Page 1 of 1

Spoilers For Thursday October 21st 2010

Posted: Thu Oct 21, 2010 12:47 pm
by James Robinson
After a relaxing break in the Channel Islands, I'm now fully up to speed with the goings on in Countdown, and at this moment in time, tomorrow might be a monumental day. 8-)

Current champ (do I have to remind you :?: ) Jack Hurst is on fire with 703 points from his first 6 games. Interestingly, just above him in the rankings are Michael Chadwick and Peter Godwin, who in their 8 games scored 705 and 706 points, respectively, meaning Jack is just a smidge behind them having played 2 games less :!: :shock: :o

As you are probably aware the octochamp points scoring record held by Andrew Hulme is 930 points, meaning that Jack needs 228 more (as well as the 2 wins obviously) to overtake Andrew. Can he do it :?:

I'll be around with the Robinson Recap later on. :D

Re: Spoilers For Thursday October 21st 2010

Posted: Thu Oct 21, 2010 12:54 pm
by Michael Wallace
James Robinson wrote:As you are probably aware the octochamp points scoring record held by Andrew Hulme is 930 points, meaning that Jack needs 228 more (as well as the 2 wins obviously)
What's the septochamp record total?

Re: Spoilers For Thursday October 21st 2010

Posted: Thu Oct 21, 2010 1:28 pm
by James Robinson
Michael Wallace wrote:
James Robinson wrote:As you are probably aware the octochamp points scoring record held by Andrew Hulme is 930 points, meaning that Jack needs 228 more (as well as the 2 wins obviously)
What's the septochamp record total?
After scurrying around, Steve Baines of Series 57 has the record at 758.

Re: Spoilers For Thursday October 21st 2010

Posted: Thu Oct 21, 2010 1:46 pm
by Jon O'Neill
James Robinson wrote:
Michael Wallace wrote:
James Robinson wrote:As you are probably aware the octochamp points scoring record held by Andrew Hulme is 930 points, meaning that Jack needs 228 more (as well as the 2 wins obviously)
What's the septochamp record total?
After scurrying around, Steve Baines of Series 57 has the record at 758.
Sexochamp?

Re: Spoilers For Thursday October 21st 2010

Posted: Thu Oct 21, 2010 1:53 pm
by Michael Wallace
Jon O'Neill wrote:Sexochamp?
You called?

Re: Spoilers For Thursday October 21st 2010

Posted: Thu Oct 21, 2010 1:54 pm
by James Robinson
Jon O'Neill wrote:Sexochamp?
Do you want me to include or exclude the viscounts from Series 46 :?:

Re: Spoilers For Thursday October 21st 2010

Posted: Thu Oct 21, 2010 2:49 pm
by Josh Hurst
CTDAEIFSH was the original selection in that round. It had to be re-filmed.

Re: Spoilers For Thursday October 21st 2010

Posted: Thu Oct 21, 2010 2:59 pm
by Rhys Benjamin
Josh Hurst wrote:CTDAEIFSH was the original selection in that round. It had to be re-filmed.
Which Round?

Why?

Re: Spoilers For Thursday October 21st 2010

Posted: Thu Oct 21, 2010 3:02 pm
by Josh Hurst
Rhys Benjamin wrote:
Josh Hurst wrote:CTDAEIFSH was the original selection in that round. It had to be re-filmed.
Which Round?

Why?
Can't remember which number the round was, but the one where Alex declared SHAFTED and Jack declared HARDIEST. The reason is because there was a rather rude 8 which you wouldn't have heard of, Rhys. The D cannot be added onto the end if you work it out, otherwise it'd be hyphenated.

Re: Spoilers For Thursday October 21st 2010

Posted: Thu Oct 21, 2010 3:03 pm
by Rhys Benjamin
Josh Hurst wrote:
Rhys Benjamin wrote:
Josh Hurst wrote:CTDAEIFSH was the original selection in that round. It had to be re-filmed.
Which Round?

Why?
Can't remember which number the round was, but the one where Alex declared SHAFTED and Jack declared HARDIEST. The reason is because there was a rather rude 8 which you wouldn't have heard of, Rhys. The D cannot be added onto the end if you work it out, otherwise it'd be hyphenated.
Try me.

Re: Spoilers For Thursday October 21st 2010

Posted: Thu Oct 21, 2010 3:03 pm
by Ben Hunter
Is he on for a max game here...

Re: Spoilers For Thursday October 21st 2010

Posted: Thu Oct 21, 2010 3:08 pm
by Jojo Apollo
Superb stuff, Jack. 8-) Is that the second ever Max?

Re: Spoilers For Thursday October 21st 2010

Posted: Thu Oct 21, 2010 3:09 pm
by Josh Hurst
Ben Hunter wrote:Is he on for a max game here...
No, missed PERENTIE in the round where he declared POINTER. 133/134 though, not too shabby at all I'd say.

The 8 was SHITFACE Rhys. It was pretty funny in the studio when it happened. Jack just started laughing pretty much as soon as the last letter came out. Buried his head on the desk, it was awesome.

Re: Spoilers For Thursday October 21st 2010

Posted: Thu Oct 21, 2010 3:11 pm
by Michael Wallace
Crikey, so just 95 for the record?

Re: Spoilers For Thursday October 21st 2010

Posted: Thu Oct 21, 2010 3:12 pm
by Jojo Apollo
Michael Wallace wrote:Crikey, so just 95 for the record?
:o Yikes! It could be smashed.

Re: Spoilers For Thursday October 21st 2010

Posted: Thu Oct 21, 2010 3:19 pm
by Josh Hurst
Jojo Apollo wrote:
Michael Wallace wrote:Crikey, so just 95 for the record?
:o Yikes! It could be smashed.
No, he plays Ed McCullagh and gets beaten. Suppose that's a spoiler so I should delete it.

Re: Spoilers For Thursday October 21st 2010

Posted: Thu Oct 21, 2010 3:22 pm
by Rhys Benjamin
63 to beat Eoin, 95 for the record.


Image

Re: Spoilers For Thursday October 21st 2010

Posted: Thu Oct 21, 2010 3:23 pm
by Rhys Benjamin
Josh Hurst wrote:
Jojo Apollo wrote:
Michael Wallace wrote:Crikey, so just 95 for the record?
:o Yikes! It could be smashed.
No, he plays Ed McCullagh and gets beaten. Suppose that's a spoiler so I should delete it.
Yesterday you said he lost today's game...... :x :x :x :x

I don't believe you.........

Re: Spoilers For Thursday October 21st 2010

Posted: Thu Oct 21, 2010 3:30 pm
by Howard Somerset
Rhys Benjamin wrote:Yesterday you said he lost today's game...... :x :x :x :x

I don't believe you.........
Well, I was told that Jack lost his first game. I don't believe anything anyone says now.

Re: Spoilers For Thursday October 21st 2010

Posted: Thu Oct 21, 2010 3:35 pm
by Jon O'Neill
James Robinson wrote:
Jon O'Neill wrote:Sexochamp?
Do you want me to include or exclude the viscounts from Series 46 :?:
Both please.

Re: Spoilers For Thursday October 21st 2010

Posted: Thu Oct 21, 2010 3:57 pm
by JackHurst
Someone posted this on my facebook event:
Stuart 'pid' Jones: You have been nominated for the coveted "king of /b/" award.
Thoughts?
I have no idea what this means, is he making some sort of joke at my expense, or am I nominated for an award on some type of forum?

Re: Spoilers For Thursday October 21st 2010

Posted: Thu Oct 21, 2010 4:01 pm
by Michael Wallace
JackHurst wrote:Someone posted this on my facebook event:
Stuart 'pid' Jones: You have been nominated for the coveted "king of /b/" award.
Thoughts?
I have no idea what this means, is he making some sort of joke at my expense, or am I nominated for an award on some type of forum?
That's presumably referring to 4chan, but I've not heard of "king of /b/", but I am not a /b/-tard, so that is perhaps why.

Re: Spoilers For Thursday October 21st 2010

Posted: Thu Oct 21, 2010 4:03 pm
by Ben Hunter
JackHurst wrote:Someone posted this on my facebook event:
Stuart 'pid' Jones: You have been nominated for the coveted "king of /b/" award.
Thoughts?
I have no idea what this means, is he making some sort of joke at my expense, or am I nominated for an award on some type of forum?
Basically it means you're now an internet sensation.

Re: Spoilers For Thursday October 21st 2010

Posted: Thu Oct 21, 2010 4:09 pm
by Ben Hunter
I fucking love openbook. Every day it seems a new person realises that there's "a new Carol".

Re: Spoilers For Thursday October 21st 2010

Posted: Thu Oct 21, 2010 4:50 pm
by Ryan Taylor
Ben Hunter wrote:I fucking love openbook. Every day it seems a new person realises that there's "a new Carol".
Oh my god, so true. Makes you wonder just how many people there are out there who still think Carol is on the show. Heaven knows there may even be people who don't know that Whiteley is brown bread.

Re: Spoilers For Thursday October 21st 2010

Posted: Thu Oct 21, 2010 5:43 pm
by Kirk Bevins
Yeah PERENTIE for a beater but even with that it was 116-116 at the conundrum and I just couldn't live with Jack's speed on the conundrum so I'm beaten again, twice in a week. Mate, you're fucking awesome and a great bloke to boot. Now do what you deserve to do and smash 95 tomorrow. :D

Edit: Why were you sucking cock after you'd solved the round 10 numbers game?

Re: Spoilers For Thursday October 21st 2010

Posted: Thu Oct 21, 2010 6:37 pm
by JackHurst
Kirk Bevins wrote:
Edit: Why were you sucking cock after you'd solved the round 10 numbers game?
What?

Re: Spoilers For Thursday October 21st 2010

Posted: Thu Oct 21, 2010 7:15 pm
by Hugh Binnie
JackHurst wrote:
Kirk Bevins wrote:Edit: Why were you sucking cock after you'd solved the round 10 numbers game?
What?
I think he's referring to your totally uninappropriate tongue-in-cheek motion.

Re: Spoilers For Thursday October 21st 2010

Posted: Thu Oct 21, 2010 7:29 pm
by Andrew Hulme

Re: Spoilers For Thursday October 21st 2010

Posted: Thu Oct 21, 2010 7:34 pm
by James Robinson
You'll so be hoping for that, won't you, Andrew :?: :twisted:

Phenomenal again, Jack. Interestingly, that 133 is the highest score on the show when the contestant just got 1 nine-letter word, beating the previous best of 131, got by Tom Hargreaves against Ben Wilson in CoC XI. 8-)

A nice appropriate 8 in round 2 was OCTAGONS.

2nd Numbers Alt.: (75 x 8) + (5 x 10) + 3 = 653

Re: Spoilers For Thursday October 21st 2010

Posted: Thu Oct 21, 2010 7:39 pm
by Gavin Chipper
Under Gevin scoring (nine points for a nine), Jack's score was 124, which I'm fairly sure is a record. Tom Hargreaves got 122 once (actual score of 131) which I think was the record.

I wondered about HEADFIRST in the HARDIEST round but apparently not, and apparently they weren't even the "real" letters. But I was happy with 90 today, without getting the 9.

Re: Spoilers For Thursday October 21st 2010

Posted: Thu Oct 21, 2010 8:04 pm
by Ryan Taylor
Gavin Chipper wrote:Under Gevin scoring (nine points for a nine), Jack's score was 124, which I'm fairly sure is a record. Tom Hargreaves got 122 once (actual score of 131) which I think was the record.

I wondered about HEADFIRST in the HARDIEST round but apparently not, and apparently they weren't even the "real" letters. But I was happy with 90 today, without getting the 9.
Jack, being the smug bastard that he is, also mentioned HEADFIRST^ to Alistair McGowan after he had suggested FISHTRADE^.

Re: Spoilers For Thursday October 21st 2010

Posted: Thu Oct 21, 2010 9:30 pm
by David Roe
It's a bit strange in NODE1 (I don't have NODE2 so can't comment about that) but "head first" is shown as two words in the lead entry, but within the definition it's used in an example as head-first. Not that it matters for Countdown purposes because it's disallowed either way, but what would be the position if it had been spelt headfirst in the definition?

Re: Spoilers For Thursday October 21st 2010

Posted: Thu Oct 21, 2010 10:09 pm
by Kirk Bevins
David Roe wrote:It's a bit strange in NODE1 (I don't have NODE2 so can't comment about that) but "head first" is shown as two words in the lead entry, but within the definition it's used in an example as head-first. Not that it matters for Countdown purposes because it's disallowed either way, but what would be the position if it had been spelt headfirst in the definition?
It'd be disallowed. It happens a lot in ODE2r - a word in the definition isn't defined in the dictionary anywhere.

Re: Spoilers For Thursday October 21st 2010

Posted: Thu Oct 21, 2010 10:32 pm
by Charlie Reams
Kirk Bevins wrote: It happens a lot in ODE2r - a word in the definition isn't defined in the dictionary anywhere.
Not really, only twice that we know of.

Also, it says in the intro that the hyphenations given are only examples and not meant to exclude alternatives, so it's probably justified on that basis.

Re: Spoilers For Thursday October 21st 2010

Posted: Thu Oct 21, 2010 10:37 pm
by Gavin Chipper
David Roe wrote:It's a bit strange in NODE1 (I don't have NODE2 so can't comment about that) but "head first" is shown as two words in the lead entry, but within the definition it's used in an example as head-first. Not that it matters for Countdown purposes because it's disallowed either way, but what would be the position if it had been spelt headfirst in the definition?
I definitely replied to this. Where's it gone?

Edit - Anyway, what I said was that a hyphen is used because of its position in the sentence - "a head-first slide" whereas you would also say "the slide was head first". But I don't think this would ever turn two words into one without even a hyphen. It would be like calling someone a not-at-all-bald chap, if he had all his hair.

Re: Spoilers For Thursday October 21st 2010

Posted: Thu Oct 21, 2010 10:42 pm
by JackHurst
SHITFACE

Re: Spoilers For Thursday October 21st 2010

Posted: Thu Oct 21, 2010 10:58 pm
by Edward McCullagh
Absolutely excellent stuff, Jack - hope you destroy the 930 tomorrow :)

Re: Spoilers For Thursday October 21st 2010

Posted: Sat Oct 30, 2010 11:31 am
by Chris Davies
It dawned on me (the day after this show) - what a superb conundrum scramble. 'Ugly' hints at the answer...

Re: Spoilers For Thursday October 21st 2010

Posted: Sat Oct 30, 2010 5:19 pm
by Mike Brown
Chris Davies wrote:It dawned on me (the day after this show) - what a superb conundrum scramble. 'Ugly' hints at the answer...
Maybe Damian is practising for when he starts doing nine-letter Teatime Teasers. :)

Re: Spoilers For Thursday October 21st 2010

Posted: Sat Oct 30, 2010 9:23 pm
by D Eadie
Chris Davies wrote:It dawned on me (the day after this show) - what a superb conundrum scramble. 'Ugly' hints at the answer...

Cheers Chris,
It's like tossing pearls to swine. Glad to see you're not a pig. :lol:

Re: Spoilers For Thursday October 21st 2010

Posted: Thu Nov 04, 2010 8:52 am
by James Robinson
Josh Hurst wrote:The 8 was SHITFACE Rhys. It was pretty funny in the studio when it happened. Jack just started laughing pretty much as soon as the last letter came out. Buried his head on the desk, it was awesome.
A few weeks later, the press get onto it:

http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/tv/news/a28 ... d.html?rss