Page 1 of 1

The Mathmo Test

Posted: Sun Jan 27, 2008 4:07 am
by Michael Wallace
Hello all, I thought I'd get around to starting a topic myself, and because I'm curious to see how countdown geeks (I use geeks in its most endearing sense) do on a supposed test of how much of a mathematician you are.

So if you're sufficiently bored, go here and see how many of the traits you have, and then we can all be amused at how non-mathsy or mathsy everyone is. Or something.

I get 48 these days (I discovered that I gained 17 points in the process of taking a maths degree, I'm not sure if this is a good thing).

Re: The Mathmo Test

Posted: Sun Jan 27, 2008 2:24 pm
by Kirk Bevins
I'm not a fan of that test really although 1728 and 1729 do mean things to me!

Re: The Mathmo Test

Posted: Sun Jan 27, 2008 2:52 pm
by Conor
39 for me.

Re: The Mathmo Test

Posted: Sun Jan 27, 2008 3:02 pm
by Joseph Bolas
Kirk Bevins wrote:I'm not a fan of that test really although 1728 and 1729 do mean things to me!
I don't know what the numbers are but 1729 sounds like a cube to me, is that right?

Re: The Mathmo Test

Posted: Sun Jan 27, 2008 3:14 pm
by Charlie Reams
1729 = 9³ + 10³ = 12³ + 1³. It's the smallest number that is the sum of two cubes in two different ways, which is the subject of a story about Ramanujan which has been retold so many times that most mathematicians want to scream and smash things when they hear it. Here it is, as told by another great mathematician, G. H. Hardy:
I remember once going to see [Ramanujan] when he was ill at Putney. I had ridden in taxi cab number 1729 and remarked that the number seemed to me rather a dull one, and that I hoped it was not an unfavorable omen. "No," he replied, "it is a very interesting number; it is the smallest number expressible as the sum of two cubes in two different ways."

Re: The Mathmo Test

Posted: Sun Jan 27, 2008 4:31 pm
by JimBentley
I only got 28, but I imagine I might've scored a bit higher twenty years ago. I can still be a geek, though, right?

Re: The Mathmo Test

Posted: Sun Jan 27, 2008 4:43 pm
by Joseph Bolas
Charlie Reams wrote:1729 = 9³ + 10³ = 12³ + 1³. It's the smallest number that is the sum of two cubes in two different ways, which is the subject of a story about Ramanujan which has been retold so many times that most mathematicians want to scream and smash things when they hear it. Here it is, as told by another great mathematician, G. H. Hardy:
I remember once going to see [Ramanujan] when he was ill at Putney. I had ridden in taxi cab number 1729 and remarked that the number seemed to me rather a dull one, and that I hoped it was not an unfavorable omen. "No," he replied, "it is a very interesting number; it is the smallest number expressible as the sum of two cubes in two different ways."
I knew it was something to do with a cube, so was close :D.

I only got 12 on this test, so must be really bad at maths now :oops:.

Re: The Mathmo Test

Posted: Sun Jan 27, 2008 5:35 pm
by Ben Pugh
5.

:o

Re: The Mathmo Test

Posted: Sun Jan 27, 2008 5:47 pm
by Dinos Sfyris
I'm a chem and maths undergrad and even I thought those questions were bizarre. I've never heard of the term "Mathmo" and had no idea what those games were in the first section of the test. Are they American? Nevertheless I got 24. :geek:

Re: The Mathmo Test

Posted: Sun Jan 27, 2008 6:40 pm
by Michael Wallace
dinos_the_chemist wrote:I'm a chem and maths undergrad and even I thought those questions were bizarre. I've never heard of the term "Mathmo" and had no idea what those games were in the first section of the test. Are they American? Nevertheless I got 24. :geek:
Mathmo is slang for someone studying maths at university, although primarily only heard in Oxbridge (it seems). I'm surprised you haven't heard of the games in the first section though I made an educated guess that the 'Let's make a Deal' reference is the cabbages/goats thing made (more) famous by dog in the nighttime.

Re: The Mathmo Test

Posted: Sun Jan 27, 2008 8:29 pm
by Jon O'Neill
I got 19, but I know my times tables.

Re: The Mathmo Test

Posted: Sun Jan 27, 2008 9:11 pm
by Jon Corby
Ginger Jono wrote:I got 19, but I know my times tables.
I got 19 too. What does this mean?

Re: The Mathmo Test

Posted: Sun Jan 27, 2008 9:41 pm
by Conor
Corby wrote: I got 19 too. What does this mean?
It means you got 19.

Re: The Mathmo Test

Posted: Sun Jan 27, 2008 9:42 pm
by Jon O'Neill
I think it means we are mathematical soulmates. I'll bring the graph paper, you bring the lube.

Re: The Mathmo Test

Posted: Sun Jan 27, 2008 10:21 pm
by Chris H
I got 25. 17 years as a Maths teacher obviously count for nothing. :)

The mental skill I am most proud of is being able to see a 12 digit number onscreen for 1 second, then retype it. There is a game on http://www.mymaths.co.uk called 'I'm Sinking Fast' that tests this memory skill (it starts with 3 digit numbers and increases by one digit after every eighth number). If you want to try it, use the username 'deacon', and password 'transform' and go to games>memory games.

Chris

Re: The Mathmo Test

Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2008 12:27 pm
by David O'Donnell
Ginger Jono wrote:I think it means we are mathematical soulmates. I'll bring the graph paper, you bring the lube.
We have to have a recommendation system where I can rec posts of this quality!

Re: The Mathmo Test

Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2008 4:54 pm
by James Hurrell
13 scored. Not sure if I am pleased or a tad disappointed! Never heard of most of this stuff.

Re: The Mathmo Test

Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2008 5:14 pm
by Michael Wallace
perhaps I should clarify that this isn't meant to be a test of how good a mathematician you are :p (in case that wasn't obvious...)

more it's a list of things that are stereotypical of uber-maths-geeks - it's quite possible that the lower you score, the better (from your point of view, at least!)

Re: The Mathmo Test

Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2008 8:44 am
by Kevin Thurlow
Strangely I scored 19 as well - obviously the chess questions helped....

Kevin

Re: The Mathmo Test

Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2008 9:58 am
by Jon Corby
Kevin Thurlow wrote:Strangely I scored 19 as well - obviously the chess questions helped....

Kevin
19 definitely appears to be the optimal score for coolness. I think I remember reading that somewhere.

Re: The Mathmo Test

Posted: Wed Jan 12, 2011 5:16 pm
by Joseph Krol
I got 36.

Re: The Mathmo Test

Posted: Wed Jan 12, 2011 5:29 pm
by Ryan Taylor
I got 16 and must still be considered cool.

Re: The Mathmo Test

Posted: Wed Jan 12, 2011 9:38 pm
by Ian Volante
22.

Re: The Mathmo Test

Posted: Fri Jan 14, 2011 10:37 am
by JackHurst
7. I win.

Re: The Mathmo Test

Posted: Fri Jan 14, 2011 10:44 am
by Michael Wallace
JackHurst wrote:7. I win.
'fraid not, 48 > 7.

(they should have taught you that last term)

Re: The Mathmo Test

Posted: Fri Jan 14, 2011 4:09 pm
by Peter Mabey
27 (It's over 60 years ago that I was granted my degree in maths :roll: )

Re: The Mathmo Test

Posted: Fri Jan 14, 2011 4:32 pm
by Rhys Benjamin
29.

Re: The Mathmo Test

Posted: Wed Nov 20, 2013 6:32 am
by Dave Preece
32 for me, is that good or bad though? I think bad!

Re: The Mathmo Test

Posted: Wed Nov 20, 2013 11:53 am
by Zarte Siempre
13.

Re: The Mathmo Test

Posted: Wed Nov 20, 2013 5:21 pm
by Thomas Carey
52... Compared to the other scores in this thread (remember that this is a Countdown forum) I'm very scared. :shock:

Re: The Mathmo Test

Posted: Tue Nov 26, 2013 10:45 am
by sean d
22. I have a maths degree and had considered myself fairly geeky but it appears I'm a Conference level maths geek ( see, a football reference, points away for that)

Re: The Mathmo Test

Posted: Wed Nov 27, 2013 5:01 pm
by Andy Platt
Ten

Re: The Mathmo Test

Posted: Wed Nov 27, 2013 10:52 pm
by Graeme Cole
21.

Re: The Mathmo Test

Posted: Thu Nov 28, 2013 9:27 am
by Conor
Conor wrote:39 for me.
22, having since done a maths degree.