown (19th April 2013)
Moderator: James Robinson
- James Robinson
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 10580
- Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2009 5:38 pm
- Location: Mirfield, West Yorkshire
Spoilers For 8 out of 10 Does Countdown (19th April 2013)
After the amazing 2 vs. 2 match last week, the favourite Channel 4 fusion returns for another match, which promises to be of even higher quality than last week.
This matchup sees Lee Mack team up with Pointless legend Richard Osman and returning champion Jon Richardson partnering comic actor Stephen Mangan.
Joe Wilkinson will return as Rachel's "assistant" again, while German comedian Henning Wehn will be in Dictionary Corner with Susie.
I'll be around with the recap later.
This matchup sees Lee Mack team up with Pointless legend Richard Osman and returning champion Jon Richardson partnering comic actor Stephen Mangan.
Joe Wilkinson will return as Rachel's "assistant" again, while German comedian Henning Wehn will be in Dictionary Corner with Susie.
I'll be around with the recap later.
- James Robinson
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 10580
- Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2009 5:38 pm
- Location: Mirfield, West Yorkshire
Re: Spoilers For 8 out of 10 Does Countdown (19th April 2013
Nice S**TFACED error by Jimmy to start the show.
-
- Series 66 Champion
- Posts: 979
- Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2011 10:32 pm
- Location: Blackpool
- Andy Platt
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1091
- Joined: Wed Jul 13, 2011 3:00 pm
- Location: Wirral
Re: Spoilers For 8 out of 10 Does Countdown (19th April 2013
PROTESTER round 4 alternative 9
- James Robinson
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 10580
- Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2009 5:38 pm
- Location: Mirfield, West Yorkshire
Re: Spoilers For 8 out of 10 Does Countdown (19th April 2013
PROTESTER as an alternative 9 in round 5 even.Andy Platt wrote:PROTESTER round 4 alternative 9
- Andy Platt
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1091
- Joined: Wed Jul 13, 2011 3:00 pm
- Location: Wirral
Re: Spoilers For 8 out of 10 Does Countdown (19th April 2013
Erm, yeah you are right
- James Robinson
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 10580
- Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2009 5:38 pm
- Location: Mirfield, West Yorkshire
Re: Spoilers For 8 out of 10 Does Countdown (19th April 2013
I so thought that was a joke when someone told me that Rach drew a cock and balls on the board. You just live for seeing stuff like that
- Chris Philpot
- Acolyte
- Posts: 214
- Joined: Sat Jan 26, 2008 12:34 pm
- Location: West Sussex
- Contact:
Re: Spoilers For 8 out of 10 Does Countdown (19th April 2013
I just about burst a blood vessel when she asked, "Shall I write it up the shaft?"
- Andy Platt
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1091
- Joined: Wed Jul 13, 2011 3:00 pm
- Location: Wirral
Re: Spoilers For 8 out of 10 Does Countdown (19th April 2013
IDIOLECT in round 37 or whatever round we're up to now
- James Robinson
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 10580
- Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2009 5:38 pm
- Location: Mirfield, West Yorkshire
Re: Spoilers For 8 out of 10 Does Countdown (19th April 2013
Take away 30 and you're there, mate.Andy Platt wrote:IDIOLECT in round 37 or whatever round we're up to now
- Andy Platt
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1091
- Joined: Wed Jul 13, 2011 3:00 pm
- Location: Wirral
Re: Spoilers For 8 out of 10 Does Countdown (19th April 2013
Enjoyed that! But it wasn't as good as it was last week
- Rhys Benjamin
- Postmaster General
- Posts: 3107
- Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2010 4:28 pm
Re: Spoilers For 8 out of 10 Does Countdown (19th April 2013
Thank God for 4 +1.
I disagree with Andy, it was better than last week by some considerable margin. Joe Wilkinson looked bored to death though.
Glancing over the fact that both Lee Mack and Joe Wilkinson were moonlighting (Joe was on Have I Got News For You from 2100 to 2130, Lee on Not Going Out from 2130 to 2200), generally a lot better. Liked the fact that they were able to get more rounds in. Four numbers games did seem a bit much, though.
I don't like 8 out of 10 Cats and my family have never seen it. Certainly the lack of a consistent format wasn't helpful. There were times when I thought "get on with it", but I felt Richard Osman was certainly more serious (yay!) than Gilbert and Beckett last week.
Really didn't like Lee Hansfording/Gandiseeging (have we invented a term for a last-minute non-buzz?) on a crucial conundrum, when the close-ups showed that Jon and Stephen were actually trying.
Good performance from Jimmy Carr in the serious parts, although I think he's running out of distraction ideas. If he remained serious Nick Hewer would be leaving tomorrow. And I don't like Nick Hewer.
No random selections and ¬ (and for anyone whose computer is insufficient to read that, it's a sideways L which one can find to the left of the number 1 on the top row of a QWERTY keyboard + Shift) this week. Good.
I do think that in January 2012 and August 2012, Cats "fans" must have said there wasn't enough "KOMEDY!!! [sic]", but I feel it may have crossed the line into too little Countdown?
In all seriousness, I think Jon may be a half-decent player at this game when he was serious. Graeme said that numbers rounds generally generate two more points than letters, so it probably would have been something like 50 - 45 (depends which rounds you take out). To get 50 in a nine-round game is quite impressive. Not as impressive as 60, mind, but, still, decent. Max would have been 88, methinks, using this method, quite high for a nine-round game. Jon could consider applying for the real show if he takes it seriously... and if he's not playing an apterite/apterforumite.
So, decent, actually.
I disagree with Andy, it was better than last week by some considerable margin. Joe Wilkinson looked bored to death though.
Glancing over the fact that both Lee Mack and Joe Wilkinson were moonlighting (Joe was on Have I Got News For You from 2100 to 2130, Lee on Not Going Out from 2130 to 2200), generally a lot better. Liked the fact that they were able to get more rounds in. Four numbers games did seem a bit much, though.
I don't like 8 out of 10 Cats and my family have never seen it. Certainly the lack of a consistent format wasn't helpful. There were times when I thought "get on with it", but I felt Richard Osman was certainly more serious (yay!) than Gilbert and Beckett last week.
Really didn't like Lee Hansfording/Gandiseeging (have we invented a term for a last-minute non-buzz?) on a crucial conundrum, when the close-ups showed that Jon and Stephen were actually trying.
Good performance from Jimmy Carr in the serious parts, although I think he's running out of distraction ideas. If he remained serious Nick Hewer would be leaving tomorrow. And I don't like Nick Hewer.
No random selections and ¬ (and for anyone whose computer is insufficient to read that, it's a sideways L which one can find to the left of the number 1 on the top row of a QWERTY keyboard + Shift) this week. Good.
I do think that in January 2012 and August 2012, Cats "fans" must have said there wasn't enough "KOMEDY!!! [sic]", but I feel it may have crossed the line into too little Countdown?
In all seriousness, I think Jon may be a half-decent player at this game when he was serious. Graeme said that numbers rounds generally generate two more points than letters, so it probably would have been something like 50 - 45 (depends which rounds you take out). To get 50 in a nine-round game is quite impressive. Not as impressive as 60, mind, but, still, decent. Max would have been 88, methinks, using this method, quite high for a nine-round game. Jon could consider applying for the real show if he takes it seriously... and if he's not playing an apterite/apterforumite.
So, decent, actually.
- James Robinson
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 10580
- Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2009 5:38 pm
- Location: Mirfield, West Yorkshire
Re: Spoilers For 8 out of 10 Does Countdown (19th April 2013
I have it as 92 actually, Rhys.Rhys Benjamin wrote:Max would have been 88, methinks.
- Andy Platt
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1091
- Joined: Wed Jul 13, 2011 3:00 pm
- Location: Wirral
Re: Spoilers For 8 out of 10 Does Countdown (19th April 2013
Rhys, why can't you just relax and try to enjoy it for what it is, which is first comedy, then Countdown?
- Rhys Benjamin
- Postmaster General
- Posts: 3107
- Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2010 4:28 pm
Re: Spoilers For 8 out of 10 Does Countdown (19th April 2013
If it were that then it would be Hewer etc. in the Cats studio.Andy Platt wrote:Rhys, why can't you just relax and try to enjoy it for what it is, which is first comedy, then Countdown?
You may want to re-read my post...James Robinson wrote:I have it as 92 actually, Rhys.
-
- Devotee
- Posts: 621
- Joined: Thu Feb 21, 2013 11:50 pm
Re: Spoilers For 8 out of 10 Does Countdown (19th April 2013
I nearly spat all my wine out when she did that, class!James Robinson wrote:I so thought that was a joke when someone told me that Rach drew a cock and balls on the board. You just live for seeing stuff like that
-
- Devotee
- Posts: 621
- Joined: Thu Feb 21, 2013 11:50 pm
Re: Spoilers For 8 out of 10 Does Countdown (19th April 2013
Ditto!Chris Philpot wrote:I just about burst a blood vessel when she asked, "Shall I write it up the shaft?"
Re: Spoilers For 8 out of 10 Does Countdown (19th April 2013
Sure, but I think it's actually funnier when they try to take it at least semi-seriously. There's quite a fine balance which I think worked better this week than last week.Andy Platt wrote:Rhys, why can't you just relax and try to enjoy it for what it is, which is first comedy, then Countdown?
They can get rid of Joe Wilkinson completely as far as I'm concerned. And I got the DC-beater IDIOLECT as well (surely a professional lexicographer should know the word?).
- Andy Platt
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1091
- Joined: Wed Jul 13, 2011 3:00 pm
- Location: Wirral
Re: Spoilers For 8 out of 10 Does Countdown (19th April 2013
Yeah, Susie probably spots it if she puts 100% of her concentration into the round, but I think presentation etc is a bigger concern
-
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1462
- Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 7:33 pm
Re: Spoilers For 8 out of 10 Does Countdown (19th April 2013
You must be an absolute dream to teach.Rhys Benjamin wrote:Thank God for 4 +1.
I disagree with Andy, it was better than last week by some considerable margin. Joe Wilkinson looked bored to death though.
Glancing over the fact that both Lee Mack and Joe Wilkinson were moonlighting (Joe was on Have I Got News For You from 2100 to 2130, Lee on Not Going Out from 2130 to 2200), generally a lot better. Liked the fact that they were able to get more rounds in. Four numbers games did seem a bit much, though.
I don't like 8 out of 10 Cats and my family have never seen it. Certainly the lack of a consistent format wasn't helpful. There were times when I thought "get on with it", but I felt Richard Osman was certainly more serious (yay!) than Gilbert and Beckett last week.
Really didn't like Lee Hansfording/Gandiseeging (have we invented a term for a last-minute non-buzz?) on a crucial conundrum, when the close-ups showed that Jon and Stephen were actually trying.
Good performance from Jimmy Carr in the serious parts, although I think he's running out of distraction ideas. If he remained serious Nick Hewer would be leaving tomorrow. And I don't like Nick Hewer.
No random selections and ¬ (and for anyone whose computer is insufficient to read that, it's a sideways L which one can find to the left of the number 1 on the top row of a QWERTY keyboard + Shift) this week. Good.
I do think that in January 2012 and August 2012, Cats "fans" must have said there wasn't enough "KOMEDY!!! [sic]", but I feel it may have crossed the line into too little Countdown?
In all seriousness, I think Jon may be a half-decent player at this game when he was serious. Graeme said that numbers rounds generally generate two more points than letters, so it probably would have been something like 50 - 45 (depends which rounds you take out). To get 50 in a nine-round game is quite impressive. Not as impressive as 60, mind, but, still, decent. Max would have been 88, methinks, using this method, quite high for a nine-round game. Jon could consider applying for the real show if he takes it seriously... and if he's not playing an apterite/apterforumite.
So, decent, actually.
NB: Hansfording/ Gandiseeging is buzzing in almost immediately when the letters reveal themselves, what Lee did has been done countless times on the show. (in the CoC XIII final no less!)
Thought these last 2 shows have been superb!
-
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 13351
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:37 pm
Re: Spoilers For 8 out of 10 Does Countdown (19th April 2013
But you don't always get every word you know!Guy Barry wrote:And I got the DC-beater IDIOLECT as well (surely a professional lexicographer should know the word?)
Maybe he was referring to Charlie going for GANDISEEG right at the end in his CofC game - that sort of thing probably does need a name though.Eoin Monaghan wrote:NB: Hansfording/ Gandiseeging is buzzing in almost immediately when the letters reveal themselves, what Lee did has been done countless times on the show. (in the CoC XIII final no less!)
Yeah, definitely, although some people's reaction (in the posts above) to the cock and balls and writing on it seems a bit like they've never seen anything funny before.Eoin Monaghan wrote:Thought these last 2 shows have been superb!
- Rhys Benjamin
- Postmaster General
- Posts: 3107
- Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2010 4:28 pm
Re: Spoilers For 8 out of 10 Does Countdown (19th April 2013
I think the fact that he buzzed at the death in a crucial conundrum is pushing it too far. Jon and Stephen were clearly trying to spot it.Eoin Monaghan wrote:NB: Hansfording/ Gandiseeging is buzzing in almost immediately when the letters reveal themselves, what Lee did has been done countless times on the show. (in the CoC XIII final no less!)
-
- Rookie
- Posts: 31
- Joined: Wed Mar 13, 2013 9:46 pm
Re: Spoilers For 8 out of 10 Does Countdown (19th April 2013
If it's right at the last second, then I don't see too much of a problem. In a regular episode people have done it. Chris Davies more or less did so to defeat Innis Carson in Series 61. In the nicest possible way Rhys, your posts aren't going to change anything. Just let it go.I think the fact that he buzzed at the death in a crucial conundrum is pushing it too far. Jon and Stephen were clearly trying to spot it.
Last edited by James Roper on Sun Apr 21, 2013 4:21 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1462
- Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 7:33 pm
Re: Spoilers For 8 out of 10 Does Countdown (19th April 2013
Oh lordy.Rhys Benjamin wrote:I think the fact that he buzzed at the death in a crucial conundrum is pushing it too far. Jon and Stephen were clearly trying to spot it.Eoin Monaghan wrote:NB: Hansfording/ Gandiseeging is buzzing in almost immediately when the letters reveal themselves, what Lee did has been done countless times on the show. (in the CoC XIII final no less!)
I'm just gonna emulate what James said, it's a comedy show, it's intended to be comedic, let it go.
SLEEPSUIT.