Page 1 of 1

Spoilers for Wednesday September 2nd, 2009

Posted: Wed Sep 02, 2009 8:52 am
by Matthew Green
I started this early just to piss James Robinson off.

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday September 2nd, 2009

Posted: Wed Sep 02, 2009 9:03 am
by Jon Corby
I applaud.

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday September 2nd, 2009

Posted: Wed Sep 02, 2009 9:05 am
by Derek Hazell
Is this some kind of James Robinson Justice?

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday September 2nd, 2009

Posted: Wed Sep 02, 2009 9:08 am
by James Robinson
I don't give a toss quite frankly, but still it's nice for someone else to have a go.

It wasn't going to last much longer. I'm busy quite a bit next week, so I wasn't going to be able to start many of them anyway.

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday September 2nd, 2009

Posted: Wed Sep 02, 2009 9:11 am
by Matthew Green
That sounded about as genuine as **** saying she wasn't bothered about leaving the house last night.

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday September 2nd, 2009

Posted: Wed Sep 02, 2009 9:12 am
by Jon Corby
Matthew Green wrote:That sounded about as genuine as Lisa saying she wasn't bothered about leaving the house last night.
ZOMGSPOILER

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday September 2nd, 2009

Posted: Wed Sep 02, 2009 9:18 am
by Derek Hazell
Matthew Green wrote:That sounded about as genuine as Lisa saying she wasn't bothered about leaving the house last night.
You only let her leave because you realised she was Lisa Riley, and not Rachel Riley.

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday September 2nd, 2009

Posted: Wed Sep 02, 2009 9:45 am
by JackHurst
Im going to try and predict the score, in the style of a child who gets asked to predict the score outside the ground before the game on match of the day.

2-1 to Chris Davies.

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday September 2nd, 2009

Posted: Wed Sep 02, 2009 10:10 am
by Oliver Garner
Matthew Green wrote:That sounded about as genuine as Lisa saying she wasn't bothered about leaving the house last night.
COUNTDOWN SPOILERS ONLY :twisted:

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday September 2nd, 2009

Posted: Wed Sep 02, 2009 10:24 am
by Matthew Green
Its alright now Oliver, Ive deleted Lisa's name from the post so you dont know who got evicted.

By the way, Sophie wins on Friday.

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday September 2nd, 2009

Posted: Wed Sep 02, 2009 10:28 am
by James Robinson
Matthew Green wrote:Its alright now Oliver, Ive deleted Lisa's name from the post so you dont know who got evicted.

By the way, Sophie wins on Friday.
Good lord, you lot must have sad lives if you watch Big Brother. :shock: :? :roll:

Still, in more important matters, I hope Chris becomes a half-octochamp today, or I suppose a quadchamp.

Suggestions welcome.

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday September 2nd, 2009

Posted: Wed Sep 02, 2009 10:36 am
by Kieran Child
quadrahead

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday September 2nd, 2009

Posted: Wed Sep 02, 2009 10:38 am
by Derek Hazell
square

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday September 2nd, 2009

Posted: Wed Sep 02, 2009 11:44 am
by Philip Jarvis
Audi Quattro

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday September 2nd, 2009

Posted: Wed Sep 02, 2009 12:33 pm
by Matthew Green
James Robinson wrote:Good lord, you lot must have sad lives if you watch Big Brother. :shock: :? :roll:

Still, in more important matters, I hope Chris becomes a half-octochamp today
Oh dear...

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday September 2nd, 2009

Posted: Wed Sep 02, 2009 2:41 pm
by Matthew Green
What a lame trick, I'd love to see him do it with the boxing gloved on display throughout.

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday September 2nd, 2009

Posted: Wed Sep 02, 2009 2:51 pm
by Sue Sanders
Matthew Green wrote:What a lame trick, I'd love to see him do it with the boxing gloved on display throughout.
Actually be magical, rather than just a magician?

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday September 2nd, 2009

Posted: Wed Sep 02, 2009 3:06 pm
by Sue Sanders
Or 100 -(5x3) x 5 , + 3

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday September 2nd, 2009

Posted: Wed Sep 02, 2009 3:10 pm
by Douglas Wilson
Today's challenger looks like he'd be a riot down the pub.

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday September 2nd, 2009

Posted: Wed Sep 02, 2009 3:20 pm
by Innis Carson
You could see Chris's excitement when he spotted SEPTUPLE. Well played again, it's getting better and better each day.

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday September 2nd, 2009

Posted: Wed Sep 02, 2009 3:35 pm
by Sue Sanders
Surprised he missed EARHOLE but then again, maybe, like The Queen he doesn't have an earhole!

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday September 2nd, 2009

Posted: Wed Sep 02, 2009 4:08 pm
by Jojo Apollo
Innis Carson wrote:You could see Chris's excitement when he spotted SEPTUPLE. Well played again, it's getting better and better each day.
Yep good going. Gonna be some epic quarters if Chris becomes an Octochamp (hopefully!).

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday September 2nd, 2009

Posted: Wed Sep 02, 2009 4:33 pm
by Kieran Child
Matthew Green wrote:What a lame trick, I'd love to see him do it with the boxing gloved on display throughout.
For the record, the boxing glove could have been on display throughout.

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday September 2nd, 2009

Posted: Wed Sep 02, 2009 5:50 pm
by Kirk Bevins
Good performance again, Chris. I was mightily impressed with SEPTUPLE and I was also annoyed to miss EARHOLE. Good to see Damo throwing a hard conundrum in.

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday September 2nd, 2009

Posted: Wed Sep 02, 2009 8:49 pm
by James Robinson
2 alternatives for the 2nd numbers game:

Alternative 1:

9 + 5 + 5 = 19

19 x 25 = 475

475 - 50 - 1 = 424

Alternative 2:

9 - 1 = 8

8 x 50 = 400

5 / 5 = 1

400 + 25 - 1 = 424

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday September 2nd, 2009

Posted: Thu Sep 03, 2009 1:23 am
by Ben Hunter
James Robinson wrote:Good lord, you lot must have sad lives if you watch Big Brother. :shock: :? :roll:

Still, in more important matters, I hope Chris becomes a half-octochamp today, or I suppose a quadchamp.
Image

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday September 2nd, 2009

Posted: Thu Sep 03, 2009 9:54 am
by Kai Laddiman
What did Michael offer in Rd 4?

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday September 2nd, 2009

Posted: Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:01 am
by Kieran Child
If I knew what chris offered I'd remember.

There was "lettice" and "inport" around then.

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday September 2nd, 2009

Posted: Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:11 am
by James Robinson
It was inport, lettice was round 3.

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday September 2nd, 2009

Posted: Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:24 am
by Kai Laddiman
Surprised DC didn't note that INPORT is invalid.

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday September 2nd, 2009

Posted: Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:39 am
by Sue Sanders
Kai Laddiman wrote:What did Michael offer in Rd 4?
There was a round when Chris got AVOIDS and Michael said, I think ANOIDS. Don't quote me on that though.

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday September 2nd, 2009

Posted: Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:49 am
by Howard Somerset
Kai Laddiman wrote:What did Michael offer in Rd 4?
I thought he'd said IMPORT, for which the M was not in the selection. So invalid, whether he said IMPORT or INPORT.

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday September 2nd, 2009

Posted: Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:49 am
by Kai Laddiman
me on that though.
Sorry.

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday September 2nd, 2009

Posted: Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:56 am
by Sue Sanders
Kai Laddiman wrote:
me on that though.
Sorry.
Ooh, you're a wag, Kai.

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday September 2nd, 2009

Posted: Thu Sep 03, 2009 1:42 pm
by Michael Wallace
Kai Laddiman wrote:Surprised DC didn't note that INPORT is invalid.
I noticed this, but then again, he was 28-0 down either way, so Susie probably couldn't bring herself to do it.