Spoilers For Thursday January 28th 2010
Moderator: James Robinson
- James Robinson
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 10580
- Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2009 5:38 pm
- Location: Mirfield, West Yorkshire
Spoilers For Thursday January 28th 2010
James Rawson seems to be enjoying his stint on the show at the moment. With 3 wins and 310 points, if he keeps this form up, he could even depose Oliver as #1 seed
But, I could easily be getting ahead of myself, after all none of us, apart from you know who, knows who James' challenger is today.
One other point, I so hope that James doesn't try to do that "Inverted-J" again. Anyway, was that even inverted Inverted means upside-down, whereas James just turned the "J" 90° clockwise.
At least that "C Formation" (Copyright J. R. Robinson 2003) worked for him in the end though.
But, I could easily be getting ahead of myself, after all none of us, apart from you know who, knows who James' challenger is today.
One other point, I so hope that James doesn't try to do that "Inverted-J" again. Anyway, was that even inverted Inverted means upside-down, whereas James just turned the "J" 90° clockwise.
At least that "C Formation" (Copyright J. R. Robinson 2003) worked for him in the end though.
- Matt Morrison
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 7822
- Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2008 2:27 pm
- Location: London
- Contact:
Re: Spoilers For Thursday January 28th 2010
I don't know who.James Robinson wrote:none of us, apart from you know who, knows who James' challenger is today.
-
- Postmaster General
- Posts: 3661
- Joined: Sun Oct 25, 2009 6:18 pm
Re: Spoilers For Thursday January 28th 2010
Yawn.James Robinson wrote: One other point, I so hope that James doesn't try to do that "Inverted-J" again. Anyway, was that even inverted Inverted means upside-down, whereas James just turned the "J" 90° clockwise.
At least that "C Formation" (Copyright J. R. Robinson 2003) worked for him in the end though.
- Matt Morrison
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 7822
- Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2008 2:27 pm
- Location: London
- Contact:
Re: Spoilers For Thursday January 28th 2010
Seriously, I don't know what this means. Damian? Doesn't Damian know who the challenger is every day?Matt Morrison wrote:I don't know who.James Robinson wrote:none of us, apart from you know who, knows who James' challenger is today.
- James Robinson
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 10580
- Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2009 5:38 pm
- Location: Mirfield, West Yorkshire
Re: Spoilers For Thursday January 28th 2010
I'd have thought Damian would know, yes.Matt Morrison wrote:Seriously, I don't know what this means. Damian? Doesn't Damian know who the challenger is every day?Matt Morrison wrote:I don't know who.James Robinson wrote:none of us, apart from you know who, knows who James' challenger is today.
- Matthew Green
- Devotee
- Posts: 716
- Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2008 12:28 pm
Re: Spoilers For Thursday January 28th 2010
I don't know who he means either Matt. That makes two of us- a reasonable % of the c4c regular users- and therefore renders the phrase 'you know who' pretty inaccurate.
If I suddenly have a squirming baby on my lap it probably means that I should start paying it some attention and stop wasting my time messing around on a Countdown forum
-
- Series 62 Champion
- Posts: 775
- Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2008 2:13 pm
Re: Spoilers For Thursday January 28th 2010
ENPLANED round 13
Re: Spoilers For Thursday January 28th 2010
James Robinson wrote:I'd have thought Damian would know, yes.
I'd have thought that James himself, and indeed his challenger, both knew who today's challenger was. I had no idea, i thought it was Sunday.
- Kirk Bevins
- God
- Posts: 4923
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:18 pm
- Location: York, UK
Re: Spoilers For Thursday January 28th 2010
Haha good spot...especially as they mentioned DEPLANE. I missed it.Oliver Garner wrote:ENPLANED round 13
Re: Spoilers For Thursday January 28th 2010
Good game today I thought.
-
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 13283
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:37 pm
Re: Spoilers For Thursday January 28th 2010
It was a very good game and the challenger could have won several had he gone up against someone else. I was surprised that James only got five in one of the rounds near the end when there were several sixes that made the conundrum half-crucial - I suppose it's nerves.
- Philip Jarvis
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 399
- Joined: Fri Nov 14, 2008 11:32 am
- Location: Cleckheaton, West Yorkshire
Re: Spoilers For Thursday January 28th 2010
Was the challenger Anglo Italian?
"It's KNACKERED Nick!"
-
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1462
- Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 7:33 pm
Re: Spoilers For Thursday January 28th 2010
NoPhilip Jarvis wrote:Was the challenger Anglo Italian?