Page 1 of 1

Spoilers For Wednesday February 3rd 2010

Posted: Wed Feb 03, 2010 1:28 pm
by James Robinson
The Countdown champions' chair seems to be changing as regular as the challengers' chair at the moment. Mark will become the newest person to sit on it today, after beating Norman yesterday.

I wonder if today's challenger will continue this trend.

So, tune it at 3:25pm to see what will happen, having said that, it can sometimes start at 3:26pm, or even 3:24pm. But, any which way, it will be in roughly 2 hours time. ;) :) :D

One final note, on behalf of the Spoiler Community, I wish to congratulate Dinos on his performance in last night's The Krypton Factor. Your performance was very exceptional, and even though you didn't win, I think we all think that you're a winner to us. ;) :) :D :mrgreen:

Re: Spoilers For Wednesday February 3rd 2010

Posted: Wed Feb 03, 2010 1:41 pm
by Dinos Sfyris
Cheers mate much appreciated :)

Re: Spoilers For Wednesday February 3rd 2010

Posted: Wed Feb 03, 2010 1:43 pm
by Michael Wallace
James Robinson wrote:<Krypton Factor spoilers>
Man, I'd be pretty annoyed if I hadn't already watched that - you really should only have spoilers relevant to the spoilers thread in here.

Re: Spoilers For Wednesday February 3rd 2010

Posted: Wed Feb 03, 2010 1:47 pm
by Davy Affleck
Michael Wallace wrote:
James Robinson wrote:<Krypton Factor spoilers>
Man, I'd be pretty annoyed if I hadn't already watched that - you really should only have spoilers relevant to the spoilers thread in here.

If you didn't want to know last nights results:
Chelsea drew 1-1
Celtic lost 1-0
St Mirren are in the League cup final

Re: Spoilers For Wednesday February 3rd 2010

Posted: Wed Feb 03, 2010 2:42 pm
by Alec Rivers
Davy Affleck wrote:Chelsea drew 1-1
There is a God.

Re: Spoilers For Wednesday February 3rd 2010

Posted: Wed Feb 03, 2010 2:55 pm
by Marc Meakin
Alec Rivers wrote:
Davy Affleck wrote:Chelsea drew 1-1
There is a God.
Gooner?

Re: Spoilers For Wednesday February 3rd 2010

Posted: Wed Feb 03, 2010 3:03 pm
by Howard Somerset
Alec Rivers wrote:
Davy Affleck wrote:Chelsea drew 1-1
There is a God.
No. A god would have made it 1 - 0 to Hull.

Re: Spoilers For Wednesday February 3rd 2010

Posted: Wed Feb 03, 2010 3:18 pm
by Matt Morrison
As much as I hate to say it, a god would have let Chelsea win so as to help prevent the Scum winning another title this year.
I wouldn't mind at all if Arsenal would win the league, that's far preferable to Chelsea or the Scum, but they're just not good enough to maintain a challenge.

Re: Spoilers For Wednesday February 3rd 2010

Posted: Wed Feb 03, 2010 3:26 pm
by James Robinson
Matt Morrison wrote:As much as I hate to say it, a god would have let Chelsea win so as to help prevent the Scum winning another title this year.
As long as "the Scum" don't win the title, I don't mind who wins it.

I just don't want the mighty Terriers to lose their place in history.

Re: Spoilers For Wednesday February 3rd 2010

Posted: Wed Feb 03, 2010 3:29 pm
by Marc Meakin
Another Aptorite today.
Good luck Jay.

Re: Spoilers For Wednesday February 3rd 2010

Posted: Wed Feb 03, 2010 3:54 pm
by Marc Meakin
The Woofits were a family of dogs on childrens telly in the eighties.

Re: Spoilers For Wednesday February 3rd 2010

Posted: Wed Feb 03, 2010 4:11 pm
by Kirk Bevins
The conundrum scramble should have been IFNOTNICE in relation to the TTT being INOTNICE.

Well done Jay, good to see another apterite owning a teapot.

Keep up the Call my Bluff style OOW segment...I'm loving it.

Re: Spoilers For Wednesday February 3rd 2010

Posted: Wed Feb 03, 2010 4:18 pm
by Karen Pearson
James Robinson wrote:
Matt Morrison wrote:As much as I hate to say it, a god would have let Chelsea win so as to help prevent the Scum winning another title this year.
As long as "the Scum" don't win the title, I don't mind who wins it.
IAWTP

On the spoilers subjects, my contributions for today are APERIENT, REASON and REMODEL.

Re: Spoilers For Wednesday February 3rd 2010

Posted: Wed Feb 03, 2010 4:25 pm
by Marc Meakin
Kirk Bevins wrote:The conundrum scramble should have been IFNOTNICE in relation to the TTT being INOTNICE.

Well done Jay, good to see another apterite owning a teapot.

Keep up the Call my Bluff style OOW segment...I'm loving it.
As long as the BBC don't object to using the name.

Re: Spoilers For Wednesday February 3rd 2010

Posted: Wed Feb 03, 2010 4:35 pm
by Mike Brailsford
Marc Meakin wrote:The Woofits were a family of dogs on childrens telly in the eighties.
Written and narrated by Michael Parkinson.

Jay had to be a United fan since he has the look of Nemanja Vidic !

Re: Spoilers For Wednesday February 3rd 2010

Posted: Wed Feb 03, 2010 6:01 pm
by Alec Rivers
Simpler first numbers: (25 - 7) x 8 = 144

Re: Spoilers For Wednesday February 3rd 2010

Posted: Wed Feb 03, 2010 7:51 pm
by James Robinson
Alec Rivers wrote:Simpler first numbers: (25 - 7) x 8 = 144
I thought mine wasn't too bad.

((8 + 7) x 10) - 7 + 1 = 144.

2nd Numbers Alternative: (4 x 3 x 10) - 1 = 119.

TRIBUTE in round 8 and EMERALD in round 12.

Re: Spoilers For Wednesday February 3rd 2010

Posted: Wed Feb 03, 2010 10:57 pm
by Richard Priest
CABILDO, round 6 I think.

Re: Spoilers For Wednesday February 3rd 2010

Posted: Thu Feb 04, 2010 2:35 pm
by Gavin Chipper
Marc Meakin wrote:
Kirk Bevins wrote:The conundrum scramble should have been IFNOTNICE in relation to the TTT being INOTNICE.

Well done Jay, good to see another apterite owning a teapot.

Keep up the Call my Bluff style OOW segment...I'm loving it.
As long as the BBC don't object to using the name.
I think if anyone complained about Apterous copying Countdown, Charlie could use the "OOW" defence.

Re: Spoilers For Wednesday February 3rd 2010

Posted: Thu Feb 04, 2010 2:45 pm
by James Robinson
Marc Meakin wrote:
Kirk Bevins wrote:Keep up the Call my Bluff style OOW segment...I'm loving it.
As long as the BBC don't object to using the name.
Maybe if it was called Susie's Call My Bluff, then they won't be able to complain. Also, I should think that as long as they don't bring in the music, it'll be OK.

Re: Spoilers For Wednesday February 3rd 2010

Posted: Sat Feb 06, 2010 8:24 pm
by Martin Bishop
Having just seen Dinos on Krypton Factor, I've been waiting a few days to say this.

Was I the only one waiting for Susie to use the foodstuff mass noun rule in round one?