Page 1 of 1
Spoilers For Friday January 29th 2010
Posted: Fri Jan 29, 2010 1:35 pm
by James Robinson
Well, Countdown has reached the end of the week and James is looking very assured as champion, despite that slight mini-dip mid-way through yesterday's show.
It would be quite impressive to have 2 octochamps with less than a month gone, wouldn't it
As always, Paul Zenon has been fantastic in DC. Those 2 tricks yesterday got me so pmsl.

Having said that, how many people would've thought he is 45.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Zenon
I certainly didn't. Must be some kind of magic, either that or just the fact that he doesn't have that facial hair on him any more.
Still, can James stay on top form and reach 5 wins

Stay tuned to find out.
P.S. Hope everyone going to COLIN tomorrow has a very good time.

Re: Spoilers For Friday January 29th 2010
Posted: Fri Jan 29, 2010 3:32 pm
by Marc Meakin
Sorry James I seem to have duplicated this thread.
Re: Spoilers For Friday January 29th 2010
Posted: Fri Jan 29, 2010 3:33 pm
by Marc Meakin
I thought GAZUNDER was another name for a piss pot.
Re: Spoilers For Friday January 29th 2010
Posted: Fri Jan 29, 2010 3:40 pm
by Kirk Bevins
An hilarious trick to finish the week. Brilliant stuff.
Re: Spoilers For Friday January 29th 2010
Posted: Fri Jan 29, 2010 3:46 pm
by Marc Meakin
LOVABLE was there.
Re: Spoilers For Friday January 29th 2010
Posted: Fri Jan 29, 2010 3:49 pm
by Peter Mabey
Simpler first numbers: (9+2)x(9+5)
Re: Spoilers For Friday January 29th 2010
Posted: Fri Jan 29, 2010 3:52 pm
by Marc Meakin
Great contest developing.
Re: Spoilers For Friday January 29th 2010
Posted: Fri Jan 29, 2010 3:58 pm
by Ray Folwell
REFLEX for a DC equaller.
Can James recover from 5 non-scoring rounds ?
Re: Spoilers For Friday January 29th 2010
Posted: Fri Jan 29, 2010 4:00 pm
by Kirk Bevins
Marc Meakin wrote:LOVABLE was there.
No it wasn't. Only one L.
Re: Spoilers For Friday January 29th 2010
Posted: Fri Jan 29, 2010 4:07 pm
by Marc Meakin
Kirk Bevins wrote:Marc Meakin wrote:LOVABLE was there.
No it wasn't. Only one L.
My bad.

Re: Spoilers For Friday January 29th 2010
Posted: Fri Jan 29, 2010 4:09 pm
by Kirk Bevins
Great game. Sad to see James go as he was a great champion. Well played Howard - you kept your nerve.
Re: Spoilers For Friday January 29th 2010
Posted: Fri Jan 29, 2010 4:09 pm
by Peter Mabey
Third numbers:(50-7)x(6+3)
Re: Spoilers For Friday January 29th 2010
Posted: Fri Jan 29, 2010 4:10 pm
by Marc Meakin
Great game, well done Howard.
Bad luck James,you seemed to lose it in the middle section there.
Re: Spoilers For Friday January 29th 2010
Posted: Fri Jan 29, 2010 4:12 pm
by Liam Tiernan
I thought boatraces was there in rd 8. Invalid, though it's a nice scramble for ASCORBATE (tx Lexplorer)
Re: Spoilers For Friday January 29th 2010
Posted: Fri Jan 29, 2010 4:13 pm
by Matt Morrison
I feel like James threw this one away a touch.
He was pretty solid on the numbers so I was surprised he missed 154, and then wasn't he 2nd to declare on the BLEND/BALOONED* round? Seems a bit unnecessary to go for an 8 which you're almost sure is spelt wrong when you've got a 16 point lead (even after losing 10 points on the 154 previously).
Think he'd prob be annoyed at missing FREELY in R7 and PUKING or KEYING in R13 too, the -LY and -ING suffixes seemed to stick out in a bunch of not-great letters.
That said, I did think Howard was going to re-throw it away again when he missed that final numbers.
Really good game from two quality players - particularly liked ENGINES and ACROBATS from Howard.
Re: Spoilers For Friday January 29th 2010
Posted: Fri Jan 29, 2010 4:17 pm
by Marc Meakin
Liam Tiernan wrote:I thought boatraces was there in rd 8. Invalid, though it's a nice scramble for ASCORBATE (tx Lexplorer)
Yeah I found out that way too.
I wonder if anyone got it legitamately?
Re: Spoilers For Friday January 29th 2010
Posted: Fri Jan 29, 2010 4:22 pm
by Kirk Bevins
Liam Tiernan wrote:I thought boatraces was there in rd 8. Invalid, though it's a nice scramble for ASCORBATE (tx Lexplorer)
Close!
Re: Spoilers For Friday January 29th 2010
Posted: Fri Jan 29, 2010 4:33 pm
by Ryan Taylor
Really good game, enjoyed it from start to finish. Thought it was over as a contest when James picks out MEDIATES and NEMATODES early on, I imagined he would continue in this form - but no! Howard did excellent to comeback from that deficit early on when it would be so easy to think the game was over. The trick was great too as Scott said. Then the 387 declaration you think its game over and BAM Howard's used the 1 twice. Gripping stuff!
http://www.apterous.org/viewgame.php?ga ... 8#r2387048 pencil for GAZUNDERS yet I missed GAZUNDER today, hmph.
Re: Spoilers For Friday January 29th 2010
Posted: Fri Jan 29, 2010 5:10 pm
by Chris Davies
I bloody love Paul Zenon.
Re: Spoilers For Friday January 29th 2010
Posted: Fri Jan 29, 2010 6:48 pm
by Joyce Phillips
After a great nine, James let it go rather. A shame, because he was a great contestant, but that takes nothing away from Howard, who did really well.
Re: Spoilers For Friday January 29th 2010
Posted: Sat Jan 30, 2010 6:56 pm
by Gavin Chipper
It was a good game, from the point of view of being exciting. But James played a bit of a shocker, with those five non-scoring rounds in a row! He was possibly a bit unlucky with the hard conundrum, but there's no guarantee it would have been him that got it. And although that first numbers wasn't massivley hard, I imagine he was expecting Rachel to pick one from the top and that might have thrown him. Never give the choice to Rachel unless you really don't care what you get! Didn't David Williams makes that mistake once?
Re: Spoilers For Friday January 29th 2010
Posted: Sat Jan 30, 2010 9:04 pm
by David Williams
Gavin Chipper wrote:Never give the choice to Rachel unless you really don't care what you get! Didn't David Williams makes that mistake once?
If only.
Re: Spoilers For Friday January 29th 2010
Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2010 9:48 am
by James Rawson
So what's the etiquette on commenting on your own show?
I don't think I was at my best - I got complacent and made some shocking choices near the beginning, then when Howard took advantage I didn't have enough energy in reserve to stop the Lovelady war machine. But he played the better game and deserved to win.
Hope he does well this week, I'll be following him closely.
Re: Spoilers For Friday January 29th 2010
Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2010 10:23 am
by Clive Brooker
Hi James. Welcome to the forum and well played.
IMO commenting on your own games is good once your run is finished. Up to that I think you need to be careful - even posting to tell everyone your transmission date carries an implication that you didn't completely embarrass yourself - but now I'm sure we'd all like to know how it was for you.
Having said that, I disobeyed my own advice after my first show and probably bored most of the forum. But everyone "knew" I was going to get flattened the next day!
Re: Spoilers For Friday January 29th 2010
Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2010 12:43 pm
by Alec Rivers
Welcome, James. I think I speak on behalf of a number of people here when I say I was rooting for you to go all the way, as you'd started your run with some impressive games. Pity it ended when it did. And hats off to you for conceding:
James Rawson wrote:I got complacent and made some shocking choices near the beginning ...
After the good start you made, I also thought you were going to coast it. It's easy to get carried away, I suppose. But congrats on some good games, nonetheless.
Re: Spoilers For Friday January 29th 2010
Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2010 1:18 pm
by James Robinson
James was definitely in with a good shout of octochampdom, he had the talent and ability to go far in this series, without a shadow of a doubt.
By the way, if you're reading this, James. I sent you a private message on Friday, and you still haven't read it yet.
If you're having trouble finding it, look up near the top of the page in the middle of the screen.
Re: Spoilers For Friday January 29th 2010
Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2010 3:45 pm
by Davy Affleck
[quote="James Robinson"]
By the way, if you're reading this, James. I sent you a private message on Friday, and you still haven't read it yet.
quote]
Maybe the restraining order hasn't kicked in yet
Re: Spoilers For Friday January 29th 2010
Posted: Fri Feb 12, 2010 8:40 pm
by Howard Lovelady
I have only discovered this website yesterday. What an absolute treasure trove of trivia on CD. Thank you for all kind comments about my success against James. Particular thanks to James for his kind words. Sorry that I was as rank on Monday 1 Feb as I was inspired on 29 January. What a buzz being on Countdown was.
Re: Spoilers For Friday January 29th 2010
Posted: Tue Aug 03, 2010 2:48 pm
by Andy Wilson
Surprised no one spotted reflex just then.
Re: Spoilers For Friday January 29th 2010
Posted: Tue Aug 03, 2010 3:15 pm
by Andy Wilson
Enjoyed seeing that again.