Page 1 of 1

Disapproval

Posted: Sat Jan 30, 2010 3:20 am
by Jason Larsen
Hi, everyone!

So, I logged on to Apterous today and soon after found out that my bots were missing and that was because my subscription time had run out. That, I understand.

However, I was looking at my very bottom setting, and it said, "Trial player, 49 days left."

Charlie, I neglected to mention this to you, but right after I subscribed to the site, my mom made my close my Paypal account. This was because she said to me, "most people who attempt to make transactions are mean."

This is not to say that you are mean, but my mom said that you really never know what kind of people you run into when you make a Paypal account. I was not given notice of the matter at hand.

Please explain why you have done this now and remind me of what you do during the day.

Thank you!

Re: Disapproval

Posted: Sat Jan 30, 2010 10:46 am
by Ian Volante
I've heard rumours that Charlie provides logistical and financial support to the semi-legal Chiffres et Lettres dens across Normandy.

Re: Disapproval

Posted: Sat Jan 30, 2010 11:57 am
by Charlie Reams
Jason Larsen wrote: Please explain why you have done this now and remind me of what you do during the day.
I did this now because your subscription ran out. I don't see the relevance of what I do during the day.

Edit: But yeah, what Ian said.

Re: Disapproval

Posted: Sat Jan 30, 2010 4:10 pm
by Matthew Green
Jason Larsen wrote:my mom said that you really never know what kind of people you run into when you make a Paypal account.
I knew there was an explanation.

Re: Disapproval

Posted: Sat Jan 30, 2010 6:35 pm
by Jason Larsen
That's true, but why wasn't it this way before?

Re: Disapproval

Posted: Sat Jan 30, 2010 7:06 pm
by Charlie Reams
Jason Larsen wrote:That's true, but why wasn't it this way before?
Your subscription hadn't run out before. Now it has.

Re: Disapproval

Posted: Sat Jan 30, 2010 7:20 pm
by Gavin Chipper
Charlie Reams wrote:
Jason Larsen wrote:That's true, but why wasn't it this way before?
Your subscription hadn't run out before. Now it has.
He wants to know why
I was not given notice of the matter at hand.

Re: Disapproval

Posted: Sat Jan 30, 2010 7:30 pm
by Charlie Reams
Gavin Chipper wrote:
Charlie Reams wrote:
Jason Larsen wrote:That's true, but why wasn't it this way before?
Your subscription hadn't run out before. Now it has.
He wants to know why
I was not given notice of the matter at hand.
He wasn't given notice because there was no code to give notice, before I wrote it this morning. We've only just reached the point where people's subscriptions are likely to expire, so I didn't get around to it. Doesn't seem like a big deal to me.

But Jason asked why "it" wasn't this way before. I'm not sure what "it" refers to but no one has ever been given notice before so it's not that. Basically I have no idea what Jason is talking about.

Re: Disapproval

Posted: Sun Jan 31, 2010 3:11 am
by Jason Larsen
Charlie, why weren't we given notice of the 50-game rule until just a few days ago?

Re: Disapproval

Posted: Sun Jan 31, 2010 4:25 am
by Andrew Feist
Jason Larsen wrote:Charlie, why weren't we given notice of the 50-game rule until just a few days ago?
I'm guessing it's because the 50-game rule didn't exist until a few days ago.

Re: Disapproval

Posted: Sun Jan 31, 2010 5:07 am
by Jason Larsen
Ok

Re: Disapproval

Posted: Sun Jan 31, 2010 6:47 pm
by peter lee
I think a 50 game Rule is quite generous.

Re: Disapproval

Posted: Sun Jan 31, 2010 9:58 pm
by Jason Larsen
Hi, Peter!

I am not a new member.

Although I don't know who you are, I have been a member of Apterous for 2 years and have seen you for at least one. People should not have to donate any more than once if they do care to donate. I believe it was David O'Donnell who said he agreed with Charlie when he stated, "You'll never be stuck for an opponent again."

This is why I am shocked at the fact that Charlie says you have to donate as many times as you want to have such features as playing against bots.

Re: Disapproval

Posted: Sun Jan 31, 2010 10:31 pm
by Jon O'Neill
Jason, if you only knew how many hours Charlie had put into programming Apterous alongside me, you would think that the subscription fee is criminally cheap.

Re: Disapproval

Posted: Sun Jan 31, 2010 10:58 pm
by Charlie Reams
Jason Larsen wrote:I have been a member of Apterous for 2 years
Apterous did not exist two years ago, so this is untrue. You've actually been a member since 13 September 2008, roughly 16 months.

It is made very clear when you sign up that £15 buys you one year. If you don't think it's worth £15 then don't pay.

Re: Disapproval

Posted: Sun Jan 31, 2010 11:08 pm
by Alec Rivers
Jason, you get roughly 4 games for a penny! (US cent). I call that good value.

[Based on the sort of usage I think one or two Apterites go in for: 3 games per hour, 8 hours per day.]

Re: Disapproval

Posted: Sun Jan 31, 2010 11:42 pm
by Jason Larsen
Charlie:

Please show me the page you view after you complete your 50 trial games on Apterous.

Re: Disapproval

Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2010 12:02 am
by Alec Rivers
Jason Larsen wrote:Charlie:
Please show me the page you view after you complete your 50 trial games on Apterous.
Or he's gonna sue yo ass. :twisted:

Re: Disapproval

Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2010 12:06 am
by Jason Larsen
Alec, no, there's got to be some way I can view that page!

Re: Disapproval

Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2010 12:08 am
by Charlie Reams
Jason Larsen wrote:Alec, no, there's got to be some way I can view that page!
There is no such page. What are you talking about?

Re: Disapproval

Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2010 12:21 am
by Kirk Bevins
Charlie Reams wrote: You've actually been a member since 13 September 2003, roughly 16 months.
I make this roughly 76 months.

Re: Disapproval

Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2010 12:27 am
by Charlie Reams
Kirk Bevins wrote:
Charlie Reams wrote: You've actually been a member since 13 September 2003, roughly 16 months.
I make this roughly 76 months.
Haha. The 8 and 3 are like right next to each other.

Re: Disapproval

Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2010 12:50 am
by Michael Wallace
I think what Jason is trying to say is

Image

Re: Disapproval

Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2010 4:01 am
by Phil Collinge
Jason, seriously, you need to get a grip.

You can barely buy a packet of fags and 2 pints of beer for the amount Charlie charges us per annum. If the fee were to be doubled (or even trebled) it would still be exceptional value for money.

If you can not justify to yourself why you should pay the subscription fee then I suggest you stop your pathetic whining and find yourself another site where you can play with yourself at such a reasonable cost.

Re: Disapproval

Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2010 9:02 am
by Jon Corby
Jason Larsen wrote:Charlie, I neglected to mention this to you, but right after I subscribed to the site, my mom made my close my Paypal account. This was because she said to me, "most people who attempt to make transactions are mean."
TBF your mum was pretty spot on on this occasion.

Re: Disapproval

Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2010 11:21 am
by Lesley Hines
Phil Collinge wrote:another site where you can play with yourself at such a reasonable cost.
Too many jokes! On the internet? Haha! I was going to post some helpful links but this is, after all, a family site.
Please stay legal tho, you've got to be careful with these 'special interest' sites.

Re: Disapproval

Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2010 10:31 pm
by peter lee
Jason Larsen wrote:Hi, Peter!

I am not a new member.

Although I don't know who you are, I have been a member of Apterous for 2 years and have seen you for at least one. People should not have to donate any more than once if they do care to donate. I believe it was David O'Donnell who said he agreed with Charlie when he stated, "You'll never be stuck for an opponent again."

This is why I am shocked at the fact that Charlie says you have to donate as many times as you want to have such features as playing against bots.
Hi Jason,
I never said nor implied that you were not a new member. I don't know you either. Haven't seen anywhere that Charlie says you have to donate as many times as you want. Let's call a spade a spade here, There is a fantastic facility available to all in Apterous and the annual fee is really quite low for the value and time enjoyed by the members. A lot of time and effort has gone into the development of Apterous so dig deep and stop whining. I still think that Charlie giving a warning of 50 games left is very generous.

Re: Disapproval

Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2010 10:35 pm
by Charlie Reams
I spoke to Jason last night, and apparently his worry was that when the 50 games was up, he would be banned irreversably from logging in to apterous ever again. Obviously this would be pretty pointless, and bad business, so that's not what happens. I'm not sure how we were supposed to infer this from his ramblings above, but anyway that's the situation. Thanks to those who've defended me; I hope you make many transactions in the future, and are not mean in so doing.

Re: Disapproval

Posted: Tue Feb 02, 2010 1:46 am
by Miriam Nussbaum
So, what does happen when the 50 games are up? We can still do everything we could as trial players before, except actually play?

(I was planning on subscribing at some point anyway, but now it will be even sooner. :D )

Re: Disapproval

Posted: Tue Feb 02, 2010 1:59 am
by Charlie Reams
Miriam Nussbaum wrote:So, what does happen when the 50 games are up? We can still do everything we could as trial players before, except actually play?
Yep. You can log in, use chat etc as normal. At least, that's what's supposed to happen. No one's managed it yet.

Re: Disapproval

Posted: Tue Feb 02, 2010 2:47 am
by Jason Larsen
I am having to jump through so many hoops to donate to Charlie, but I'm not giving up. As they say, if at first you don't succeed, try, try again.

Re: Disapproval

Posted: Tue Feb 02, 2010 3:34 am
by Alec Rivers
Jason Larsen wrote:As they say, if at first you don't succeed, try, try again.
If at first you don't succeed, don't take up skydiving.

Re: Disapproval

Posted: Tue Feb 02, 2010 3:39 am
by Jason Larsen
And hope for no phishing, either

Re: Disapproval

Posted: Tue Feb 02, 2010 8:43 pm
by Lesley Hines
Jason, why don't you give your Mum $24 and ask her to send it via Paypal (in £sterling, obviously)? Charlie's had my email address since I joined, and apart from all the love letters he sends me it really hasn't been a problem. I'm sure she'll agree it's worth the 6 1/2c a day once you show her how excellent the site is. Otherwise please come back on and show us a better site. :lol:

(And Charlie, please tell Jean-Baptiste there's no way I'd do that!!)

Re: Disapproval

Posted: Tue Feb 02, 2010 8:47 pm
by Charlie Reams
Jason Larsen wrote:And hope for no phishing, either
Phishing can only occur if the site you give your credit card details to is hacked or is itself untrustworthy. Since Paypal is a multibillion dollar business, that's really not likely.

Re: Disapproval

Posted: Tue Feb 02, 2010 10:38 pm
by Jason Larsen
What I'm doing is trying to open up another account and make my debit card the default payment method. It's as simple as that.