c4countdown

Wahey A new week, new month, new time zone (well, reverted back to the old one), but the same old champion, as Steve Turvey begins this week as the 2 times champion.

His challenger is also a 2 times champion, albeit it from 14 years ago, our very own Marcus Hares, who won 2 shows in Series 32, back in 1996. http://wiki.apterous.org/Marcus_Hares

Back in DC for his 2nd stint is former world snooker champion, John Parrott.

So, will Marcus make Steve go topsy-Turvey, or will Steve make it a case of Hares today, gone tomorrow for Marcus.

Ryan will be around with the recap later.

James Robinson wrote:His challenger is also a 2 times champion, albeit it from 14 years ago, our very own Marcus Hares, who won 2 shows in Series 32, back in 1996. http://wiki.apterous.org/Marcus_Hares

Haha what.

Cute first numbers alt: 9*7*3*2.

Also, what raccoon boy (insert meme here) said.

Close game, good TV. Nice one Marcus

Phew!!! That was too close for comfort, exciting game though, well played Marcus.

How did he get back on?

Hard luck Steve and good job Marcus. Good luck in Jungle law school. I hope you pass the bar and become a lion judge.

James Robinson wrote:His challenger is also a 2 times champion, albeit it from 14 years ago, our very own Marcus Hares, who won 2 shows in Series 32, back in 1996. http://wiki.apterous.org/Marcus_Hares

Well played Marcus - good game.

However, I feel I must query whether Damian has changed his policy again? I'm pretty sure this is the 2nd time this series a previous winner has been allowed to compete again.
I'm not sure I can quite understand the logic in allowing previous winners to add to their teapot collection, whereas "losers" (for want of a better word) are banned from having a 2nd bite at the cherry.

Philip Jarvis wrote:logic

Philip Jarvis wrote:Well played Marcus - good game.

However, I feel I must query whether Damian has changed his policy again? I'm pretty sure this is the 2nd time this series a previous winner has been allowed to compete again.
I'm not sure I can quite understand the logic in allowing previous winners to add to their teapot collection, whereas "losers" (for want of a better word) are banned from having a 2nd bite at the cherry.

I never won a teapot the first time around - it was 14 years ago, 2 years before the teapot thing

Marcus Hares wrote:

Philip Jarvis wrote:Well played Marcus - good game.

However, I feel I must query whether Damian has changed his policy again? I'm pretty sure this is the 2nd time this series a previous winner has been allowed to compete again.
I'm not sure I can quite understand the logic in allowing previous winners to add to their teapot collection, whereas "losers" (for want of a better word) are banned from having a 2nd bite at the cherry.

I never won a teapot the first time around - it was 14 years ago, 2 years before the teapot thing

So stick that in your (hose)pipe and smoke it.