Page 1 of 1

Spoilers For Wednesday April 7th 2010

Posted: Wed Apr 07, 2010 12:46 pm
by James Robinson
The middle of the week comes round again, and Peter Zyss is still the champ, and has the chance to break into the top 8 today, and by this time next week, could even book his place in the finals.

It does seem amazing to think that we've already passed the half-way mark this series, but there you go. :D Still only one octochamp on the board, but surely that'll change soon, or will it :?:

Re: Spoilers For Wednesday April 7th 2010

Posted: Wed Apr 07, 2010 2:22 pm
by James Doohan
You said my instead of by James, fucking disgraceful, how dare you make a mistake

Re: Spoilers For Wednesday April 7th 2010

Posted: Wed Apr 07, 2010 2:23 pm
by Kirk Bevins
james doohan wrote:You said my instead of by James, fucking disgraceful, how dare you make a mistake
Kirk Bevins likes this.

Re: Spoilers For Wednesday April 7th 2010

Posted: Wed Apr 07, 2010 2:25 pm
by James Robinson
james doohan wrote:You said my instead of by James, fucking disgraceful, how dare you make a mistake
Where's your :!: , or if you don't like smilies, !, James :?:

Re: Spoilers For Wednesday April 7th 2010

Posted: Wed Apr 07, 2010 2:26 pm
by Ben Hunter
fucking SKERISPOFKSDPofkd

Re: Spoilers For Wednesday April 7th 2010

Posted: Wed Apr 07, 2010 2:28 pm
by Ben Hunter
Nice one, battle of the Yorkies.

Re: Spoilers For Wednesday April 7th 2010

Posted: Wed Apr 07, 2010 2:28 pm
by Marc Meakin
Anglo Italian?

Re: Spoilers For Wednesday April 7th 2010

Posted: Wed Apr 07, 2010 2:36 pm
by Kirk Bevins
HOMAGE is actually specified as a count noun in another sense so there needn't have been any risky mass noun decisions.

Re: Spoilers For Wednesday April 7th 2010

Posted: Wed Apr 07, 2010 2:39 pm
by John Brackstone
gumshoe for a nice equaller

Re: Spoilers For Wednesday April 7th 2010

Posted: Wed Apr 07, 2010 2:40 pm
by Kirk Bevins
Nice TTT clue.

Re: Spoilers For Wednesday April 7th 2010

Posted: Wed Apr 07, 2010 2:49 pm
by Ben Hunter
Peter's having a stormer

Re: Spoilers For Wednesday April 7th 2010

Posted: Wed Apr 07, 2010 2:52 pm
by Kirk Bevins
Ben Hunter wrote:Peter's having a stormer
Certainly is. I'm losing 58-66 to him atm. He's not missing much.

Re: Spoilers For Wednesday April 7th 2010

Posted: Wed Apr 07, 2010 2:54 pm
by Marc Meakin
Ben Hunter wrote:Peter's having a stormer
Think you jinxed him. :)

Re: Spoilers For Wednesday April 7th 2010

Posted: Wed Apr 07, 2010 3:43 pm
by James Doohan
James Robinson wrote:
james doohan wrote:You said my instead of by James, fucking disgraceful, how dare you make a mistake
Where's your :!: , or if you don't like smilies, !, James :?:
Was only pointing out your mistake James, same as you get such pleasure in doing, don't need daft characters for that

Re: Spoilers For Wednesday April 7th 2010

Posted: Wed Apr 07, 2010 4:32 pm
by Brian Moore
I think that DIURNAL was there in R7.

I'm enjoying Peter's run and his solid play. And the bonus of a Peter Purves-style collar on the shirt today. I didn't think we'd see those again.

EDIT - I just noticed that this was the 15,000th post in the spoliers forum. At least I wasn't staring at a milometer rather than the road wanting to see all zeros come up. Not that I'd do anything silly like that. Well, not very often ... only every 10,000miles.

Re: Spoilers For Wednesday April 7th 2010

Posted: Wed Apr 07, 2010 4:59 pm
by Joyce Phillips
Anglo Italian on Apterous is called Simon. Daniel plays under his own name - but I haven't seen him on for a while. (funny how coming onto this site makes people pedantic)

Re: Spoilers For Wednesday April 7th 2010

Posted: Wed Apr 07, 2010 7:02 pm
by James Robinson
james doohan wrote:
James Robinson wrote:
james doohan wrote:You said my instead of by James, fucking disgraceful, how dare you make a mistake
Where's your :!: , or if you don't like smilies, !, James :?:
Was only pointing out your mistake James, same as you get such pleasure in doing, don't need daft characters for that
I never get any pleasure in doing it, James. It's just one of my functions that I can't stop.

Interestingly, did anyone think that Rachel jinxed Peter in the 2nd numbers game :?: To me, it looked like that after Peter gave the first part of his method and then Rachel gave that look of "You've done it wrong, haven't you?" at him, almost making it look like that he just gave up on the numbers, whereas if he did (3 + 3) x 25, and added it to the 370 he had, that would've given him the answer.

UNTASTED in round 8 and ARISTOS in round 11.

1st Numbers Alt.: (25 x 10) - 100 + 7 + 6 = 163
Brian Moore wrote:I think that DIURNAL was there in R7.
There was no N in the selection, Brian. 6 was the best.

Re: Spoilers For Wednesday April 7th 2010

Posted: Wed Apr 07, 2010 8:50 pm
by Kirk Bevins
James Robinson wrote: Interestingly, did anyone think that Rachel jinxed Peter in the 2nd numbers game :?: To me, it looked like that after Peter gave the first part of his method and then Rachel gave that look of "You've done it wrong, haven't you?" at him, almost making it look like that he just gave up on the numbers, whereas if he did (3 + 3) x 25, and added it to the 370 he had, that would've given him the answer.
Do you mean he actually went wrong and did the right thing of admitting he'd made a mistake rather than try to fudge it?

Re: Spoilers For Wednesday April 7th 2010

Posted: Wed Apr 07, 2010 10:18 pm
by Brian Moore
James Robinson wrote:
Brian Moore wrote:I think that DIURNAL was there in R7.
There was no N in the selection, Brian. 6 was the best.
Typical - the phatom extra letter I frequetly see. I should have rewoud 4oD to check.