SALUTES?Jon Corby wrote:I liked Gareth, but... seven eh? Using the 'S' twice? (Was there one?) Certainly had a whiff of fudge about it...
Search found 2018 matches
- Tue Jul 05, 2011 8:51 pm
- Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
- Topic: Spoilers For Tuesday July 5th 2011
- Replies: 17
- Views: 2458
Re: Spoilers For Tuesday July 5th 2011
- Tue Jul 05, 2011 8:44 pm
- Forum: apterous.org
- Topic: Words You Would Have Thought...
- Replies: 479
- Views: 183693
Re: Words You Would Have Thought...
RANDIER is allowed.Jennifer Steadman wrote:and, carrying on the sex note, 'RANDIER' - how is 'RANDIEST' allowed but not its comparative version? OUTRAGEOUS
(Edit: looks like you had it disallowed earlier, but that's because there wasn't an N.)
- Mon Jul 04, 2011 7:42 pm
- Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
- Topic: Spoilers For Monday July 4th 2011
- Replies: 13
- Views: 1932
Re: Spoilers For Monday July 4th 2011
Very surprised about DISTILL^ being a US-only spelling.
Also, has anyone else noticed that we're into the fifth week of the series and there hasn't been a female contestant yet?
Also, has anyone else noticed that we're into the fifth week of the series and there hasn't been a female contestant yet?
- Thu Jun 30, 2011 10:47 pm
- Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
- Topic: Thursday 30th June Spoilers
- Replies: 17
- Views: 2542
Re: Thursday 30th June Spoilers
What happened to the incorrect thing with the conundrum? That was good. I'm not sure why they didn't use the Conundral Corbometer this time. Perhaps while it's still a new idea that might not be expected by the contestants they want to avoid using it on crucials. Otherwise Andrew might have thought...
- Thu Jun 30, 2011 8:54 pm
- Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
- Topic: Thursday 30th June Spoilers
- Replies: 17
- Views: 2542
Re: Thursday 30th June Spoilers
What happened to the incorrect thing with the conundrum? That was good. I'm not sure why they didn't use the Conundral Corbometer this time. Perhaps while it's still a new idea that might not be expected by the contestants they want to avoid using it on crucials. Otherwise Andrew might have thought...
- Sun Jun 26, 2011 3:07 pm
- Forum: apterous.org
- Topic: 2011 Summer Knockout (Sign Ups)
- Replies: 54
- Views: 11081
Re: 2011 Summer Knockout (Sign Ups)
Open, please. Rating is 1616.
- Fri Jun 24, 2011 6:54 pm
- Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
- Topic: Spoilers For Friday June 24th 2011
- Replies: 32
- Views: 5044
Re: Spoilers For Friday June 24th 2011
Fantastic performance from both contestants today. I'd have been beaten by either of them. Matt and Andrew maxed every round between them. BTW, HEARTING isn't in Lexplorer as being a valid word. I didn't think it was when I heard it said either, but there you go........., or is it :?: HEART is defin...
- Thu Jun 23, 2011 7:01 pm
- Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
- Topic: Wednesday 22nd June Spoilers
- Replies: 17
- Views: 4551
Re: Wednesday 22nd June Spoilers
I know the "INCORRECT" thing has been suggested a few times before... But what I want to know is, what are they going to do if the scramble is INTERCROC ? Ahem. Yeah, these were my thoughts too, basically "why have it going the same way both times as that surely requires an edit - wh...
- Wed Jun 22, 2011 7:13 pm
- Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
- Topic: Wednesday 22nd June Spoilers
- Replies: 17
- Views: 4551
Re: Wednesday 22nd June Spoilers
I know the "INCORRECT" thing has been suggested a few times before, but it still caught me by surprise. When Jeff said "let's take a look", I thought, "oh, I didn't know you could spell SHREDDING with an A" and then it came up "INCORRECT". The answer flippythi...
- Thu Jun 16, 2011 9:08 pm
- Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
- Topic: Spoilers For Thursday June 16th 2011
- Replies: 16
- Views: 4487
Re: Spoilers For Thursday June 16th 2011
Thanks everyone. The whole thing was a fantastically enjoyable experience as soon as I entered the studio, even that fifth game where I genuinely thought I'd lost it after R10. As for TROIKA, I think that was the only time I deliberately went for an obscure word over a common one, and it was entirel...
- Thu Jun 16, 2011 7:33 am
- Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
- Topic: Spoilers For Wednesday June 15th 2011
- Replies: 16
- Views: 3829
Re: Spoilers For Wednesday June 15th 2011
RESAMPLE not being good is a travesty, unless it's only hyphenated, and even then most statisticians call it resampling, without the hyphen. It basically means what it sounds -- when you have a small data set, you can "resample" in order to get a better idea of the distribution. It isn't ...
- Wed Jun 15, 2011 6:33 pm
- Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
- Topic: Spoilers For Wednesday June 15th 2011
- Replies: 16
- Views: 3829
Re: Spoilers For Wednesday June 15th 2011
He delivered his solution so confidently that for a moment I thought I was the one who'd cocked up.Ben Hunter wrote:Second numbers was painful to watch. I can imagine doing something similar if I was on.
- Tue Jun 14, 2011 11:06 pm
- Forum: apterous.org
- Topic: Feature requests
- Replies: 1956
- Views: 476550
Re: Feature requests
Secondly, in Lexplorer if a word's a conundrum could it please display the difficulty somewhere obvious at the top, rather than having to find it as a conundrum in a game, to find out you spent 28.7 seconds on a gypsum in games without stones awarded? The "conundrum search" feature alread...
- Mon Jun 13, 2011 8:44 pm
- Forum: Countdown - General
- Topic: "Laxadaisical"
- Replies: 8
- Views: 1830
Re: "Laxadaisical"
Is it just me or do people get the word lackadaisical wrong so often that it might as well actually be laxadaisical? You could make the same argument for "perculator", "anenome", "Febuary", "seccetry", "haitch", "goverment" and hundreds mo...
- Mon Jun 13, 2011 7:06 pm
- Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
- Topic: Spoilers For Monday June 13th 2011
- Replies: 25
- Views: 5158
Re: Spoilers For Monday June 13th 2011
I think it must be difficult to concentrate game after game, because Graeme missed a couple of easy spots, but he pulled it around big time. Shame about Graham. He'd have beaten most other competitors. Yes, it does get tiring - this one was in the morning after not much sleep, and the previous day'...
- Mon Jun 13, 2011 6:41 pm
- Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
- Topic: Spoilers For Monday June 13th 2011
- Replies: 25
- Views: 5158
Re: Spoilers For Monday June 13th 2011
Goodness knows. I didn't bring anyone with me. The monitor at the far corner of the studio, I think.Marcus Hares wrote:Graeme - who were you keeping your fingers crossed to during the GRAINIEST round?
- Mon Jun 13, 2011 5:51 pm
- Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
- Topic: Spoilers For Monday June 13th 2011
- Replies: 25
- Views: 5158
Re: Spoilers For Monday June 13th 2011
FEINTER was also disallowed when Jonathan Coles offered it against Jon Corby in the last CoC, but like Jono I'm not sure why lines shouldn't be FEINTER than other lines either... :? Well done Graeme, good run. Thanks. I think the word FEINT refers to the paper itself, the fact that it's got lines o...
- Mon Jun 13, 2011 3:27 pm
- Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
- Topic: Spoilers For Monday June 13th 2011
- Replies: 25
- Views: 5158
Re: Spoilers For Monday June 13th 2011
Nice one Graeme. Good contest. Glad you got the con and thus won by 19 points too, meaning your opponent's missing GRAINIEST became just a trivial matter rather than a game-changing moment of blindness. Cheers. I nearly didn't spot GRAINIEST myself. I had INGRATES and TASERING, then saw GRAINIEST a...
- Mon Jun 13, 2011 2:27 pm
- Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
- Topic: Spoilers For Monday June 13th 2011
- Replies: 25
- Views: 5158
Re: Spoilers For Monday June 13th 2011
Apterous seems to think FEINTER is fine, who's right? Knew this would come up. :-) I really don't know. FEINT, as well as being a verb, is also an adjective denoting writing paper with lines on it (you might buy a pad of "feint ruled" paper). It's one syllable, which suggests you should a...
- Sat Jun 11, 2011 3:29 pm
- Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
- Topic: Spoilers For Friday June 10th 2011
- Replies: 28
- Views: 5642
Re: Spoilers For Friday June 10th 2011
There must have been a small audience that day, as, yes Ryan, the lady behind the conundrum solver was Yvonne, who helps Saralee usher us around so they must have "doughnutted" as they say in Parliament. The girl on the right is also one of Saralee's little helpers. Yes, there weren't man...
- Sat Jun 11, 2011 2:58 pm
- Forum: apterous.org
- Topic: Bug reports
- Replies: 2157
- Views: 492418
Re: Bug reports
For vital and important reasons of immature humour I wanted to find the game from ages ago where my opponent had STAINED and I had PANTIES. When I searched for STAINED and PANTIES in Lexplorer to get it to show me games where they'd been offered, the list of games it returned didn't go back far enou...
- Sat Jun 11, 2011 9:43 am
- Forum: apterous.org
- Topic: Bug reports
- Replies: 2157
- Views: 492418
Re: Bug reports
I think it's about time the rules for unlimited were changed, or at least remove the "aegilops" rules from the rules page on unlimited. Yet again for a duel I've clicked on rules, realise I have to find a 9 letter word then fail to find it. Then the answer tells me it was just a 7 and I'v...
- Thu Jun 09, 2011 6:12 pm
- Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
- Topic: Spoilers For Thursday June 9th 2011
- Replies: 11
- Views: 4420
Re: Spoilers For Thursday June 9th 2011
The decision to disallow OUTSETS wasn't made on a whim. Susie and Damian discussed it during the cut before the last numbers round, and again just before the next game. Basically, OUTSET is listed in the dictionary as a noun "in singular". At the front of the dictionary it says this means ...
- Tue Jun 07, 2011 7:32 pm
- Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
- Topic: Spoilers For Tuesday June 7th 2011
- Replies: 24
- Views: 4520
Re: Spoilers For Tuesday June 7th 2011
Thanks for all the comments, everyone. Nerves probably didn't show because I was just enjoying the experience of doing something I'd wanted to do for years. Also I'm proud to have got a record (even an esoteric one that takes a while to say), thanks Marcus. :-) Things I've learned: I sound like *tha...
- Sat Jun 04, 2011 8:53 pm
- Forum: Countdown - General
- Topic: Who Do You Want In The COC?
- Replies: 24
- Views: 4451
Re: Who Do You Want In The COC?
A 17-player tournament? Now there's a novel idea.Douglas Wilson wrote:Kirk, Chris, Oliver, Jack, Ed, plus 65 winner would presumebly be dead certs. Leaving 11 positions left.
[/pedant]
- Sat Jun 04, 2011 8:48 pm
- Forum: Countdown - General
- Topic: Who Do You Want In The COC?
- Replies: 24
- Views: 4451
Re: Who Do You Want In The COC?
I'm pretty sure they said that since everyone is now so good, a 15-episode CoC is too long. I can see them doing a shorter one though. Maybe have a week-long one (like CoC X) featuring just the winners from Series 60 through 65? It's an interesting idea, but a week-long tournament containing only t...
- Fri Jun 03, 2011 9:31 pm
- Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
- Topic: Spoilers for Friday June 3rd 2011
- Replies: 35
- Views: 8419
Re: Spoilers for Friday June 3rd 2011
Congratulations Ed, and commiserations Adam; both outstanding players. Really had no idea who was going to win this one, you'd both performed so well in previous games.
I had MATINESS in R7. Somehow overlooked MEATINESS.
I had MATINESS in R7. Somehow overlooked MEATINESS.
- Fri Jun 03, 2011 7:23 pm
- Forum: Countdown - General
- Topic: 7 not written down
- Replies: 11
- Views: 3251
Re: 7 not written down
I think they're both given a few seconds to write it down. Then they do a retake so you never see that bit.
- Thu Jun 02, 2011 8:02 am
- Forum: Countdown - General
- Topic: Insofar
- Replies: 5
- Views: 2202
Re: Insofar
INSOFAR was accepted, not for the first time, on yesterday's show. I'm made to wonder: How exactly does the ODE list this word? I wonder because it seems to me that it exists only as "insofar as", not as a word in its own right. Generally, pseudowords like this haven't been accepted - for...
- Wed Jun 01, 2011 7:57 am
- Forum: Countdown - Current recaps
- Topic: Tuesday 31 May 2011 (Series 64, Quarter Final 4)
- Replies: 30
- Views: 3056
Re: Tuesday 31 May 2011 (Series 64, Quarter Final 4)
Not quite. Ned did 75*10-(3-100/50) in the first numbers round. And DOTAGE has got an O in it.Rhys Benjamin wrote:IS EVERYBODY HAPPY NOW
Christ above, it's bad enough with no subtitles and wikicapping all this week as well in the absence of James!
- Tue May 31, 2011 7:14 pm
- Forum: Countdown - Current recaps
- Topic: Tuesday 31 May 2011 (Series 64, Quarter Final 4)
- Replies: 30
- Views: 3056
Re: Tuesday 31 May 2011 (Series 64, Quarter Final 4)
Round 9: G O H A E X D K T NP: oathed AM: HOAXED (6) DC: GOATED (6) OT: KATHODE (7) DOM: 6 Score: 55–47 (max 66, DC Max 62) Pretty sure they said DOTAGE Nah, I watched it with some friends. They all got GOATED and were over the moon when DC said GOATED. Nope. I've just watched that bit again, and G...
- Mon May 30, 2011 6:44 pm
- Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
- Topic: Spoilers for Monday May 30th 2011
- Replies: 27
- Views: 4575
Re: Spoilers for Monday May 30th 2011
JR style: Just ROSETTED and TETRODES in Round 13 today. :D :) ;) :o :shock: :ugeek: :mrgreen: :geek: Pre-game stats: Firstly, No.3 Seed Tom Barnes - 8 Wins, 822 Points Highest Score: 123 vs. Stuart Pecksen (3rd Game) Lowest Score: 86 vs. Brian Gale (7th Game) 9's Achieved: 0/3 Total Points/Max/%: 8...
- Fri May 27, 2011 8:35 pm
- Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
- Topic: Spoilers For Thursday May 26th 2011
- Replies: 44
- Views: 6291
Re: Spoilers For Thursday May 26th 2011
I got the first one in 0.0625 seconds.Steve Balog wrote:THENEXIST or QUITESOUR
(in before "I got both of those in under a second each", I just know it's going to happen)
- Thu May 26, 2011 7:41 pm
- Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
- Topic: Spoilers For Thursday May 26th 2011
- Replies: 44
- Views: 6291
Re: Spoilers For Thursday May 26th 2011
Well played Adam, unlucky on the conundrum.
In R12, FASCISM was considered but dismissed because it's capitalised. Actually it's perfectly valid. However, you couldn't have it in that round because there was only one S.
In R12, FASCISM was considered but dismissed because it's capitalised. Actually it's perfectly valid. However, you couldn't have it in that round because there was only one S.
- Mon May 23, 2011 9:17 pm
- Forum: Countdown - Current recaps
- Topic: Monday 23rd May 2011 (Series 64, Prelim 91)
- Replies: 5
- Views: 1555
Re: Monday 23rd May 2011 (Series 64, Prelim 91)
No.Johnny Canuck wrote:Could he win 4 games, get a total over 366 points and choose to enter the finals unbeaten? This has happened a bunch of times before (in the 9-round era), although he would have to get an average of over 101 points tomorrow and Wednesday.
- Mon May 23, 2011 7:29 pm
- Forum: Countdown - Current recaps
- Topic: Monday 23rd May 2011 (Series 64, Prelim 91)
- Replies: 5
- Views: 1555
Re: Monday 23rd May 2011 (Series 64, Prelim 91)
Wrapping this mumbo jumbo up: Liam wins for a second time and should he win tomorrow but then lose on Wednesday he might qualify in 8th place for the finals if his cumulative score is high enough. Alternatively he might lose tomorrow and sink into the Series 64 abyss. Or even he might go on and win...
- Sat May 21, 2011 9:47 am
- Forum: Countdown - General
- Topic: Who Will Win Series 64?
- Replies: 10
- Views: 2592
Re: Who Will Win Series 64?
Assuming it's not some kind of spoiler to say so, Graham Hill couldn't make it. So we're going to see Michelle Nevitt in the finals? Not necessarily. This thing with Graham makes things interesting in that, at least for now, the finals are NOT set. It is entirely possible that Liam Herringshaw coul...
- Fri May 20, 2011 6:04 pm
- Forum: Countdown - General
- Topic: Who Will Win Series 64?
- Replies: 10
- Views: 2592
Re: Who Will Win Series 64?
So we're going to see Michelle Nevitt in the finals?Innis Carson wrote:Assuming it's not some kind of spoiler to say so, Graham Hill couldn't make it.
- Thu May 12, 2011 7:19 pm
- Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
- Topic: Spoilers For Thursday May 12th 2011
- Replies: 9
- Views: 3843
Re: Spoilers For Thursday May 12th 2011
Well played, Tom.
I did exactly the same thing on the first numbers game, arriving at 328 and failing to find another 3. But then, I'm also the only person in the world other than Daniel Pati and Brenda Bagust to miss 912 from 100 25 9 9 6 6.
My excuse today is that I was blinded by Tom's shirt.
I did exactly the same thing on the first numbers game, arriving at 328 and failing to find another 3. But then, I'm also the only person in the world other than Daniel Pati and Brenda Bagust to miss 912 from 100 25 9 9 6 6.
My excuse today is that I was blinded by Tom's shirt.
- Sun May 08, 2011 9:59 pm
- Forum: Off-topic
- Topic: Hide the Bible
- Replies: 7
- Views: 2217
Hide the Bible
This might be of particular interest to the series finalists waiting around in their hotel rooms over the next few days. Literally minutes of fun.
Hide the Bible
Hide the Bible
- Sat May 07, 2011 7:03 pm
- Forum: Off-topic
- Topic: AV: Yes or No?
- Replies: 277
- Views: 51448
Re: AV: Yes or No?
I'm prepared to give Cameron the benefit of the doubt on this, and assume that he genuinely doesn't understand how AV works. If so, it's a pity Humphrys made his slip when he did. Rather proving the NO campaign's point :lol: "Alternative Vote: so complicated even the Prime Minister doesn't und...
- Sat May 07, 2011 1:19 pm
- Forum: Off-topic
- Topic: AV: Yes or No?
- Replies: 277
- Views: 51448
Re: AV: Yes or No?
I had to laugh on Tuesday morning listening to me, sorry I mean David Cameron on Today (around 8.20pm if you want to listen to it on i-player) being interviewed by John Humpreys where he put the exact points you were collectively making to Cameron about multi-votes to get the response "You are...
- Sat May 07, 2011 11:23 am
- Forum: Countdown - General
- Topic: Countdown Calendar
- Replies: 126
- Views: 18405
Re: Countdown Calendar
Today's conundrum STORMFIRE has an alternative, somewhat easier, solution as well as the intended one.
- Fri May 06, 2011 10:40 pm
- Forum: apterous.org
- Topic: Feature requests
- Replies: 1956
- Views: 476550
Re: Feature requests
At the end of the current series, can we have an update of Classic Games to include Series 62-64 and also Watchword items for Series 63-64? Any suggestions for Watchwords for S63 and S64 contestants? (If the Classic Games thing will take forever to do, I don't mind helping out a bit). You just want...
- Tue May 03, 2011 9:38 pm
- Forum: Off-topic
- Topic: AV: Yes or No?
- Replies: 277
- Views: 51448
- Sat Apr 30, 2011 9:34 pm
- Forum: apterous.org
- Topic: Dog Eat Dog Tournament May-June 2011 - apply here
- Replies: 84
- Views: 15419
Re: Dog Eat Dog Tournament May-June 2011 - apply here
It should be 45 seconds per round to start with; the games will automatically be set up with the correct parameters once the tournament is actually scheduled to start, which is 1 May (tomorrow). I wasn't expecting you keenos to start already... Heh, I just thought this one didn't use the tournament...
- Sat Apr 30, 2011 7:04 pm
- Forum: apterous.org
- Topic: Dog Eat Dog Tournament May-June 2011 - apply here
- Replies: 84
- Views: 15419
Re: Dog Eat Dog Tournament May-June 2011 - apply here
Jim Bentley 129 - 96 Graeme Cole
We weren't sure whether were supposed to start at 45 seconds or use the default of 30, so we left it at the default. Might be worth clarifying which is correct for the purpose of future games.
We weren't sure whether were supposed to start at 45 seconds or use the default of 30, so we left it at the default. Might be worth clarifying which is correct for the purpose of future games.
- Thu Apr 28, 2011 11:32 am
- Forum: Off-topic
- Topic: AV: Yes or No?
- Replies: 277
- Views: 51448
Re: AV: Yes or No?
Looks like most people don't want to play your tourney.
- Wed Apr 27, 2011 9:49 pm
- Forum: Off-topic
- Topic: AV: Yes or No?
- Replies: 277
- Views: 51448
Re: AV: Yes or No?
Okay, I'll bite. Martin Bishop - The word occasionally is not applicable here. In fact, the Yes campaign admitted that we would be more likely to get a person who did not come first being Member of Parliament! An election should be most votes wins, it's like saying, (excuse the racing terms) "L...
- Wed Apr 27, 2011 12:37 am
- Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
- Topic: Spoilers For Tuesday April 26th 2011
- Replies: 8
- Views: 2928
Re: Spoilers For Tuesday April 26th 2011
Yes, I noticed that. In the scramble and the solution, so at least they were consistent.James Robinson wrote:Did anyone else notice the upside-down M's used as W's in the conundru too
- Thu Apr 21, 2011 6:48 pm
- Forum: apterous.org
- Topic: Bug reports
- Replies: 2157
- Views: 492418
Re: Bug reports
PROPELLORS should be allowed, but isn't.
(While I'm here, I might as well mention that the same goes for OPTICALS. Also PAGANI[Z|S]E (and inflections) and WINCHER are allowed but shouldn't be.)
(While I'm here, I might as well mention that the same goes for OPTICALS. Also PAGANI[Z|S]E (and inflections) and WINCHER are allowed but shouldn't be.)
- Wed Apr 20, 2011 7:13 pm
- Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
- Topic: Spoilers For Wednesday April 20th 2011
- Replies: 14
- Views: 3065
Re: Spoilers For Wednesday April 20th 2011
Not in.James Robinson wrote:Can anyone double-check WINCHER in the ODE3 I only ask as the recap writer gives it as OK.
- Tue Apr 19, 2011 11:11 pm
- Forum: apterous.org
- Topic: You know you're playing too much apterous when...
- Replies: 114
- Views: 67223
Re: You know you're playing too much apterous when...
...you see "4.32MB" on your screen at work and immediately think "9 x 8 x 6".
- Tue Apr 19, 2011 8:22 pm
- Forum: apterous.org
- Topic: Apterous FA Cup
- Replies: 195
- Views: 33276
Re: Apterous FA Cup
Well I thought it was an excellent idea. Seconded. Please can we have it back? I think the idea had plenty of potential, but there are so many edge cases to deal with that don't really have any right answers. Or at least, answers that people can't argue about for the rest of eternity. I've already ...
- Tue Apr 19, 2011 7:46 pm
- Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
- Topic: Spoilers For Tuesday April 19th 2011
- Replies: 9
- Views: 2030
Re: Spoilers For Tuesday April 19th 2011
No. The resemblance struck me on the sidelong shot of the contestants while Mary was talking, before Aidan had even been introduced.Dan McColm wrote:Am I the only one who thought the challenger looked a lot like Chris Davies?
- Mon Apr 18, 2011 8:55 pm
- Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
- Topic: Spoilers For Monday April 18th 2011
- Replies: 10
- Views: 2719
Re: Spoilers For Monday April 18th 2011
apterous is wrong this time. ODE3 gives OPTICAL as a noun but only in the plural OPTICALS, which is apparently an Indian term for a pair of glasses.Jojo Apollo wrote:OPTICALS from round 2 seems to be invaild on apterous.
- Thu Apr 14, 2011 8:24 pm
- Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
- Topic: Spoilers For Thursday April 14th 2011
- Replies: 23
- Views: 5160
Re: Spoilers For Thursday April 14th 2011
Mike Brown has mentioned time and time again that SENHORA^ is no longer in. No he hasn't. SENOR^, SENORA^ and SENORITA^ are no longer in (go with SNORE, REASON or NOTARISE instead), but SENHOR, SENHORA and SENHORITA are. Even though Firefox's wiggly-red-line spell checker seems to think it's the ot...
- Wed Apr 13, 2011 7:09 pm
- Forum: Countdown - Spoilers
- Topic: Spoilers For Wednesday April 13th 2011
- Replies: 12
- Views: 4826
Re: Spoilers For Wednesday April 13th 2011
DC's offering of ACETIC^ in R4 is invalid; it only occurs in the term "acetic acid" and doesn't have an entry on its own.
ASCETIC was there for 7, though.
ASCETIC was there for 7, though.
- Sun Apr 10, 2011 10:43 am
- Forum: apterous.org
- Topic: Bug reports
- Replies: 2157
- Views: 492418
Re: Bug reports
If Tourney Owl is so that you can play a tournament game separately from your opponent, then pencils from Tourney Owl games shouldn't be announced in chat. So that's what Tourney Owl is... didn't know exactly how it worked. I didn't even know slightly how she worked! Played her today - ended quite ...
- Tue Apr 05, 2011 7:08 pm
- Forum: Countdown - Current recaps
- Topic: Tuesday 5th April 2011 (Series 64, Prelim 57)
- Replies: 3
- Views: 1514
Re: Tuesday 5th April 2011 (Series 64, Prelim 57)
I spotted WECAST^ too, but only because it's been mentioned before as an error in apterous's word list, probably a typo of WEBCAST. It isn't in the dictionary.James Bradley wrote:Round 13: Z S W T C A E O A
AM: WASTE (5)
GS: SWEAT (5)
DC: ASCOT (5)
OT: COSTAE (6) WECAST (6)
Score: 74–20 (max 99)