Spoilers for Friday June 8th 2012 (Series 66 Prelim 104)

Discuss anything that happened in recent games. This is the place to post any words you got that beat Dictionary Corner, or numbers games that evaded Rachel.

Moderator: James Robinson

Post Reply
Jordan F
Kiloposter
Posts: 1063
Joined: Sun Jun 20, 2010 11:01 pm

Spoilers for Friday June 8th 2012 (Series 66 Prelim 104)

Post by Jordan F »

Ben Nicholson is up to 3 wins, which in this series' past may have been enough to creep into the top 8, but for now, he'll certainly need the 4th, and almost definitely need the 5th as well. Can he get the 4th today? One person who will not be rooting for him is Rob Gibney, who I believe guarantees himself a spot in the finals if Ben loses. It's also the end of Alastair Stewart, who while certainly not terrible, I remember him being better in other appearances in my opinion.

Join Thomas for the recap later.
User avatar
Andy Platt
Kiloposter
Posts: 1091
Joined: Wed Jul 13, 2011 3:00 pm
Location: Wirral

Re: Spoilers for Friday June 8th 2012 (Series 66 Prelim 104)

Post by Andy Platt »

I'll do it. MALONATES in round 9
User avatar
Tony Atkins
Fanatic
Posts: 2237
Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2010 3:19 pm
Location: Reading
Contact:

Re: Spoilers for Friday June 8th 2012 (Series 66 Prelim 104)

Post by Tony Atkins »

Jordan F wrote:It's also the end of Alastair Stewart, who while certainly not terrible, I remember him being better in other appearances in my opinion.
Better contestants too last year! ;)
CO-MSO every August
CO:Rea 20th April 2024
User avatar
James Robinson
Post-apocalypse
Posts: 10580
Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2009 5:38 pm
Location: Mirfield, West Yorkshire

Re: Spoilers for Friday June 8th 2012 (Series 66 Prelim 104)

Post by James Robinson »

AMOSITE in round 2 and ASSORTED in round 11.

Bring on Jonathan Rawlinson on Monday :!: ;) :) :D :mrgreen: 8-)
Jordan F
Kiloposter
Posts: 1063
Joined: Sun Jun 20, 2010 11:01 pm

Re: Spoilers for Friday June 8th 2012 (Series 66 Prelim 104)

Post by Jordan F »

Interesting situation Monday as well, if Ben wins, he's in the finals for sure (he'd be at least number 7 seed), and if he loses, Rob Gibney is in.
User avatar
James Robinson
Post-apocalypse
Posts: 10580
Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2009 5:38 pm
Location: Mirfield, West Yorkshire

Re: Spoilers for Friday June 8th 2012 (Series 66 Prelim 104)

Post by James Robinson »

Jordan F wrote:Interesting situation Monday as well, if Ben wins, he's in the finals for sure (he'd be at least number 7 seed), and if he loses, Rob Gibney is in.
Indeed, and if this week wasn't weird enough, the buzzers weren't buzzed this week either, as all 5 conundrums went to the audience without being guessed at :!: :shock: :o
Keith Bennett
Acolyte
Posts: 154
Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2011 11:26 am
Location: Kent

Re: Spoilers for Friday June 8th 2012 (Series 66 Prelim 104)

Post by Keith Bennett »

Tony Atkins wrote:
Jordan F wrote:It's also the end of Alastair Stewart, who while certainly not terrible, I remember him being better in other appearances in my opinion.
Better contestants too last year! ;)

Indeed Tony. For you may recall the controversy that surrounded Phyl Style's appearance. At the point she played her first game she was unable to make the seedings for that series, but her results weren't carried over to the current one. Having been unfortunate enough to come up against Jack in her 7th(?) game she lost out entirely, and wrongly so in my view.

Had she been included in the current series I'm guessing she would have been around 5th or 6th seed.
Jack Worsley
Series 66 Champion
Posts: 979
Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2011 10:32 pm
Location: Blackpool

Re: Spoilers for Friday June 8th 2012 (Series 66 Prelim 104)

Post by Jack Worsley »

In round 13, the challenger had BUSING disallowed but it's valid on apterous and I've checked the dictionary and it's in! If that had been allowed, it would have gone to a crucial conundrum, assuming they'd both still have got the final numbers game. Don't know why Susie didn't at least check it.
User avatar
Innis Carson
Devotee
Posts: 898
Joined: Sat Nov 15, 2008 3:24 pm

Re: Spoilers for Friday June 8th 2012 (Series 66 Prelim 104)

Post by Innis Carson »

Jack Worsley wrote:In round 13, the challenger had BUSING disallowed but it's valid on apterous and I've checked the dictionary and it's in! If that had been allowed, it would have gone to a crucial conundrum, assuming they'd both still have got the final numbers game. Don't know why Susie didn't at least check it.
I thought he said BOSSING, but it is ambiguous. Hopefully this was checked more thoroughly in the original take.
User avatar
Graeme Cole
Series 65 Champion
Posts: 2048
Joined: Tue Jul 06, 2010 9:59 pm

Re: Spoilers for Friday June 8th 2012 (Series 66 Prelim 104)

Post by Graeme Cole »

Innis Carson wrote:
Jack Worsley wrote:In round 13, the challenger had BUSING disallowed but it's valid on apterous and I've checked the dictionary and it's in! If that had been allowed, it would have gone to a crucial conundrum, assuming they'd both still have got the final numbers game. Don't know why Susie didn't at least check it.
I thought he said BOSSING, but it is ambiguous. Hopefully this was checked more thoroughly in the original take.
Sounds like BUSING to me. In Susie's defence if I'd been in DC I probably wouldn't have checked it either, because I'd have thought it's obviously BUSSING.
Peter Mabey
Kiloposter
Posts: 1123
Joined: Sat Mar 01, 2008 3:15 pm
Location: Harlow

Re: Spoilers for Friday June 8th 2012 (Series 66 Prelim 104)

Post by Peter Mabey »

I thought BUSING is the U.S. variant, as I'd only seen it used in reports from there :?
Gavin Chipper
Post-apocalypse
Posts: 13346
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:37 pm

Re: Spoilers for Friday June 8th 2012 (Series 66 Prelim 104)

Post by Gavin Chipper »

Graeme Cole wrote:
Innis Carson wrote:
Jack Worsley wrote:In round 13, the challenger had BUSING disallowed but it's valid on apterous and I've checked the dictionary and it's in! If that had been allowed, it would have gone to a crucial conundrum, assuming they'd both still have got the final numbers game. Don't know why Susie didn't at least check it.
I thought he said BOSSING, but it is ambiguous. Hopefully this was checked more thoroughly in the original take.
Sounds like BUSING to me. In Susie's defence if I'd been in DC I probably wouldn't have checked it either, because I'd have thought it's obviously BUSSING.
Didn't watch this, but Susie should check every word that she's going to disallow. Anything else would be not doing her job.
User avatar
Graeme Cole
Series 65 Champion
Posts: 2048
Joined: Tue Jul 06, 2010 9:59 pm

Re: Spoilers for Friday June 8th 2012 (Series 66 Prelim 104)

Post by Graeme Cole »

Gavin Chipper wrote:
Graeme Cole wrote:
Innis Carson wrote:I thought he said BOSSING, but it is ambiguous. Hopefully this was checked more thoroughly in the original take.
Sounds like BUSING to me. In Susie's defence if I'd been in DC I probably wouldn't have checked it either, because I'd have thought it's obviously BUSSING.
Didn't watch this, but Susie should check every word that she's going to disallow. Anything else would be not doing her job.
You're right, I'm not saying it wasn't a mistake to disallow it (go quadruple negative!), all I'm saying is that it was an understandable one to make. I find it surprising that BUSING is in the dictionary.
Martin Long
Acolyte
Posts: 246
Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2010 12:24 pm
Location: Redcar, UK
Contact:

Re: Spoilers for Friday June 8th 2012 (Series 66 Prelim 104)

Post by Martin Long »

I think I pencilled BUSING on Apterous, so I was quite surprised when this was disallowed.
Post Reply