Page 1 of 3

Classic posts

Posted: Sun Mar 15, 2009 6:18 pm
by Ben Hunter
To reward people who make good posts (and to encourage people to make further good posts) I've decided to start a classic posts thread. Link to posts that made you laugh, cry or think so that others may join you in your outpouring of emotion. Users who find their posts posted here will earn both glory, and the right to let their hair down and make nothing but rubbish posts the following week.

To link a post, click the image of a folded piece of paper next to the word "posted" at the top of your recommended post (circled red in the image below). Then copy the URL from the address bar and paste it into this thread.

Image

Re: Post of the week nominations (15/03/09)

Posted: Sun Mar 15, 2009 6:20 pm
by Ben Hunter
I'll get the ball rolling:

http://www.c4countdown.co.uk/viewtopic. ... =12#p36505 - Rosemary Robert's helpful breakdown of the human condition.

http://www.c4countdown.co.uk/viewtopic. ... 559#p36559 - A classic post by perhaps the best poster on this forum.

EDIT: Also, I'm wondering if this thread might generate too many recommendations, but we'll see how it goes this week.

Re: Post of the week nominations (15/03 to 22/03)

Posted: Sun Mar 15, 2009 6:30 pm
by Dinos Sfyris

Re: Post of the week nominations (15/03 to 22/03)

Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2009 7:43 pm
by Charlie Reams
http://www.c4countdown.co.uk/viewtopic. ... 753#p36753

Old, but still funny. (Both author and post.)

Re: Post of the week nominations (15/03 to 22/03)

Posted: Wed Mar 18, 2009 12:31 pm
by Charlie Reams
http://www.c4countdown.co.uk/viewtopic. ... 991#p36991

It's a post of two halves, Jeff, and they're both good.

Re: Post of the week nominations (15/03 to 22/03)

Posted: Wed Mar 18, 2009 8:15 pm
by Martin Gardner
Had this thread existed all those months ago, I would have proposed this, and this, with one post in advance for context.

Re: Post of the week nominations (15/03 to 22/03)

Posted: Wed Mar 18, 2009 10:30 pm
by Gavin Chipper
Martin Gardner wrote:Had this thread existed all those months ago, I would have proposed this, and this, with one post in advance for context.
Let's not forget the classic - http://www.c4countdown.co.uk/viewtopic.php?p=4723#p4723

Re: Post of the week nominations (15/03 to 22/03)

Posted: Wed Mar 18, 2009 10:43 pm
by Joseph Bolas
Gavin Chipper wrote:
Martin Gardner wrote:Had this thread existed all those months ago, I would have proposed this, and this, with one post in advance for context.
Let's not forget the classic - http://www.c4countdown.co.uk/viewtopic.php?p=4723#p4723
That's a good one that.

How about this one as well - http://www.c4countdown.co.uk/viewtopic. ... 474#p14474

Re: Post of the week nominations (15/03 to 22/03)

Posted: Thu Mar 19, 2009 11:39 am
by Martin Gardner

Re: Classic posts

Posted: Mon Mar 23, 2009 8:05 pm
by Ben Hunter
Due to my crippling laziness this thread is now a 'classic posts' thread. Keep on making those classic posts, but don't expect any Virtual Mars Bars from me (besides, reduced Virtual Mars Bar production will increase their value, so maybe this is for the best).

Re: Classic posts

Posted: Thu Mar 26, 2009 8:59 am
by Martin Gardner

Re: Classic posts

Posted: Thu Mar 26, 2009 3:54 pm
by Jason Larsen
I just might have something to add to this thread very soon!

It'll be so classic, you won't even believe it!

Re: Classic posts

Posted: Thu Mar 26, 2009 4:20 pm
by Michael Wallace
Jason Larsen wrote:I just might have something to add to this thread very soon!

It'll be so classic, you won't even believe it!
I'm so excited, I don't believe it already!

Re: Classic posts

Posted: Thu Mar 26, 2009 5:11 pm
by Jason Larsen
Michael, I'll give you a little preview of it.

It has something to do with someone you see on UK cable TV.

Re: Classic posts

Posted: Fri Mar 27, 2009 1:43 pm
by Charlie Reams

Re: Classic posts

Posted: Fri Mar 27, 2009 1:57 pm
by Clare Sudbery
Charlie Reams wrote:PMSL alert
PMSL training. I wonder if they provide clean pants.

Re: Classic posts

Posted: Fri Mar 27, 2009 2:54 pm
by Jason Larsen
Really?

Re: Classic posts

Posted: Sun Mar 29, 2009 10:14 pm
by Ben Hunter
http://www.c4countdown.co.uk/viewtopic. ... 818#p38818

Won't be everyone's cup of tea, but it made me lol heartily.

Re: Classic posts

Posted: Sun Mar 29, 2009 10:43 pm
by Jason Larsen
Thank you, Ben, but remember, I apologized!

Re: Classic posts

Posted: Thu Apr 02, 2009 4:40 pm
by Ben Hunter
http://www.c4countdown.co.uk/viewtopic. ... 206#p39206

A double whammy of wit from Kirk Bevins and Phil Reynolds.

Re: Classic posts

Posted: Thu Apr 02, 2009 5:48 pm
by Kirk Bevins
Ben Hunter wrote:http://www.c4countdown.co.uk/viewtopic. ... 206#p39206

A double whammy of wit from Kirk Bevins and Phil Reynolds.
Oh, was that wit? It wasn't supposed to be.

Re: Classic posts

Posted: Thu Apr 02, 2009 6:14 pm
by Paul Howe
Kirk Bevins wrote:
Oh, was that wit? It wasn't supposed to be.
Kirk, I've learned that when you're not naturally funny (although I do find you extremely entertaining, tbf) most of your best jokes will end up being completely unintentional. Just sit back and pretend you meant it.

Re: Classic posts

Posted: Fri Apr 03, 2009 5:47 pm
by Gavin Chipper
Kirk Bevins wrote:
Ben Hunter wrote:http://www.c4countdown.co.uk/viewtopic. ... 206#p39206

A double whammy of wit from Kirk Bevins and Phil Reynolds.
Oh, was that wit? It wasn't supposed to be.
What, so was it just coincidence that you brought up Pythagoras?

Re: Classic posts

Posted: Sat Apr 04, 2009 12:34 pm
by Kirk Bevins
Gavin Chipper wrote:
What, so was it just coincidence that you brought up Pythagoras?
I thought wit was supposed to be funny. I didn't find it funny - maybe I find it harder to laugh at things which is why people find some of my stuff funny and I have no idea it is.

Re: Classic posts

Posted: Sat Apr 04, 2009 12:42 pm
by Kai Laddiman
Kirk Bevins wrote:
Gavin Chipper wrote:
What, so was it just coincidence that you brought up Pythagoras?
I thought wit was supposed to be funny. I didn't find it funny - maybe I find it harder to laugh at things which is why people find some of my stuff funny and I have no idea it is.
What happened to Sid?

Re: Classic posts

Posted: Sat Apr 04, 2009 12:44 pm
by Kirk Bevins
Kai Laddiman wrote: What happened to Sid?
I don't get you, he's still around (Simon Myers)

Re: Classic posts

Posted: Sat Apr 04, 2009 12:51 pm
by Simon Myers
Obviously I've failed...

Re: Classic posts

Posted: Sat Apr 04, 2009 12:53 pm
by Kirk Bevins
That's Kai's fault. He linked to the wrong message which made no sense. Now he's changed it.

He linked to: http://www.c4countdown.co.uk/viewtopic. ... 508#p23508

You git Kai, trying to make me look even more stupid.

Re: Classic posts

Posted: Sat Apr 04, 2009 1:08 pm
by Kai Laddiman
Kirk Bevins wrote:That's Kai's fault. He linked to the wrong message which made no sense. Now he's changed it.

He linked to: http://www.c4countdown.co.uk/viewtopic. ... 508#p23508

You git Kai, trying to make me look even more stupid.
Er, no I didn't :?

Re: Classic posts

Posted: Sat Apr 04, 2009 2:35 pm
by Ben Hunter
Kirk Bevins wrote:
Gavin Chipper wrote:
What, so was it just coincidence that you brought up Pythagoras?
I thought wit was supposed to be funny. I didn't find it funny - maybe I find it harder to laugh at things which is why people find some of my stuff funny and I have no idea it is.
Wit is the speedy connection of different ideas to generate amusement, though I can see why the notion of Pythagoras coming back from the dead to play in a series final of Countdown might only be perceived as a sobre and serious observation for some.

Re: Classic posts

Posted: Sat Apr 04, 2009 3:23 pm
by Rosemary Roberts
Ben Hunter wrote:I can see why the notion of Pythagoras coming back from the dead to play in a series final of Countdown might only be perceived as a sobre and serious observation for some.
To somebody with a working prototype time machine it might come across as a serious suggestion, somebody without one might consider it wistful and slightly sad. But I don't see how it could ever be funny.

Re: Classic posts

Posted: Sun Apr 05, 2009 4:57 pm
by Hannah O
Bet he wouldn't be any good at all the letters rounds anyway...

Re: Classic posts

Posted: Sun Apr 05, 2009 6:29 pm
by Kai Laddiman
This post is truly legendary.
Cos it was my 1000th
So is the one under it.

Re: Classic posts

Posted: Wed Apr 08, 2009 5:37 pm
by Charlie Reams
This just tickled me, I think because I was trying to think of a similar joke and couldn't come up with one.

Re: Classic posts

Posted: Fri Apr 17, 2009 4:36 pm
by Charlie Reams
This made me LOL so L that my mom had to come in to see if I was alright.

Oh and [url=http://www.c4countdown.co.uk/viewtopic. ... 468#p40468] etc, obviously.

Re: Classic posts

Posted: Sun Apr 19, 2009 5:43 pm
by Michael Wallace

Re: Classic posts

Posted: Mon Apr 20, 2009 7:35 am
by Kai Laddiman

Re: Classic posts

Posted: Fri May 01, 2009 2:56 pm
by Charlie Reams
A perfectly pitched troll, shame there's probably no one here stupid enough to bite.

Re: Classic posts

Posted: Fri May 01, 2009 3:08 pm
by Jon Corby
Charlie Reams wrote:A perfectly pitched troll, shame there's probably no one here stupid enough to bite.
It's a quote from The Simpsons!

Re: Classic posts

Posted: Sun May 17, 2009 9:13 pm
by Dinos Sfyris
Lol this one from Ben made me chucle :)

Re: Classic posts

Posted: Fri Jun 26, 2009 2:14 pm
by Phil Reynolds

Re: Classic posts

Posted: Tue Jul 07, 2009 11:39 pm
by Charlie Reams

Re: Classic posts

Posted: Wed Jul 22, 2009 5:43 pm
by Gavin Chipper
I always wondered about the inspiration of their song but I've now found out: http://www.c4countdown.co.uk/viewtopic. ... 008#p52008

Re: Classic posts

Posted: Thu Jul 23, 2009 4:54 pm
by Charlie Reams

Re: Classic posts

Posted: Thu Jul 23, 2009 5:10 pm
by Jon O'Neill
I can't work out if it is a joke or not?

Re: Classic posts

Posted: Thu Jul 23, 2009 5:13 pm
by Matt Morrison
Jon O'Neill wrote:I can't work out if it is a joke or not?
I was just saying to Charlie that that was why I didn't facepalm it. The last bit about hating the law and old people was just too silly.

Re: Classic posts

Posted: Fri Jul 24, 2009 12:44 am
by Matt Morrison
I lightly chuckled the first time I read this, but upon rereading it and giving it the full attention it deserves, I've totally A-lolled. Getting the wrong end of the stick, and then running with it as hard and fast as you possibly can. Awesome.

Re: Classic posts

Posted: Fri Aug 21, 2009 12:32 pm
by Derek Hazell
Excellent one from Phil Reynolds which, though not strictly on topic, gave me (and I'm surely the relevant forumite when he reads it) a good chuckle.

Re: Classic posts

Posted: Fri Aug 21, 2009 4:36 pm
by Dinos Sfyris
Lolz! Although it took me ages to get it as I pronounce it dill-emma so thought there was some dirty verb "to dill" that I was missing out on :P

Re: Classic posts

Posted: Fri Aug 21, 2009 5:01 pm
by Matt Morrison
Dinos Sfyris wrote:Lolz! Although it took me ages to get it as I pronounce it dill-emma so thought there was some dirty verb "to dill" that I was missing out on :P
It didn't take me 'ages' but yeah, when Phil made that joke I read it as 'dill' too the first time - although filling in a dirty verb was fucking easy for me, just think of it as an abbreviation :)

Re: Classic posts

Posted: Fri Aug 21, 2009 5:23 pm
by Phil Reynolds
Matt Morrison wrote:
Dinos Sfyris wrote:Lolz! Although it took me ages to get it as I pronounce it dill-emma so thought there was some dirty verb "to dill" that I was missing out on :P
It didn't take me 'ages' but yeah, when Phil made that joke I read it as 'dill' too the first time
Interesting - I've always pronounced dilemma with a long i on the first syllable, but on looking it up I see that either way is valid. Seems a bit odd; I can't think of another word having a di-, bi- or tri- prefix (meaning 2 or 3) that has the same dual pronunciation.
filling in a dirty verb was fucking easy for me, just think of it as an abbreviation :)
That'll be dil(annoyed grunt), then.

Re: Classic posts

Posted: Fri Aug 21, 2009 5:27 pm
by Matt Morrison
Phil Reynolds wrote:I can't think of another word having a di-, bi- or tri- prefix (meaning 2 or 3) that has the same dual pronunciation.
Bin-oculars / Biy-noculars ? They both sound fairly valid to me, I think I've probably used both myself too.

Re: Classic posts

Posted: Fri Aug 21, 2009 5:43 pm
by Phil Reynolds
Matt Morrison wrote:
Phil Reynolds wrote:I can't think of another word having a di-, bi- or tri- prefix (meaning 2 or 3) that has the same dual pronunciation.
Bin-oculars / Biy-noculars ? They both sound fairly valid to me, I think I've probably used both myself too.
Yeah OK. Actually, I think I always pronounce this one with a short i, although again both are apparently valid.

Re: Classic posts

Posted: Fri Aug 21, 2009 5:53 pm
by Sue Sanders
Phil Reynolds wrote:
Matt Morrison wrote:
Phil Reynolds wrote:I can't think of another word having a di-, bi- or tri- prefix (meaning 2 or 3) that has the same dual pronunciation.
Bin-oculars / Biy-noculars ? They both sound fairly valid to me, I think I've probably used both myself too.
Yeah OK. Actually, I think I always pronounce this one with a short i, although again both are apparently valid.
I'm with Phil on this one. BY-focals......yes : BY - nockerliers......no

Re: Classic posts

Posted: Tue Sep 01, 2009 10:39 am
by Dinos Sfyris
THIS Warning contains "spoilers"

Re: Classic posts

Posted: Tue Sep 08, 2009 5:28 pm
by Phil Reynolds
Sometimes one post justifies the existence of an entire thread.

Re: Classic posts

Posted: Tue Sep 08, 2009 5:44 pm
by Matt Morrison
Phil Reynolds wrote:Sometimes one post justifies the existence of an entire thread.
I actually totally missed it, probably something to do with it being a lot less funny when your name is Matt and you hear it at least bi-monthly for your whole life! Well slipped in though (ooh matron).

Re: Classic posts

Posted: Tue Sep 08, 2009 7:20 pm
by Jason Larsen
Why, Phil?

Re: Classic posts

Posted: Tue Sep 08, 2009 7:28 pm
by Phil Reynolds
Jason Larsen wrote:Why, Phil?
Why what, Jason?

Re: Classic posts

Posted: Wed Sep 09, 2009 1:42 am
by Jason Larsen
Why would one post justify the existence of my recap thread?