Spoilers For Wednesday August 26th 2009

Discuss anything that happened in recent games. This is the place to post any words you got that beat Dictionary Corner, or numbers games that evaded Rachel.

Moderator: James Robinson

Post Reply
User avatar
James Robinson
Post-apocalypse
Posts: 10580
Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2009 5:38 pm
Location: Mirfield, West Yorkshire

Spoilers For Wednesday August 26th 2009

Post by James Robinson »

Another day, another Countdown and another chance for Paul to... oh, no he lost yesterday didn't he?

Never mind, still there's our new champ Ed to look forward to, although I somehow think that most people are waiting to see Mr Davies in around 54 hours time.

P.S. I'm not trying to set up every spoiler for this week's shows, I just seem to be the first to think about it. Having said that, I doubt I'll be first for tomorrow, since I'm heading to up to St. James' Park tonight to see my beloved Terriers kick some Magpie butt in the Carling Cup, so I actually see today's show until tomorrow, but there you go.
User avatar
Chris Davies
Series 61 Champion
Posts: 404
Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2008 5:50 pm

Re: Spoilers For Wednesday August 26th 2009

Post by Chris Davies »

AGOGOS in r2 - got this in the green room.
User avatar
Craig Beevers
Series 57 Champion
Posts: 653
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:37 am
Contact:

Re: Spoilers For Wednesday August 26th 2009

Post by Craig Beevers »

GALAGOS is good according to Apterous
User avatar
Kirk Bevins
God
Posts: 4923
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:18 pm
Location: York, UK

Re: Spoilers For Wednesday August 26th 2009

Post by Kirk Bevins »

Chris Davies wrote:AGOGOS in r2 - got this in the green room.
Was just going to post this - damn you Davies.
User avatar
Craig Beevers
Series 57 Champion
Posts: 653
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:37 am
Contact:

Re: Spoilers For Wednesday August 26th 2009

Post by Craig Beevers »

Interestingly AMINO is purely adjectival in CSW (Scrabble's wordlist). SOZIN(S) is Scrabble-only.
Last edited by Craig Beevers on Wed Aug 26, 2009 2:47 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Andrew Hulme
Acolyte
Posts: 175
Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2009 12:45 am

Re: Spoilers For Wednesday August 26th 2009

Post by Andrew Hulme »

Challenger seems good too
User avatar
JimBentley
Fanatic
Posts: 2820
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 6:39 pm
Contact:

Re: Spoilers For Wednesday August 26th 2009

Post by JimBentley »

Couple of unlucky risks by Ed but it's not over yet. Been a really excellent game so far.
User avatar
Craig Beevers
Series 57 Champion
Posts: 653
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:37 am
Contact:

Re: Spoilers For Wednesday August 26th 2009

Post by Craig Beevers »

Surprised they didn't edit that (further) or re-shoot it.
User avatar
Phil Reynolds
Postmaster General
Posts: 3329
Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2008 3:43 pm
Location: Leamington Spa, UK

Re: Spoilers For Wednesday August 26th 2009

Post by Phil Reynolds »

Round 10 was distinctly uncomfortable to watch, so I can't imagine what it must have been like in the studio.
User avatar
Matt Morrison
Post-apocalypse
Posts: 7822
Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2008 2:27 pm
Location: London
Contact:

Re: Spoilers For Wednesday August 26th 2009

Post by Matt Morrison »

Phil Reynolds wrote:Round 10 was distinctly uncomfortable to watch, so I can't imagine what it must have been like in the studio.
Agreed, I presume there wasn't really a precedent set for what to do when this happens? I guess Jeff didn't/doesn't have the power to make such adjudications by himself - if he had been able to, you'd think Ed would have been stopped whilst he paused. Presumably Jeff had to wait for the direction in his earpiece, and by then Ed had continued with the "4 x 2" part of his solution and it just looked cringeworthily messy.
User avatar
Craig Beevers
Series 57 Champion
Posts: 653
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:37 am
Contact:

Re: Spoilers For Wednesday August 26th 2009

Post by Craig Beevers »

Hmm PIXILATE is another that wouldn't be allowed in Scrabble, although PIXILATED is okay there.
User avatar
Kai Laddiman
Fanatic
Posts: 2314
Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2008 3:37 pm
Location: My bedroom

Re: Spoilers For Wednesday August 26th 2009

Post by Kai Laddiman »

Intersting game today, The challenger scored more against me than the champion did, and I blobbed on Rd 6 and 11, but made up for it with TERAPHIM and the mentioned PIXILATED. Also easy numbers today.
Last edited by Kai Laddiman on Wed Aug 26, 2009 3:47 pm, edited 1 time in total.
16/10/2007 - Episode 4460
Dinos Sfyris 76 - 78 Dorian Lidell
Proof that even idiots can get well and truly mainwheeled.
User avatar
Kirk Bevins
God
Posts: 4923
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:18 pm
Location: York, UK

Re: Spoilers For Wednesday August 26th 2009

Post by Kirk Bevins »

SEIGNIOR as a nice equaller in round 11. Argh, I missed TERAPHIM yet again, ffs.

Davies, how did you do in the green room? Were you annoyed to potentially play this scrabbler or was it reassuring to know he kept offering phoneys and isn't that great on the numbers?
User avatar
Phil Reynolds
Postmaster General
Posts: 3329
Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2008 3:43 pm
Location: Leamington Spa, UK

Re: Spoilers For Wednesday August 26th 2009

Post by Phil Reynolds »

I was surprised to find that PIXILATE is in the dictionary as an alternative spelling to PIXELATE, given its derivation from PIXEL. One to remember.

I found the whole of today's game oddly uncomfortable to watch for some reason. If someone told me that the players had had a huge falling out in the green room just before the recording, it wouldn't surprise me in the slightest.
User avatar
Kirk Bevins
God
Posts: 4923
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:18 pm
Location: York, UK

Re: Spoilers For Wednesday August 26th 2009

Post by Kirk Bevins »

Phil Reynolds wrote:I was surprised to find that PIXILATE is in the dictionary as an alternative spelling to PIXELATE, given its derivation from PIXEL. One to remember.

I found the whole of today's game oddly uncomfortable to watch for some reason. If someone told me that the players had had a huge falling out in the green room just before the recording, it wouldn't surprise me in the slightest.
Really? It looked OK to me. The champ looked nervous (still) and got visibly red in the third part of the show. The challenger looked cool and collected to be honest.
JackHurst
Series 63 Champion
Posts: 2025
Joined: Tue Jan 20, 2009 8:40 pm

Re: Spoilers For Wednesday August 26th 2009

Post by JackHurst »

Im assuming the champs scrabble experience came to be partly detrimental in this game, because he appeared to have risked words that were valid in scrabble but not in countdown. I liked todays conundrum.
User avatar
Chris Davies
Series 61 Champion
Posts: 404
Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2008 5:50 pm

Re: Spoilers For Wednesday August 26th 2009

Post by Chris Davies »

Kirk Bevins wrote:SEIGNIOR as a nice equaller in round 11. Argh, I missed TERAPHIM yet again, ffs.

Davies, how did you do in the green room? Were you annoyed to potentially play this scrabbler or was it reassuring to know he kept offering phoneys and isn't that great on the numbers?
I was a little worried about potentially playing him because of his strength on the letters and quick conundrum spots, but playing against him in the green room I was the clear winner. I didn't know PIXILATED though (at the time) - I remember thinking 'PIXELATED is almost there', but hey.
User avatar
Phil Reynolds
Postmaster General
Posts: 3329
Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2008 3:43 pm
Location: Leamington Spa, UK

Re: Spoilers For Wednesday August 26th 2009

Post by Phil Reynolds »

Kirk Bevins wrote:
Phil Reynolds wrote:I found the whole of today's game oddly uncomfortable to watch for some reason. If someone told me that the players had had a huge falling out in the green room just before the recording, it wouldn't surprise me in the slightest.
Really? It looked OK to me. The champ looked nervous (still) and got visibly red in the third part of the show. The challenger looked cool and collected to be honest.
Just had another quick look and I thought they both seemed incredibly nervous throughout. I'm sure there wasn't really any ill-feeling, just that the nerves gave both of them a tendency to look surly. Take a look at Adam's expression after declaring PRIMATE in round 3 - he looks down at the desk, then glances up with an expression that seems to say, "Somebody get me out of here..."
Jojo Apollo
Devotee
Posts: 825
Joined: Mon Feb 02, 2009 12:29 am

Re: Spoilers For Wednesday August 26th 2009

Post by Jojo Apollo »

Good high quality game that. Hardlines to Adam, well done to Ed on the good comeback, a worthy champ.
Gavin Chipper
Post-apocalypse
Posts: 13331
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:37 pm

Re: Spoilers For Wednesday August 26th 2009

Post by Gavin Chipper »

Matt Morrison wrote:
Phil Reynolds wrote:Round 10 was distinctly uncomfortable to watch, so I can't imagine what it must have been like in the studio.
Agreed, I presume there wasn't really a precedent set for what to do when this happens? I guess Jeff didn't/doesn't have the power to make such adjudications by himself - if he had been able to, you'd think Ed would have been stopped whilst he paused. Presumably Jeff had to wait for the direction in his earpiece, and by then Ed had continued with the "4 x 2" part of his solution and it just looked cringeworthily messy.
What happened?
User avatar
Matt Morrison
Post-apocalypse
Posts: 7822
Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2008 2:27 pm
Location: London
Contact:

Re: Spoilers For Wednesday August 26th 2009

Post by Matt Morrison »

Gavin Chipper wrote:
Matt Morrison wrote:
Phil Reynolds wrote:Round 10 was distinctly uncomfortable to watch, so I can't imagine what it must have been like in the studio.
Agreed, I presume there wasn't really a precedent set for what to do when this happens? I guess Jeff didn't/doesn't have the power to make such adjudications by himself - if he had been able to, you'd think Ed would have been stopped whilst he paused. Presumably Jeff had to wait for the direction in his earpiece, and by then Ed had continued with the "4 x 2" part of his solution and it just looked cringeworthily messy.
What happened?
R10: 75, 2, 9, 4, 7, 1. Target: 561
Can't remember the method, but Ed declared 561 and then started with a multiplication of 75. He then "er"-ed and went quiet whilst looking down at his notes. After a very long-feeling silent pause (probably about 6 seconds in real time) he went to carry on with "4 x 2", and just after he said that Jeff interrupted and explained that he'd taken too long and his method couldn't be accepted.
Joyce Phillips
Acolyte
Posts: 107
Joined: Fri Mar 06, 2009 8:25 pm

Re: Spoilers For Wednesday August 26th 2009

Post by Joyce Phillips »

James, you could have had a cup of tea with me in Newcastle, just to make your trip worthwhile.
User avatar
Phil Reynolds
Postmaster General
Posts: 3329
Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2008 3:43 pm
Location: Leamington Spa, UK

Re: Spoilers For Wednesday August 26th 2009

Post by Phil Reynolds »

Matt Morrison wrote:
Gavin Chipper wrote:What happened?
R10: 75, 2, 9, 4, 7, 1. Target: 561
Can't remember the method, but Ed declared 561 and then started with a multiplication of 75. He then "er"-ed and went quiet whilst looking down at his notes. After a very long-feeling silent pause (probably about 6 seconds in real time) he went to carry on with "4 x 2", and just after he said that Jeff interrupted and explained that he'd taken too long and his method couldn't be accepted.
He actually began with "75 - 4 = 71", then after the long pause continued with "4 x 2 = 8" so he'd used the 4 twice in any case. But seriously Gavin, why not simply watch it online?
User avatar
John Bosley
Enthusiast
Posts: 380
Joined: Fri Oct 17, 2008 3:52 pm
Location: Huddersfield

Re: Spoilers For Wednesday August 26th 2009

Post by John Bosley »

Matt Morrison wrote:
Phil Reynolds wrote:Round 10 was distinctly uncomfortable to watch, so I can't imagine what it must have been like in the studio.
Agreed, I presume there wasn't really a precedent set for what to do when this happens? I guess Jeff didn't/doesn't have the power to make such adjudications by himself - if he had been able to, you'd think Ed would have been stopped whilst he paused. Presumably Jeff had to wait for the direction in his earpiece, and by then Ed had continued with the "4 x 2" part of his solution and it just looked cringeworthily messy.
Questions from a layman -
(1) at what point in that process does it become unfair play?
(2) why doesn't the other contestant (Adam) then get a go. I think he was one away but could be wrong.
User avatar
Darren Carter
What a lot of bling
Posts: 344
Joined: Tue Mar 10, 2009 1:58 pm
Location: Shrewsbury

Re: Spoilers For Wednesday August 26th 2009

Post by Darren Carter »

John Bosley wrote: (2) why doesn't the other contestant (Adam) then get a go. I think he was one away but could be wrong.
Adam didn't declare anything.
User avatar
John Bosley
Enthusiast
Posts: 380
Joined: Fri Oct 17, 2008 3:52 pm
Location: Huddersfield

Re: Spoilers For Wednesday August 26th 2009

Post by John Bosley »

OK - thanks, Darren.
Douglas Wilson
Enthusiast
Posts: 354
Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2009 6:54 pm

Re: Spoilers For Wednesday August 26th 2009

Post by Douglas Wilson »

If anyone wants to see the incident again/for the first time but can't be bothered to see the whole show go straight for 24 minutes exactly, on 4OD. (You'll still have to watch the adverts first though)

There was 8 of silence between calculations, although that may have been edited down.

Also noticed that on 4OD Countdown now lasts 37 minutes, compared to 36 before the summer break.
User avatar
Michael Wallace
Racoonteur
Posts: 5458
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:01 am
Location: London

Re: Spoilers For Wednesday August 26th 2009

Post by Michael Wallace »

Douglas Wilson wrote:Also noticed that on 4OD Countdown now lasts 37 minutes, compared to 36 before the summer break.
Really? I just checked Wednesday's and it's 36.09.
User avatar
James Robinson
Post-apocalypse
Posts: 10580
Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2009 5:38 pm
Location: Mirfield, West Yorkshire

Re: Spoilers For Wednesday August 26th 2009

Post by James Robinson »

Joyce Phillips wrote:James, you could have had a cup of tea with me in Newcastle, just to make your trip worthwhile.
Thanks for that offer, Joyce, although me and my dad met up with grandparents in Whitley Bay before the match.

Having said that, it was a thrilling match :D , despite the result. :evil:

I also had to sit right at the back of the stadium, so all in all I was satisfied.
Gavin Chipper
Post-apocalypse
Posts: 13331
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:37 pm

Re: Spoilers For Wednesday August 26th 2009

Post by Gavin Chipper »

Phil Reynolds wrote:He actually began with "75 - 4 = 71", then after the long pause continued with "4 x 2 = 8" so he'd used the 4 twice in any case. But seriously Gavin, why not simply watch it online?
Well I've never used the 4 online service thing before but I suppose I should.
Post Reply