c4countdown

..is brilliant. Any of our in-house game show regulars been on it?

Oh my god, Stephen on this week's one.. just brilliant.

Such a show.

I'm not partial to the programme myself, so I don't waste the power illuminating my TV screen for it.

My housemates think I should apply and I am kind of tempted just so I can embarrass myself again on TV. It would deifnitely be funny seeing all the lights go out after I come out from the love lift. I've not seen all of this week's but it's still on sky plus, I have however seen the bit on the date where the guy knocks over his drink. That was fucking hilarious!

Hiya.

Take Me Out's ok... I would rate it 7/10.

I'm not like those people (probably you - as you said it is brilliant) who rush to go and watch it even if they are, say, in the middle of a close game on Apterous. I just watch it if I have time, and most of the time just finish off a game on Apterous (if I am playing one), or finishing a post on here (if I am doing one) then go and watch it.

That Krystal with bright pink hair is not going to get anyone and if she does, someone blind and crazy! The twins are weird too, it's their hair again. All messy and strange. Same kind of person would probably pick them. Some other people, as well, are utterly mad and weird! No offence to them! I'm not saying looks are nessacessarily more important than personality, but you wouldn't want to go out with someone who doesn't look very nice in your opinion really.

Soph.

Ryan Taylor wrote:My housemates think I should apply and I am kind of tempted just so I can embarrass myself again on TV. It would deifnitely be funny seeing all the lights go out after I come out from the love lift. I've not seen all of this week's but it's still on sky plus, I have however seen the bit on the date where the guy knocks over his drink. That was fucking hilarious!

The last bloke is hilarious, ten times funnier.

Soph K wrote:I'm not like those people (probably you - as you said it is brilliant) who rush to go and watch it even if they are, say, in the middle of a close game on Apterous. I just watch it if I have time, and most of the time just finish off a game on Apterous (if I am playing one), or finishing a post on here (if I am doing one) then go and watch it.

a-lol

Soph K wrote:Hiya.

Take Me Out's ok... I would rate it 7/10.

You can't say something is ok and then give it 7/10. 7/10 is way more than just ok. Unless you're someone who gives things 10/10 willy nilly, like newspapers who review video games. Even Countdown would be a tough show to give 10/10 to. Are you saying Take Me Out is only two or three levels below Countdown as a tv show? I don't think so. I'd say it would be -34/10 as a tv show. And I've not even watched it(it would be much much lower if I had).

Soph K wrote:nessacessarily

Cool new word, Soph. Fun to say.

Matt Morrison wrote:

Soph K wrote:nessacessarily

Cool new word, Soph. Fun to say.

Oops.

Mark James wrote:

Soph K wrote:Hiya.

Take Me Out's ok... I would rate it 7/10.

You can't say something is ok and then give it 7/10. 7/10 is way more than just ok. Unless you're someone who gives things 10/10 willy nilly, like newspapers who review video games. Even Countdown would be a tough show to give 10/10 to. Are you saying Take Me Out is only two or three levels below Countdown as a tv show? I don't think so. I'd say it would be -34/10 as a tv show. And I've not even watched it(it would be much much lower if I had).

5/10 then. 5.5

Soph K wrote: 5/10 then. 5.5

Another of my pet hates. X.5?/10. That's the same as rating something out of 100. It's far to big a number. Even 10 is too big for rating things really. I prefer the five star system of rating movies.(why is there a red squiggly line under movies? Is that not how you spell it).

Mark James wrote:

Soph K wrote: 5/10 then. 5.5

Another of my pet hates. X.5?/10. That's the same as rating something out of 100. It's far to big a number. Even 10 is too big for rating things really. I prefer the five star system of rating movies.(why is there a red squiggly line under movies? Is that not how you spell it).

Ok. 3/5 then.

Soph K wrote:

Mark James wrote:

Soph K wrote: 5/10 then. 5.5

Another of my pet hates. X.5?/10. That's the same as rating something out of 100. It's far to big a number. Even 10 is too big for rating things really. I prefer the five star system of rating movies.(why is there a red squiggly line under movies? Is that not how you spell it).

Ok. 3/5 then.

So, 6/10?

So, 6/10?

well i would do 2.5/5 - 5/10, only mark said he doesnt like __.5/__ things. he's fussy

Mark James wrote:Another of my pet hates. X.5?/10. That's the same as rating something out of 100. It's far to big a number.

Out of 20 surely?

Mark James wrote:

Soph K wrote: 5/10 then. 5.5

Another of my pet hates. X.5?/10. That's the same as rating something out of 100. It's far to big a number

Presumably you were delighted with the rise in VAT.

Charlie Reams wrote:

Mark James wrote:

Soph K wrote: 5/10 then. 5.5

Another of my pet hates. X.5?/10. That's the same as rating something out of 100. It's far to big a number

Presumably you were delighted with the rise in VAT.

Why, what was the rise in VAT? I don't pay attention to these things.

Charlie Reams wrote: Presumably you were delighted with the rise in VAT.

Never knew 'owt about it.

Mark James wrote:(why is there a red squiggly line under movies? Is that not how you spell it)

Yep, you do spell movies like that so I am not too sure why it had a red squiggly line under it... Maybe it's because you didn't put a space before the brackets...