Page 1 of 1

Spoilers for Friday October 26th 2012 (Series 67 Prelim 59)

Posted: Fri Oct 26, 2012 1:16 pm
by Jordan F
Like last week, we could have every winner this week have the last name of Boyle. Unlike last week, we have two potential people involved. Dave Boyle won yesterday in a battle of two new contestants, can he end this week with 2 under his belt? We're done with Jon Culshaw for now, I hope we end this week with an impression of an apterite (Maybe he met one at one of his shows and knew how they talked).

Join Thomas for the recap later.

Re: Spoilers for Friday October 26th 2012 (Series 67 Prelim

Posted: Fri Oct 26, 2012 2:17 pm
by Jordan F
UPRATED as a round 1 equaller.

Re: Spoilers for Friday October 26th 2012 (Series 67 Prelim

Posted: Fri Oct 26, 2012 2:22 pm
by Ryan Taylor
WANNESS beater in R4.

Re: Spoilers for Friday October 26th 2012 (Series 67 Prelim

Posted: Fri Oct 26, 2012 2:30 pm
by szodiac
I got FARTED in round 1, found a PENIS in round two, got stuck with ANUSES in round 4, Now we had MALEPRAT in the first tea-time teaser. Hope things gets a bit better in the rest of the program :)

Well having BURPED in round 7, was at my most PONGIEST in round 8... it all gave me DEMENTIA in round 9. What a story line !

The theme continued well into the third half: STONED in 10, EROTICA in 11, WETNESS in 12 and the conundrum fitted in well too.

Still, I'm not sure James will like Nick suggesting Huddersfield's away kit is PINK :P

Mauro

Re: Spoilers for Friday October 26th 2012 (Series 67 Prelim

Posted: Fri Oct 26, 2012 2:38 pm
by Adam Gillard
Expected Susie to get AMNESTIED.

Re: Spoilers for Friday October 26th 2012 (Series 67 Prelim

Posted: Fri Oct 26, 2012 2:42 pm
by Jack Worsley
Adam Gillard wrote:Expected Susie to get AMNESTIED.
Same, bit of a shocker after getting AMNESTIES in yesterday's show. :roll:

Re: Spoilers for Friday October 26th 2012 (Series 67 Prelim

Posted: Fri Oct 26, 2012 2:51 pm
by Jordan F
If I heard right, TOELESS was the -LESS word they mentioned, but I thought TONELESS was valid. Is it?

Re: Spoilers for Friday October 26th 2012 (Series 67 Prelim

Posted: Fri Oct 26, 2012 2:57 pm
by Jack Worsley
Yes, TONELESS is fine for eight.

Re: Spoilers for Friday October 26th 2012 (Series 67 Prelim

Posted: Fri Oct 26, 2012 4:03 pm
by Tony Atkins
Not sure how Mauro missed VOMITER in R3. NOWNESS is another beater alongside WANNESS in R4.

Re: Spoilers for Friday October 26th 2012 (Series 67 Prelim

Posted: Fri Oct 26, 2012 4:14 pm
by James Robinson
szodiac wrote:Still, I'm not sure James will like Nick suggesting Huddersfield's away kit is PINK :P

Mauro
Lol, yeah although I was slightly more insulted that Rachel thinks that we couldn't be in the Premier League!!!

Interestingly, we did release a charity kit a few years ago where the blue stripes were replaced with pink stripes, and it sold out within a couple of days :!: :!: 8-)

UPRATED in round 1.

Re: Spoilers for Friday October 26th 2012 (Series 67 Prelim

Posted: Fri Oct 26, 2012 4:18 pm
by Grant Waters
SPOUTING as an alternative 8 in r3

Re: Spoilers for Friday October 26th 2012 (Series 67 Prelim

Posted: Fri Oct 26, 2012 4:21 pm
by Grant Waters
Well played by Amy. She must have had a moment when Dave buzzed
on the crucial but then said "no idea, just wanted to buzz!"

Re: Spoilers for Friday October 26th 2012 (Series 67 Prelim

Posted: Fri Oct 26, 2012 5:18 pm
by Tony Atkins
Grant Waters wrote:Well played by Amy. She must have had a moment when Dave buzzed
on the crucial but then said "no idea, just wanted to buzz!"
Not sure Nick should have allowed him to offer an answer at the end of his explanation. He may have got it by then...

Re: Spoilers for Friday October 26th 2012 (Series 67 Prelim

Posted: Fri Oct 26, 2012 6:58 pm
by Graeme Cole
Tony Atkins wrote:
Grant Waters wrote:Well played by Amy. She must have had a moment when Dave buzzed on the crucial but then said "no idea, just wanted to buzz!"
Not sure Nick should have allowed him to offer an answer at the end of his explanation. He may have got it by then...
Agree. He buzzed on 28 seconds, and it was 22 seconds later when he finally said he had nothing. (Yes, really.) I don't think he had any malicious intent - it seemed he was just joking about rather than deliberately trying to buy time, and the audience laughter lengthened things a bit. However, I would hope that if he had got it right after that long it would have been disallowed.