Page 1 of 1
How would Susie fare as a contestant?
Posted: Thu Jan 31, 2008 7:21 pm
by Matthew Green
Do you reckon series champion or mere QFinalist?
I remember she couldnt get some of the teatime teasers (unless she was just saying it to make me feel better) that were very easy and she seems very impressed when people get a good numbers solution so it'd be interesting to see her in the chair. On the subject, who would win in a tournament of the following players:
Des O'Connor
Des Lynam
Carol Vorderman
Susie Dent
Alison Heard
Richard Digance
Tom O'Connor
Jo Brand
Re: How would Susie fare as a contestant?
Posted: Thu Jan 31, 2008 7:30 pm
by Julian Fell
Jo Brand I think - Damian said in 'Spreading the Word' that she was one of the very few DC guests who could probably beat a good proportion of contestants...
Re: How would Susie fare as a contestant?
Posted: Thu Jan 31, 2008 7:36 pm
by Joseph Bolas
Julian wrote:Jo Brand I think - Damian said in 'Spreading the Word' that she was one of the very few DC guests who could probably beat a good proportion of contestants...
Jo may come up with funny nonsense words, but I think she would be the eventual winner. I would include Stephen Fry and Alan Davies into the selection of contestants though.
Re: How would Susie fare as a contestant?
Posted: Sun Feb 03, 2008 7:03 pm
by Martin Smith
I think Susie would win. She's so good at memorising the words which come up a lot (daemons, palinode, operant/operand, qintar etc). The numbers aren't so important; at worst you'll lost 30 points , but you can get that back from 4 or 5 of the 11 letters rounds, and that's before you consider 9-letter words or the conundrum.
Re: How would Susie fare as a contestant?
Posted: Sun Feb 03, 2008 7:35 pm
by Jon O'Neill
Errr, doesn't anyone know she cheats?
Re: How would Susie fare as a contestant?
Posted: Sun Feb 03, 2008 8:05 pm
by Charlie Reams
Yeah, knowing the words is a different skill to spotting them. Otherwise I'd be quite good.
Re: How would Susie fare as a contestant?
Posted: Sun Feb 03, 2008 8:30 pm
by Joseph Bolas
Martin Smith wrote:The numbers aren't so important; at worst you'll lost 30 points , but you can get that back from 4 or 5 of the 11 letters rounds, and that's before you consider 9-letter words or the conundrum.
I disagree with that. If you have letter selections where there are no 9's and there are no obscure words that you will know and your opponent wont know, then you have to rely on the numbers to gain a lead, so I think those 30 points are important.
Re: How would Susie fare as a contestant?
Posted: Sun Feb 03, 2008 9:46 pm
by Charlie Reams
I think Jono's octochamp run proves that if you can nail your opponent on the numbers then you can afford to make shit up in about half of the letters rounds and still win comfortably.
Re: How would Susie fare as a contestant?
Posted: Sun Feb 03, 2008 10:04 pm
by Jon O'Neill
Thanks mate.
Re: How would Susie fare as a contestant?
Posted: Sun Jan 18, 2009 1:50 pm
by Ian Volante
So what's causing this recent spate of thread-bumping?
Re: How would Susie fare as a contestant?
Posted: Sun Jan 18, 2009 2:11 pm
by Jason Larsen
Susie would do so-so, because she's good at the Letters Game, but not the Numbers Game!
Re: How would Susie fare as a contestant?
Posted: Sun Jan 18, 2009 3:30 pm
by Ben Wilson
Ian Volante wrote:So what's causing this recent spate of thread-bumping?
You, by the looks of things. [/reams]
Re: How would Susie fare as a contestant?
Posted: Mon Jan 19, 2009 7:25 am
by Ian Volante
Ben Wilson wrote:Ian Volante wrote:So what's causing this recent spate of thread-bumping?
You, by the looks of things. [/reams]
I blame Sunday.