"Laxadaisical"
- Jon O'Neill
- Ginger Ninja
- Posts: 4552
- Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2008 12:45 am
- Location: London, UK
"Laxadaisical"
Is it just me or do people get the word lackadaisical wrong so often that it might as well actually be laxadaisical? I guess it's a conflation of lax and lackadaisical. Or am I missing something?
- Joseph Krol
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1063
- Joined: Wed Jun 23, 2010 6:47 pm
-
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 13343
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:37 pm
Re: "Laxadaisical"
I don't hang around with people who use that word. What about "congradulations"?
- Phil Reynolds
- Postmaster General
- Posts: 3329
- Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2008 3:43 pm
- Location: Leamington Spa, UK
Re: "Laxadaisical"
You could make the same argument for "perculator", "anenome", "Febuary", "seccetry", "haitch", "goverment" and hundreds more.Jon O'Neill wrote:Is it just me or do people get the word lackadaisical wrong so often that it might as well actually be laxadaisical?
However, I'd rather you didn't.
- Jon O'Neill
- Ginger Ninja
- Posts: 4552
- Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2008 12:45 am
- Location: London, UK
Re: "Laxadaisical"
Yeah, true. This one gets to me though. If you've got the fortitude to use a word with so many syllables, you should at least have it down, you know what I mean?
- Michael Wallace
- Racoonteur
- Posts: 5458
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:01 am
- Location: London
Re: "Laxadaisical"
Totes. It's like when people say "x and I" when they actually mean "x and me", because they know that saying "and I" is what SMRT people do, but haven't actually worked out that it's not always correct.Jon O'Neill wrote:Yeah, true. This one gets to me though. If you've got the fortitude to use a word with so many syllables, you should at least have it down, you know what I mean?
- Graeme Cole
- Series 65 Champion
- Posts: 2048
- Joined: Tue Jul 06, 2010 9:59 pm
Re: "Laxadaisical"
There's always this approach.Phil Reynolds wrote:You could make the same argument for "perculator", "anenome", "Febuary", "seccetry", "haitch", "goverment" and hundreds more.Jon O'Neill wrote:Is it just me or do people get the word lackadaisical wrong so often that it might as well actually be laxadaisical?
However, I'd rather you didn't.
-
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 13343
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:37 pm
Re: "Laxadaisical"
In the sentence starting at about 1:06 I think Webb was lucky not to die. Shouldn't it be "wrongly"?Graeme Cole wrote:There's always this approach.Phil Reynolds wrote:You could make the same argument for "perculator", "anenome", "Febuary", "seccetry", "haitch", "goverment" and hundreds more.Jon O'Neill wrote:Is it just me or do people get the word lackadaisical wrong so often that it might as well actually be laxadaisical?
However, I'd rather you didn't.
- Phil Reynolds
- Postmaster General
- Posts: 3329
- Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2008 3:43 pm
- Location: Leamington Spa, UK
Re: "Laxadaisical"
Nope - wrong can be an adverb as well an adjective, as in "What did I do wrong?"Gavin Chipper wrote:In the sentence starting at about 1:06 I think Webb was lucky not to die. Shouldn't it be "wrongly"?Graeme Cole wrote:There's always this approach.