Spoilers for Tuesday 8th September 2009

Discuss anything that happened in recent games. This is the place to post any words you got that beat Dictionary Corner, or numbers games that evaded Rachel.

Moderator: James Robinson

Post Reply
Marc Meakin
Post-apocalypse
Posts: 6311
Joined: Wed May 20, 2009 3:37 pm

Spoilers for Tuesday 8th September 2009

Post by Marc Meakin »

Can Chris become Octochamp today, or will he be beaten by an inswinger
GR MSL GNDT MSS NGVWL SRND NNLYC NNCT
Peter Mabey
Kiloposter
Posts: 1123
Joined: Sat Mar 01, 2008 3:15 pm
Location: Harlow

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 8th September 2009

Post by Peter Mabey »

First numbers alternative: (75-3-3)x(9-2)
Marc Meakin
Post-apocalypse
Posts: 6311
Joined: Wed May 20, 2009 3:37 pm

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 8th September 2009

Post by Marc Meakin »

poor letter selections so far.

What has been the lowest ever Max game?
GR MSL GNDT MSS NGVWL SRND NNLYC NNCT
User avatar
Charlie Reams
Site Admin
Posts: 9494
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm
Location: Cambridge
Contact:

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 8th September 2009

Post by Charlie Reams »

http://www.apterous.org/cdb/records.php ... st_maximum

No chance of pushing these records unless one of the numbers games is impossible, really.
Peter Mabey
Kiloposter
Posts: 1123
Joined: Sat Mar 01, 2008 3:15 pm
Location: Harlow

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 8th September 2009

Post by Peter Mabey »

It's really strange that RATIONALS is missing as IRRATIONALS is allowed by ODE. :?
User avatar
Kirk Bevins
God
Posts: 4923
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:18 pm
Location: York, UK

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 8th September 2009

Post by Kirk Bevins »

INWALES for a beater in round 3. I thought I could get a max game today but missed PIPETTES, argh.

Well played again today Chris. You seemed to slump back in your chair once you made the octochamp status as in relief but you weren't really under much threat this game. A tremendous performance and I'm sure many people at home would wonder why you're only the number 2 seed, forgetting Andrew's superb run.
Marc Meakin
Post-apocalypse
Posts: 6311
Joined: Wed May 20, 2009 3:37 pm

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 8th September 2009

Post by Marc Meakin »

Kirk Bevins wrote:INWALES for a beater in round 3. I thought I could get a max game today but missed PIPETTES, argh.

Well played again today Chris. You seemed to slump back in your chair once you made the octochamp status as in relief but you weren't really under much threat this game. A tremendous performance and I'm sure many people at home would wonder why you're only the number 2 seed, forgetting Andrew's superb run.
Probably due to the low amounts of 9 letter words available in his run compared to Andrew
GR MSL GNDT MSS NGVWL SRND NNLYC NNCT
Jojo Apollo
Devotee
Posts: 825
Joined: Mon Feb 02, 2009 12:29 am

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 8th September 2009

Post by Jojo Apollo »

Well done on becoming an Octochamp, Chris. 8-)

Really looking forward to seeing the quarters with the big three. Hopefully some more top guns to follow. :D
User avatar
Craig Beevers
Series 57 Champion
Posts: 653
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:37 am
Contact:

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 8th September 2009

Post by Craig Beevers »

Charlie Reams wrote:http://www.apterous.org/cdb/records.php ... st_maximum

No chance of pushing these records unless one of the numbers games is impossible, really.
First game on that list has an incorrect max... 2nd numbers game is easily doable.
Jimmy Gough
Devotee
Posts: 876
Joined: Thu May 22, 2008 4:08 pm
Location: Eastbourne

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 8th September 2009

Post by Jimmy Gough »

Jojo Apollo wrote:Well done on becoming an Octochamp, Chris. 8-)

Really looking forward to seeing the quarters with the big three. Hopefully some more top guns to follow. :D
Isn't this you? :?:
User avatar
Kirk Bevins
God
Posts: 4923
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:18 pm
Location: York, UK

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 8th September 2009

Post by Kirk Bevins »

Craig Beevers wrote:
First game on that list has an incorrect max... 2nd numbers game is easily doable.
In fact Carol got it spot on but it erroneously shows 542 instead of 544.
Eoin Monaghan
Kiloposter
Posts: 1462
Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 7:33 pm

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 8th September 2009

Post by Eoin Monaghan »

Did Chris use the 2 twice in the first numbers?
User avatar
Chris Davies
Series 61 Champion
Posts: 404
Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2008 5:50 pm

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 8th September 2009

Post by Chris Davies »

Jimmy Gough wrote:
Jojo Apollo wrote:Well done on becoming an Octochamp, Chris. 8-)

Really looking forward to seeing the quarters with the big three. Hopefully some more top guns to follow. :D
Isn't this you? :?:
:shock:

Well, I feel I've been judged very harshly there. :( I felt really self-conscious throughout my Countdown run - I know I twitch when I'm nervous, and I was feeling the pressure pretty much the whole time, even when I was miles ahead. I wasn't natural in front of the cameras, and if I've conveyed any air of smugness at all, it was entirely accidental!
User avatar
Phil Reynolds
Postmaster General
Posts: 3329
Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2008 3:43 pm
Location: Leamington Spa, UK

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 8th September 2009

Post by Phil Reynolds »

Eoin Monaghan wrote:Did Chris use the 2 twice in the first numbers?
No.
User avatar
Ben Hunter
Kiloposter
Posts: 1770
Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2008 2:54 pm
Location: S Yorks

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 8th September 2009

Post by Ben Hunter »

Chris Davies wrote: :shock:

Well, I feel I've been judged very harshly there. :( I felt really self-conscious throughout my Countdown run - I know I twitch when I'm nervous, and I was feeling the pressure pretty much the whole time, even when I was miles ahead. I wasn't natural in front of the cameras, and if I've conveyed any air of smugness at all, it was entirely accidental!
You don't need to worry about being judged by a load of sad telly addicts.
User avatar
JimBentley
Fanatic
Posts: 2820
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 6:39 pm
Contact:

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 8th September 2009

Post by JimBentley »

Chris Davies wrote: :shock:

Well, I feel I've been judged very harshly there. :( I felt really self-conscious throughout my Countdown run - I know I twitch when I'm nervous, and I was feeling the pressure pretty much the whole time, even when I was miles ahead. I wasn't natural in front of the cameras, and if I've conveyed any air of smugness at all, it was entirely accidental!
Don't worry about it, Chris, the Digital Spy forums are notorious for being full of cunts. They're a bunch of nobodies and their opinions are worthless.

Oh, and really well done on your awesome octoperformance!
Eoin Monaghan
Kiloposter
Posts: 1462
Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 7:33 pm

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 8th September 2009

Post by Eoin Monaghan »

Chris didn't appear to be smug to me at all.
Joyce Phillips
Acolyte
Posts: 107
Joined: Fri Mar 06, 2009 8:25 pm

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 8th September 2009

Post by Joyce Phillips »

Well done Chris. You certainly didn't come across as smug. In fact, you seemed to be the only person who had any doubt that you would become and Octochamp.
User avatar
Brian Moore
Devotee
Posts: 582
Joined: Fri Feb 06, 2009 6:11 pm
Location: Exeter

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 8th September 2009

Post by Brian Moore »

News latest: Kate Humble reads reasonably well from a book, quoting a man from Devon, who quotes a man from Marks & Spencers about why you should use fresh water for making tea. Gosh. It's a shame Kate pulled such a blinder, as it quite overshadowed Chris's excellent performance.
Gavin Chipper
Post-apocalypse
Posts: 13280
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:37 pm

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 8th September 2009

Post by Gavin Chipper »

What was the 8-game total in the end? I think it might have been just shy of 900 (like 892 or something but I'm not sure). Also how come Andrew Hulme has 9 games in the octo run on the database thing?

And this is going to be a fucking good knockout section. I don't think anyone scoring as high as Innis in third place has ever not been number one seed before. So well done Chris.
User avatar
Michael Wallace
Racoonteur
Posts: 5458
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:01 am
Location: London

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 8th September 2009

Post by Michael Wallace »

Joyce Phillips wrote:Well done Chris. You certainly didn't come across as smug. In fact, you seemed to be the only person who had any doubt that you would become and Octochamp.
This.
User avatar
Darren Carter
What a lot of bling
Posts: 344
Joined: Tue Mar 10, 2009 1:58 pm
Location: Shrewsbury

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 8th September 2009

Post by Darren Carter »

Felt sorry for Chris' opponent today, seemed to be even more nervous than Chris! Although I did chuckle slightly at the 3 when MAKE was written out in the selection! :D
Simon Myers
Enthusiast
Posts: 295
Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2008 12:41 am
Location: Stamford, Connecticut

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 8th September 2009

Post by Simon Myers »

Gavin Chipper wrote:What was the 8-game total in the end?
892
Gavin Chipper wrote:I don't think anyone scoring as high as Innis in third place has ever not been number one seed before. So well done Chris.
You're right, Innis' 861 is higher than any past #2 seed, the highest scoring of which were Jon Corby (856, S54) and Tom Hargreaves (850, S47).
User avatar
Kieran Child
Enthusiast
Posts: 355
Joined: Fri Mar 20, 2009 8:48 pm

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 8th September 2009

Post by Kieran Child »

I just watched again and I was right:
Chris declares rationals.
Susie says no.
The woman with the smile next to her says "yes. susie said to me 'I've got a 9 I've got a 9' but then she did what you [chris] did and looked it up"

So Chris was allowed a dictionary. That explains it.
Jimmy Gough
Devotee
Posts: 876
Joined: Thu May 22, 2008 4:08 pm
Location: Eastbourne

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 8th September 2009

Post by Jimmy Gough »

Chris Davies wrote:
Jimmy Gough wrote:
Jojo Apollo wrote:Well done on becoming an Octochamp, Chris. 8-)

Really looking forward to seeing the quarters with the big three. Hopefully some more top guns to follow. :D
Isn't this you? :?:
:shock:

Well, I feel I've been judged very harshly there. :( I felt really self-conscious throughout my Countdown run - I know I twitch when I'm nervous, and I was feeling the pressure pretty much the whole time, even when I was miles ahead. I wasn't natural in front of the cameras, and if I've conveyed any air of smugness at all, it was entirely accidental!
Sorry Chris, it wasn't meant as a downer on your octochamp success. Like everyone else I didn't detect any smugness at all. You did seem (understandably) nervous throughout but not smug in the slightest. Congratulations and good luck in the final.
Jojo Apollo
Devotee
Posts: 825
Joined: Mon Feb 02, 2009 12:29 am

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 8th September 2009

Post by Jojo Apollo »

Jimmy Gough wrote:
Jojo Apollo wrote:Well done on becoming an Octochamp, Chris. 8-)

Really looking forward to seeing the quarters with the big three. Hopefully some more top guns to follow. :D
Isn't this you? :?:
No way!!! I have the upmost (or is it utmost?) respect for Chris and Kirk and all the contestants who are brave enough to take part. Chris, don't take any notice of that idiot, you didn't come across as smug at all, and even if you did (which you didn't), so what? Also don't worry about the nerves showing, it's natural. Keep up the good work and good luck in the quarters.
User avatar
Kirk Bevins
God
Posts: 4923
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:18 pm
Location: York, UK

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 8th September 2009

Post by Kirk Bevins »

Jimmy Gough wrote:Congratulations and good luck in the final.
Bit optimistic? Looks like a Chris Davies vs Innis Carson semi final on the cards.
User avatar
Charlie Reams
Site Admin
Posts: 9494
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm
Location: Cambridge
Contact:

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 8th September 2009

Post by Charlie Reams »

If I were any more excited about this series' finals I'd have to be legally restrained.
Jimmy Gough
Devotee
Posts: 876
Joined: Thu May 22, 2008 4:08 pm
Location: Eastbourne

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 8th September 2009

Post by Jimmy Gough »

Kirk Bevins wrote:
Jimmy Gough wrote:Congratulations and good luck in the final.
Bit optimistic? Looks like a Chris Davies vs Innis Carson semi final on the cards.
Ha, true. Finals then.
Jojo Apollo wrote:
Jimmy Gough wrote:
Jojo Apollo wrote:Well done on becoming an Octochamp, Chris. 8-)

Really looking forward to seeing the quarters with the big three. Hopefully some more top guns to follow. :D
Isn't this you? :?:
No way!!! I have the upmost (or is it utmost?) respect for Chris and Kirk and all the contestants who are brave enough to take part. Chris, don't take any notice of that idiot, you didn't come across as smug at all, and even if you did (which you didn't), so what? Also don't worry about the nerves showing, it's natural. Keep up the good work and good luck in the quarters.
:)
Gavin Chipper
Post-apocalypse
Posts: 13280
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:37 pm

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 8th September 2009

Post by Gavin Chipper »

Is "finals" just something that's come from the football World Cup?
Howard Somerset
Kiloposter
Posts: 1955
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 9:02 am
Location: UK

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 8th September 2009

Post by Howard Somerset »

Back to the word RATIONALS not being allowed. As a result of a separate thread, I've just looked up the definition of POSITIVE, and notice that when talking about a positive number, positive is listed both as an adjective and a noun. Strange that POSITIVE should get this treatment, yet RATIONAL is shown as an adjective only. I'd have thought that it should have been the other way round; calling a rational number a rational is quite common in my experience, far more common that calling a positive number a positive.
User avatar
Ben Hunter
Kiloposter
Posts: 1770
Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2008 2:54 pm
Location: S Yorks

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 8th September 2009

Post by Ben Hunter »

I always heard my old maths teacher call rational numbers 'rationals'.
User avatar
Sue Sanders
Kiloposter
Posts: 1334
Joined: Mon May 25, 2009 10:29 pm
Location: Whitstable Kent

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 8th September 2009

Post by Sue Sanders »

Howard Somerset wrote:Back to the word RATIONALS not being allowed. As a result of a separate thread, I've just looked up the definition of POSITIVE, and notice that when talking about a positive number, positive is listed both as an adjective and a noun. Strange that POSITIVE should get this treatment, yet RATIONAL is shown as an adjective only. I'd have thought that it should have been the other way round; calling a rational number a rational is quite common in my experience, far more common that calling a positive number a positive.
But talking about the positives and negatives of a situation rather than thinking of positive as being a maths thing is perfectly common.
'This one goes up to eleven'
Fool's top.
User avatar
Michael Wallace
Racoonteur
Posts: 5458
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:01 am
Location: London

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 8th September 2009

Post by Michael Wallace »

Sue Sanders wrote:But talking about the positives and negatives of a situation rather than thinking of positive as being a maths thing is perfectly common.
Howard Somerset wrote:I've just looked up the definition of POSITIVE, and notice that when talking about a positive number, positive is listed both as an adjective and a noun.
User avatar
Sue Sanders
Kiloposter
Posts: 1334
Joined: Mon May 25, 2009 10:29 pm
Location: Whitstable Kent

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 8th September 2009

Post by Sue Sanders »

Michael Wallace wrote:
Sue Sanders wrote:But talking about the positives and negatives of a situation rather than thinking of positive as being a maths thing is perfectly common.
Howard Somerset wrote:I've just looked up the definition of POSITIVE, and notice that when talking about a positive number, positive is listed both as an adjective and a noun.
Oh, did I miss the point??? Sorry!!
'This one goes up to eleven'
Fool's top.
User avatar
Martin Bishop
Enthusiast
Posts: 471
Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2008 4:29 pm
Location: Tadworth, Surrey

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 8th September 2009

Post by Martin Bishop »

As is often the case, I am about a week behind with my countdown viewing. Congrats Chris on a great octo-run. You may be pleased to know that you are now my mum's favourite apterist. Sorry Kirk; you've been usurped.
User avatar
Matt Morrison
Post-apocalypse
Posts: 7822
Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2008 2:27 pm
Location: London
Contact:

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 8th September 2009

Post by Matt Morrison »

Old news I know, but Chris didn't come across as smug, just nervous. To me, nervousness and smugness tend to be pretty much polar opposites - it's pretty hard to come across as both, and I'd have thought (until all the "Chris = smug" comments on Digital Spy) that it'd be pretty hard to confuse them as a viewer too.

And on the Mother's Favourite Countdowner level, it's still Jimmy. By far.
Post Reply