+sums+
-
- Devotee
- Posts: 557
- Joined: Wed Jan 30, 2008 3:53 pm
- Location: South Yorkshire
+sums+
Do you say "plus" or "add" or "and"?
Do you say "take" or "minus" or "subtract"?
Why does it vary? Is it a generational thing? Or geographical?
Does it matter?
Do you say "take" or "minus" or "subtract"?
Why does it vary? Is it a generational thing? Or geographical?
Does it matter?
Re: +sums+
Plus and minus for me. It doesn't matter to me if others use different terms, though, apart from 'by' for 'times': wtf??
Dunno if it's generational, but I was at school in the 1960s and 70s, both in Lancashire and in Essex, if that helps your research!
Dunno if it's generational, but I was at school in the 1960s and 70s, both in Lancashire and in Essex, if that helps your research!
"My idea of an agreeable person is a person who agrees with me." Benjamin Disraeli
-
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 6347
- Joined: Wed May 20, 2009 3:37 pm
Re: +sums+
Come back Derek and create one of your sadly missed polls.
BTW its plus and minus for me.
BTW its plus and minus for me.
GR MSL GNDT MSS NGVWL SRND NNLYC NNCT
-
- Devotee
- Posts: 876
- Joined: Thu May 22, 2008 4:08 pm
- Location: Eastbourne
Re: +sums+
Interesting
- JimBentley
- Fanatic
- Posts: 2820
- Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 6:39 pm
- Contact:
Re: +sums+
I use all of them with no consistency or logical method and often change which type I'm using midway through a sum.
- Clive Brooker
- Devotee
- Posts: 505
- Joined: Wed Feb 11, 2009 7:37 pm
- Location: San Toy
Re: +sums+
I'm 100% with you on "by". In 1970s Universify of Warwick speak, "by" meant "divided by", as in 90 degrees equals pi by 2 radians.Julie T wrote:Plus and minus for me. It doesn't matter to me if others use different terms, though, apart from 'by' for 'times': wtf??
Dunno if it's generational, but I was at school in the 1960s and 70s, both in Lancashire and in Essex, if that helps your research!
I think I'm pretty consistent in keeping the distinction between 4 minus 3, take 3 from 4. Just as I'd always multiply 3 by 4.
- Lesley Hines
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1250
- Joined: Tue Mar 24, 2009 9:29 pm
- Location: Worcester
Re: +sums+
My most frequent expression mid-sum is pretty much "um... fuck..."
After that it really can be anything, and with varied results.
After that it really can be anything, and with varied results.
Lowering the averages since 2009
- Alec Rivers
- Devotee
- Posts: 918
- Joined: Fri Nov 14, 2008 11:36 pm
- Location: Studio 57, Cheriton (Kent)
- Contact:
Re: +sums+
lol.Lesley Hines wrote:My most frequent expression mid-sum is pretty much "um... fuck..."
After that it really can be anything, and with varied results.
I don't say it myself, but when people use 'by' for times I think of areas, e.g. 7 by 12 meaning 7 x 12, so it seems pretty reasonable to me (although it does have a slightly uneducated feel to it).Julie T wrote:It doesn't matter to me if others use different terms, though, apart from 'by' for 'times': wtf??
- Kirk Bevins
- God
- Posts: 4923
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:18 pm
- Location: York, UK
Re: +sums+
Interestingly, ODE doesn't give MINUS as a verb, so where "I'm adding these two numbers together" is acceptable, "I'm minusing these two numbers" is invalid.
- Alec Rivers
- Devotee
- Posts: 918
- Joined: Fri Nov 14, 2008 11:36 pm
- Location: Studio 57, Cheriton (Kent)
- Contact:
Re: +sums+
Plussing, the antonym of minusing, isn't in, either. The antonym of adding is subtracting. And the syntax changes for subtracting because you must specify which number is subtracted from which (subtraction is not commutative).Kirk Bevins wrote:Interestingly, ODE doesn't give MINUS as a verb, so where "I'm adding these two numbers together" is acceptable, "I'm minusing these two numbers" is invalid.
- Kirk Bevins
- God
- Posts: 4923
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:18 pm
- Location: York, UK
Re: +sums+
Good point. I think plussing should be in too.Alec Rivers wrote: Plussing, the antonym of minusing, isn't in, either.
- Alec Rivers
- Devotee
- Posts: 918
- Joined: Fri Nov 14, 2008 11:36 pm
- Location: Studio 57, Cheriton (Kent)
- Contact:
Re: +sums+
Aaaaarghh!Kirk Bevins wrote:Good point. I think plussing should be in too.
-
- Devotee
- Posts: 876
- Joined: Thu May 22, 2008 4:08 pm
- Location: Eastbourne
Re: +sums+
Not in.Alec Rivers wrote:Aaaaarghh!Kirk Bevins wrote:Good point. I think plussing should be in too.
- Sue Sanders
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1334
- Joined: Mon May 25, 2009 10:29 pm
- Location: Whitstable Kent
Re: +sums+
Influenced by the sentence construction surely, rather than geographical or generational influence
'1 plus 1 is 2, and then you need to add that to the 10' - the 'plus' sounds fine replaced with either 'and' or 'add' but only the 'add' works in the second bit.
Along similar lines....
'They won 1 - 0', I'd pronounce the 0 as nil.
'10 - 10' = 0, I'd pronounce it as zero
'Tel no. 01227.....' I'd pronounce that 'oh'
'Add 0 to times it by 10' I'd probably pronounce that one 'nought'
'1 plus 1 is 2, and then you need to add that to the 10' - the 'plus' sounds fine replaced with either 'and' or 'add' but only the 'add' works in the second bit.
Along similar lines....
'They won 1 - 0', I'd pronounce the 0 as nil.
'10 - 10' = 0, I'd pronounce it as zero
'Tel no. 01227.....' I'd pronounce that 'oh'
'Add 0 to times it by 10' I'd probably pronounce that one 'nought'
'This one goes up to eleven'
Fool's top.
Fool's top.
-
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1268
- Joined: Wed Jan 30, 2008 9:57 pm
Re: +sums+
I'm nonplussed.Alec Rivers wrote:Plussing, the antonym of minusing, isn't in, either. The antonym of adding is subtracting. And the syntax changes for subtracting because you must specify which number is subtracted from which (subtraction is not commutative).Kirk Bevins wrote:Interestingly, ODE doesn't give MINUS as a verb, so where "I'm adding these two numbers together" is acceptable, "I'm minusing these two numbers" is invalid.