Spoiler for Friday November 27th 2009
Posted: Fri Nov 27, 2009 9:05 am
Charlie Reams makes an unexpected return to Countdown today, disguised as challenger Tom Curran. Fooled nobody.
A group for contestants and lovers of the Channel 4 game show 'Countdown'.
http://www.c4countdown.co.uk/
Two-thirds of George Raison's shows were in September.Jon Corby wrote:Is he related to George Raison from back in October?
Or Apterous Prune.Jon Corby wrote:Is he related to George Raison from back in October?
Except what I said was perfectly correct, and you weren't.James Robinson wrote:Two-thirds of George Raison's shows were in September.Jon Corby wrote:Is he related to George Raison from back in October?
Slight nit-picking I know, but you did it to me yesterday.
We can't all be human calculators.........James Robinson wrote:I'm not quite convinced about how good he is, especially after missing that fairly simple numbers game early on.
Based on my performances, I was more like a calculator with a couple of bugs inside.D Eadie wrote:We can't all be human calculators.........James Robinson wrote:I'm not quite convinced about how good he is, especially after missing that fairly simple numbers game early on.
I think you misspelled "burgers".James Robinson wrote: Based on my performances, I was more like a calculator with a couple of bugs inside.
Maybe, he might be given the points later.Phil Reynolds wrote:Surely a fleet of ships can have different TONNAGES?
LMFAOCharlie Reams wrote:I think you misspelled "burgers".James Robinson wrote: Based on my performances, I was more like a calculator with a couple of bugs inside.
Yeah, my dad beat me with HEIRESS - I was quite impressed.Malcolm James wrote:R1 DC-equaller WOOLLENS
R12 DC-beater HEIRESS
I don't know, but he Mordored his opponent today.Mark Kudlowski wrote:Does anyone else think that Graham is a dead ringer for a hobbit ?
He has a bit of a look of Elijah Wood as Frodo Baggins lol !
I assume that paper is attached with magnets as well, like the tiles. That would explain the four little circles in the corners. Was very funny though, and her reactions were great.Eoin Monaghan wrote:What happened Rachel on the first numbers?
What happened though?Derek Hazell wrote:I assume that paper is attached with magnets as well, like the tiles. That would explain the four little circles in the corners. Was very funny though, and her reactions were great.Eoin Monaghan wrote:What happened Rachel on the first numbers?
One or more of the magnets must have slipped.Eoin Monaghan wrote:What happened though?
Cool, ERRATIC was there as an equaller.Derek Hazell wrote:One or more of the magnets must have slipped.Eoin Monaghan wrote:What happened though?
Or the board suddenly lost its magnetic polarity or something.
Better ask Dinosthechemist for a more detailed explanation.
(Yeah, I know it's closer to physics, but he still knows a lot about science)
We deliberately disallowed TONNAGES to discredit Lexplorer and all those involved in creating it.Marc Meakin wrote:TONNAGES looks good on Lexplorer
Maybe you need some liver.D Eadie wrote:The white squared numbers sheet is pinned to the board with drawing pins, onto a cork backing. It's been used repeatedly for a long while, so over time, what with all the pins going in and out, the holes have merged into one large crater and the pins no longer stick in properly, hence the sheet falling off.
Make up your own jokes.
Marc Meakin wrote:Maybe you need some liver.D Eadie wrote:The white squared numbers sheet is pinned to the board with drawing pins, onto a cork backing. It's been used repeatedly for a long while, so over time, what with all the pins going in and out, the holes have merged into one large crater and the pins no longer stick in properly, hence the sheet falling off.
Make up your own jokes.
I thought it was Scott Mearns, having taken some kind of age-reducing serum. Unfortunately, it also seems to have sapped his Countdown ability (sorry, Tom).D Eadie wrote:Charlie Reams makes an unexpected return to Countdown today, disguised as challenger Tom Curran. Fooled nobody.
Yeah I was surprised how poorly Tom played (sorry Tom) given he's a young male, although I suppose he picked up a bit after round 6. Probably nerves I'll bet.Mike Brown wrote:I thought it was Scott Mearns, having taken some kind of age-reducing serum. Unfortunately, it also seems to have sapped his Countdown ability (sorry, Tom).D Eadie wrote:Charlie Reams makes an unexpected return to Countdown today, disguised as challenger Tom Curran. Fooled nobody.
He did seem to be seriously lacking in self-confidence and belief right from the start.Dinos Sfyris wrote:Yeah I was surprised how poorly Tom played (sorry Tom) given he's a young male, although I suppose he picked up a bit after round 6. Probably nerves I'll bet.Mike Brown wrote:I thought it was Scott Mearns, having taken some kind of age-reducing serum. Unfortunately, it also seems to have sapped his Countdown ability (sorry, Tom).D Eadie wrote:Charlie Reams makes an unexpected return to Countdown today, disguised as challenger Tom Curran. Fooled nobody.
Cork refusing to play ball. Nothing new there.D Eadie wrote:The white squared numbers sheet is pinned to the board with drawing pins, onto a cork backing. It's been used repeatedly for a long while, so over time, what with all the pins going in and out, the holes have merged into one large crater and the pins no longer stick in properly, hence the sheet falling off.
Make up your own jokes.
If you do get caught you can end up with a criminal record.Derek Hazell wrote:It's like when you try to fare dodge when riding a train - you keep thinking "what if I get caught?", and you can't concentrate. It's never worth it.
I'm not sure this is the case. I've seen loads of people without a ticket when the inspector comes along, and normally they just pay the fare there and then. I think if they're being strict they'd charge them a penaty fare as well. The prosecution normally only happens when they don't have the money to pay so it's assumed they were fare-dodging rather than being too slow to buy a ticket.Philip Jarvis wrote:If you do get caught you can end up with a criminal record.Derek Hazell wrote:It's like when you try to fare dodge when riding a train - you keep thinking "what if I get caught?", and you can't concentrate. It's never worth it.
Railway authorities often have a zero tolerance policy in fare dodging cases and insist on prosecuting. I've seen many aspiring solicitors, doctors and other young professionals in tears when they realise that their attempt to avoid paying 50p may have compromised their future career hopes.
Be warned. Derek is right - it's never worth it.
Same. Maybe it's different on some lines but at least in my area (Cambridge/Ely/London), I've seen people be incredibly abusive to the ticket inspector and still receive nothing worse than the statutory fine. I wouldn't advise fair dodging because, as Derek says, it's just really embarrassing if you get caught, and it means you spend your journey fidgeting nervously instead of checking out the hot railway poontang.Gavin Chipper wrote: I'm not sure this is the case. I've seen loads of people without a ticket when the inspector comes along, and normally they just pay the fare there and then. I think if they're being strict they'd charge them a penaty fare as well. The prosecution normally only happens when they don't have the money to pay so it's assumed they were fare-dodging rather than being too slow to buy a ticket.
Is that train spotter terminology?Charlie Reams wrote:and it means you spend your journey fidgeting nervously instead of checking out the hot railway poontang.
I think your hilarious parody of my homophone mix-up may be slightly undermined by your own disregard for capitalisation and punctuation.Richard Adams wrote:As a kid I always dodged fairs because the lads riding the Waltzer were scary
That's a bit unfare.Charlie Reams wrote:I think your hilarious parody of my homophone mix-up may be slightly undermined by your own disregard for capitalisation and punctuation.Richard Adams wrote:As a kid I always dodged fairs because the lads riding the Waltzer were scary
As above. I've travelled on many many trains without a ticket, a mix of deliberately and accidentally - got away with it half the time, and of the other times I've never once been forced to pay a penalty fare or got in any trouble. Just once I was told I wasn't allowed to use my railcard for discount (fare was only a few quid anyway) and that's the worst it ever got. It does help to have the gift of gab when you do get caught, most situations can be explained away fairly innocently.Charlie Reams wrote:Same. Maybe it's different on some lines but at least in my area (Cambridge/Ely/London), I've seen people be incredibly abusive to the ticket inspector and still receive nothing worse than the statutory fine. I wouldn't advise fair dodging because, as Derek says, it's just really embarrassing if you get caught, and it means you spend your journey fidgeting nervously instead of checking out the hot railway poontang.Gavin Chipper wrote: I'm not sure this is the case. I've seen loads of people without a ticket when the inspector comes along, and normally they just pay the fare there and then. I think if they're being strict they'd charge them a penaty fare as well. The prosecution normally only happens when they don't have the money to pay so it's assumed they were fare-dodging rather than being too slow to buy a ticket.
Philip Jarvis wrote:Derek Hazell wrote:It's like when you try to fare dodge when riding a train - you keep thinking "what if I get caught?", and you can't concentrate. It's never worth it.
If you do get caught you can end up with a criminal record.
Once I bought a ticket from a machine but it didn't print the ticket, just some crappy debit card receipt which didn't really have anything on. There didn't appear to be anyone around and I was in a hurry anyway so I had to "go for it" and successfully talked my way past three separate people on my journey home. That was good.Matt Morrison wrote:As above. I've travelled on many many trains without a ticket, a mix of deliberately and accidentally - got away with it half the time, and of the other times I've never once been forced to pay a penalty fare or got in any trouble. Just once I was told I wasn't allowed to use my railcard for discount (fare was only a few quid anyway) and that's the worst it ever got. It does help to have the gift of gab when you do get caught, most situations can be explained away fairly innocently.
Have had two similar experiences:Gavin Chipper wrote:Once I bought a ticket from a machine but it didn't print the ticket, just some crappy debit card receipt which didn't really have anything on. There didn't appear to be anyone around and I was in a hurry anyway so I had to "go for it" and successfully talked my way past three separate people on my journey home. That was good.
Davy Affleck wrote:Are they giving out Susan Boyle records to fare dodgers instead of a fine now?Philip Jarvis wrote:If you do get caught you can end up with a criminal record.Derek Hazell wrote:It's like when you try to fare dodge when riding a train - you keep thinking "what if I get caught?", and you can't concentrate. It's never worth it.
Recently I tried to buy a ticket from a machine, and the basic journey I wanted to do was missing from the screen. It was a journey I had done a few times before, but this time there were lots of weird options but not the basic A to B one. So, as the train was coming I just got on and waited for a guy to ask on board. When he did, I explained and paid up. I then realized he has overcharged me a bit. I mentioned this at my destination station, and they made me fill in a whole A4 sheet full of small print - all for just over £4! Amazing how it suddenly becomes so difficult when it's them that are in the wrong.Charlie Reams wrote:So now I can't really remember why I bothered relating these boring experiences, except that it irritates me that the train system threatens to treat you like a criminal for having the wrong ticket while holding itself to nothing like the same standards of precision.
Worst £8 I ever spentKirk Bevins wrote:He decided to run off and ask someone if his ticket would be valid --- it turned out it wouldn't (and the first one via Ely was gone 10am, the time we needed to be in Peterborough!) so he bought another ticket.
Please tell me you got a refund. I had presumed you did, as in the second of your previous two stories you mentioned how you had no leg to stand on in being able to prove the inadequacy of the staff member who fucked up your tickets, which silently suggested to me that you had successfully got your refund sorted for the first story?Charlie Reams wrote:Worst £8 I ever spentKirk Bevins wrote:He decided to run off and ask someone if his ticket would be valid --- it turned out it wouldn't (and the first one via Ely was gone 10am, the time we needed to be in Peterborough!) so he bought another ticket.
On the other hand you're likely to need the full 10 minutes from the tube station, as there's a huge shopping mall to trek through after reaching surface levelAlec Rivers wrote: Again in London, the change time between St Pancras Domestic and St Pancras International is 10 minutes. They're in the same building! It takes 1 minute (if you know where you're going).