"Laxadaisical"

All discussion relevant to Countdown that is not too spoilerific. New members: come here first to introduce yourself. We don't bite, or at least rarely.
Post Reply
User avatar
Jon O'Neill
Ginger Ninja
Posts: 4552
Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2008 12:45 am
Location: London, UK

"Laxadaisical"

Post by Jon O'Neill »

Is it just me or do people get the word lackadaisical wrong so often that it might as well actually be laxadaisical? I guess it's a conflation of lax and lackadaisical. Or am I missing something?
User avatar
Joseph Krol
Kiloposter
Posts: 1063
Joined: Wed Jun 23, 2010 6:47 pm

Re: "Laxadaisical"

Post by Joseph Krol »

I pronounce it lackadaisical.
Image
Gavin Chipper
Post-apocalypse
Posts: 13343
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:37 pm

Re: "Laxadaisical"

Post by Gavin Chipper »

I don't hang around with people who use that word. What about "congradulations"?
User avatar
Phil Reynolds
Postmaster General
Posts: 3329
Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2008 3:43 pm
Location: Leamington Spa, UK

Re: "Laxadaisical"

Post by Phil Reynolds »

Jon O'Neill wrote:Is it just me or do people get the word lackadaisical wrong so often that it might as well actually be laxadaisical?
You could make the same argument for "perculator", "anenome", "Febuary", "seccetry", "haitch", "goverment" and hundreds more.

However, I'd rather you didn't.
User avatar
Jon O'Neill
Ginger Ninja
Posts: 4552
Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2008 12:45 am
Location: London, UK

Re: "Laxadaisical"

Post by Jon O'Neill »

Yeah, true. This one gets to me though. If you've got the fortitude to use a word with so many syllables, you should at least have it down, you know what I mean?
User avatar
Michael Wallace
Racoonteur
Posts: 5458
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:01 am
Location: London

Re: "Laxadaisical"

Post by Michael Wallace »

Jon O'Neill wrote:Yeah, true. This one gets to me though. If you've got the fortitude to use a word with so many syllables, you should at least have it down, you know what I mean?
Totes. It's like when people say "x and I" when they actually mean "x and me", because they know that saying "and I" is what SMRT people do, but haven't actually worked out that it's not always correct.
User avatar
Graeme Cole
Series 65 Champion
Posts: 2048
Joined: Tue Jul 06, 2010 9:59 pm

Re: "Laxadaisical"

Post by Graeme Cole »

Phil Reynolds wrote:
Jon O'Neill wrote:Is it just me or do people get the word lackadaisical wrong so often that it might as well actually be laxadaisical?
You could make the same argument for "perculator", "anenome", "Febuary", "seccetry", "haitch", "goverment" and hundreds more.

However, I'd rather you didn't.
There's always this approach.
Gavin Chipper
Post-apocalypse
Posts: 13343
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:37 pm

Re: "Laxadaisical"

Post by Gavin Chipper »

Graeme Cole wrote:
Phil Reynolds wrote:
Jon O'Neill wrote:Is it just me or do people get the word lackadaisical wrong so often that it might as well actually be laxadaisical?
You could make the same argument for "perculator", "anenome", "Febuary", "seccetry", "haitch", "goverment" and hundreds more.

However, I'd rather you didn't.
There's always this approach.
In the sentence starting at about 1:06 I think Webb was lucky not to die. Shouldn't it be "wrongly"?
User avatar
Phil Reynolds
Postmaster General
Posts: 3329
Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2008 3:43 pm
Location: Leamington Spa, UK

Re: "Laxadaisical"

Post by Phil Reynolds »

Gavin Chipper wrote:
Graeme Cole wrote:There's always this approach.
In the sentence starting at about 1:06 I think Webb was lucky not to die. Shouldn't it be "wrongly"?
Nope - wrong can be an adverb as well an adjective, as in "What did I do wrong?"
Post Reply