Page 1 of 1
Spoilers for Friday December 6th 2013 (S69 P108)
Posted: Fri Dec 06, 2013 2:45 pm
by Jordan F
As we end this week, Rod Chatfield made quite a comeback yesterday to get his first win. If he can win a few more, he may be in position to try for the Series 70 finals. But first, he needs win number 2. Can he get it?
Join Anthony for the recap later.
Re: Spoilers for Friday December 6th 2013 (S69 P108)
Posted: Fri Dec 06, 2013 3:21 pm
by Tony Atkins
Giles's NAIVEST is actually valid! NOVATES would be a good 7.
Quick way on 1st numbers: 7x8x10+2
Re: Spoilers for Friday December 6th 2013 (S69 P108)
Posted: Fri Dec 06, 2013 3:40 pm
by Tony Atkins
3rd numbers ((50-(9/9))x8-3)x2 but well out of time.
Re: Spoilers for Friday December 6th 2013 (S69 P108)
Posted: Fri Dec 06, 2013 3:55 pm
by Tony Atkins
Alt last numbers (75+7)x(9-3-1)+1
Re: Spoilers for Friday December 6th 2013 (S69 P108)
Posted: Fri Dec 06, 2013 6:01 pm
by James Robinson
EVASION in round 1 and SATPHONE in round 5 as equallers.
Re: Spoilers for Friday December 6th 2013 (S69 P108)
Posted: Fri Dec 06, 2013 7:09 pm
by Callum Todd
I love that the challenger arrived at the studio in November with a spiffing MOVEMBER tash, probably unaware that his episode wouldn't be broadcast until December.
Re: Spoilers for Friday December 6th 2013 (S69 P108)
Posted: Sat Dec 07, 2013 1:21 pm
by Martin Thompson
James Robinson wrote:EVASION in round 1 and SATPHONE in round 5 as equallers.
Is PHONATES valid?
Re: Spoilers for Friday December 6th 2013 (S69 P108)
Posted: Sat Dec 07, 2013 1:51 pm
by Callum Todd
Martin Thompson wrote:James Robinson wrote:EVASION in round 1 and SATPHONE in round 5 as equallers.
Is PHONATES valid?
yes.
Re: Spoilers for Friday December 6th 2013 (S69 P108)
Posted: Sat Dec 07, 2013 3:30 pm
by Jack Worsley
James Robinson wrote:EVASION in round 1 and SATPHONE in round 5 as equallers.
Do you mean EVASION as a
beater? NAIVEST^ isn't valid, as NAIVE is two syllables and its comparatives are not specified by the dictionary and I don't think DC offered any other sevens.
Re: Spoilers for Friday December 6th 2013 (S69 P108)
Posted: Sat Dec 07, 2013 4:20 pm
by James Robinson
Jack Worsley wrote:James Robinson wrote:EVASION in round 1 and SATPHONE in round 5 as equallers.
Do you mean EVASION as a
beater? NAIVEST^ isn't valid, as NAIVE is two syllables and its comparatives are not specified by the dictionary and I don't think DC offered any other sevens.
Yeah, strictly that's true. And also it says PONGEES which they offered isn't in either.............
Re: Spoilers for Friday December 6th 2013 (S69 P108)
Posted: Sat Dec 07, 2013 4:26 pm
by Gevin Chapwell
I suppose you can always go for VAINEST instead.
Re: Spoilers for Friday December 6th 2013 (S69 P108)
Posted: Sat Dec 07, 2013 4:27 pm
by Gevin Chapwell
Interestingly, ODO likes both PONGEES and NAIVEST.
Re: Spoilers for Friday December 6th 2013 (S69 P108)
Posted: Sat Dec 07, 2013 4:39 pm
by Jack Worsley
James Robinson wrote:Jack Worsley wrote:James Robinson wrote:EVASION in round 1 and SATPHONE in round 5 as equallers.
Do you mean EVASION as a
beater? NAIVEST^ isn't valid, as NAIVE is two syllables and its comparatives are not specified by the dictionary and I don't think DC offered any other sevens.
Yeah, strictly that's true. And also it says PONGEES which they offered isn't in either.............
It sounded like they just had PONGEE to me and never mentioned the plural anyway.