Page 1 of 1

Friday 12th June 2009 (Series 60, QF2)

Posted: Fri Jun 12, 2009 4:51 pm
by Phil Reynolds
Countdown recap for Friday 12 June 2009.

C1: Champion Cate Henderson (8 wins, 782 points.)
C2: Champion Hamish Williamson (4 wins, 415 points.)
DC: Susie Dent and John Stapleton.
RR: Rachel Riley.
OT: Other words or solutions.

The second quarter-final takes place between the number 2 and 7 seeds: Cate, a retired probation officer from Portland in Dorset, and Hamish, from Helensburgh in Scotland - or, as Jeff describes them, the Portland Powerhouse and the Helensburgh Humdinger. Hamish holds the record for the highest debut score (134) in the game's 27-year history. However, influenced no doubt by the seedings^, most people on the predictions thread have got this one down as a win for Cate. We'll see. :ugeek:

Put on the spot by Jeff and asked to define pi, Rachel waffles on for nearly half a minute without actually defining it. Let's get on with the game.

R01: A E A R V Q L O R
R02: D L E A N T O G A
R03: E I E D T T C A J
R04: M E Z E K I G S E
R05: 50, 9, 4, 1, 5, 6. Target: 495.
TTT: UNDERFED - "Underfed in a restaurant? Then you get your money back"
R06: L M I A R L E D H
R07: I E A S N M T I Y
R08: T N E R O P U G R
R09: E E I S R L S B N
R10: 75, 7, 8, 3, 9, 3. Target: 723.
TTT: HENGILLS - "Splashing out money on peas, perhaps"
R11: A E U M C F P E B
R12: T F O I R S U C A
R13: O I O R D N T E P
R14: 50, 5, 8, 10, 4, 1. Target: 505.
R15: B A D L Y B E A T (conundrum)


And now a brief interlude before our main feature:

SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER
SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER
SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER
SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER
SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER
SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER
SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER
SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER
SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER
SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER
SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER
SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER
SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER
SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER
SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER
SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER
SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER
SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER
SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER
SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER

Enjoy the show.

Round 1: A E A R V Q L O R

C1: ROVER (5)
C2: LOVER (5)
DC: AREOLAR (7)
OT: LARVAE (6) (Liam Tiernan)
Score: 5–5 (max 7)

AREOLAR is the adjective relating to the areola, which is the pigmented area around the nipple. Racy stuff for 3.30 in the afternoon.

Round 2: D L E A N T O G A

C1: TANGLED (7)
C2: TANGLED (7)
DC: TANGELO (7)
OT: GLOATED (7) GONADAL (7) TALONED (7) TANGOED (7)
Score: 12–12 (max 14)

A flat round but including a Countdown classic (TANGELO). GONADAL is also there but no one has the balls to mention it (sorry).

Round 3: E I E D T T C A J

C1: JETTED (6)
C2: DICTATE (7)
DC: EJECTA (6)
OT: JADEITE (7)
Score: 12–19 (max 21)

Hamish edges ahead. EJECTA is material thrown out by an erupting volcano; JADEITE is the mineral from which jade is obtained.

Round 4: M E Z E K I G S E

C1: MIKES (5)
C2: MIKES (5)
DC: SEIZE (5) GEEKS (5) GEESE (5) (Jeff)
OT: MEZES (5) SEMEE (5) SIEGE (5)
Score: 17–24 (max 26)

Another flat round. SEMEE is a term in heraldry; Susie mentions the genuinely surprising (to me at any rate) snippet of information that GEEKS were originally people who bit off the heads of chickens.

Round 5: 50, 9, 4, 1, 5, 6. Target: 495.

C1: 495. 50 x (9 + 1) - 5 (10)
C2: 495. 50 x (6 + 4) - 5 (10)
OT: (50 + 5) x 9 (Mark Kudlowski)
Score: 27–34 (max 36)

An easy numbers round sees Hamish go into the first break with his slight lead maintained.

Teatime teaser: UNDERFED -> REFUNDED

Round 6: L M I A R L E D H

C1: RALLIED (7)
C2: -
DC: MIRED (5) MARLED (6)
OT: DIALLER (7) HEDARIM (7)
Score: 34–34 (max 43)

A slip by Hamish (he thinks he has a 7 but realises when asked to declare that he's used a letter twice) allows Cate to level the score. John Stapleton casually mentions MARLED, which goes unremarked by Susie despite being an unfamiliar word - it's a nautical term to do with fastening a rope. Nobody spots the word that caused Kirk (and Susie) to have a sweaty moment back in the heats, HEDARIM.

Round 7: I E A S N M T I Y

C1: STAMEN (6)
C2: AMNESTY (7)
DC: INMATES (7)
OT: AMENITY (7) ANYTIME (7) ANIMIST (7) INTIMAE (7)
Score: 34–41 (max 50)

Hamish takes the lead once more. An ANIMIST is one who believes that natural objects have desires and intentions. INTIMAE is the plural of INTIMA, the innermost layer of a body part, especially a blood vessel.

Round 8: T N E R O P U G R

C1: GROUPER (7)
C2: unreport
DC: GROUTER (7)
OT: REGROUP (7) GRUNTER (7) TROUPER (7)
Score: 41–41 (max 57)

A calculated risk by Hamish fails to pay off and Cate levels the score yet again.

Round 9: E E I S R L S B N

C1: LINERS (6)
C2: SENSIBLE (8)
DC: RESILES (7)
Score: 41–49 (max 65)

And a splendid darren takes Hamish back into the lead. To RESILE is to resume an original position or shape.

OoW: Susie explains the origins of the word GALVANISE in the experiments of Luigi Galvani (1737-98).

Round 10: 75, 7, 8, 3, 9, 3. Target: 723.

C1: 723. 75 x (7 + 3) - 9 x 3 (10)
C2: 723. Mistake in working.
Score: 51–49 (max 75)

Hamish uses one 3 too many, allowing Cate to take the lead for the first time in the game.

Teatime teaser: HENGILLS -> SHELLING

Round 11: A E U M C F P E B

C1: BECAME (6)
C2: BECAME (6)
Score: 57–55 (max 81)

Round 12: T F O I R S U C A

C1: FACTORS (7)
C2: FRACTIOUS (18)
DC: SAUTOIR (7) CARIOUS (7)
Score: 57–73 (max 99)

A terrific spot from Hamish puts him well ahead, though still not unbeatable. A SAUTOIR is a kind of necklace; CARIOUS is the adjective from CARIES meaning tooth decay.

Round 13: O I O R D N T E P

C1: POINTER (7)
C2: POINTER (7) PRINTED (7)
DC: PORTIONED (18)
OT: POINTED (7) PERIDOT (7)
Score: 64–80 (max 117)

Hamish flamboyantly offers a choice of two words for his 7, but this time both players miss the 9. The game is still potentially salvageable for Cate...

Round 14: 50, 5, 8, 10, 4, 1. Target: 505.

C1: 505. 50 x 10 + 5 (10)
C2: 505. 50 x 10 + 5 (10)
Score: 74–90 (max 127)

...but a trivial final numbers round seals the game for Hamish.

Round 15: B A D L Y B E A T

C2 buzzes on 5 seconds to say DEBATABLY which is correct.
Score: 74–100 (max 137)

And so, in the first notable upset of this series' finals, the number 2 seed is ousted. After what was for most of the time a very close game, Hamish cruises into the semis where he'll face either Jimmy Gough or James Doohan next Thursday. Kudos to Cate for a terrific game, although it's worth noting that Hamish would still have won by one point even without the 9 in round 12.

Further summaries are at:
http://www.apterous.org/cdb/series.php?series=60

Re: Friday 12th June 2009 (Series 60, QF2)

Posted: Fri Jun 12, 2009 5:00 pm
by Kai Laddiman
Wow, Mark must be great at numbers attacks...

Re: Friday 12th June 2009 (Series 60, QF2)

Posted: Fri Jun 12, 2009 6:34 pm
by Kirk Bevins
Phil Reynolds wrote:
Round 5: 50, 9, 4, 1, 5, 6. Target: 495.

C1: 495. 50 x (9 + 1) - 5 (10)
C2: 495. 50 x (6 + 4) - 5 (10)
OT: (50 - 9) x 5 (Mark Kudlowski)
Score: 27–34 (max 36)
Clearly Mark's solution is wrong.

Re: Friday 12th June 2009 (Series 60, QF2)

Posted: Fri Jun 12, 2009 10:51 pm
by Phil Reynolds
Kirk Bevins wrote:Clearly Mark's solution is wrong.
Arseflakes (sorry Kai). That's what happens when you try and do a recap in a hurry. Fixed now. :oops:

Re: Friday 12th June 2009 (Series 60, QF2)

Posted: Sat Jun 13, 2009 8:52 am
by Kai Laddiman
Thar's strange, I posted the exact same thing before Kirk...

Re: Friday 12th June 2009 (Series 60, QF2)

Posted: Sat Jun 13, 2009 9:53 am
by Phil Reynolds
Kai Laddiman wrote:Thar's strange, I posted the exact same thing before Kirk...
Did you? You must have subsequently deleted it then. :?

Re: Friday 12th June 2009 (Series 60, QF2)

Posted: Sat Jun 13, 2009 10:03 am
by Kai Laddiman
Phil Reynolds wrote:
Kai Laddiman wrote:Thar's strange, I posted the exact same thing before Kirk...
Did you? You must have subsequently deleted it then. :?
Er, it's the first reply to the recap. Is the hint too subtle?

Re: Friday 12th June 2009 (Series 60, QF2)

Posted: Sat Jun 13, 2009 10:20 am
by Phil Reynolds
Kai Laddiman wrote:
Phil Reynolds wrote:
Kai Laddiman wrote:Thar's strange, I posted the exact same thing before Kirk...
Did you? You must have subsequently deleted it then. :?
Er, it's the first reply to the recap.
Which isn't the exact same thing as Kirk wrote. It has, you know, like different words and everything. :roll: Kirk's reply was a plain, straightforward pointing out of the mistake, which made it more appropriate to reply to than your rather elliptical comment.

Re: Friday 12th June 2009 (Series 60, QF2)

Posted: Sat Jun 13, 2009 10:26 am
by Kai Laddiman
Phil Reynolds wrote:Kirk's reply was a plain, straightforward pointing out of the mistake, which made it more appropriate to reply to than your rather elliptical comment.
Accepted.

Re: Friday 12th June 2009 (Series 60, QF2)

Posted: Sat Jun 13, 2009 10:28 am
by Junaid Mubeen
Seriously though, why even bother including an alternative to an easy numbers game? Hope that's not too elliptical.

Nice recap, though.

Re: Friday 12th June 2009 (Series 60, QF2)

Posted: Sat Jun 13, 2009 12:39 pm
by Phil Reynolds
Junaid Mubeen wrote:Seriously though, why even bother including an alternative to an easy numbers game?
I thought Mark's solution was especially neat, and it doesn't hurt anybody by being included.

Re: Friday 12th June 2009 (Series 60, QF2)

Posted: Sun Jun 14, 2009 10:36 am
by Phil Reynolds
Thought this was a moment worthy of preserving for posterity:

Image

Re: Friday 12th June 2009 (Series 60, QF2)

Posted: Sun Jun 14, 2009 11:16 am
by Marc Meakin
Phil Reynolds wrote:Thought this was a moment worthy of preserving for posterity:

Image
Hamish McDeath