Spoilers for Thursday March 1st 2012 (Series 66 Prelim 39)

Discuss anything that happened in recent games. This is the place to post any words you got that beat Dictionary Corner, or numbers games that evaded Rachel.

Moderator: James Robinson

Post Reply
Jordan F
Kiloposter
Posts: 1063
Joined: Sun Jun 20, 2010 11:01 pm

Spoilers for Thursday March 1st 2012 (Series 66 Prelim 39)

Post by Jordan F »

Much congratulations to Peter Lee for becoming an octochamp yesterday, and as a result we have two new contestants today. Will they become the next Peter Lee, or only the next Christine Buffrey? John Parrott is still here, and hopefully I'll slowly forget about that Kate Hunniford and that Gloria Ciddewombe or whoever they were.

James will be here later with a recap, and at least 33% of every smiley in the list.
User avatar
Clive Brooker
Devotee
Posts: 505
Joined: Wed Feb 11, 2009 7:37 pm
Location: San Toy

Re: Spoilers for Thursday March 1st 2012 (Series 66 Prelim 3

Post by Clive Brooker »

TELETHON in R1 if I got the letters right.
User avatar
Adam Gillard
Kiloposter
Posts: 1762
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2010 8:42 pm
Location: About 45 minutes south-east of Thibodaux, Louisiana

Re: Spoilers for Thursday March 1st 2012 (Series 66 Prelim 3

Post by Adam Gillard »

Rachel's playing Omelette rules for the numbers!
Mike Brown: "Round 12: T N R S A E I G U

C1: SIGNATURE (18) ["9; not written down"]
C2: SEATING (7)
Score: 108–16 (max 113)

Another niner for Adam and yet another century. Well done, that man."
John Garcia
Enthusiast
Posts: 318
Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2011 6:45 pm

Re: Spoilers for Thursday March 1st 2012 (Series 66 Prelim 3

Post by John Garcia »

They had DOTAGE in R13, but didn't mention DOTAGES for some reason.
User avatar
Charlie Hastings
Newbie
Posts: 24
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2011 8:30 pm

Re: Spoilers for Thursday March 1st 2012 (Series 66 Prelim 3

Post by Charlie Hastings »

Was it round 7 (I think) that started a bit unfortunately? nudge nudge ;) ;)

Print that Daily Mail / The Sun (take your pick if u must)
John Garcia
Enthusiast
Posts: 318
Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2011 6:45 pm

Re: Spoilers for Thursday March 1st 2012 (Series 66 Prelim 3

Post by John Garcia »

Charlie Hastings wrote:Was it round 7 (I think) that started a bit unfortunately? nudge nudge ;) ;)

Print that Daily Mail / The Sun (take your pick if u must)
I didn't realize until Rachel gave a chuckle, and I was wondering what was funny. Took me a while to figure out!
User avatar
James Robinson
Post-apocalypse
Posts: 10580
Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2009 5:38 pm
Location: Mirfield, West Yorkshire

Re: Spoilers for Thursday March 1st 2012 (Series 66 Prelim 3

Post by James Robinson »

John Garcia wrote:They had DOTAGE in R13, but didn't mention DOTAGES for some reason.
Probably cos they mentioned DOSAGE. :geek:

MARDIEST and READMITS in round 2, ENSIFORM and FERMIONS in round 4, SIGMATE in round 8.

2nd Numbers Alt.: (75 x (5 + 5)) - (7 x 3) - 1 = 728
Fancy 3rd Numbers Alt.: (50 x 3) + ((10 - 1) x 9) = 231
User avatar
James Robinson
Post-apocalypse
Posts: 10580
Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2009 5:38 pm
Location: Mirfield, West Yorkshire

Re: Spoilers for Thursday March 1st 2012 (Series 66 Prelim 3

Post by James Robinson »

Clive Brooker wrote:TELETHON in R1 if I got the letters right.
Indeed, a very good spot, Clive.

By the way, I don't know if it's been like it all week, but has anyone noticed the interesting error in the end credits :?:
David Barnard
Enthusiast
Posts: 290
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2011 1:02 am

Re: Spoilers for Thursday March 1st 2012 (Series 66 Prelim 3

Post by David Barnard »

Looked like a fudge from Sam on that last numbers round, he lost to a decent opponent but nowhere near the calibre of Jack or Peter but not bad none the less
User avatar
Graeme Cole
Series 65 Champion
Posts: 2040
Joined: Tue Jul 06, 2010 9:59 pm

Re: Spoilers for Thursday March 1st 2012 (Series 66 Prelim 3

Post by Graeme Cole »

James Robinson wrote:By the way, I don't know if it's been like it all week, but has anyone noticed the interesting error in the end credits :?:
I've had a look to see if I can spot it, and all I can see is that it says "VT Editors" then only lists one name.
User avatar
James Robinson
Post-apocalypse
Posts: 10580
Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2009 5:38 pm
Location: Mirfield, West Yorkshire

Re: Spoilers for Thursday March 1st 2012 (Series 66 Prelim 3

Post by James Robinson »

Graeme Cole wrote:
James Robinson wrote:By the way, I don't know if it's been like it all week, but has anyone noticed the interesting error in the end credits :?:
I've had a look to see if I can spot it, and all I can see is that it says "VT Editors" then only lists one name.
Yup, well done. A bottle of my juice will be on its way to you. :P
Niall Seymour
Rookie
Posts: 95
Joined: Sat May 30, 2009 8:10 pm

Re: Spoilers for Thursday March 1st 2012 (Series 66 Prelim 3

Post by Niall Seymour »

Jeez looks like my record of the best player to appear in Series 66 that goes to Nottingham Trent is down the swanny!
User avatar
Brian Moore
Devotee
Posts: 582
Joined: Fri Feb 06, 2009 6:11 pm
Location: Exeter

Re: Spoilers for Thursday March 1st 2012 (Series 66 Prelim 3

Post by Brian Moore »

James Robinson wrote:A bottle of my juice will be on its way to you. :P
Please, mods, I didn't think that this was that sort of forum. (Or not the public one, anyway.)

Impressive debut from the winner. A two-NBG show today. Sounded like there was also a chuckle from one of the contestants at Rachel's 'BJ'.

Oh, maybe it is one of those sorts of forums after all.
John Garcia
Enthusiast
Posts: 318
Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2011 6:45 pm

Re: Spoilers for Thursday March 1st 2012 (Series 66 Prelim 3

Post by John Garcia »

Brian Moore wrote: Sounded like there was also a chuckle from one of the contestants at Rachel's 'BJ'.
The chuckle was from Rachel believe it or not!
User avatar
Mike Brown
Legend
Posts: 1413
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 7:16 pm
Location: King's Lynn
Contact:

Re: Spoilers for Thursday March 1st 2012 (Series 66 Prelim 3

Post by Mike Brown »

Graeme Cole wrote:
James Robinson wrote:By the way, I don't know if it's been like it all week, but has anyone noticed the interesting error in the end credits :?:
I've had a look to see if I can spot it, and all I can see is that it says "VT Editors" then only lists one name.
Yes, it's said it all week, presumably a hangover from there being two VT editors credited for most of the previous week. :geek:
Post Reply