Page 1 of 1

Spoilers for Tuesday 7th of September 2010

Posted: Tue Sep 07, 2010 11:03 am
by JackHurst
With two impressive wins under his belt, Daniels looks set to be this series third OCTOCHAMP, but you never know, he could face a stinker of an opponent today. Will he continue to crush everyone in his path, or will perhaps a young apterite who has played over 3 thousand games come and give him a run for his money? Who knows what might happen? Will Daniel have had another hair cut??!?! Will he lean in even closer to the monitor?!?! Will Penny Smith go mental because she gets pussierot disallowed and smash Susie over the head with her dictionary??!?!!?!?!?!!?!!?!?!?!?!

Find out first on channel 4 ant 15:25 today! (Or alternatively try and wheedle the imformation out of Daniel if you happen to play against him on apterous today before the episode is aired)

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 7th of September 2010

Posted: Tue Sep 07, 2010 11:10 am
by Ben Hunter
In other news, Huddersfield, and Scott Gillies will be writing the recap.

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 7th of September 2010

Posted: Tue Sep 07, 2010 11:14 am
by Matt Morrison
Ben Hunter wrote:In other news, Huddersfield, and Scott Gillies will be writing the recap.
lol

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 7th of September 2010

Posted: Tue Sep 07, 2010 11:32 am
by James Robinson
It would be brill if Daniel could keep his scores well high, as he could even have a chance of breaking the points record.

He has 239 points from his first 2, if he keeps that average up, that would be 956 by next Tuesday, smashing Andrew's record by 26 points. 8-)

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 7th of September 2010

Posted: Tue Sep 07, 2010 11:34 am
by Ben Hunter
James Robinson wrote:It would be brill if Daniel could keep his scores well high, as he could even have a chance of breaking the points record.

He has 239 points from his first 2, if he keeps that average up, that would be 956 by next Tuesday, smashing Andrew's record by 26 points. 8-)
I'll update the wiki now.

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 7th of September 2010

Posted: Tue Sep 07, 2010 11:36 am
by JackHurst
James Robinson wrote:It would be brill if Daniel could keep his scores well high, as he could even have a chance of breaking the points record.

He has 239 points from his first 2, if he keeps that average up, that would be 956 by next Tuesday, smashing Andrew's record by 26 points. 8-)
Unlikely as there would have to be about 6 nines available over the rest of his games, which I doubt. I wouldn't bet against him beating the record though as he is clearly phenomenal at the letters, if he gets the right opponents and selections then id definitely say he stand a chance.

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 7th of September 2010

Posted: Tue Sep 07, 2010 11:43 am
by James Robinson
JackHurst wrote:
James Robinson wrote:It would be brill if Daniel could keep his scores well high, as he could even have a chance of breaking the points record.

He has 239 points from his first 2, if he keeps that average up, that would be 956 by next Tuesday, smashing Andrew's record by 26 points. 8-)
Unlikely as there would have to be about 6 nines available over the rest of his games, which I doubt. I wouldn't bet against him beating the record though as he is clearly phenomenal at the letters, if he gets the right opponents and selections then id definitely say he stand a chance.
Yeah, but it's a nice thought though, isn't it :?:

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 7th of September 2010

Posted: Tue Sep 07, 2010 2:35 pm
by Ryan Taylor
APOMICT there again.

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 7th of September 2010

Posted: Tue Sep 07, 2010 2:37 pm
by Matt Morrison
(50+7)*(9+9-8)+4

naughty Rachel.

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 7th of September 2010

Posted: Tue Sep 07, 2010 2:38 pm
by Peter Mabey
574=(50-9)x7x8/4

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 7th of September 2010

Posted: Tue Sep 07, 2010 3:03 pm
by James Doohan
TOWNEES in R13

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 7th of September 2010

Posted: Tue Sep 07, 2010 3:12 pm
by Mark Kudlowski
3rd numbers:

((6 x 6) + 5) x ((10 -1) x 2)

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 7th of September 2010

Posted: Tue Sep 07, 2010 7:23 pm
by Eoin Monaghan
Well played again Daniel, you probably would have got over 100 had it not been for those two numbers, the six small being very hard. Nice conundrum spot too, I know people probably thought it was quite easy, but I couldn't see it. Keep it up!

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 7th of September 2010

Posted: Wed Sep 08, 2010 7:25 am
by Derek Taylor
Nice one Matt,

That's how I saw it in about 16/17 seconds.

No doubt you and others on here got it quicker IE: 574 (50+7) (9+9-8) +4

I bet none of you could beat me at tiddlywinks though! :lol: