Spoilers For Tuesday June 14th 2011

Discuss anything that happened in recent games. This is the place to post any words you got that beat Dictionary Corner, or numbers games that evaded Rachel.

Moderator: James Robinson

Post Reply
User avatar
James Robinson
Post-apocalypse
Posts: 10580
Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2009 5:38 pm
Location: Mirfield, West Yorkshire

Spoilers For Tuesday June 14th 2011

Post by James Robinson »

If anyone thinks that being a highly skilled Apterite almost guarantees you octochampdom, take a look at yesterday's game. Our Graeme was lucky to pass Graham Moonie-Dalton yesterday, and he will have to up his game today to make sure that that was just a blip and nothing permanent.

Liam will be joining you for the recap later. ;) :) :D
User avatar
Stuart Arnot
Acolyte
Posts: 139
Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2009 3:34 pm
Location: Manchester

Re: Spoilers For Tuesday June 14th 2011

Post by Stuart Arnot »

R1 SIMOLEON
Tom Barnes
Rookie
Posts: 39
Joined: Fri Mar 26, 2010 1:57 am
Location: London

Re: Spoilers For Tuesday June 14th 2011

Post by Tom Barnes »

Well done again Graeme, seriously concerned for my record there
User avatar
Tony Atkins
Fanatic
Posts: 2237
Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2010 3:19 pm
Location: Reading
Contact:

Re: Spoilers For Tuesday June 14th 2011

Post by Tony Atkins »

Tom Barnes wrote:Well done again Graeme, seriously concerned for my record there
It was higher score v zero, but that's not an official record.

I was quite please to equal Graeme in 12 rounds and nearly risked MATELESS, but didn't. Can anyone explain why TEAMLESS is not in ODE3, but MEATLESS and MATELESS are?
CO-MSO every August
CO:Rea 20th April 2024
User avatar
Jon O'Neill
Ginger Ninja
Posts: 4546
Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2008 12:45 am
Location: London, UK

Re: Spoilers For Tuesday June 14th 2011

Post by Jon O'Neill »

Tony Atkins wrote:It was higher score v zero, but that's not an official record.
Who decides what constitutes an official record, out of interest?
User avatar
Michael Wallace
Racoonteur
Posts: 5458
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:01 am
Location: London

Re: Spoilers For Tuesday June 14th 2011

Post by Michael Wallace »

Jon O'Neill wrote:
Tony Atkins wrote:It was higher score v zero, but that's not an official record.
Who decides what constitutes an official record, out of interest?
Me.
Dan McColm
Series 71 Champion
Posts: 255
Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2010 1:23 am

Re: Spoilers For Tuesday June 14th 2011

Post by Dan McColm »

Good performance, Graeme, you missed very little. I spotted HAVELI in round 8.
Joyce Phillips
Acolyte
Posts: 107
Joined: Fri Mar 06, 2009 8:25 pm

Re: Spoilers For Tuesday June 14th 2011

Post by Joyce Phillips »

Well done Graeme. Hard to keep concentrating against such poor opposition.
User avatar
Brian Moore
Devotee
Posts: 582
Joined: Fri Feb 06, 2009 6:11 pm
Location: Exeter

Re: Spoilers For Tuesday June 14th 2011

Post by Brian Moore »

Good performance from Graeme after yesterday's scorcher, but oh dear, what a car crash for the challenger. I can only assume nerves got to him - lots of silly mistakes, missing obvious words and numbers. Not one of the most comfortable games to watch - even the last numbers I thought "phew", then he screwed it up. Oh dear indeed. Probably enough to make Graeme uncomfortable too.
User avatar
James Robinson
Post-apocalypse
Posts: 10580
Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2009 5:38 pm
Location: Mirfield, West Yorkshire

Re: Spoilers For Tuesday June 14th 2011

Post by James Robinson »

Jon O'Neill wrote:
Tony Atkins wrote:It was higher score v zero, but that's not an official record.
Who decides what constitutes an official record, out of interest?
Well there was a record (of sorts) set today.

Since Graeme was 79 points ahead at the end of part 2, it was impossible for Mike to win, even with 3 9's and the numbers and conundrum.

So, that was the earliest a game was actually won in the history of the show. :geek:

It was also the 3rd highest winning margin, out of interest.

FOETID in round 12 and REBASING in round 13.
Ryan Taylor
Postmaster General
Posts: 3661
Joined: Sun Oct 25, 2009 6:18 pm

Re: Spoilers For Tuesday June 14th 2011

Post by Ryan Taylor »

James Robinson wrote:
Jon O'Neill wrote:
Tony Atkins wrote:It was higher score v zero, but that's not an official record.
Who decides what constitutes an official record, out of interest?
Well there was a record (of sorts) set today.

Since Graeme was 79 points ahead at the end of part 2, it was impossible for Mike to win, even with 3 9's and the numbers and conundrum.

So, that was the earliest a game was actually won in the history of the show. :geek:

It was also the 3rd highest winning margin, out of interest.

FOETID in round 12 and REBASING in round 13.
Please go on Mastermind and chooe Countdown as your specialist subject.
User avatar
Adam Gillard
Kiloposter
Posts: 1762
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2010 8:42 pm
Location: About 45 minutes south-east of Thibodaux, Louisiana

Re: Spoilers For Tuesday June 14th 2011

Post by Adam Gillard »

Ryan Taylor wrote:
James Robinson wrote: :geek:
Please go on Mastermind and choo[s]e Countdown as your specialist subject.
This would be Really Kewell (Harry's cousin).
Mike Brown: "Round 12: T N R S A E I G U

C1: SIGNATURE (18) ["9; not written down"]
C2: SEATING (7)
Score: 108–16 (max 113)

Another niner for Adam and yet another century. Well done, that man."
Keith Bennett
Acolyte
Posts: 154
Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2011 11:26 am
Location: Kent

Re: Spoilers For Tuesday June 14th 2011

Post by Keith Bennett »

The letters rounds, fine. A lot of contestants faced with a top notch contestant like Graeme lose several rounds by one letter that they wouldn't to most other players; as a result their score on the day doesn't look too clever. But this guy screwed up 30 fairly straightforward points on numbers games. Graeme even abandoned 6 small for the first one which gave him a very fair chance.

The more I see heats like this the more I believe they need a rethink. Most of the people now in their 50s+ who both want to do the show and are genuinely good enough have probably already been on. If C4 insist, as they probably do, that the contestants are drawn from as wide a spectrum as possible in terms of age, gender, location and so on then sooner or later surely the rules have to change to let past contestants re-apply.
User avatar
Mike Brown
Legend
Posts: 1413
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 7:16 pm
Location: King's Lynn
Contact:

Re: Spoilers For Tuesday June 14th 2011

Post by Mike Brown »

Ryan Taylor wrote:Please go on Mastermind and chooe Countdown as your specialist subject.
**LIKE **
User avatar
Mike Brown
Legend
Posts: 1413
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 7:16 pm
Location: King's Lynn
Contact:

Re: Spoilers For Tuesday June 14th 2011

Post by Mike Brown »

Tony Atkins wrote:Can anyone explain why TEAMLESS is not in ODE3, but MEATLESS and MATELESS are?
Presumably because it's less commonly used in written English, at least according to the Oxford corpus.
User avatar
Philip Jarvis
Enthusiast
Posts: 399
Joined: Fri Nov 14, 2008 11:32 am
Location: Cleckheaton, West Yorkshire

Re: Spoilers For Tuesday June 14th 2011

Post by Philip Jarvis »

Ryan Taylor wrote:
James Robinson wrote: :geek:
Please go on Mastermind and choo[s]e Countdown as your specialist subject.
Yes - and just think ...... If you happen to lose, their rules allow you to go back on again at a later date. LOL
"It's KNACKERED Nick!"
User avatar
Brian Moore
Devotee
Posts: 582
Joined: Fri Feb 06, 2009 6:11 pm
Location: Exeter

Re: Spoilers For Tuesday June 14th 2011

Post by Brian Moore »

Mike Brown wrote:
Tony Atkins wrote:Can anyone explain why TEAMLESS is not in ODE3, but MEATLESS and MATELESS are?
Presumably because it's less commonly used in written English, at least according to the Oxford corpus.
I sometimes have my doubts about how the Oxford corpus decides these things. Even if it is all computerised, the weighting given to different sources must be a human decision. Or is it a panel of the great and the good, cigar in one hand, glass of port in the other, taking a break from discussing the finer points of ancient Greece (or whatever Really Clever People do)?
Post Reply