Page 1 of 1

No spoilers for Wednesday 2nd June 2010

Posted: Wed Jun 02, 2010 2:40 pm
by Ben Hunter
Sorry everyone.

Re: No spoilers for Wednesday 2nd June 2010

Posted: Wed Jun 02, 2010 2:50 pm
by Oliver Garner
GUANACO

Re: No spoilers for Wednesday 2nd June 2010

Posted: Wed Jun 02, 2010 2:54 pm
by Ray Folwell
Neater 2nd numbers : (100-1) x 2

Re: No spoilers for Wednesday 2nd June 2010

Posted: Wed Jun 02, 2010 2:58 pm
by Josh Hurst
TOADLETS in round 1, unless DC said it and I missed it. Sorry if they did, alright? Also NEUTRINO as an equaller in round 6.

Re: No spoilers for Wednesday 2nd June 2010

Posted: Wed Jun 02, 2010 3:04 pm
by Michael Wallace
CF got REMORAS in round 13 - were the letters really there?

Re: No spoilers for Wednesday 2nd June 2010

Posted: Wed Jun 02, 2010 3:09 pm
by Ray Folwell
Michael Wallace wrote:CF got REMORAS in round 13 - were the letters really there?
Yes - I got ROAMERS which is an anagram of that.

Re: No spoilers for Wednesday 2nd June 2010

Posted: Wed Jun 02, 2010 3:11 pm
by Mark Kudlowski
Yes - I got ROAMERS as well, and a far easier last numbers of (100 -1) x 2.

Re: No spoilers for Wednesday 2nd June 2010

Posted: Wed Jun 02, 2010 3:13 pm
by Michael Wallace
Ray Folwell wrote:
Michael Wallace wrote:CF got REMORAS in round 13 - were the letters really there?
Yes - I got ROAMERS which is an anagram of that.
Sweet, thanks.

Re: No spoilers for Wednesday 2nd June 2010

Posted: Wed Jun 02, 2010 3:42 pm
by Ray Folwell
All three numbers games could be solved with just 3 numbers
9x50 + 1
(100-1) x 2
(9+7) x 8

Is this a record?

Re: No spoilers for Wednesday 2nd June 2010

Posted: Wed Jun 02, 2010 4:08 pm
by Douglas Wilson
Think HOARSER was there in the last letters round as well.

Isn't Scott Gillies on tomorrow?

Re: No spoilers for Wednesday 2nd June 2010

Posted: Wed Jun 02, 2010 4:15 pm
by Ben Hunter
Douglas Wilson wrote:Think HOARSER was there in the last letters round as well.

Isn't Scott Gillies on tomorrow?
Yep.

Yeah.

Re: No spoilers for Wednesday 2nd June 2010

Posted: Wed Jun 02, 2010 5:15 pm
by Gavin Chipper
In the NODE, QIBLA is listed as a variant spelling of KIBLAH which has [in sing.] after it - so should QIBLAS really be allowed?

Re: No spoilers for Wednesday 2nd June 2010

Posted: Wed Jun 02, 2010 7:49 pm
by James Robinson
SNAFUED in round 4 and BUNGLED in round 7. Thought I had SALKOS in round 11, as in triple SALKO in ice skating, but apparently that's not OK. :shock: :(

Re: No spoilers for Wednesday 2nd June 2010

Posted: Thu Jun 03, 2010 9:40 am
by Martin Smith
I wondered about QIBLAS too - the definition made it sound like something there's only one of? I'm not clued up enough about Arabic or Islam to be sure though.

Re: No spoilers for Wednesday 2nd June 2010

Posted: Thu Jun 03, 2010 10:23 am
by Bob De Caux
James Robinson wrote:SNAFUED in round 4 and BUNGLED in round 7. Thought I had SALKOS in round 11, as in triple SALKO in ice skating, but apparently that's not OK. :shock: :(
It's SALCHOW, named after the guy who first did it. Surprisingly (to me anyway) it is valid.

Re: No spoilers for Wednesday 2nd June 2010

Posted: Thu Jun 03, 2010 12:38 pm
by Ryan Taylor
TOTEMIC for beater in round 12.

Re: No spoilers for Wednesday 2nd June 2010

Posted: Thu Jun 03, 2010 12:40 pm
by Ben Hunter
Martin Smith wrote:I wondered about QIBLAS too - the definition made it sound like something there's only one of? I'm not clued up enough about Arabic or Islam to be sure though.
There are quite a few senses in which 'qibla' can be plural. The first is historical: when Mohammed first started authoring the Quran in Mecca, the instructions were to pray toward Jerusalem (from their location in Mecca in Saudi Arabia). Then when the Jews lolled at his Quran, he wrote the hardcore verses in Medina and changed the 'qibla' to Mecca. So there are historically two qiblas.

In the technical sense, the direction you pray toward Mecca is different for people who aren't lying on the same line going through Mecca, so most people have different qiblas. From most points on the world there will be different directions of prayer toward Mecca i.e. different qiblas. On a side note, I own a little qibla compass which comes with a list of cities across the world, each numbered, and then you point the arrow of the compass toward the relevant number (they're marked around the circle of the compass). Another arrow which is painted onto the compass is now pointing to your own personal qibla.
Gavin Chipper wrote:In the NODE, QIBLA is listed as a variant spelling of KIBLAH which has [in sing.] after it - so should QIBLAS really be allowed?
Got the OED2 here and KIBLAH is just listed as a noun and variant of QIBLA, which in turn is just listed as a noun.