Enjoy the show and feel free to compare, taunt, laugh at, sexually objectify and otherwise have fun at Karen's expense here

Moderators: JackHurst, Lesley Hines
Utterly excruciating is how I'd describe it!Michael Wallace wrote:OH MY GOD YES.
I am *so* looking forward to her banter. (srsly, the contestant/chaser banter is by far the best thing about that show - utterly hilarious)
No, it was never mentioned! It was probably in the rules we were given but who reads those?Michael Wallace wrote:Good stuff so far. Karen - did they tell you what happens if everyone gets caught?
Fair enough, I'm just really curious to know what they'd do. (Also, when we did Pointless they made us listen to them reading out the (very long) rules all the way through!).Karen Pearson wrote:No, it was never mentioned! It was probably in the rules we were given but who reads those?Michael Wallace wrote:Good stuff so far. Karen - did they tell you what happens if everyone gets caught?
Michael Wallace wrote:(Anyone who's read this far into the thread deserves spoilers anyway, but I'll spoiler-colour it just in case)
Awesome stuff, Karen. Not many teams manage to get the money, and I thought you weren't going to manage it when you only set a target of 21 (that's seemed a fairly easy target so far this seris), but she had an absolute mare near the start and never recovered. Out of interest - did that Bill guy contribute anything to the final? I don't remember him getting anything at all (which, if true means he just cost you guys money).
Yes, they did that to us too but I was busy revising my daily newspaper editors in my head!!Michael Wallace wrote:Fair enough, I'm just really curious to know what they'd do. (Also, when we did Pointless they made us listen to them reading out the (very long) rules all the way through!).Karen Pearson wrote:No, it was never mentioned! It was probably in the rules we were given but who reads those?Michael Wallace wrote:Good stuff so far. Karen - did they tell you what happens if everyone gets caught?
Will watch once my flatmates are up: had someone complain because I was watching something at the ungodly hour of noon while they were trying to sleep.Lesley Hines wrote:Can't believe no-one's had the decency to post a link!
Well done, Karen. Thanks for the text, Dinos. I was sat in a hotel in Bolton bored so it was an excellent way to pass the time.Ryan Taylor wrote:I'm up early on a Sunday and have just finished watching you having finally got round to it! Excellent stuff Karen, definitely the best contestant there in every way and I had a sneaky feeling that you'd won before the show just from the minor chat in aptochat. The Scottish bloke weren't too bad either despite him getting that Edinburgh question wrong, which I was clueless about too. The other two didn't really pull their weight but as you say it is the nature of the show and Bill did get you 2 moves up the endgame and young lass put £5,000 in the kitty. Well done Karen!
Thanks guys.Rich Priest wrote:Finally got round to watching this, nice one KarenWell done.And FWIW I didn't think you were ?? age
I'm surprised you didn't bump into a couple more forumites there as there were two others auditioning yesterday! Could be a bumper series for Countdowners on Pointless!Ryan Taylor wrote:I went to an audition for Pointless yesterday.
Dinos I believe auditioned yesterday at the same place as me but I didn't know this until I got back and saw his facebook page. So we missed each other by about 2 hours.Karen Pearson wrote:I'm surprised you didn't bump into a couple more forumites there as there were two others auditioning yesterday! Could be a bumper series for Countdowners on Pointless!Ryan Taylor wrote:I went to an audition for Pointless yesterday.
DoneKaren Pearson wrote:Thanks guys.Rich Priest wrote:Finally got round to watching this, nice one KarenWell done.And FWIW I didn't think you were ?? age
But Rich! Some people had missed the age bit! Any chance you could edit your post please!!!
What a gentleman!! Thank you!Rich Priest wrote:DoneKaren Pearson wrote:Thanks guys.Rich Priest wrote:Finally got round to watching this, nice one KarenWell done.And FWIW I didn't think you were ?? age
But Rich! Some people had missed the age bit! Any chance you could edit your post please!!!
Yeah me and Rich were in the 2-4 audition. Would've been cool to hook up in the morning had I known you'd been there, although I was pretty fucked from post-exam celebrations the night before so maybe not the best idea. Anyway text me next time you're in my cityRyan Taylor wrote:Dinos I believe auditioned yesterday at the same place as me but I didn't know this until I got back and saw his facebook page. So we missed each other by about 2 hours.Karen Pearson wrote:I'm surprised you didn't bump into a couple more forumites there as there were two others auditioning yesterday! Could be a bumper series for Countdowners on Pointless!Ryan Taylor wrote:I went to an audition for Pointless yesterday.
I would need your number again!. I lost my contacts after an awful Thursday night. I dropped my mobile in the toilet which I had vomited in and then proceeded to fish it out. It didn't work after that.Dinos Sfyris wrote:Yeah me and Rich were in the 2-4 audition. Would've been cool to hook up in the morning had I known you'd been there, although I was pretty fucked from post-exam celebrations the night before so maybe not the best idea. Anyway text me next time you're in my cityRyan Taylor wrote: Dinos I believe auditioned yesterday at the same place as me but I didn't know this until I got back and saw his facebook page. So we missed each other by about 2 hours.
Funnily enough I watched it today whilst practising my darts...I wouldn't usually watch it. Was quite fun to watch.Eoin Monaghan wrote:Very good show today.
RacistRyan Taylor wrote:smug Irish twat
Definitely not my topic Ryan! That git Dinos started it. I was trying to play it all low-key!!Ryan Taylor wrote: Edit: And sorry for posting this in your topic Karen!
...you win the money?Jon O'Neill wrote:It was a fun show, I liked CF on here unlike real life where he's an utter prick.
How does the end bit work when they beat her?
It's split equally regardless of who puts what into the kitty.Michael Wallace wrote:...you win the money?Jon O'Neill wrote:It was a fun show, I liked CF on here unlike real life where he's an utter prick.
How does the end bit work when they beat her?
Oh right, yeah. This is why CF went low - there's not much point risking it when you only want £1500 to go on holidayRyan Taylor wrote:It's split equally regardless of who puts what into the kitty.Michael Wallace wrote:...you win the money?Jon O'Neill wrote:It was a fun show, I liked CF on here unlike real life where he's an utter prick.
How does the end bit work when they beat her?
Like SHOES or PONIES?Matt Morrison wrote:Heather wants to talk to CF about Japan. I might talk to you about something else while they are chatting Michael.
I think so, and they brought a contestant back who was picked by the team.Matt Morrison wrote:Was the Chaser taking the piss today? Just seemed like he was letting her win. Insane number of messed up questions, real easy stuff like the Nike/Adidas one.
Conspiracytastic.
I wonder if he's even allowed to beat all four contestants in the prelims, too? Has it happened before?
As a new viewer I may be missing something here but if no one gets through the prelims wouldn't there be no jackpot to play for.Eoin Monaghan wrote:I think so, and they brought a contestant back who was picked by the team.Matt Morrison wrote:Was the Chaser taking the piss today? Just seemed like he was letting her win. Insane number of messed up questions, real easy stuff like the Nike/Adidas one.
Conspiracytastic.
I wonder if he's even allowed to beat all four contestants in the prelims, too? Has it happened before?
Nah, Eoin is right. If everyone is caught they bring back a contestant and specify some arbitrary jackpot for them to go for. It happened in episode 5 of this series, apparently.Mark James wrote:I'd never seen this show before as I have an aversion to ITV but I must say it's really good.
As a new viewer I may be missing something here but if no one gets through the prelims wouldn't there be no jackpot to play for.Eoin Monaghan wrote:I think so, and they brought a contestant back who was picked by the team.Matt Morrison wrote:Was the Chaser taking the piss today? Just seemed like he was letting her win. Insane number of messed up questions, real easy stuff like the Nike/Adidas one.
Conspiracytastic.
I wonder if he's even allowed to beat all four contestants in the prelims, too? Has it happened before?
I think it's £4000, equivalent of £1000 each.Joseph Krol wrote:I think they get £1000.
Didn't see it but who was it? Shaun or Mark? There have been times before when it looks a little suspect when they get one wrong, the type of question that they would undoubtedly have come across in their many years of quizzing. It always seems to happen at an important point too e.g. needs to get one wrong so that the guy stays in the game. Mircaulously the guy who would have been caught proceeds to the final.Matt Morrison wrote:Meh, that's pretty shit I reckon. Feels wrong.
But yeah - anyone agree he was being almost deliberately bad yesterday? Did seem dodgy.
This was for the final chase, with one left. It was Mark. The Nike/Adidas question was which sportswear manufacturer's motto is "Just Do It". You can't get that wrong.Ryan Taylor wrote:Didn't see it but who was it? Shaun or Mark? There have been times before when it looks a little suspect when they get one wrong, the type of question that they would undoubtedly have come across in their many years of quizzing. It always seems to happen at an important point too e.g. needs to get one wrong so that the guy stays in the game. Mircaulously the guy who would have been caught proceeds to the final.Matt Morrison wrote:Meh, that's pretty shit I reckon. Feels wrong.
But yeah - anyone agree he was being almost deliberately bad yesterday? Did seem dodgy.
I have no interest in expensive trainers, so had to Google for the answerMatt Morrison wrote: The Nike/Adidas question was which sportswear manufacturer's motto is "Just Do It". You can't get that wrong.
Nor do I.Peter Mabey wrote:I have no interest in expensive trainers, so had to Google for the answerMatt Morrison wrote: The Nike/Adidas question was which sportswear manufacturer's motto is "Just Do It". You can't get that wrong.![]()
![]()
I have an anecdote about Nike trainers. My friend who is at Derby university got extremely pissed before a night out (pre-drinks) so that he was considered too drunk to go out and was left at the house. After getting back around 4am he wasn't in the house any more and only reappeared at 11am the next morning wearing what looked like a new Helly Hansen jacket and some very white trainers.Matt Morrison wrote:Nor do I.Peter Mabey wrote:I have no interest in expensive trainers, so had to Google for the answerMatt Morrison wrote: The Nike/Adidas question was which sportswear manufacturer's motto is "Just Do It". You can't get that wrong.![]()
![]()