Graeme Cole wrote:Rhys Benjamin wrote:I hate to say it, but I told you so... they seem to be doing as little Countdown as possible.
It's not meant to be taken seriously. They're comedians doing a mashup with a comedy panel show. You don't book a bunch of professional comedians and just have them play a word game and make the occasional humorous quip as time allows. The comedy has to be made a big part of the whole thing, as that's why most people are watching it.
Rhys Benjamin wrote:James: a request - for that horrible round where they're putting up the letters randomly, can you put the selection as the "true" Countdown version.
Why is the order in which the letters were picked any more "true" than the order in which they were displayed?
I really enjoyed the very first edition of these "mash-ups" in January 2012. There, I think they managed to get the balance, if you will, just right between Countdown and comedy. The second one, shown last August, was a little bit too silly for my liking, and this one was going over the edge.
Put it this way:
January '12 - 7 rounds in 24 mins.
August '12 - 10 rounds in 48 mins.
April '13 - 8 rounds in 48 mins.
I appreciate it's not a "real" game of Countdown, but it seems as if they want to do as little Countdown as possible. I personally don't like 8 out of 10 Cats, and only watch this for the Countdown (and for the fact that Nick Hewer's not presenting...).
Or to put it another way:
Normal Countdown - 2.4 mins per round.
Jan '12 - 3.4 mins per round.
Aug '12 - 4.8 mins per round.
Apr '13 - 6 mins per round.
So in the time it almost takes "normal" Countdown to do three rounds, this mash-up only does one.