Spoilers for Thursday 30th April
Moderator: James Robinson
- Andy Wilson
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1181
- Joined: Mon Mar 09, 2009 3:09 pm
Spoilers for Thursday 30th April
5 x 100 + (9x8) + 7 = 579
not too tough, surprised Rachel missed it...
not too tough, surprised Rachel missed it...
- Chris Davies
- Series 61 Champion
- Posts: 404
- Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2008 5:50 pm
Re: Spoilers for Thursday 30th April
I missed it too! I managed 577. But I did get PETIOLES as a DC beater in (I think) round 2.Andy Wilson wrote:5 x 100 + (9x8) + 7 = 579
not too tough, surprised Rachel missed it...
-
- Newbie
- Posts: 1
- Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 3:15 pm
Re: Spoilers for Thursday 30th April
You beat me to it Andy - my thoughts exactly. I'm only watching Countdown at the moment as I have just taken redundancy but that is the first time that I have beaten Rachel and the contestants.
-
- Newbie
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 3:24 pm
Re: Spoilers for Thursday 30th April
Okk so i am year 9 and i got that within like 10 seconds...
100 x 5 =500
9 x 8 = 72
7
572.
I had to recheck a couple of times because i thought rachel would have got it.
Not hard.
Bring Carol Back.
please?
100 x 5 =500
9 x 8 = 72
7
572.
I had to recheck a couple of times because i thought rachel would have got it.
Not hard.
Bring Carol Back.
please?
-
- Series 80 Champion
- Posts: 2707
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:07 am
- Location: Sheffield
Re: Spoilers for Thursday 30th April
Unnecessary over-complication of the first numbers:
(50-(8+1)x8/2)x10 = 140
(50-(8+1)x8/2)x10 = 140
- Darren Carter
- What a lot of bling
- Posts: 344
- Joined: Tue Mar 10, 2009 1:58 pm
- Location: Shrewsbury
Re: Spoilers for Thursday 30th April
I am normally ok with numbers but I completely missed it as well. At first thought it looks hard so I tried to do the 5 x (100 + ____ ) way but couldn't manage it. My sister who is pretty pants with numbers got it easily.Andy Wilson wrote:5 x 100 + (9x8) + 7 = 579
not too tough, surprised Rachel missed it...
-
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1462
- Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 7:33 pm
Re: Spoilers for Thursday 30th April
What age does that make you?EllieJones wrote:Okk so i am year 9 and i got that within like 10 seconds...
100 x 5 =500
9 x 8 = 72
7
572.
I had to recheck a couple of times because i thought rachel would have got it.
Not hard.
Bring Carol Back.
please?
-
- Newbie
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 3:24 pm
-
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1462
- Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 7:33 pm
Re: Spoilers for Thursday 30th April
So you're 4th youngest here. Congrats. Unless Oliver's younger than you.EllieJones wrote:14 (:
Last edited by Eoin Monaghan on Thu Apr 30, 2009 4:02 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Newbie
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 3:24 pm
Re: Spoilers for Thursday 30th April
Wow.
Who else is??
Who else is??
-
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1462
- Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 7:33 pm
Re: Spoilers for Thursday 30th April
Kai's 12, Callum's 11, Oliver's 14 and I'm 12.EllieJones wrote:Wow.
Who else is??
-
- Newbie
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 3:24 pm
Re: Spoilers for Thursday 30th April
Cooooll....
- Charlie Reams
- Site Admin
- Posts: 9494
- Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm
- Location: Cambridge
- Contact:
Re: Spoilers for Thursday 30th April
Methods which are easy to compute are not necessarily easy to spot in the numbers round. Just like words which are easy to spell are not necessarily easy to find in the letters round.
-
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1462
- Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 7:33 pm
Re: Spoilers for Thursday 30th April
Check out http://www.apterous.org/ to test yourself against other great players.EllieJones wrote:Okk so i am year 9 and i got that within like 10 seconds...
100 x 5 =500
9 x 8 = 72
7
572.
I had to recheck a couple of times because i thought rachel would have got it.
Not hard.
Bring Carol Back.
please?
- Phil Reynolds
- Postmaster General
- Posts: 3329
- Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2008 3:43 pm
- Location: Leamington Spa, UK
Re: Spoilers for Thursday 30th April
Surprising in round 11 that DC got FERMENT but missed FOMENTER.
- Kirk Bevins
- God
- Posts: 4923
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:18 pm
- Location: York, UK
Re: Spoilers for Thursday 30th April
I got FERMENT and missed FOMENTER too. Be surprised. I also missed PETIOLES which has annoyed me so I've just murdered a small fly. I was pleased with ABELIAN and pleased that the challenger got it but there was another maths word in round 1 of ERGODIC for an equaller.Phil Reynolds wrote:Surprising in round 11 that DC got FERMENT but missed FOMENTER.
I missed 579 the easy way (amazing how so many people missed it as I found it really tough):
(100-9)x7=637.
50+8=58.
637-58=579.
Thought AVIDIN would be a beater but Susie got it, despite Gyles misreading it and thinking it related to birds. Ha.
- Matthew Green
- Devotee
- Posts: 716
- Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2008 12:28 pm
Re: Spoilers for Thursday 30th April
I'm only 13.
Where do you live?
Where do you live?
If I suddenly have a squirming baby on my lap it probably means that I should start paying it some attention and stop wasting my time messing around on a Countdown forum
Re: Spoilers for Thursday 30th April
Matthew Green wrote:I'm only 13.
Where do you live?
-
- Series 80 Champion
- Posts: 2707
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:07 am
- Location: Sheffield
Re: Spoilers for Thursday 30th April
Brandreth corner: ie invalid words
I can't believe nobody has suggested NOBHEADS^ yet!
Also VIKITIN^ as in the drug taken by Dr Gregory House (Huge ego sorry)
I can't believe nobody has suggested NOBHEADS^ yet!
Also VIKITIN^ as in the drug taken by Dr Gregory House (Huge ego sorry)
- Clive Brooker
- Devotee
- Posts: 505
- Joined: Wed Feb 11, 2009 7:37 pm
- Location: San Toy
Re: Spoilers for Thursday 30th April
I am quite confident that Carol used to miss a higher proportion of easy ones than Rachel does.EllieJones wrote:...Not hard. Bring Carol Back.
- Martin Bishop
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 471
- Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2008 4:29 pm
- Location: Tadworth, Surrey
Re: Spoilers for Thursday 30th April
When I came home from work on the day of the show, my mum showed me that numbers game on a bit of paper and told me how no one got it, even though it was spectacularly easy. Naturally, I got it straight away.
When I watched the full episode today, I forgot all about that and didn't get the numbers.
It just shows how easy it is to miss an "easy" solution, by virtue of attempting more complicated methods. This is particularly true for 2 large, as there are so many ways you can go.
When I watched the full episode today, I forgot all about that and didn't get the numbers.
It just shows how easy it is to miss an "easy" solution, by virtue of attempting more complicated methods. This is particularly true for 2 large, as there are so many ways you can go.