Page 1 of 1

Spoilers For Thursday October 28th 2010

Posted: Thu Oct 28, 2010 12:38 pm
by James Robinson
So, Thursday is here, and so is Stevie after yesterday's very tight game against Julian "Jules" Joss.

Can he complete the hat-trick with a victory today :?:

The 2nd half of your bi-weekly Robinson Recap will be around later. ;) :) :D

Re: Spoilers For Thursday October 28th 2010

Posted: Thu Oct 28, 2010 2:43 pm
by Tony Atkins
Originally Rachel said she drank Red Bull at the services, which had to be redone
as "fizzy drink". They also recorded a version where she puts her foot down and
drives straight home without stopping!

Re: Spoilers For Thursday October 28th 2010

Posted: Thu Oct 28, 2010 3:08 pm
by Andy Wilson
I wonder did Rory remember MAIZES being disallowed when he was on during Jimmy's run last year?

Re: Spoilers For Thursday October 28th 2010

Posted: Thu Oct 28, 2010 3:11 pm
by Tony Atkins
Andy Wilson wrote:I wonder did Rory remember MAIZES being disallowed when he was on during Jimmy's run last year?
Originally Susie disallowed it, which was nice as the scores were then equal.
Then the gallery intervened and filming was stopped for several minutes
whilst Susie and the gallery argued it out.

An equaller they gave was SAMMIE (Australian sandwhich).

Re: Spoilers For Thursday October 28th 2010

Posted: Thu Oct 28, 2010 4:41 pm
by Eoin Monaghan
SEAFRONT was there as a beater in the TREASON round and SAMFIE was there in the MAIZES round.

Disappointing to see Stevie beaten, I enjoyed his games.

Re: Spoilers For Thursday October 28th 2010

Posted: Thu Oct 28, 2010 5:06 pm
by Andy Wilson
Tony Atkins wrote:
Originally Susie disallowed it, which was nice as the scores were then equal.
Then the gallery intervened and filming was stopped for several minutes
whilst Susie and the gallery argued it out.
An interesting insight. Cheers.

Re: Spoilers For Thursday October 28th 2010

Posted: Thu Oct 28, 2010 9:18 pm
by Brian Moore
Hmm, maizes. It's going to make Susie's life more difficult if the mass noun (with the qualification "if you can order it in a restaurant") plural disqualification is smudged. I think Susie mentioned in the definition "varieties of maize" which gives a clear understanding (e.g. "there are several varieties of maize"), whereas "there are several maizes" is ambiguous, and I've never heard it used in farming circles (or crop circles). Most of the Google mentions of 'maizes' are surnames, though there are several instances of the plural.

Totally unconnected, DIALLERS was there in an early round as a DC-equaller.