Page 1 of 1
Spoilers For Tuesday May 11th 2010
Posted: Tue May 11, 2010 12:53 pm
by James Robinson
So, Lee is bidding to become an octochamp today. Oops, no, he's not
That brilliant comeback by Gwen Robinson yesterday means that she's the new champion.
She becomes the first Robinson since....., oh, me to be in the champions' chair.
Will she last as long, or even longer than I did in the chair.
Find out later.
Re: Spoilers For Tuesday May 11th 2010
Posted: Tue May 11, 2010 3:12 pm
by JackHurst
WTF was Jeff talking about when he mentioned fingering that man in the audience?!?!
Though wrathsome might have been good in the round where dc got SOMEWHAT, but its not in.
Re: Spoilers For Tuesday May 11th 2010
Posted: Tue May 11, 2010 4:07 pm
by Ryan Taylor
JackHurst wrote:WTF was Jeff talking about when he mentioned fingering that man in the audience?!?!
I actually have no idea it sounded so wrong! Possibly fingerprint him or something but that doesn't make sense.
Re: Spoilers For Tuesday May 11th 2010
Posted: Tue May 11, 2010 4:10 pm
by Michael Wallace
Ryan Taylor wrote:JackHurst wrote:WTF was Jeff talking about when he mentioned fingering that man in the audience?!?!
I actually have no idea it sounded so wrong! Possibly fingerprint him or something but that doesn't make sense.
Yeah, I had not idea what this was about either.
Re: Spoilers For Tuesday May 11th 2010
Posted: Tue May 11, 2010 4:10 pm
by Matt Morrison
Haha. Thought Jack was joking but the way Ryan reacted maybe you youngsters haven't heard of 'fingering'.
It was in relation to referring to the challenger's entourage as looking like a police line up - fingering people in terms of investigative policework type thing is pointing the finger at them, suspecting them of being the guilty party.
Re: Spoilers For Tuesday May 11th 2010
Posted: Tue May 11, 2010 4:11 pm
by Matt Morrison
You too MW? This is a classic 'cafetiere' moment for me.
Re: Spoilers For Tuesday May 11th 2010
Posted: Tue May 11, 2010 4:20 pm
by Michael Wallace
Matt Morrison wrote:You too MW? This is a classic 'cafetiere' moment for me.
Ah, I think I must have missed the police lineup line, or at least forgotten it by the end of the show when he made the fingering remark.
Re: Spoilers For Tuesday May 11th 2010
Posted: Tue May 11, 2010 4:24 pm
by Matt Morrison
Right. I didn't actually listen to the crap at the end, so maybe I'm wrong, but I'm just presuming it was connected to the start, that's how Jeff usually rolls.
As such I'm now not sure if Ryan and Jack were asking what fingering meant or if they just didn't get the police lineup link too, so apologies for any offence caused.
Re: Spoilers For Tuesday May 11th 2010
Posted: Tue May 11, 2010 7:16 pm
by Brian Moore
Matt Morrison wrote:Haha. Thought Jack was joking but the way Ryan reacted maybe you youngsters haven't heard of 'fingering'.
It was in relation to referring to the challenger's entourage as looking like a police line up - fingering people in terms of investigative policework type thing is pointing the finger at them, suspecting them of being the guilty party.
When I heard it, I thought it might be taken, deliberately or otherwise, a different way.
In a similar vein, the leader of a big band I play in decided to give the bass player the epithet 'Fingers' in a concert announcement, the only problem being that "David Fingers George" was the resulting name. Fortunately it was Sidmouth, so no-one noticed.
Re: Spoilers For Tuesday May 11th 2010
Posted: Tue May 11, 2010 9:42 pm
by Kirk Bevins
ASSARTED as a beater in round 7. Was impressed with the challenger today - pushed me all the way - he must have hit a lot of maximums for a debut, impressive stuff. I like his tones too.
Re: Spoilers For Tuesday May 11th 2010
Posted: Tue May 11, 2010 9:44 pm
by Ryan Taylor
Matt Morrison wrote:Haha. Thought Jack was joking but the way Ryan reacted maybe you youngsters haven't heard of 'fingering'.
It was in relation to referring to the challenger's entourage as looking like a police line up - fingering people in terms of investigative policework type thing is pointing the finger at them, suspecting them of being the guilty party.
Thanks for clearing that up MWM.
Re: Spoilers For Tuesday May 11th 2010
Posted: Tue May 11, 2010 9:59 pm
by Hugh Binnie
Kirk Bevins wrote:I like his tones too.
Do you mean the way he announces his declarations rather than asking them?
Re: Spoilers For Tuesday May 11th 2010
Posted: Tue May 11, 2010 10:03 pm
by Ryan Taylor
Hugh Binnie wrote:Kirk Bevins wrote:I like his tones too.
Do you mean the way he announces his declarations rather than asking them?
No, he meant his toned body.