Page 1 of 1

Spoilers For Tuesday October 13th 2009

Posted: Tue Oct 13, 2009 1:10 pm
by James Robinson
Well, Steve has joined Jacqueline, Paul & Bob on 5 wins. So we have 4 octochamps and 4 pentachamps currently.

Hopefully win number 6 will be achieved today, but with 3 people already failed on 5, is the curse of the 6th show about to strike again :!: :?: :?

Re: Spoilers For Tuesday October 13th 2009

Posted: Tue Oct 13, 2009 1:54 pm
by Clive Brooker
Good luck to his opponent too.

Re: Spoilers For Tuesday October 13th 2009

Posted: Tue Oct 13, 2009 2:09 pm
by Ben Hunter
Saw this one live in the studio. All I can say is, get ready for a classic. Steve's opponent got well drunk before he went on and loads of shit went down. I hope they kept it all in the recording.

Re: Spoilers For Tuesday October 13th 2009

Posted: Tue Oct 13, 2009 2:20 pm
by James Robinson
Clive Brooker wrote:Good luck to his opponent too.
Well said, Clive. I wish good luck to Steve's opponent, whoever he or she is too.

Re: Spoilers For Tuesday October 13th 2009

Posted: Tue Oct 13, 2009 2:39 pm
by Douglas Wilson
Birdies as a nice DC equaller in round one.

Got excited thinking openplan might be one word for round four, but evidently not.

Re: Spoilers For Tuesday October 13th 2009

Posted: Tue Oct 13, 2009 2:40 pm
by Sue Sanders
Hey, I'm stopping now - I've just done a potential max round!!

My numbers sol using all the numbers in a KaiStai-lee... 100 + (50/10) - 4 x (6 + 2) Forgive me if those brackets are wrong!

Re: Spoilers For Tuesday October 13th 2009

Posted: Tue Oct 13, 2009 2:42 pm
by Sue Sanders
Douglas Wilson wrote:Birdies as a nice DC equaller in round one.

Got excited thinking openplan might be one word for round four, but evidently not.
It's not a DC equaller as they got 8 - OVERBIDS

;)

Re: Spoilers For Tuesday October 13th 2009

Posted: Tue Oct 13, 2009 2:56 pm
by Liam Tiernan
GOONDAS as a dc beater rd 9

Re: Spoilers For Tuesday October 13th 2009

Posted: Tue Oct 13, 2009 3:00 pm
by Craig Beevers
Okay who's actually heard of that word in the tea time teaser?

It's not even in CSW (Scrabble's dictionary) which has just the 200,000 words or so.

Re: Spoilers For Tuesday October 13th 2009

Posted: Tue Oct 13, 2009 3:02 pm
by Sue Sanders
Craig Beevers wrote:Okay who's actually heard of that word in the tea time teaser?

It's not even in CSW (Scrabble's dictionary) which has just the 200,000 words or so.
Pas moi. Maybe they're best after flambeing.

Re: Spoilers For Tuesday October 13th 2009

Posted: Tue Oct 13, 2009 3:13 pm
by Darren Carter
Steve is living very dangerously - his opponent threw it away there at the end which was a shame.

Re: Spoilers For Tuesday October 13th 2009

Posted: Tue Oct 13, 2009 3:17 pm
by D Eadie
Craig Beevers wrote:Okay who's actually heard of that word in the tea time teaser?

It's not even in CSW (Scrabble's dictionary) which has just the 200,000 words or so.

Well you've heard of it now. Bet it appears on Apterous pretty soon as a winning word.

As for the CSW, 200,000 words, most of which were invented / researched purely to give Scrabblers a way of offloading their difficult letters.

Let's face it Craig, Scrabble in its present form absolutely sucks. Until there is a World Championship where everyone plays duplicate Scrabble and doesnt rely on picking out the best letters, i can never take it seriously.

Re: Spoilers For Tuesday October 13th 2009

Posted: Tue Oct 13, 2009 3:19 pm
by Allan Harmer
Sue Sanders wrote:
Craig Beevers wrote:Okay who's actually heard of that word in the tea time teaser?

It's not even in CSW (Scrabble's dictionary) which has just the 200,000 words or so.
Pas moi. Maybe they're best after flambeing.
Haha Sue, that tickled me and I laughed at the screen - silly old sod!
....and no, I hadn't heard of it either, not even in an Indian restaurant. :D

Re: Spoilers For Tuesday October 13th 2009

Posted: Tue Oct 13, 2009 4:10 pm
by Alec Rivers
I don't claim to have much fashion sense but Rachel's outfit looked like it had been rescued from a shredder. Anyone with me on this?

Re: Spoilers For Tuesday October 13th 2009

Posted: Tue Oct 13, 2009 4:13 pm
by Alec Rivers
Oh, and a DC-beater in the 'GONADS' round: UNSOUND. :)

Re: Spoilers For Tuesday October 13th 2009

Posted: Tue Oct 13, 2009 4:17 pm
by Sue Sanders
Alec Rivers wrote:Oh, and a DC-beater in the 'GONADS' round: UNSOUND. :)
Only one U though...???

Re: Spoilers For Tuesday October 13th 2009

Posted: Tue Oct 13, 2009 4:18 pm
by Sue Sanders
Alec Rivers wrote:I don't claim to have much fashion sense but Rachel's outfit looked like it had been rescued from a shredder. Anyone with me on this?

It was odd - like she'd got her bra on the outside.

Re: Spoilers For Tuesday October 13th 2009

Posted: Tue Oct 13, 2009 4:22 pm
by Peter Mabey
Scrabble does accept the alternative spellings CHAPRASSI or CHUPRASSY. :roll:

By the way, when discussing POLLEN,Susie said she thought "the bee's knees" was an arbitrary invention, but surely it's just a jokey mispronunciation of "the business"? :P

Re: Spoilers For Tuesday October 13th 2009

Posted: Tue Oct 13, 2009 4:43 pm
by Sue Sanders
My brain switched off momentarily at the end of the round where Steve offered DUNGIEST (which I had written down too) Did the word DUSTINGS get discussed and accepted by any chance? You can give something a dusting so surely you can give it two dustings.

Re: Spoilers For Tuesday October 13th 2009

Posted: Tue Oct 13, 2009 6:56 pm
by Alec Rivers
Sue Sanders wrote:
Alec Rivers wrote:Oh, and a DC-beater in the 'GONADS' round: UNSOUND.
Only one U though...???
Oops, my bad. :oops:

Re: Spoilers For Tuesday October 13th 2009

Posted: Tue Oct 13, 2009 7:25 pm
by James Robinson
Sue Sanders wrote:
Alec Rivers wrote:I don't claim to have much fashion sense but Rachel's outfit looked like it had been rescued from a shredder. Anyone with me on this?
It was odd - like she'd got her bra on the outside.
I have virtually no fashion sense either, Alec. Me and my mum watched the show and she definitely thought there was something odd about it. Definitely her worst outfit in the "new" collection.
Sue Sanders wrote:My brain switched off momentarily at the end of the round where Steve offered DUNGIEST (which I had written down too) Did the word DUSTINGS get discussed and accepted by any chance? You can give something a dusting so surely you can give it two dustings.
No, but DUSTING was given, so does seem odd that DUSTINGS wasn't mentioned, if it's there. I was actually waiting for someone to add NUDISTS into the discussion with DISGUST. :lol:

Re: Spoilers For Tuesday October 13th 2009

Posted: Tue Oct 13, 2009 7:54 pm
by Brian Moore
Sue Sanders wrote:
Alec Rivers wrote:I don't claim to have much fashion sense but Rachel's outfit looked like it had been rescued from a shredder. Anyone with me on this?
It was odd - like she'd got her bra on the outside.
I wanted to paint eyelashes and eyes onto it.
Image
...though this would obviously be much more fun to do in person than in Photoshop.

Re: Spoilers For Tuesday October 13th 2009

Posted: Tue Oct 13, 2009 9:00 pm
by D Eadie
Alec Rivers wrote:I don't claim to have much fashion sense but Rachel's outfit looked like it had been rescued from a shredder. Anyone with me on this?

Not really, you're a bloke, and what we know about womens fashion you could write on the inside of a gnats foreskin with a toilet brush.

I'll take a bet your are about as fashionable as root canal minus the anaesthetic.

Re: Spoilers For Tuesday October 13th 2009

Posted: Tue Oct 13, 2009 9:24 pm
by Derek Hazell
Haha, Damian's quite clearly taken a new tack now. Instead of letting whingers wind him up and make him feel like leaving the board, he has decided to become the main antagonist himself. It certainly seems to be working so far. ;)

Re: Spoilers For Tuesday October 13th 2009

Posted: Tue Oct 13, 2009 11:03 pm
by Sue Sanders
Derek Hazell wrote:Haha, Damian's quite clearly taken a new tack now. Instead of letting whingers wind him up and making him feel like leaving the board, he has decided to become the main antagonist himself. It certainly seems to be working so far. ;)
I reckon it's piles. Apparently they make people really grouchy.

Re: Spoilers For Tuesday October 13th 2009

Posted: Wed Oct 14, 2009 6:56 am
by Rosemary Roberts
Sue Sanders wrote:It was odd - like she'd got her bra on the outside.
I thought so, too. Had she been to an audition for Batgirl?

Re: Spoilers For Tuesday October 13th 2009

Posted: Wed Oct 14, 2009 1:21 pm
by Alec Rivers
Brian Moore wrote:I wanted to paint ... eyes onto it.
Image


Edit - changed picture host.

Re: Spoilers For Tuesday October 13th 2009

Posted: Wed Oct 14, 2009 2:25 pm
by Sue Sanders
:D Good one. I had a go but it looked naff. I think the teeth are the clincher!