Re: Known bugs
Posted: Sun Oct 12, 2008 8:21 pm
I can, Kirk.
A group for contestants and lovers of the Channel 4 game show 'Countdown'.
http://www.c4countdown.co.uk/
First day in my lovely new office and I've spent the morning fixing the high scores table... Anyway, it's now working again. (The database query that built the conundrum top scores turned out not to be very scalable and was taking more than 15 minutes to run, which is not good when it gets run every 15 minutes.)Charlie Reams wrote:It seems to be working again. I'm not really in a position to fix things properly at the moment so the high scores page will be blank for a while, but your scores will still count so don't worry.
I was thinking about this and it's probably quite difficult to do without making it too easy to cheat or too harsh. Your system would be too generous as surrounding a number by brackets would slip through the net - e.g. (((((6))))). Maybe you could simply ban consecutive brackets that are also closed consecutively. But sometimes you might open too many by mistake not knowing how many you really need. Maybe allow anything with the brackets as it was originally but they don't reset the patience bar when a bracket key is pressed. Would that be too harsh on timing?Paul Howe wrote:Just had a brackets issue with the numbers game, I was trying to make 28*9 and got as far as
(25+9-5-(6/6)
and couldn't add a second close bracket, leaving me resoundingly buggered. And yes I realise that making 6 by doing 5 + 6/6 was far from astonishingly brilliant.
I know there are issues with people opening loads of brackets to stall for time and the brackets round the 6/6 weren't necessary, but maybe you should be able to close brackets you've already opened, provided they don't immediately follow an open bracket?
We'll, strictly, he's not. BIDMAS has division and multiplication at the same time and then you should read left to right. If he wanted 6/210 he'd have to have typed 6/(7x3x10). I can't see what's wrong.Jon Corby wrote:You're dividing 6 by 210
Still bad form I think, you could easily have PM'd this to Charlie or made a note of it and waited till tomorrow (erm, today now)Gavin Chipper wrote:Today's duel so look away now, but I've still got it on the screen so it can't wait.
I think I could've rescued myself by clicking the "subtotal" at the side and moving it to the top row, just didn't come to mind at the time because I'm so used to using the brackets. With this in mind, further fiddling with the brackets rules is probably unnecessary.Gavin Chipper wrote:
I was thinking about this and it's probably quite difficult to do without making it too easy to cheat or too harsh. Your system would be too generous as surrounding a number by brackets would slip through the net - e.g. (((((6))))). Maybe you could simply ban consecutive brackets that are also closed consecutively. But sometimes you might open too many by mistake not knowing how many you really need. Maybe allow anything with the brackets as it was originally but they don't reset the patience bar when a bracket key is pressed. Would that be too harsh on timing?
Paul Howe wrote:I tend to use as many brackets as possible for complete certainty, this got me into trouble earlier when it wouldn't let me close one! I don't what additional logic Charlie's built into the numbers game, but Java would evaluate 6/3*7*10 as (((6/3)*7)*10) =140 because * and / have equal precedence and arithmetic left associates, so I'm confused about what's happening here.
Yeah I know mate, I was just confirming that's what happens in Java as well, i.e. it's not a weird programming language issue. I reckon Charlie has probably written his own parser to handle the numbers games that doesn't work in this case.Kirk Bevins wrote:Paul Howe wrote:I tend to use as many brackets as possible for complete certainty, this got me into trouble earlier when it wouldn't let me close one! I don't what additional logic Charlie's built into the numbers game, but Java would evaluate 6/3*7*10 as (((6/3)*7)*10) =140 because * and / have equal precedence and arithmetic left associates, so I'm confused about what's happening here.
Exactly my point about 6 posts previous.
Does it matter? I put spoiler space in - this seems surprisingly anal from you! Is it because I called your last puzzle boring?!Paul Howe wrote:Still bad form I think, you could easily have PM'd this to Charlie or made a note of it and waited till tomorrow (erm, today now)Gavin Chipper wrote:Today's duel so look away now, but I've still got it on the screen so it can't wait.
I'm pretty sure I've had it as well, and thought I might have made a mistake.As for the bug, I'm sure I've had the same thing happen to me before, at the time I closed the window as I assumed I'd done something daft but looking back on the game browser I couldn't find anything wrong.
I typed it in the same the second time round to see if I could work out where it was going wrong and to see if the same problem existed in both things.Jon Corby wrote:Fair enough - when I went to school (obviously a lot longer ago than you guys) it was BOMDAS and you did multiplication before division. Nonetheless, if I haven't got my formula typed before the 30 seconds I avoid brackets completely and just click the "=" after every sum (unless I'm just adding a load of stuff together). Too much potential for disaster otherwise.
I think it went funny on a few of us - noticeably Steven Briers. He must have closed the daily duel and then redid it - he got the first two conundrums in stupidly quick times.Gavin Chipper wrote:The Daily Duel went funny on me today. I'd done about 14 rounds and then had to answer the phone and when I came back (20 minutes or so later) it just sat there when I clicked to play the next round. I exited and went back in again hoping I could resume where I'd left off but it came up as a new duel so I did that and kicked arse - no actually I'd remembered what I'd done and scored the same up to the point.
Boozing between takes again?Damian E wrote:Oh, and red ants.
Eh?Ian Volante wrote:Boozing between takes again?Damian E wrote:Oh, and red ants.
You, as opposed to the antsDamian E wrote:Eh?Ian Volante wrote:Boozing between takes again?Damian E wrote:Oh, and red ants.
Weird. I should probably do something about that.Jon Corby wrote:Charles, I just filtered the players list to 'hide bots', but when I clicked people it was still giving me options as if bots were still shown (ie, I'd click Simon, it would show me your details, I click you it says Apterous someone).
A man on the phone for 20 minutes? Or are you hiding something from us...Gavin Chipper wrote:The Daily Duel went funny on me today. I'd done about 14 rounds and then had to answer the phone and when I came back (20 minutes or so later) it just sat there when I clicked to play the next round. I exited and went back in again hoping I could resume where I'd left off but it came up as a new duel so I did that and kicked arse - no actually I'd remembered what I'd done and scored the same up to the point.
Aye, the game browser goes a bit funny sometimes:
Kai - that was a 10 second game. Did you get it in under that time?
Apterous is getting excited.Jon Corby wrote:Why are there exclamation marks popping up all over the shop? !.Waiting for x to pick.! etc. And I've noticed some in the game chat window.
But not within the 10 seconds though.Matt Coates wrote:
within 30 secs as well
You can't, but sometimes the timer is out of sync with the clock.Martin Gardner wrote:How come you can buzz in after the allotted time for the conundrum?
Yes, it's a bit flimsy. We were discussing this last night and concluded that anyone who's used apterous for a while will be awair of its fragility and won't be too offended if you just stop replying.Jimmy wrote:My chat seems to break all the time. Is this normal? At the moment it doesn't work at all, I just hope I don't come across as rude when it breaks half way through a game!
Well E Coli is a bacterium so I wouldn't call it a bug.Damian E wrote:E Coli.
Listeria.
Praying Mantis.
Yep - the blank board appears and I can hear the beeps of letters/numbers being selected (it only seems to happen when it's my opponent to choose), but nothing appears. The only way to continue is to close the window and if the game is resumable, I'll find that I'll have lost the round (as all is normal for my opponent). It didn't happen before I installed the latest version of Flash about a week ago, so perhaps it's something to do with that (also new with this version of Flash are various alarming green and purple borders flickering up around the game rounds from time to time).Innis Carson wrote:Might just be me (or might be something well-known) but often when I'm playing games, the letters/numbers window will come up completely blank, so I can't see what I'm doing. And this persists until I shut the window and go back in, and then about half the time it doesn't let me resume the game I was in.
Do you think is just my computer/internet, or does this happen to anyone else?
Bizarre. Apterous doesn't use Flash anywhere so it sounds like our friends at Adobe have done something pretty nasty to your computer. Interesting that it only ever occurs when the other person picks though; I'll look into that.jimbentley wrote:Yep - the blank board appears and I can hear the beeps of letters/numbers being selected (it only seems to happen when it's my opponent to choose), but nothing appears. The only way to continue is to close the window and if the game is resumable, I'll find that I'll have lost the round (as all is normal for my opponent). It didn't happen before I installed the latest version of Flash about a week ago, so perhaps it's something to do with that (also new with this version of Flash are various alarming green and purple borders flickering up around the game rounds from time to time).Innis Carson wrote:Might just be me (or might be something well-known) but often when I'm playing games, the letters/numbers window will come up completely blank, so I can't see what I'm doing. And this persists until I shut the window and go back in, and then about half the time it doesn't let me resume the game I was in.
Do you think is just my computer/internet, or does this happen to anyone else?
You have to play it on the day, hence the name. I think there's a 5 minute grace period so you were fairly unlucky to miss the cut.Dan Vanniasingham wrote:Unsure if this is a bug or not, but I commenced yesterday's duel around 11:55pm, eventually scoring 6 (I think) but finishing it today at 12:07am, by which time the scores had updated. I'm not overly fussed about the lost points as I've had to miss a few duels through being away, but if the duel needs to be started and completed before a certain time to count then that's worth noting.
That sounds annoying. Is it just the Duel that's affected or is your first challenge always broken?Dan Vanniasingham wrote:Whilst I'm at it, more often than not, when logging in for the first time that day the duel challenge box is squashed to the point where I can see it exists but can't read anything about it (i.e. I can't see the format, or the words "Challenge by The Duellist" or whatever it says). This in itself isn't enough for me to moan, but I accepted Thursday's challenge, discovered the format was something like 45sec for 24 rounds, realised I didn't have enough time to do all that, closed the duel and then couldn't access it again later despite not having started the first round.
If you need some code or a screenshot from me on the latter I'll do what I can.
I have this too. It's just the duel for me but it doesn't always go like that.Charlie Reams wrote:You have to play it on the day, hence the name. I think there's a 5 minute grace period so you were fairly unlucky to miss the cut.Dan Vanniasingham wrote:Unsure if this is a bug or not, but I commenced yesterday's duel around 11:55pm, eventually scoring 6 (I think) but finishing it today at 12:07am, by which time the scores had updated. I'm not overly fussed about the lost points as I've had to miss a few duels through being away, but if the duel needs to be started and completed before a certain time to count then that's worth noting.
That sounds annoying. Is it just the Duel that's affected or is your first challenge always broken?Dan Vanniasingham wrote:Whilst I'm at it, more often than not, when logging in for the first time that day the duel challenge box is squashed to the point where I can see it exists but can't read anything about it (i.e. I can't see the format, or the words "Challenge by The Duellist" or whatever it says). This in itself isn't enough for me to moan, but I accepted Thursday's challenge, discovered the format was something like 45sec for 24 rounds, realised I didn't have enough time to do all that, closed the duel and then couldn't access it again later despite not having started the first round.
If you need some code or a screenshot from me on the latter I'll do what I can.
I didn't think it did, but I've not changed anything else on the system (well, not intentionally) so wondered if it was involved somehow. Anyway, I'll reinstall an older version and see if it makes any difference.Charlie Reams wrote:Bizarre. Apterous doesn't use Flash anywhere so it sounds like our friends at Adobe have done something pretty nasty to your computer. Interesting that it only ever occurs when the other person picks though; I'll look into that.
I've seen this a few times, too - the first challenge box is squashed to about ten pixels high, so it could be any sort of challenge from anyone (although, of course, it's always the Duellist).Dan Vanniasingham wrote:Whilst I'm at it, more often than not, when logging in for the first time that day the duel challenge box is squashed to the point where I can see it exists but can't read anything about it (i.e. I can't see the format, or the words "Challenge by The Duellist" or whatever it says).