That's really good. I was considering making some stupid comment but I'm glad I didn't now.Graeme Cole wrote: ↑Mon Sep 11, 2017 11:14 pmI studied the ODE for ages. Where's my Duke of Edinburgh award?Marc Meakin wrote: ↑Mon Sep 11, 2017 3:15 pm It can take years of studying CSW in order to win the WSC.
Best ever contestants
-
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 13318
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:37 pm
Re: Best ever contestants
-
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 6347
- Joined: Wed May 20, 2009 3:37 pm
Re: Best ever contestants
Presumably, it must take some skill to unlearn words from one dictionary before studying a new oneGraeme Cole wrote: ↑Mon Sep 11, 2017 11:14 pmI studied the ODE for ages. Where's my Duke of Edinburgh award?Marc Meakin wrote: ↑Mon Sep 11, 2017 3:15 pm It can take years of studying CSW in order to win the WSC.
GR MSL GNDT MSS NGVWL SRND NNLYC NNCT
-
- Devotee
- Posts: 662
- Joined: Sat May 26, 2018 1:10 am
Re: Best ever contestants
1: Dylan Taylor
2: Zarte Siempre
3: Conor Travers
4:Kirk Bevins
5: Chris Davies
6: Julian Fell
7: Craig Beevers
8: Jack Hurst
9: Giles hutchings
10: Jen Steadmen
2: Zarte Siempre
3: Conor Travers
4:Kirk Bevins
5: Chris Davies
6: Julian Fell
7: Craig Beevers
8: Jack Hurst
9: Giles hutchings
10: Jen Steadmen
-
- Devotee
- Posts: 935
- Joined: Sat Dec 24, 2016 12:42 pm
Re: Best ever contestants
I think the list of players is more or less similar to mine, but I wouldn't put them in that order. Be interesting to hear your logic for this order (if they indeed were in order here).Owen Carroll wrote: ↑Sat May 26, 2018 11:31 am 1: Dylan Taylor
2: Zarte Siempre
3: Conor Travers
4:Kirk Bevins
5: Chris Davies
6: Julian Fell
7: Craig Beevers
8: Jack Hurst
9: Giles hutchings
10: Jen Steadmen
-
- Devotee
- Posts: 662
- Joined: Sat May 26, 2018 1:10 am
Re: Best ever contestants
I wasn't going in order completely. That was an accident. And I didn't see your list
-
- Devotee
- Posts: 935
- Joined: Sat Dec 24, 2016 12:42 pm
Re: Best ever contestants
Zarte surely has to be considered amongst the all the time greatest now...
-
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 13318
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:37 pm
Re: Best ever contestants
Yes, but with a CoC coming up fairly soon, it's not worth coming up with a new list until then.Elliott Mellor wrote: ↑Fri Jun 22, 2018 6:49 pm Zarte surely has to be considered amongst the all the time greatest now...
-
- Devotee
- Posts: 662
- Joined: Sat May 26, 2018 1:10 am
Re: Best ever contestants
Zarte and Philip definitely make it in my opinion!
Re: Best ever contestants
With all due respect to Philip, and whilst he is a great player and one who is of a much better ability than myself, I would not personally count him as one of the best of all time.
-
- Devotee
- Posts: 935
- Joined: Sat Dec 24, 2016 12:42 pm
Re: Best ever contestants
If he wins COC, then I'd possibly be willing to consider him up there - but largely yeah I agree with this sentiment. His 2 losses in his series are sort of going to hinder him in this field, even if they were to Zarte.
Re: Best ever contestants
Agreed- and he definitely deserves to be at CoCElliott Mellor wrote: ↑Sun Jun 24, 2018 5:45 pmIf he wins COC, then I'd possibly be willing to consider him up there - but largely yeah I agree with this sentiment. His 2 losses in his series are sort of going to hinder him in this field, even if they were to Zarte.
- Rhys Benjamin
- Postmaster General
- Posts: 3107
- Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2010 4:28 pm
Re: Best ever contestants
It's a real shame Scott Mearns was never invited back for the 30BC.
-
- Devotee
- Posts: 662
- Joined: Sat May 26, 2018 1:10 am
Re: Best ever contestants
Maybe he was and rejected his invitation. Julian fell didRhys Benjamin wrote: ↑Sun Aug 26, 2018 11:39 pm It's a real shame Scott Mearns was never invited back for the 30BC.
-
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 13318
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:37 pm
Re: Best ever contestants
I don't think people were invited as such. I think they had to put their names forward. This ended up largely being people from the online Countdown community and the Scrabble community because they were the easiest groups to reach in the short amount of time available. I think it would have been nice if the production team had made an effort to try and contact a few people in particular even if they weren't doing the whole thing with invitations - people like Scott Mearns, Harvey Freeman and Allan Saldanha would be people they might have wanted to hunt down.Owen Carroll wrote: ↑Sun Aug 26, 2018 11:47 pmMaybe he was and rejected his invitation. Julian fell didRhys Benjamin wrote: ↑Sun Aug 26, 2018 11:39 pm It's a real shame Scott Mearns was never invited back for the 30BC.
-
- Devotee
- Posts: 662
- Joined: Sat May 26, 2018 1:10 am
Re: Best ever contestants
Good theoryGavin Chipper wrote: ↑Mon Aug 27, 2018 9:57 amI don't think people were invited as such. I think they had to put their names forward. This ended up largely being people from the online Countdown community and the Scrabble community because they were the easiest groups to reach in the short amount of time available. I think it would have been nice if the production team had made an effort to try and contact a few people in particular even if they weren't doing the whole thing with invitations - people like Scott Mearns, Harvey Freeman and Allan Saldanha would be people they might have wanted to hunt down.Owen Carroll wrote: ↑Sun Aug 26, 2018 11:47 pmMaybe he was and rejected his invitation. Julian fell didRhys Benjamin wrote: ↑Sun Aug 26, 2018 11:39 pm It's a real shame Scott Mearns was never invited back for the 30BC.
-
- Acolyte
- Posts: 196
- Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2012 2:13 pm
Re: Best ever contestants
We invited people to put their names forward. We had no idea who was still keen on playing Countdown after all those years, and due to the data laws, we didn't have the details of many ex-contestants any longer.Gavin Chipper wrote: ↑Mon Aug 27, 2018 9:57 am I don't think people were invited as such. I think they had to put their names forward. This ended up largely being people from the online Countdown community and the Scrabble community because they were the easiest groups to reach in the short amount of time available. I think it would have been nice if the production team had made an effort to try and contact a few people in particular even if they weren't doing the whole thing with invitations - people like Scott Mearns, Harvey Freeman and Allan Saldanha would be people they might have wanted to hunt down.
Some cited the clash with OSW and the ODO as an obstacle, and others had simply moved on and found a different path in life. As for the 'effort' from the production team, you post as though you're aware of exactly what we did do and who we contacted, when in reality, you're clueless.
-
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 13318
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:37 pm
Re: Best ever contestants
Well, sorry if I've misrepresented what you did, but I seemed to remember you saying previously that you didn't contact people individually.Countdown Team wrote: ↑Fri Sep 14, 2018 5:22 pmWe invited people to put their names forward. We had no idea who was still keen on playing Countdown after all those years, and due to the data laws, we didn't have the details of many ex-contestants any longer.Gavin Chipper wrote: ↑Mon Aug 27, 2018 9:57 am I don't think people were invited as such. I think they had to put their names forward. This ended up largely being people from the online Countdown community and the Scrabble community because they were the easiest groups to reach in the short amount of time available. I think it would have been nice if the production team had made an effort to try and contact a few people in particular even if they weren't doing the whole thing with invitations - people like Scott Mearns, Harvey Freeman and Allan Saldanha would be people they might have wanted to hunt down.
Some cited the clash with OSW and the ODO as an obstacle, and others had simply moved on and found a different path in life. As for the 'effort' from the production team, you post as though you're aware of exactly what we did do and who we contacted, when in reality, you're clueless.
-
- Acolyte
- Posts: 196
- Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2012 2:13 pm
Re: Best ever contestants
Not having email addresses and mobile numbers for contestants who last appeared in the mid-90s doesn't constitute a lack of effort from the production team. Most of our data was obsolete, but we contacted whoever we were able to get hold of at the time. Believe it or not, people moved house in that 30-year timespan, phone numbers changed and email and mobile weren't invented.
- Rhys Benjamin
- Postmaster General
- Posts: 3107
- Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2010 4:28 pm
Re: Best ever contestants
To be honest, I can see both points of view here. Not that that helps.
-
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 13318
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:37 pm
Re: Best ever contestants
I thought I'd wait a bit after the CoC finished before updating this, partly in case of spoilers, and also to let the dust settle and think about it. Basically from the recent CoC, only Zarte would make an all-time top ten list. Obviously there were loads of great players, but none of the others have achieved enough to make the list. Obviously I've now got to get rid of someone from the previous list. And it's quite tough.Gavin Chipper wrote: ↑Sun Jan 24, 2016 8:12 pmThis was my last top ten greatest player list. Looking at it now, some of those players are in a far more fragile position than others. Edward McCullagh was on the list because he had the highest maxes of any xicount at the time (which might actually still be the case), but he was only marginally ahead of Julian Fell anyway, and others have had higher max rates and not won a series, or done it in a champions' tournament. Now that he's longer ago, I don't feel the need to include him so much. Also, Don Reid and Graham Nash are likely to fall away with other new great players. The ones likely to stay are those who took the game to new levels or won more than anyone else.Gavin Chipper wrote:I'll go for this ten contestants thing, even if it hasn't proven popular so far. In chronological order of first appearance:
Mark Nyman
Harvey Freeman
Allan Saldanha
Don Reid
Graham Nash
Julian Fell
Paul Gallen
Conor Travers
Jack Hurst
Edward McCullagh
Some quite tough choices here. Mark Nyman is included because although he didn't win his series, he did win the CofC, and then the CofCofC against Clive Freedman before following it all up by beating Harvey Freeman in that legendary Masters game. His scores and max rate weren't that high compared to today's players, but judging by the standards of the day, he's certainly worthy of inclusion. Allan Saldanha didn't win a tournament but reaching the final of the Supreme championship with arguably the best form anyone had ever shown up to that point was probably the main factor for me. Edward McCullagh's inclusion is primarily based on his series, where he achieved more maxes than anyone else (in his octorun and the whole series), but he did also then beat Graeme Cole in the champions special, making him a mini CofC winner. Although he lost his first game in the 30th birthday tournament, it was on a tiebreak conundrum.
Nic Brown and Scott Mearns were both octochamps, series winners and CofC winners, so it might seem tough not to include them, especially when you could argue that Don Reid and Graham Nash achieved largely the same and are included. I put Graham Nash in because he was in what was probably the best CofC up to that point, and had to beat Tom Hargreaves, Julian Fell and Chris Wills to win it. Nic Brown didn't feature in the Supremes (I've heard rumours it was to protect his unbeaten record), and his scores weren't as high as some of the others anyway. According to Graeme's stats, Scott and Don both had the same number of maxes in the octoruns (although I don't think he's done the stats for xicount 9-rounders) and it's very tough to split them, but I'm actually going to give it to Don based on the tiebreak that his only defeat was on a tiebreak. So he never lost in a "full game" (like Edward McCullagh).
Also, I'm actually inclined to include Helen Grayson now. She didn't win anything (but neither did Allan Saldanha), but it was really her rather than Harvery Freeman who upped the game in terms of max rates. She arguably took it to a new level and was perhaps unlucky not to win her series or be invited (or did she decline?) to a CoC.
And what of the players since the 30th birthday championship? Well, I think I probably would include Dylan Taylor now after that performance, but I don't think any of the others have done enough for inclusion in the top 10 ever. So in chronological order:
1. Helen Grayson
2. Mark Nyman
3. Harvey Freeman
4. Allan Saldanha
5. Graham Nash
6. Julian Fell
7. Paul Gallen
8. Conor Travers
9. Jack Hurst
10. Dylan Taylor
I know I haven't put them in order of greatness, but it would be too arbitrary. But Conor would be top definitely and probably Harvey Freeman second.
Did Helen Grayson really do enough to warrant a place on this list? She didn't actually win a championship, but she did set the standard in terms of percentage of max in her run, which I believe wasn't beaten until Julian Fell came along.
Allan Saldanha also didn't win any tournaments. He was the "boy wonder" of course with his great octorun at the age of 10. He also made it to the final of the supreme championships, losing only to Harvey Freeman, despite actually being the more convincing player throughout the tournament.
Graham Nash won his series and the CoC unbeaten, but then so did Nic Brown, Don Reid and Scott Mearns, and they're not on the list. Graham did, however, beat arguably the three top players in the CoC on the way though - Julian Fell, Tom Hargreaves and Chris Wills. Graham's performances overall weren't as convincing as some other players', but his game against Julian was obviously the highlight.
Paul Gallen didn't win his series, but then did win his CoC, beating Conor Travers on the way and was generally very convincing throughout. He was only a good player during his series, but a great one when the CoC came.
Looking at this list, most of the players on there set new standards in some way, in terms of scoring or winning or just general playing standard, and I think the one who does that least on my current list is Graham Nash. So that's the tough decision right there. But of course I might change my mind in a later list and put Graham back on, like how Helen Grayson previously came out of the past to make my list. Anyway, in chronological order as before (I've counted Zarte as before Dylan):
1. Helen Grayson
2. Mark Nyman
3. Harvey Freeman
4. Allan Saldanha
5. Julian Fell
6. Paul Gallen
7. Conor Travers
8. Jack Hurst
9. Zarte Siempre
10. Dylan Taylor
Re: Best ever contestants
We'll have to wait at least until Elliott (I assume) duly wins his series before deciding where he fits in, but in terms of "best", if not "greatest", surely only Conor's 30BC form compares to what we've just seen.
-
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 425
- Joined: Wed Sep 18, 2013 2:32 pm
Re: Best ever contestants
It's an interesting quirk that all the serious contenders that might be considered the best ever all have a defeat to their name, whilst none of the unbeaten players are held in quite the same regard.
That said, I do disagree with the Wiki's view that Harvey Freeman once lost. Countdown Masters was a different programme, and also I believe his loss was partly as a result of an invalid word being used in one of the conundrums.
That said, I do disagree with the Wiki's view that Harvey Freeman once lost. Countdown Masters was a different programme, and also I believe his loss was partly as a result of an invalid word being used in one of the conundrums.
Re: Best ever contestants
My top 10 ever contestants are
Zarte Siempre-He is flipping unbelievable.
Elliott Mellor (The Mellobot)-He is great and unlucky not to win his series.
Conor Travers-He won 2 different series
Dinos Sfyris-Series 80 Champion
Robin Johnson-Hopefully he will be in the Series 81 finals
Martin May-Great
Mike Daysley-Great
Phillip Aston-Great
Tom Chafer-Cook-Great
Bradley Horrocks (Brahag)-best 6 small player ever.
Zarte Siempre-He is flipping unbelievable.
Elliott Mellor (The Mellobot)-He is great and unlucky not to win his series.
Conor Travers-He won 2 different series
Dinos Sfyris-Series 80 Champion
Robin Johnson-Hopefully he will be in the Series 81 finals
Martin May-Great
Mike Daysley-Great
Phillip Aston-Great
Tom Chafer-Cook-Great
Bradley Horrocks (Brahag)-best 6 small player ever.
Re: Best ever contestants
Bradley what is your favourite numbers selection
-
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 13318
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:37 pm
Re: Best ever contestants
I think it's partly because most of the unbeaten players are unbeaten because they retired in some way and didn't compete in later tournaments.Fred Mumford wrote: ↑Sun Jun 30, 2019 2:50 pm It's an interesting quirk that all the serious contenders that might be considered the best ever all have a defeat to their name, whilst none of the unbeaten players are held in quite the same regard.
That said, I do disagree with the Wiki's view that Harvey Freeman once lost. Countdown Masters was a different programme, and also I believe his loss was partly as a result of an invalid word being used in one of the conundrums.
Richard Whiteley used to refer to Harvey Freeman as unbeaten if that makes any difference.
-
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 425
- Joined: Wed Sep 18, 2013 2:32 pm
Re: Best ever contestants
Indeed, Whiteley introduced him in the Supreme final as "the only unbeaten Countdowner", which must have pleased Nic Brown no end.
-
- Newbie
- Posts: 26
- Joined: Thu Dec 08, 2016 10:36 pm
Re: Best ever contestants
Strong list - particularly the person who's not been on yet.Ash Smith wrote: ↑Sun Jun 30, 2019 3:03 pm My top 10 ever contestants are
Zarte Siempre-He is flipping unbelievable.
Elliott Mellor (The Mellobot)-He is great and unlucky not to win his series.
Conor Travers-He won 2 different series
Dinos Sfyris-Series 80 Champion
Robin Johnson-Hopefully he will be in the Series 81 finals
Martin May-Great
Mike Daysley-Great
Phillip Aston-Great
Tom Chafer-Cook-Great
Bradley Horrocks (Brahag)-best 6 small player ever.
-
- Devotee
- Posts: 621
- Joined: Thu Feb 21, 2013 11:50 pm
Re: Best ever contestants
For me... the best are the winners.
There are several ways to look at the winners: Supreme Champion/30th Birthday Champion, Champion of champions, Series champions, Octochampions, Champions.
Also consider: unbeaten contestants and contestants who have a high win-rate - for example - 85% or more?
Score a point for each achievement and you'll get an idea who are among the best.
Figure out who beat who of these or why they didn't compete again and somehow weight this into the 'argument'.
This is off the top of my head, add many more achievement 'indicators' in and you get a more accurate list.
There are several ways to look at the winners: Supreme Champion/30th Birthday Champion, Champion of champions, Series champions, Octochampions, Champions.
Also consider: unbeaten contestants and contestants who have a high win-rate - for example - 85% or more?
Score a point for each achievement and you'll get an idea who are among the best.
Figure out who beat who of these or why they didn't compete again and somehow weight this into the 'argument'.
This is off the top of my head, add many more achievement 'indicators' in and you get a more accurate list.
-
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 13318
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:37 pm
Re: Best ever contestants
I was thinking about this again after the recent CoC. Before I consider making any sort of definitive list, I thought I might make a fairly inclusive list of players who could be in contention for the top 10 (in chronological order):
1. Helen Grayson
2. Mark Nyman
3. Harvery Freeman
4. Nic Brown
5. Allan Saldanha
6. Don Reid
7. Scott Mearns
8. Graham Nash
9. Julian Fell
10. Paul Gallen
11. Conor Travers
12. Jack Hurst
13. Zarte Siempre
14. Dylan Taylor
15. Elliott Mellor
16. Luke Johnson-Davies
17. Ahmed Mohamed
1. Helen Grayson
2. Mark Nyman
3. Harvery Freeman
4. Nic Brown
5. Allan Saldanha
6. Don Reid
7. Scott Mearns
8. Graham Nash
9. Julian Fell
10. Paul Gallen
11. Conor Travers
12. Jack Hurst
13. Zarte Siempre
14. Dylan Taylor
15. Elliott Mellor
16. Luke Johnson-Davies
17. Ahmed Mohamed
- Tracey Anne Mills
- Devotee
- Posts: 730
- Joined: Tue Jan 19, 2010 9:30 pm
- Location: The Series 72 Runner Up, The Crazy Cat Lady that lives with her two cats Freddie and Callie
Re: Best ever contestants
More recently here is my top 10
1. Elliott Mellor aka Mellhag one the best players to win his series the current record holder ( that still stands to this day )
2.Luke Johnson-Davies
3.Ahmed Mohammed
4. Ronan Higginson
5.Dan Byrom
6.Matt O'Connor
7.Zarte Siempre
8.Harry Savage
9.Bradley Horrocks aka Brahag
10.Adam Latchford
Honorable mentions Stephen Read Paul Erdunast Tom-Chafer Cook and Florence Cappleman-Lynes
1. Elliott Mellor aka Mellhag one the best players to win his series the current record holder ( that still stands to this day )
2.Luke Johnson-Davies
3.Ahmed Mohammed
4. Ronan Higginson
5.Dan Byrom
6.Matt O'Connor
7.Zarte Siempre
8.Harry Savage
9.Bradley Horrocks aka Brahag
10.Adam Latchford
Honorable mentions Stephen Read Paul Erdunast Tom-Chafer Cook and Florence Cappleman-Lynes
Tracey 'Old Enough To Be My Mum' Mills aka Crazy Cat Lady and Cat Lover
-
- Newbie
- Posts: 14
- Joined: Thu May 09, 2024 2:37 pm
Re: Best ever contestants
Upcoming champion of champions should be the best ever - Ronan Higginson vs Tom Stevenson in the final ?
Re: Best ever contestants
Bit of a way to go yet. I think it’s better to have champion of champions every 4 instead of 3 as it means potentially up to 8 series winners vs 6. Last one had 7 and it was one of the best and closest championships ever.Jamie Weisenberg wrote: ↑Thu May 09, 2024 11:25 pm Upcoming champion of champions should be the best ever - Ronan Higginson vs Tom Stevenson in the final ?
Series 78 Runner-up
Re: Best ever contestants
Tom already played in the previous CoC. Incidentally, that CoC was the strongest ever. We'll need quite a few amazing players to burst on the scene in the next few series for next CoC to come close in terms of quality.Jamie Weisenberg wrote: ↑Thu May 09, 2024 11:25 pm Upcoming champion of champions should be the best ever - Ronan Higginson vs Tom Stevenson in the final ?
-
- Acolyte
- Posts: 183
- Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2022 4:29 pm
Re: Best ever contestants
Every two years is optimal from the "semi-finalists having a lovely time" point of view though. So who can say which is bestPhilip A wrote: ↑Fri May 10, 2024 7:04 amBit of a way to go yet. I think it’s better to have champion of champions every 4 instead of 3 as it means potentially up to 8 series winners vs 6. Last one had 7 and it was one of the best and closest championships ever.Jamie Weisenberg wrote: ↑Thu May 09, 2024 11:25 pm Upcoming champion of champions should be the best ever - Ronan Higginson vs Tom Stevenson in the final ?
-
- Newbie
- Posts: 14
- Joined: Thu May 09, 2024 2:37 pm
Re: Best ever contestants
Just watched last year's CoC. Ahmed is unreal, only one who comes close is Connor Travers.JackHurst wrote: ↑Fri May 10, 2024 7:49 amTom already played in the previous CoC. Incidentally, that CoC was the strongest ever. We'll need quite a few amazing players to burst on the scene in the next few series for next CoC to come close in terms of quality.Jamie Weisenberg wrote: ↑Thu May 09, 2024 11:25 pm Upcoming champion of champions should be the best ever - Ronan Higginson vs Tom Stevenson in the final ?
-
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 13318
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:37 pm
Re: Best ever contestants
I'd say that's back to front. Conor is the GOAT and it's a question of which player comes closest to him.
-
- Newbie
- Posts: 14
- Joined: Thu May 09, 2024 2:37 pm
Re: Best ever contestants
Prove that Conor is the GOAT. Ahmed is too good with Conundrums, you hear about words nobody's heard of.Gavin Chipper wrote: ↑Tue May 14, 2024 1:32 pm I'd say that's back to front. Conor is the GOAT and it's a question of which player comes closest to him.
-
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 13318
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:37 pm
Re: Best ever contestants
Well, it's not something you can prove as such. But:Jamie Weisenberg wrote: ↑Tue May 14, 2024 3:04 pmProve that Conor is the GOAT. Ahmed is too good with Conundrums, you hear about words nobody's heard of.Gavin Chipper wrote: ↑Tue May 14, 2024 1:32 pm I'd say that's back to front. Conor is the GOAT and it's a question of which player comes closest to him.
Conor maxed three games in the row in the 30th birthdays champs (could have been four if he hadn't pluralised SOIGNEE), followed by a 14/15 max final. It was a more clinical performance than Ahmed's in the CoC. In Ahmed's favour, obviously the dictionary is larger now, but he was less consistent in general against the other contestants. Conor only failed to score in two rounds in the 30th BC - the disallowed soignees, and when Ben Wilson beat him with STOTTY. He was only beaten in one round, as his opponent also had his word disallowed in the soignees round. That was across six games. In the recent CoC, Ahmed lost two letters rounds, two numbers and one conundrum, as well as having a word disallowed when his opponent did. In four games. He lost three rounds in the final alone, going 14 down at one point.
-
- Newbie
- Posts: 14
- Joined: Thu May 09, 2024 2:37 pm
Re: Best ever contestants
Interesting post.Gavin Chipper wrote: ↑Tue May 14, 2024 3:37 pm
Well, it's not something you can prove as such. But:
Conor maxed three games in the row in the 30th birthdays champs (could have been four if he hadn't pluralised SOIGNEE), followed by a 14/15 max final. It was a more clinical performance than Ahmed's in the CoC. In Ahmed's favour, obviously the dictionary is larger now, but he was less consistent in general against the other contestants. Conor only failed to score in two rounds in the 30th BC - the disallowed soignees, and when Ben Wilson beat him with STOTTY. He was only beaten in one round, as his opponent also had his word disallowed in the soignees round. That was across six games. In the recent CoC, Ahmed lost two letters rounds, two numbers and one conundrum, as well as having a word disallowed when his opponent did. In four games. He lost three rounds in the final alone, going 14 down at one point.
However, in Ahmed's defence I'd say the quality of the opposition was FAR higher than what Conor faced. Almost every game in last year's CoC went down to the wire. Conor should come of of retirement and face him, I think Ahmed would blow him away.
Re: Best ever contestants
Rude.Jamie Weisenberg wrote: ↑Tue May 14, 2024 3:49 pm However, in Ahmed's defence I'd say the quality of the opposition was FAR higher than what Conor faced.
- Jon O'Neill
- Ginger Ninja
- Posts: 4551
- Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2008 12:45 am
- Location: London, UK
Re: Best ever contestants
Extremely.JackHurst wrote: ↑Tue May 14, 2024 4:02 pmRude.Jamie Weisenberg wrote: ↑Tue May 14, 2024 3:49 pm However, in Ahmed's defence I'd say the quality of the opposition was FAR higher than what Conor faced.
Re: Best ever contestants
Conor still plays, and is still top dog statistically. Most typically in a 15 game:Jamie Weisenberg wrote: ↑Tue May 14, 2024 3:49 pm Conor should come of of retirement and face him, I think Ahmed would blow him away.
- He'll get 9 or 10 letters maxes
- He'll get 40/40 on the numbers
- He'll be able to solve most conundrums in under a second.
Even a robot who plays perfect Countdown and knows the answer to conundrums before they are shown is typically going to only beat Conor by 10 or 18 points per games. It's not exactly being blown away is it?
You've been on this forum for 5 days. You are acting like you know more about Countdown than people who have been on here 15+ years and know much more about the show and about the game than you. Pipe down and respect your elders boy.
-
- Newbie
- Posts: 14
- Joined: Thu May 09, 2024 2:37 pm
Re: Best ever contestants
My apologies.JackHurst wrote: ↑Tue May 14, 2024 4:02 pmRude.Jamie Weisenberg wrote: ↑Tue May 14, 2024 3:49 pm However, in Ahmed's defence I'd say the quality of the opposition was FAR higher than what Conor faced.
I remember the other finalist in the 30th anniversary CoC was exceptional too. I forget his name.
But you did yourself say that last year's CoC was easily the best of all time due to the quality.
Last edited by Jamie Weisenberg on Tue May 14, 2024 6:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Newbie
- Posts: 14
- Joined: Thu May 09, 2024 2:37 pm
Re: Best ever contestants
I've been watching Countdown on and off since the 90s actually.
- Ronan M Higginson
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 292
- Joined: Fri Apr 19, 2019 5:11 pm
Re: Best ever contestants
Anyway, even if we disagree on Countdown opinions, it's always good to have another enthusiast on board. Welcome to C4CJamie Weisenberg wrote: ↑Tue May 14, 2024 5:49 pm I've been watching Countdown on and off since the 90s actually.
Re: Best ever contestants
Wut?Ronan M Higginson wrote: ↑Tue May 14, 2024 6:06 pmActually 5 years, only the 70th odd account here is 5 days old.
Code: Select all
Joined:Thu May 09, 2024 2:37 pm
Last active:Tue May 14, 2024 6:28 pm
Total posts:9
- Andres Sanchez
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 268
- Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2022 12:32 am
Re: Best ever contestants
I've played Ahmed on Discord 16 times and despite being beaten every single time by his greatness, I still think Conor is better honestly. Both, of course, fucking immaculate playing.
One of da 'Muricans
-
- Acolyte
- Posts: 123
- Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2022 8:47 am
Re: Best ever contestants
Was a super strong COC but about 14/16 people in it had Ahmed down as the winner before hand which shows how goated he is. Hard to compare him and Conor but i'd have them both miles clear of probably Zarte in 3rd.
Although shoutouts to these two - best doesn't mean most talented...:
David Green for making up words in almost every single round
https://wiki.apterous.org/Episode_7481
Carlos Da Silva for THAT conundrum
https://wiki.apterous.org/Episode_7547
Although shoutouts to these two - best doesn't mean most talented...:
David Green for making up words in almost every single round
https://wiki.apterous.org/Episode_7481
Carlos Da Silva for THAT conundrum
https://wiki.apterous.org/Episode_7547
Re: Best ever contestants
If you wanted to throw co-events into the mix for 30BC vs CoC16 debate
To date, since the CoC final aired:
- 9 Co events won by 30BC Cohort
- 3 Co events won by CoC16 Cohort
Thats with CoC16 cohort generally outnumbering 30BC cohort at most events.
To date, since the CoC final aired:
- 9 Co events won by 30BC Cohort
- 3 Co events won by CoC16 Cohort
Thats with CoC16 cohort generally outnumbering 30BC cohort at most events.
- Andres Sanchez
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 268
- Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2022 12:32 am
Re: Best ever contestants
Now thinking, I think Jack did superb in his run and very much deserved to be talked about as well.
One of da 'Muricans
- Adam Gillard
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1763
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2010 8:42 pm
- Location: About 45 minutes south-east of Thibodaux, Louisiana
Re: Best ever contestants
Admittedly I haven't seen the last 10 series or so, but the best performing contestant for me is Conor Travers. My favourites were ones who resonated with me as most of my viewing time was while I was primary school age, namely Tanmay Dixit and Kai Laddiman.
Mike Brown: "Round 12: T N R S A E I G U
C1: SIGNATURE (18) ["9; not written down"]
C2: SEATING (7)
Score: 108–16 (max 113)
Another niner for Adam and yet another century. Well done, that man."
C1: SIGNATURE (18) ["9; not written down"]
C2: SEATING (7)
Score: 108–16 (max 113)
Another niner for Adam and yet another century. Well done, that man."
Re: Best ever contestants
Don't listen to them, everything you've said has been correct.Jamie Weisenberg wrote: ↑Tue May 14, 2024 5:49 pmI've been watching Countdown on and off since the 90s actually.
Re: Best ever contestants
Pretty sure Ahmed has won 100% of the events he's attended since CoCXVI.
-
- Acolyte
- Posts: 123
- Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2022 8:47 am
Re: Best ever contestants
see finishing positions of where those players who mostly attend the events came in coc. One semi, couple of quarters, couple of round of 16s. Every now and then Ahmed turns up and annihilates everyone
It's all irrelevant anyway because as soon as Zohaib goes on, drops zero maxes in an octo run and wins series 100 bonanza with his eyes closed then we're gonna see the actual true goat.
-
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 13318
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:37 pm
Re: Best ever contestants
By the way, I think this thread has always been largely about performance on the show rather than CO-events, Apterous etc. There is also this thread on Apterites and this thread as a general greatness thing. But for the thread we're in right now, I'm sticking with Conor.
-
- Newbie
- Posts: 14
- Joined: Thu May 09, 2024 2:37 pm
Re: Best ever contestants
Who is the best ever contestant on TV Countdown that isn't involved/is completely oblivious of the professional scene ? By professional, I mean Apterous, CO-events, ZoomDowns etc ..
-
- Newbie
- Posts: 14
- Joined: Thu May 09, 2024 2:37 pm
Re: Best ever contestants
Are you THE Ahmed or an impostor ?Ahmed M wrote: ↑Wed May 15, 2024 8:35 pmDon't listen to them, everything you've said has been correct.Jamie Weisenberg wrote: ↑Tue May 14, 2024 5:49 pmI've been watching Countdown on and off since the 90s actually.