Bored of wanking already?Ben Hunter wrote:After three months in exile I have internet back in my room. I planned to celebrate by joining a goatblitz tournament and I'm going to stick by it.
Troy McClure?Hi, I'm Kai Laddiman. You may remember me from such TV programmes as Countdown and GMTV
Thanks. I'm not sure whether I'll get enough entrants for 4 groups, so I'll decide when more people join.Eoin Monaghan wrote:I hear Charlie Reams is quite good with websites
- What ratings brackets should I use? Goatdown
- Would people prefer one game per round or best-of-3? Best of 3, to compensate for poor first games.
- Can anyone give me suggestions/help for my website? https://sites.google.com/site/goatblitz2010tournament/
You gotta beat the best to be the best.Eoin Monaghan wrote:Since I don't play Goatdown that often, my rating is only 1268, and thus I will probably end up playing one of the better players and get knocked out.
Awooga!Matt Morrison wrote:You gotta beat the best to be the best.Eoin Monaghan wrote:Since I don't play Goatdown that often, my rating is only 1268, and thus I will probably end up playing one of the better players and get knocked out.
Aye, the Goatdown rating list is bizarre. I think my rating (1086, 76th) is about right, cos I'm shit at it, but Edward McCullagh's (957, 102nd) makes no sense at all, as he's very good at it. On the other hand, I'd definitely fancy my chances against Susan Ahluwalia (2033, 3rd).Hugh Binnie wrote:Maybe using normal ratings would be better, given how odd the Goatdown ratings are for some (a lot of?) players
Shit, can we still let him in late?Kirk Bevins wrote:Haha I completely missed this thread. Piss.
Please no.Jon O'Neill wrote:Shit, can we still let him in late?Kirk Bevins wrote:Haha I completely missed this thread. Piss.
This might be the thread you are looking forBen Hunter wrote:Adam Gillard was meant to post our results but it looks like he was too ashamed to admit defeat. I can't find the games now but I won both of them, one by a record-breaking margin and one where I got about eight pencils and an egg.
Adam and I appear to have different opinions on how our games turned out. Since he posted in the correct thread I'll trust his judgement on the scores too.James Doohan wrote:This might be the thread you are looking forBen Hunter wrote:Adam Gillard was meant to post our results but it looks like he was too ashamed to admit defeat. I can't find the games now but I won both of them, one by a record-breaking margin and one where I got about eight pencils and an egg.
Whoever's top of each division wins, unless you want something else.Ian Volante wrote:What happens after the groups?
I wasn't sure if there was a knockout involving both groups, or whatever. Secondary group winner seems a bit, well, secondary. Not that I expect to keep winning.Kai Laddiman wrote:Whoever's top of each division wins, unless you want something else.Ian Volante wrote:What happens after the groups?
Actually that's a good idea. Maybe the winner of A plays the winner of B, runner-up of A plays runner-up of B, etc. I'm not sure, what do others think?Ian Volante wrote:I wasn't sure if there was a knockout involving both groups, or whatever. Secondary group winner seems a bit, well, secondary. Not that I expect to keep winning.Kai Laddiman wrote:Whoever's top of each division wins, unless you want something else.Ian Volante wrote:What happens after the groups?
Sounds good. Hopefully bottom of B wouldn't mind.Ian Volante wrote:More logical surely would be top of B plays bottom of A, etc in a straight seeded knockout? Obviously the top people in A will win, but this gives the lower players a chance of decent progression
