Page 1 of 1
Spoilers For Tuesday November 1st 2011
Posted: Tue Nov 01, 2011 1:39 pm
by James Robinson
So, we have entered the 11th month of the year. And we still (just) have the possibility of having 8 octochamps in a series.
But, David Butcher, will have to get his foot back on the gas after his very average performance yesterday against Dawn. Can he make an Lazarus-esque style rise from the grave
Join Liam later to find out.
Re: Spoilers For Tuesday November 1st 2011
Posted: Tue Nov 01, 2011 2:15 pm
by Thomas Carey
We could still have 9 octochamps.
Re: Spoilers For Tuesday November 1st 2011
Posted: Tue Nov 01, 2011 3:41 pm
by Matt Morrison
I didn't bother rewinding but the pencam dictionary definition for IMPERIAL looked like it mentioned "Napoleon 111".
I was always under the impression it was right to use III and not 111. In fact I've never seen 111 before. Opinions?
Re: Spoilers For Tuesday November 1st 2011
Posted: Tue Nov 01, 2011 3:42 pm
by Charlie Hastings
CLAUSES in the round just before Word of the Day
Anyone else spot it?
Re: Spoilers For Tuesday November 1st 2011
Posted: Tue Nov 01, 2011 3:53 pm
by Andy Platt
Mucosae was there in R9 as a 'nice' 7.
Stodgy game, tho. Guy on the right mostly going 3V6C even though he won the first two rounds which were both 4V5C, so I didn't get onto his logic there. Glad he lost really. That and him coming across like a dick.
Re: Spoilers For Tuesday November 1st 2011
Posted: Tue Nov 01, 2011 4:00 pm
by Tony Atkins
Matt Morrison wrote:I didn't bother rewinding but the pencam dictionary definition for IMPERIAL looked like it mentioned "Napoleon 111".
I was always under the impression it was right to use III and not 111. In fact I've never seen 111 before. Opinions?
No the ODE3 says III with seraphs.
Re: Spoilers For Tuesday November 1st 2011
Posted: Tue Nov 01, 2011 4:04 pm
by Matt Morrison
Tony Atkins wrote:Matt Morrison wrote:I didn't bother rewinding but the pencam dictionary definition for IMPERIAL looked like it mentioned "Napoleon 111".
I was always under the impression it was right to use III and not 111. In fact I've never seen 111 before. Opinions?
No the ODE3 says III with seraphs.
Ah, obviously I need to get an HDTV.
Re: Spoilers For Tuesday November 1st 2011
Posted: Tue Nov 01, 2011 4:09 pm
by Matt Morrison
Matt Morrison wrote:Ah, obviously I need to get an HDTV.
Oops, maybe not.
Re: Spoilers For Tuesday November 1st 2011
Posted: Tue Nov 01, 2011 4:52 pm
by John Bosley
Charlie Hastings wrote:CLAUSES in the round just before Word of the Day
Anyone else spot it?
Yes
Re: Spoilers For Tuesday November 1st 2011
Posted: Tue Nov 01, 2011 6:24 pm
by Phil Reynolds
Tony Atkins wrote:the ODE3 says III with seraphs
What, no cherubs?
Re: Spoilers For Tuesday November 1st 2011
Posted: Tue Nov 01, 2011 7:41 pm
by James Robinson
ADAPTOR in round 3, RELATOR in round 4, KATHODE in round 6, ARIDNESS in round 7, TASERING in round 11, INDENTOR in round 12 and MITOGEN in round 13.
Thomas Carey wrote:
We could still have 9 octochamps.
True, although we can only have 8 in the finals though.