Page 1 of 1

Spoilers for Thursday 12th June 2008

Posted: Thu Jun 12, 2008 1:45 pm
by JasonCullen
Post spoilers here :D

Re: Spoilers for Thursday 12th June 2008

Posted: Thu Jun 12, 2008 2:32 pm
by Joseph Bolas
jasoncullen wrote:Post spoilers here :D
David's on today, so how can you be sure there is any spoilers :lol:.

Re: Spoilers for Thursday 12th June 2008

Posted: Thu Jun 12, 2008 2:41 pm
by Howard Somerset
I'm sure OVATES was available in one of Jonathan's games a week or two ago. It was the definition that I remembered, not the word. :(

Re: Spoilers for Thursday 12th June 2008

Posted: Thu Jun 12, 2008 2:42 pm
by Howard Somerset
I was hoping the GROUPEE was available as an equallier, but it's spelt GROUPIE :(

Re: Spoilers for Thursday 12th June 2008

Posted: Thu Jun 12, 2008 2:43 pm
by Ray Folwell
1st numbers : 7 x (50 + 75 + 8 + 100/25) (took > 30 secs though)

Re: Spoilers for Thursday 12th June 2008

Posted: Thu Jun 12, 2008 2:45 pm
by Peter Mabey
(75+8)/50=12
(100+12+25)7=959

Re: Spoilers for Thursday 12th June 2008

Posted: Thu Jun 12, 2008 2:48 pm
by Peter Mabey
PeterMabey wrote:(75+8)/50=12
(100+12+25)7=959
Sorry, meant 75x8 etc. :oops:

Re: Spoilers for Thursday 12th June 2008

Posted: Thu Jun 12, 2008 2:51 pm
by Ross Allatt
My last spoiler turned out to be a fail, but in the round where David got Diamines, I would have had a shot at MISNAMED. Its in the Shorter Oxford; no idea if in NODE or not.

Ross

Re: Spoilers for Thursday 12th June 2008

Posted: Thu Jun 12, 2008 2:53 pm
by Joseph Bolas
Did Susie allow IODINES?

Re: Spoilers for Thursday 12th June 2008

Posted: Thu Jun 12, 2008 2:53 pm
by JasonCullen
Like in my 4th heat game, IODINES has come up and has been accepted by Susie but it is not allowed by CountMax :?

Re: Spoilers for Thursday 12th June 2008

Posted: Thu Jun 12, 2008 2:54 pm
by Howard Somerset
Ross Allatt wrote:My last spoiler turned out to be a fail, but in the round where David got Diamines, I would have had a shot at MISNAMED. Its in the Shorter Oxford; no idea if in NODE or not.

Ross
Yes. It's in the dictionary now in use. :)

Re: Spoilers for Thursday 12th June 2008

Posted: Thu Jun 12, 2008 2:57 pm
by Michael Wallace
was it just me who felt it was a bit weird of Des to ask David "how risky" his 8 was *before* asking Ben for his declaration? :roll:

Re: Spoilers for Thursday 12th June 2008

Posted: Thu Jun 12, 2008 3:00 pm
by Dinos Sfyris
I wondered if you'd spot DIAMINES David. Nice one :D and IODINES. You're making me proud!

For the last numbers I did ((9x3)+75+7)x8-7 = 865

Re: Spoilers for Thursday 12th June 2008

Posted: Thu Jun 12, 2008 3:00 pm
by Joseph Bolas
jasoncullen wrote:Like in my 4th heat game, IODINES has come up and has been accepted by Susie but it is not allowed by CountMax :?
They should've accepted my INSOLATED then if they are accepting loads of mass nouns :lol:

Re: Spoilers for Thursday 12th June 2008

Posted: Thu Jun 12, 2008 3:02 pm
by JasonCullen
by jasoncullen on Mon Jun 09, 2008 2:46 pm
TSARINA? Watch out for this word in the near future - but slightly different
My bad everyone :cry:

Re: Spoilers for Thursday 12th June 2008

Posted: Thu Jun 12, 2008 3:03 pm
by Peter Mabey
Are EQUINOIDS (PSEUDO-HORSES) in NODE2?

Re: Spoilers for Thursday 12th June 2008

Posted: Thu Jun 12, 2008 3:07 pm
by Joseph Bolas
I love these conundrums :D

Re: Spoilers for Thursday 12th June 2008

Posted: Thu Jun 12, 2008 3:09 pm
by JasonCullen
My uncle got GARIBALDI in the audience but Benji stole his moment of glory :lol:

Re: Spoilers for Thursday 12th June 2008

Posted: Thu Jun 12, 2008 3:11 pm
by Joseph Bolas
jasoncullen wrote:My uncle got GARIBALDI in the audience but Benji stole his moment of glory :lol:
IMO I thought it was an easy one :D.

Re: Spoilers for Thursday 12th June 2008

Posted: Thu Jun 12, 2008 3:13 pm
by Matt Coates
me too Jay :cry:

Re: Spoilers for Thursday 12th June 2008

Posted: Thu Jun 12, 2008 3:16 pm
by JasonCullen
Joseph Bolas wrote: IMO I thought it was an easy one :D.
Well all the other contestants in the green room did not get GARIBALDI but ironically the comedian who warms up the crowd was talking about GARIBALDI biscuits before this game begun. I should of seen it coming really :x

Re: Spoilers for Thursday 12th June 2008

Posted: Thu Jun 12, 2008 3:20 pm
by Howard Somerset
PeterMabey wrote:Are EQUINOIDS (PSEUDO-HORSES) in NODE2?
Not in the ODE2r, which is the one now in use. :(

Re: Spoilers for Thursday 12th June 2008

Posted: Thu Jun 12, 2008 4:08 pm
by Richard Brittain
A solid performance today by DoD, but the scoreline flattered him because Ben Hanks put in a strong performance bar 2 or 3 rounds. As I've come to expect in modern series finals, the game threw out a lot of difficult letters selections which restricted scoring but also allowed for some exotic words to be formed. DoD didn't quite look infallible, but I would still back him to win the series because of his ability to spot words like 'diamines' and 'tzarina'. And well done to Ben(ji) on his Countdown run, showed himself to be a very good player, especially on the letters. Obviously unlucky to have to face DoD in the QFs, but also unlucky today with some disallowed words. The contest was tighter than the scoreline suggested, but I'm happy because the margin of victory fits in with my initial predictions given in another thread!

Re: Spoilers for Thursday 12th June 2008

Posted: Thu Jun 12, 2008 5:07 pm
by Martin Gardner
I thought David was excellent today and seemed to beat Dictionary Corner in a couple of rounds like NORTENA and TZARINA. He certains looks streets ahead of the other players. The only round I could beat him on was the conundrum, which I didn't think was easy at all and I'm even surprised I got it.

Martin

Re: Spoilers for Thursday 12th June 2008

Posted: Thu Jun 12, 2008 5:56 pm
by Ben Pugh
VOETSAK. I think it means 'fuck off'.

It's one of those nice South African words like SITKAMER and POTJIE in the OED whose only use is to come up on Countdown.

Good game from DoD today, spots like DIAMINES and NORTENA confirmed why I think he's going to win the series, he's able to pull out obscure words out of fairly common letter selections.

Re: Spoilers for Thursday 12th June 2008

Posted: Fri Jun 13, 2008 12:28 am
by Julian Fell
David - really, really well done for today. Although you got a relatively low score, I thought you coped exceptionally well with a load of horrible selections (on both letters and numbers). I know I couldn't've coped with those sort of selections in my own series QF - how much harder have they got in the last five or six years?! Not to mention the pressure of being in the studio, being no.1 seed, facing a strong opponent etc.!

You beat me with REGROUP and NORTENA (which was absolutely brilliant, I'd never heard of it); and on the first numbers round, and with TZARINA, which I still missed even though Jason had told us all it was going to come up! (please don't do that again though Jason, or anyone else...)

I did beat you on a few rounds, but overall I would only just have forced a crucial conundrum against you, and I had the advantage of being at home under no pressure... excellent stuff and you showed why you're the favourite.

Ben, I didn't see your original run, but you came across really well today, and put up a good fight... am I right in thinking you had an exam on that same morning? Amazing recovery powers if so.

(With regard to IODINES, and other mass noun plurals which have been allowed on the show, not being listed in CountMax - you could tell Jim to add them to his dictionary, but then again, the next time they come up Susie will probably change her mind and disallow them, as she did with OPALINES, TYMPANIES, CARMINES etc., so it'll have to be changed again... it's an impossible situation to keep track of, really)

Re: Spoilers for Thursday 12th June 2008

Posted: Fri Jun 13, 2008 10:19 am
by JasonCullen
Julian wrote: and with TZARINA, which I still missed even though Jason had told us all it was going to come up! (please don't do that again though Jason, or anyone else...)
I am sorry Julian :cry: . It wont happen again :)

Re: Spoilers for Thursday 12th June 2008

Posted: Fri Jun 13, 2008 2:53 pm
by Craig Beevers
Hadn't seen this game so catching up on it now, bit of a mixed bag really. Obviously two of the rounds were very difficult to get the maximum on, plus the dead conundrum which didn't matter. Second numbers was a bit counter-intuitive, one of those where a run-of-the-mill contestant would probably get within 10 as they'd never bother adding/subtracting anything to the big number and just look to get 825/900 and mess around with whatever is left. Those numbers games are a lot harder under pressure of course.

So anyway no century from David so I assume he was kicked out of the studio and I expect we'll be seeing Amey Deshpande in the semi-final instead.

Re: Spoilers for Thursday 12th June 2008

Posted: Mon Jun 16, 2008 2:23 am
by Benji Hanks
Indeed, I was sitting in an exam roughly 4 hours before this was filmed :lol:

Thanks for all the kind words, I'll wait to see what bits were cut before I make many comments, but like I said, I had fun ;)

Re: Spoilers for Thursday 12th June 2008

Posted: Mon Jun 16, 2008 7:25 am
by Julian Fell
Craig did you miss anything when you were watching the game at home?

Been thinking a bit more about David's performance - he beat me (watching at home) on 4 different rounds and I think there are only two other occasions that's happened to me in the 15-round era... ok he missed a few things but it's a quarter-final, you're going to be nervous (unless you're Craig!). So, very impressive all in all.

And is it just me or were the rounds in the second quarter-final a lot easier than in David's game?

Re: Spoilers for Thursday 12th June 2008

Posted: Tue Jun 17, 2008 8:20 am
by David O'Donnell
Craig Beevers wrote:
So anyway no century from David so I assume he was kicked out of the studio and I expect we'll be seeing Amey Deshpande in the semi-final instead.
Just saw this ... :D

Re: Spoilers for Thursday 12th June 2008

Posted: Sat Jun 21, 2008 4:01 pm
by Benji Hanks
Yeah, I hope you dedicate your win to me, given that without me you wouldn't have been able to write you were shaking so much :P